This thread has become a microcosm of American politics today; no one wants to actually debate.
That is indeed the problem. I read a few things in this forum because I saw it titled, "Politics & Debate." There is no debate.
It wouldn't surprise me if there is similar phenomena in a "Religion" forum, but I'm rather afraid to even look in there.
It depends what you want: We're conditioned to like the looks of a big cock. If you're a top, the bottom's size isn't going to matter.
If you're a bottom, what matters is how the top uses his cock: Most of the pleasure of getting fucked comes from stimulating the prostate gland, which can be reached about 5 cm (2 inches) up the arse. It doesn't take a long cock to get there. A guy with a long cock could easily go past that magic spot–if he's only concerned with burying his tool deep inside, you might not be satisfied.
The pain and fear can be related: If you're worried about having an "accident," you'll probably contract your anal sphincter, which makes your hole tight–and more likely to feel pain. If you relax your sphincter (often associated with mildly "pushing" to expel feces), you won't feel as much--or any--pain. Instead, your partner's cock will slide right in and experience your inner warmth.
Relaxing the sphincter isn't intuitive if we're worried about an accident. A good douche, and picking the right time of day, will make your rectum very clean--but you need to believe that this is the case. Practicing with a dildo (or a cucumber) can give you the confidence you need.
In my experience, lots of cut guys like uncut cocks, and lots of uncut guys like cut cocks. I think there's something appealing about another guy's cock being "different" from one's own. If that's the case, you might find yourself liking uncut cocks after you are circumcised.
One thing to consider is that once you are circumcised, the result might or might not be to your liking, and there's no "undo" button like we have on the computer. I won't offer an opinion one way or the other about getting it done, other than to suggest that you be very sure of your decision if you do it,
Perhaps it would help to experience lots of other guys' cocks, both cut and uncut. That might give you data to aid in making your decision…and if not, it would be a lot of fun ;D
Are there any gay asians?
If not, I've certainly met several who fake it really well.
You say that your relationship is purely sexual, and that the sex is great. It sounds like both of you want a more personal connection, beyond physical sex–and that while you realize this and are open to it, he's probably very much afraid of it...or at least deeply conflicted between his idea of religion and his natural bodily attractions.
I don't think you can resolve his internal conflict--it's something he has to work out on his own. Until he works that out, I think it will be painful for you to be around him and not have things develop the way you would like. (I have been in this same position, and it's not pleasant.) I suggest that you tell him that you are open to a more significant interaction with him, but that you won't simply put things "on hold" and wait for him to come back after Great Lent.
This will be a difficult conversation to have, but I think it's valuable for you to stand up for your own feelings--and that you won't be controlled or harmed by him. He may or may not realise that he is also harming himself...but that's something he needs to take responsibility for.
Please let us know how this turns out. You sound like a sensitive, caring person who not only enjoys great sex, but sees the value of emotional attachment with another guy. It also sounds like you are willing to "attach" to someone who has different beliefs or ideas than your own, and that's a wonderful thing. But these characteristics can lead to pain if you don't actively take care of yourself. There are lots of wonderful guys out there with whom you can form a wonderful, and mutual, attachment.
These things need time. Your original post was over one year ago, and I would like to know how things are today.
And your English is very good 
Some studios will ask the site managers to remove content they've published, if it's still under copyright. It's not against gt.ru rules to post this material, but it will be removed on request.
It would be helpful to know which sites make these requests. I think EnglishLads usually asks their stuff to be removed. I don't know if TIM is also in that category. I don't usually look at TIM's stuff, despite the fact that I once fucked one of their models…but that's another story. ;D
If other users know of studios that routinely make takedown requests, it would be helpful for you to add a reply to let the rest of us know.
I'm familiar with giving bonus points along with a thank-you on a torrent. I've been chatting with some guys on here who haven't uploaded torrents, and they could use a few bonus points to help their ratio. I've got a bunch of them; is there a way I can give points to someone who hasn't uploaded a torrent?
Thanks!
EnglishLads material is also often taken down. Sometimes it's almost random: I've posted torrents that have been taken down, and then they've been posted again by someone else and have stayed up for years.
If you're posting a collection, it's good to not mix studios. If you have a collection of "hot uncut redheads" and just one of them is from EnglishLads, the whole things could come down.
And your efforts are never for nothing: A site like this relies on people sharing their material, and it's very much appreciated even if people don't always say so.
Thanks very much for the information!
Both my desktop workstation, and laptop ("Latitude" series, not a workstation but still high end), have SSD for the primary drive. I have lots of backup drives, always synched (they're so cheap these days). I'm not as concerned about losing data as I am the overall hassle, but you're giving me courage. I might try it on the laptop first.
Thanks, every1.
I re-checked the TurboTax website. It seems that their product will run on Win7, but they repeat the Microsoft party line, "Danger, Danger, If you keep using Win7, you'll be insecure." It seems that their product will still run on Win7. They go on to say that next year's product will not run on Win7. What they probably mean is that one will need a 64 bit OS to run next year's product, but since my Win7 is the 64 bit version, I should be fine.
My fondness for XP is for two reasons: Some software that run under XP won't run on Win7, such as PrintKey2000 and ImageGrabber (which I've used a lot to make tiled thumbnails for torrent uploads). There are applications with similar functionality that will run on Win7/10, but they're clunkier to use.
My other beef with Win7/10 is that in Windows Explorer, XP had the option of giving you folder size for each element in a directory; I don't see that in the newer versions, and it was a handy way to see what folders were getting too big. Sure, I can right-click on a folder to look at its "Properties," but that's clumsy. Also, When I open a directory (Explorer window) in Win7, the default starting view is the bottom of the list. My default directory sort is "newest file at the top" so I always have to scroll up to see what I want. XP would open at the top of the directory, which was much more convenient.
Finally, when you say a "clean install" rather than upgrade, do you mean wiping the disk and starting from scratch? I have all my data backed up, but it would be massive pain to reinstall all of my applications…Office, AcrobatPro, QuickTimePro, uTorrent, Firefox, etc., etc. If I need to do all that, I might as well get a new machine--which I hardly need, as it's a Dell "Workstation" that cost me a bundle and has all the capability I could want.
If you have any suggestions about how I can address these issues, I'd love to hear them. Or maybe I'm just being a whiny little boy...I've been called that before.
Windows 10 is horrible.
If you are having no issues with Windows 7 no need to switch because support has stopped this doesn't even mean a great deal to most people the OS will still function just fine.
A lot of scare tactics floating around.
My computer at work has Windows 10–I don't find it horrible, but I don't see how it's an "improvement" over Windows 7 (or even XP, which has features not found in 7 or 10).
My home computer has Windows 7, and I'm tempted to leave it alone. But I need to file US income tax, and the leading tax software brand (TurboTax) says its new version won't run under Windows 7. Changing the operating system on a computer sounds a lot like doing a heart/lung/brain transplant, so I've held off.
I also have a licensed copy of Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2013 on my home computer. It works fine under Windows 7. I have a sneaking suspicion that after installing Window 10, the license won't be recognised and I'll be "asked" to buy a new copy of Office.
Microsoft sucks....and not in the good way.
To talk about "safe" vs. "unsafe" is an oversimplification. Risk has to be measured along a continuous scale. For example:
Jumping out of a second-floor window might be less risky than jumping out of a tenth-floor window. Does that mean jumping out of the second-floor window is "safe?"
Driving 100 km/hr on an icy road might be less risky than driving 200 km/hr on that road. Does that mean driving 100 km/hr on ice is "safe?"
There is risk of disease transmission in unprotected oral sex–even without ejaculation. It's less than the risk of disease transmission from unprotected anal sex with ejaculation. That doesn't make unprotected oral sex "safe."
Eventually we will grow out of labels like gay, straight, bi, or whatever, and just accept that people can respond physically or emotionally to other people as individuals, not as members of a group.
It's hard to believe that a guy could be that mentally f*cked up. I would say to the girlfriend, "You don't need to diagnose him; just run away as fast as you can."
I think people are just confusing the definitions.
sexual acts are just sexual acts. just blow your rocks off. If you use a fleshlight, does that mean you're attracted to it or something? A latexual?
once if there are feelings involved, I believe that would already be sexual orientation.
Precisely. I have a friend who is "straight" by most definitions (although I hate labels). He's married, loves his wife, and he's a great dad to their children. He also enjoys the sensation of getting fucked, and I'm happy to oblige him. But don't infer from this that "he's really gay, and suppressed." He's just freer than most guys, willing to enjoy what he can.
The younger guy with the curly hair is Johnny Polak. He's in several torrents on here, just search by his name: https://www.gaytorrent.ru/browse.php?search=polak&incldead=0&inname=1&infn=1&orderby=added&sort=desc
Is it possible to filter by resolution please?
I have a 4k monitor, and find that after downloading rather large files over number of weeks, that they are impossible to view due to the low resolution of the original file.
I've noted on previous threads that some Globals Moderators have the ability to remaster files to a higher resolution, but I have not as yet learnt this dark art.
There are a few technical points here worth noting:
1) I have found that a video file will look best at the original resolution in which it was created. For example, most standard-resolution DVD material from, say, 2000-2010, was recorded in 480i (640x480). It's possible to use software to increase the dimensions of the video file (such as to 1440x1080), but that's not going to improve the clarity of the image–it just stretches it out. You can't add information that wasn't there to begin with. And, depending on the software used to do this, it might even make the image look worse. We can't make a true high-definition video out of a lower-definition video. Some users on here will take a standard definition video and use software to "stretch" it, and claim that they have a "high definition 1080i video." That's deceptive...and just plain wrong.
2) I, too have a 4K monitor. If I want to watch a video that is smaller than (real) 4K, my computer graphics card and monitor will do a better job of stretching the image out over the screen than a graphics application that fiddles with the file. To put this another way, a non-4K file will look better on your monitor if you leave it as is, and let your computer blow it up to full-screen. (I use VLC player running on Windows.)
3) It's true that there's some good vintage material from the 19080's and 1990's that is low resolution and enjoyable to watch...but it can look wretched on a large screen monitor. Unfortunately, there's no way to fix this. I have some old favourites that I watch occasionally, and find the low video quality more tolerable if I just move back a bit from the screen.
4) If you do want to change the frame size (resolution) of a video, I've found that "Movavi Video Converter" works pretty well, and is easy to use. I got it a few years ago, and I think it was about $75 US. [This is not an advertisement, and I don't own any of their stock.] I use this to join files together, especially when they might have different frame sizes. It's also handy if you need to change the encoding btween .avi, .mp4, .mov, etc.
Happy viewing!