• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. bi4smooth
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 3
    • Topics 53
    • Posts 2140
    • Best 333
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by bi4smooth

    • RE: Is it just me? WHO pulls out of a fine ass to cum on a dude's face?

      I should point out: I've worked in porn (a VERY LONG time ago)...

      In the condom age it wasn't uncommon to pull out (wearing a condom) and to shoot on the guys face... that was safety! (It was also sometimes as long as 20-30 minutes after the bottom came!)

      • The ass was open and raw - cumming on his ass after fucking him was not much safer than fucking raw to begin with
      • The actor being cum on back then, usually was careful NOT to get cum in any "openings" (eyes, mouth, nose, etc)... for the same reason: if the other guy had HIV and his cum got in your nose, you could conceivably get the virus.
      • It was rare - back then - for a guy to pull out, yank off the condom, and cum on his face in a "single take"... it happened, but usually there was a scene cut (and, to be honest, a significant delay) before the top came on him (usually, back then, yes - on his face)...

      But the porn where I'm suddenly seeing this predilection for pulling out and cumming on their face is newer (and bareback) porn...

      to coin a phrase: this ain't that

      Maybe the directors are just old farts (like me) who remember the old days? ROFL

      posted in Sex & Relationships
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Is it just me? WHO pulls out of a fine ass to cum on a dude's face?

      @utf16 said in Is it just me? WHO pulls out of a fine ass to cum on a dude's face?:

      It’s ok not to be aroused at something you see in porn. Someone else will. At least 90% of porn content is completely unappealing to me personally.

      I hear ya... and I totally agree... but while I get a lot of fetishes: e.g.: I don't give a flying fuck what you're wearing - my goal is to get you OUT of them anyways! Leather? Lace? Jockstraps? Speedos? It's nothing to me sexually until you drop 'em and we get down to business! But, I get it that a LOT of guys are INTO leather and these other scenes... and I totally support that! Porn is fantasy, and we all fantasize about our own things...

      Even in real life if you want to fuck while wearing a bear suit, I'm down! The bear suit doesn't do anything for me, but if it makes it better for you, I'm with it!

      I guess what I'm looking for is the plethora of porn fans who are watching a good fuck scene and thinking to themselves: Gee, I hope he pulls out and cums on his face! - you'd think they way they're doing these scenes, there would be a LOT of those guys out there... but I've never met ONE! Not a one!

      That's not to say that oral scenes aren't hot, and flip-flop scenes are my PERSONAL favorite (I get it - a lot of guys don't like flip-flop scenes because a top is supposed to BE A TOP, not turn around and give-up his ass to the bottom! - and if that's you, I respect your opinion... I don't want ALL scenes to be flip-flop.... OK, that's a lie... I personally DO WANT that, but I don't EXPECT that...)... but my own expectation of porn in general is that the studios go where the fetishes are!

      There is a new series out from Helix with guys wearing costumes! Cool! I know that fetish is out there, and I know how hot some guys think it is! Cool! Get 'em hard and let the spunk fly! But I'm not expecting to see costumes in nearly ALL Helix videos in the future! Just a few while the fetish remains "in force"...

      But the "pull out and cum on his face" thing seems kinda recent to me, and I'm pretty sure it's not really a fetish per-se, so I'm wondering if there is ANOTHER explanation?

      Anyone?

      posted in Sex & Relationships
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Advice for sucking cock and breathing

      @kekkaishi said in Advice for sucking cock and breathing:

      I love to suck cock very much. In my head I tell to myself that I can suck for hours, but when start to suck a dick (regular size and above), I'm having difficulty breathing even though my nostrils are open.

      It mainly happens when I deepthroat, I can deepthroat no problem, but even regular size dicks i'm having hard time breathing.

      Depending on the dick size and how deep you go, I can suck a dick at most for 30 seconds without a break for air

      I am aware that while I have a dick in my mouth, I try knowingly to breath through my nose, but it's not enough

      I don't have this problem with small dicks though

      any tips?

      Understand the biology - and equally understand that porn is fantasy - when you see what looks like a guy staying all-the-way down on a 9-inch cock for long periods of time, it's not real - it's spliced together.

      So, biologically speaking, the air pathway for your nose-breathing "meets" the air pathway for mouth breathing - pretty much right at the back of the mouth... See here

      As you can see, the air pathways join pretty much right at the end/back of your mouth... so any cock you're taking beyond that point, you're taking into your throat - which is shared by both mouth-breathing and nose-breathing.

      You could (purely theoretically) get a tracheostomy - a tube inserted into the base of your neck and into your breathing tube (your trachea - hence the name)... that would allow air to come in well below the end of all-but-the-largest dick! But, IMHO, that'd be a little extreme! LOL

      No, the fact is, you have to pull off far enough to get air (through your nose OR mouth - try it with your mouth - the cool air rushing around his hot, wet cock can be quite exhilarating for him!) every few moments to catch your breath...

      posted in Sex & Relationships
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: I actually AGREE with Bette Midler!

      @raphjd said in I actually AGREE with Bette Midler!:

      @bi4smooth

      Before you talk a ton of shit, let's not forget that you have blatantly lied about what is still exactly written on a website.

      I quoted and posted the link directly to the Mayo Clinic's website for C-19 and I quoted directly from their webpage, where they said that if you get the vaccine, it will PREVENT you from getting C-19.

      You made up all kinds of shitty mental gymnastics to claim that the exact words on their page didn't actually say what it literally said.

      You routinely do this.

      You also routinely downplay EVERYTHING done by Democrats or done that favors them.

      You downplay the fact that all the things that the Carter/Baker Commission said would cause voter fraud, the Dems did.

      I point out Dems who have been prosecuted for multiple counts of voter fraud and you excuse it away.

      I point out (with a link) the woman in Wayne County who confessed to doing it for over 20 years and in the triple digits each time, but you pretend it's nothing.

      I point out how an entire election in NJ was so dirty that it had to be thrown out. Well, the Presidential election was totally clean, said the judge, but the rest of it was extremely dirty. Of course, you ignored the fact that the judge just so happened to be a Dem.

      Every topic is the same.

      So before you talk shit about me, clean up your own damned house.

      You silly Russian Troll - I don't DOWNPLAY Dem bullshit - I've written plenty about them... what I don't ABIDE by is INFLAMING shit purely for the fun of trying to make things WORSE than they actually are!

      And while you are right about the MAYO Clinic saying the vaccine would prevent the COVID-19 illness - you made it sound like they were saying it would prevent the VIRUS - and those are 2 different things... and unlike you, I was clear and specific about what the difference was and how plainly & utterly stupid your argument that it (the vaccine) could actually prevent the virus from entering your body was... but you, in your Trumpy way, cannot admit that you made any error of any kind, and insist that, no matter how small the point, you are/were/will-always-be correct!

      But you keep on being your Russian Troll supporting self: keep spreading your lies designed to hurt and divide the country (starting tomorrow it'll be about the California election being stolen... because, after all - if the 5-million registered Republican voters in CA can't out-vote the 10-million registered Democrat voters in CA, there must be fraud! - indeed, ANY election you lose, MUST BE FRAUD... it can't be that even Republicans around the state (of CA) can't abide by replacing the idiot Newsom with the DANGEROUS and DERANGED Elder. )

      I'll keep shining a light on those lies and exaggerations - and keep on supporting REAL Conservative political principles... and I'll keep trying to calm the overall temperature of the politics - even it that means inflaming you (and your type)!

      FWIW: If you'd bothered to read: I am anti-abortion - even in the case of rape and incest (since when do we, as Americans, punish the child - the unborn child - for the sins of the father?) ... but I do NOT support the false narrative that Dems want to legalize the murder of newly-born children (except, of course, for when they want to eat them... isn't that part of the extremist narrative too?).

      Even though this false and inflammatory narrative purports to support my side of the argument, I don't support the false demonization of them (pro-abortionists) purely to falsely prop-up my own side... my side has decency and morals (from all major religions) on it's side, it doesn't need lies and exaggerations to make it's point more correct!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: IS THIS CONSIDERED A DUPLICATE?

      @john32123666 said in IS THIS CONSIDERED A DUPLICATE?:

      A duplicate must be same size and file type.
      Same movie in different formats are allowed ...

      MP4 and M4V are the same file type - the extensions are interchangeable.

      Post at your own risk - but, unless you make a habit of it, I don't hear any complaints about mods punishing people who post dupes. So, I don't think there's much "risk" πŸ™‚

      posted in New Forum Issues
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: IS THIS CONSIDERED A DUPLICATE?

      @perro2492 said in IS THIS CONSIDERED A DUPLICATE?:

      I have a movie with the next data.
      Duration - 02:07:19
      Size - 3.63 GB
      Aspect Ratio - 1628x880
      kbps - 4091
      Format - M4V
      Subs - English + Portuguese

      And I changed it to.
      Duration - 02:07:19
      Size - 3.63 GB
      Aspect Ratio - 1460x790
      kbps - 4500
      Format - MP4
      Subs - English

      Does it count as a duplicate because the size is the same? or doesn't because I changed the fromat, the aspect ratio, the kbps, and the subs.

      According to the rules: https://www.gaytorrent.ru/rules.php#102
      that would be a duplicate... However, a Mod told me once (when I uploaded a potential duplicate) that ADDING Subtitles to non-porn videos counted as NOT a duplicate...

      But, in the example above, you REMOVED subtitles. So it's a dupe.
      Just another note: Mods DO care about subtitles, they DO NOT care about pics added to a torrent - so if you upload a torrent that is a dupe, but you added 1000 pics to the torrent, it is STILL a dupe!

      NOTE: This is MY UNDERSTANDING of the rules... to get an OFFICIAL "ruling" you should post something in the Help Desk. (On the Torrent side of the site, under Support)

      posted in New Forum Issues
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: HELP. Torrents magically uploaded

      @sacrebleu3 said in HELP. Torrents magically uploaded:

      It happened once again. Ive been notified with messages to a torrent. So I clicked on it only to find out that the comment was for a torrent that I DID NOT UPLOAD. . What the heck is going on? This also happened 30 weeks ago basing on MY TORRENTS. First of all, I do not collect porn anime or games to begin with. Second, if I dont have it, then its impossible for me to upload it. The first time this happened I brought it up but the moderators did not believe me.

      https://community.gaytorrent.ru/topic/50099/who-rewarded-me-with-seed-bonus?_=1631367441340

      Can somebody explain it to me because ive received a warning that I uploaded an incorrect file type or whatever before and now. It also says that the moderator will review my torrents before Im able to upload it.To be honest I dont fully understand what my offense was.HELP

      Even though you didn't get "satisfaction" the first time this happened, you still need to report this to the mods... that would be a Help Desk item... no one BUT a Mod or Staff Member will be able to help...

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Joe Biden Hall-of-Presidents Robot Malfunction

      @raphjd said in Joe Biden Hall-of-Presidents Robot Malfunction:

      Youtube Video

      Sigh... was so hoping for a good laugh... instead, got a bad fake. 😞

      Disappointing... was hoping maybe he stumbled or couldn't stand up or otherwise acted like the old man that he is... instead, we god a bad voice-over and an obvious fake...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: How to access torrents

      @yty4 said in How to access torrents:

      @bi4smooth You're right, I get login. How to create account for torrents?

      I cannot help with that - write a help desk ticket...

      posted in Downloading
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: I actually AGREE with Bette Midler!

      @lololulu19 said in I actually AGREE with Bette Midler!:

      @kalcifer87 They did it in a backwards way.. by decriminalizing the murder of babies... so.. if a baby is delivered live, and is allowed to die without being cared for, that is no longer a crime. https://lozierinstitute.org/six-states-and-their-radical-approaches-to-abortion-law/

      You have been trained well by the @raphjd, grasshopper - you, as he so often does, have quoted a source that DOES NOT backup or confirm your assertions!

      Look, I'm no fan of abortion - but it HURTS the cause when you so blatantly LIE about the other side!

      In the article above, it DOES highlight SIX US States that broadened abortion rights. What did you expect from their Dem legislatures and Dem Governors? They KNOW that Roe v Wade is gonna DIE soon enough, so they're codifying THEIR positions into THEIR State laws... If WE want to use State Laws to deny abortion "rights" (and I use the term loosely), they certainly they can use State Laws to allow them! (Ever heard the term: double edged sword?)

      BUT, none of them - at least not as written about in this article - have de-criminalized killing a baby once it is born. Not caring for a newborn isn't even mentioned in the article - AT ALL - and, in NO US STATE is it legal to kill - through action or inaction - a human being (other than under the orders/sentence of a Judge and approved by the Governor) once it has been born.

      Their new laws are egregious and morally repugnant (to me)... but to make claims that are SO VERY EASY to prove untrue, hyperbolic, and inflammatory, you do yourself - and the cause - no favors.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: How to access torrents

      @yty4 said in How to access torrents:

      Trying to figure out how to access/search torrents. If press torrents icon it goes back to homepage, with only login/forum/signup buttons. If press search icon it only searches in forums, not torrents. Thanks.

      You are in forums now - and be careful, it is NOT always true that a forums login works on the torrents site!

      Along the top, there is an icon in the middle (at the right end of the left-side icons) that looks like a down-arrow into a tray... click that. You'll either get a login page or the MAIN page...

      If you get the main page, you're logged in... click the button at the top labeled Torrents - it's a drop-down, the top entry of which is the Torrent Search page.

      If you get the login, then there is either a problem with your login synch between the 2 sites, or you just don't have an account there... either way, create a help desk item and ask a Moderator to help.

      posted in Downloading
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: SCAT porn belongs to the SCAT category not fetish!

      @davis94 said in SCAT porn belongs to the SCAT category not fetish!:

      Do users that upload scat porn do it on purpose and upload their scat torrents under fetish and not under scat just to mock those who don't want to see this stuff? Fetish you can't disable, but scat you can.

      Whatr's the use of disabling scat category if users still upload it under the wrong tag?
      And when you kindly ask them to change the category, either they just ignore you or they reply with a rude comment.

      Can't there be something done about it?

      Report the offending torrents... the Mods can warn the uploader for not using the right categories.

      You might also put in a suggestion to the Help Desk that you also be allowed to filter-out the fetish category - it that was part of your complaint...

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Best gay torrent sites and other sharing resources

      @memu666 said in Best gay torrent sites and other sharing resources:

      @weegax dead site

      gay-torrents.org is not dead... however, if you don't know the RIGHT URL, the site may appear so...

      If you try this link, you should be prompted for a login:
      https://gay-torrents.org/index.php

      if you add a www (like browsers often do), you will not get what you want! πŸ™‚

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Australia goes full crackhead on Free Speech

      @raphjd said in Australia goes full crackhead on Free Speech:

      Court judgment on social media posts is a blow to free speech

      https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/court-judgment-on-social-media-posts-is-a-blow-to-free-speech-20210908-p58pya.html

      Maybe you didn't read or understand the article above, but this is EXACTLY the double-edged-sword I've been warning you about with your tirades against US Section 230!

      This article you quote tells how the Australian Court has found that the Sydney Morning Herald (a newspaper with a Facebook page) CAN be held liable for the postings OTHER PEOPLE make IN REFERENCE TO their stories...

      So, the Herald prints an article about a youth in detention (jail) - a fact not in question. Someone ELSE posts a claim (in the comments section... as a "reply" to the story) that this kid is a rapist. The Herald has no control over the replies and cannot self-edit them (that's a Facebook duty), but since it's the Herald's Facebook feed, he (the youth) is suing the Herald for libel. And the Court has said "OK - that's reasonable".

      Of course, if the Herald DID have the ability to remove such posts, it would be labeled anti-free-speech and part of a "conspiracy" to protect the young man...

      Lunacy... They're damned if they do, and now they're equally damned if they don't... but to PROTECT the Herald from such nonsense, you need something... I don't know, maybe something like the US Section 203!

      Just to note: as I predicted - the end result is that Australian outlets are just turning off user comments...

      YEAH! That's the BEST way to have free speech! TURN OFF the outlets for public comment!

      Next, the plaintiffs will go after Facebook itself! (under the same "logic" used to permit the claim against the paper: "The court found that several news outlets, including the Herald, should be considered the publishers of allegedly defamatory comments added by third parties to Facebook posts..." So, why shouldn't Facebook be considered the publisher, too?

      But this is a common thread amongst the new alt-right:

      • all individuals are good
      • all corporations are bad
      • any chance "the people" have to "stick it" to the corporations is good!

      If this legal theory prevails, it will change the Internet as we know it... Free platforms like Twitter & Facebook will disappear for lack of funding for the legal protections needed. Pay platforms like the Herald and the NY Times will regain their "stature" as "purveyors of news", but all public comments on them will be "moderated" by their publishers...

      This'll be GREAT for alt-right-ers... because they OWN all the biggest media outlets!... Oh, wait... no... LIBERALS own most of the traditional media... my bad...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Switching clients and need to add all my torrents again

      @nydude25 said in Switching clients and need to add all my torrents again:

      @bi4smooth Hey there, thanks for that info. I clicked on 'completed torrents' but that list only seems to included torrents from 2021 even though I have been seeding ones going back to around 2016. I guess I'll have to go through the torrents in my old client one at time and look up each one on the site, download it, and add it to the new client.

      Would you happen to know if running two clients at the same time will screw anything up?

      No - you should be fine... I run multiple clients all the time. πŸ™‚

      posted in Uploading
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • Is it just me? WHO pulls out of a fine ass to cum on a dude's face?

      I don't get it... SO MUCH porn these days features this "ending"...

      2 hot guys fucking - sometimes even flip-flopping - and at the last minute... when the top is about to cum... he pulls out, quickly re-positions himself, and shoots his load on the other guy's face... not even in his mouth, just "across his face"...

      Is this some kind of "gay for pay" thing? "I'm not queer if I don't take loads in/on my ass, just on my face"?

      I get it - as much as porn is fantasy, the guys still have to do something to actually get-off... and sometimes, the guy you're topping just isn't doing it for you... I completely understand the scenes where they fuck for a while, then you have to cut away and they beat off to get off... shit happens...

      But in many (most?) of these scenes, there isn't really a cut-away, it's literally that the top says he's gonna cum, so he pulls out, strokes himself 3-4 times while the bottom quickly re-positions, and he squirts on his face...

      This has become SUCH a pet-peeve of mine lately... I have started to skip to the end of the scene to see how they cum... and if this is the ending, I delete the file without ever really watching it!

      Anyone else feel the same? Or care to defend the practice?

      One last thing: this isn't to be confused with the A2M fetish (Ass to Mouth) - because the bottom doesn't take the load into is mouth, and usually doesn't lick the top's dick after he cums - much less take him into his mouth... this is just pull out of his ass, spin him around, shoot across his face.... and end scene... such a waste! Such a turn-OFF!

      posted in Sex & Relationships
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Man Threatened With Arrest For Wearing MAGA Hat

      @eobox91103 said in Man Threatened With Arrest For Wearing MAGA Hat:

      @bi4smooth said in Man Threatened With Arrest For Wearing MAGA Hat:

      Look! One bad cop and it's the start of a dystopian nightmare! Dogs are raping cats! Children are grading teachers! Dems are going to force you to save your own damned life by wearing a cloth mask...

      I liked the TX School Board who made masks part of the dress code. Appropriate!

      It's possible that we don't have a bad cop here. Let's take another look at the video: There's no sourcing for it, no date, no location. There's a queue of people in the background, so I suspect it was probably taken at a voters' polling station...where there's a "neutral zone" of 50 meters or so from poll activities where one cannot campaign or display campaign signage, literature, posters, etc. Given that most people in the queue were wearing masks, this could have been the November 2020 presidential election in the US.

      We all know that "Make America Great Again" is a campaign slogan for a specific person and the political party for which he is Dear Leader. Displaying that slogan too close to a voting place would be just as illegal as wearing a shirt that said "Build Back Better," which was a chief slogan for the Dear Leader's opponent.

      So, the cop may very well have been doing his job. We don't know enough about the situation to judge. (Of course, "knowing enough"--or even "knowing"--is frowned upon in some political circles.)

      That is a perfectly reasonable explanation... but it will be dismissed out-of-hand by resident our Trumpites... there should be exceptions for MAGA, they will argue... because it's PRO-US, not just Trump!

      Can any attempt to thwart a Trumpite from showing his/her Trumpiness be TRULY reasonable? LOL

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Ivermectin - the liberal hoax

      @raphjd said in Ivermectin - the liberal hoax:

      @bi4smooth

      You forgot the AP story about 70% of calls to Poison Control is for Ivermectin issues. It was less than 2% and in many cases, it was asking for information, not about medical needs.

      The examples of "aggregators" not doing even basic homework on the stuff they're regurgitating are many and varied... on all sides.

      In a perfect world, we'd find a way BACK to making news reporting a non-profit enterprise... so that there was no need to hyper-inflate stories, and no value in click-bait!

      --

      β€œThere is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.

      There is another theory which states that this has already happened.”

      ― Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Switching clients and need to add all my torrents again

      @nydude25 said in Switching clients and need to add all my torrents again:

      I have to switch torrent clients since I'm having problems. I'm using a very old crappy program called FDM. The problem is I have like 1,500 torrents seeding in it so I have to download all of the .torrent files again to add them to the new client. The FDM program doesn't keep a backup of each torrent like most torrent clients.

      I've read online that some torrent sites allow you to download all of the little torrent files from your history on the site at once in a zip file. Is this available here or do I need to search and locate each video and click download manually?

      If you look in your profile, under "Details & Stats" you will find a section that says:
      Show seeding torrents
      Show leeching torrents
      Show completed torrents
      Show uploaded torrents

      Assuming you have at-least one of each category...
      Click on the "Show completed torrents" (and perhaps "Show uploaded torrents") and you will see the names (and links) to all of the desired torrents....

      No zip file that I'm aware of - so this might take some time...

      posted in Uploading
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Ivermectin - the liberal hoax

      @raphjd said in Ivermectin - the liberal hoax:

      Liberal media has been posting lies about Ivermectin.

      It's not "fringe" media, but MSM that is doing this. The AP published a version of the lies.

      NO, people are not ODing on Ivermectin.

      NO, gunshot victims are not dying because hospital ERs are overflowing with Ivermectin patients.

      NO, people are not flooding Poison Control with calls about bad reactions from Ivermectin.

      Whatever you think about Ivermectin use, you should be angry about MSM reporting fake news and not vetting the sources.

      CNN got it right: here

      This story is a MESS from the get go - a mess on the left AND the right! It seems everyone is so eager to throw "the other guy" under-the-bus, they consistently fail to check on the facts before they report.

      FACTS:

      • One OKC hospital had several ivermectin OD patients in their ICU - an ICU that was full (and therefore, turning away patients). Said ICU was not full "of ivermectin OD patients", most of the ICU had COVID-19 patients - but there were some ivermectin OD patients there too...
      • One Dr from that OKC hospital reported as much on social media in an interview for local TV
      • SEVERAL left-wing outlets reposted and made it seem like OKC was stuffing all of their hospitals with ivermectin OD patients (clearly overstating the case)...
      • Rolling Stone (online, not the printed mag) used a headline: "Gunshot Victims Left Waiting as Horse Dewormer Overdoses Overwhelm Oklahoma Hospitals, Doctor Says." which was blatantly untrue... They later retracted it.
      • MSNBC host Rachel Maddow tweeted the OKC local story - itself untrue (and to-date, hasn't yet retracted her reporrting of it!)
      • When someone did a little research, they found the Dr listed online and called one of the hospitals (multiple - which is not uncommon) where he is on staff - and that hospital reported NO ivermectin OD patients in their ICU
      • Right-wingers in the Twitterverse RAN with this one, some calling the Dr a liar (not true - everything HE actually said was true - the TV stations inferences and the people hyperbolizing upon one another were all that was untrue). Some even left negative reviews on this Dr.'s profiles on medical review sites.

      Lots (and LOTS) of finger pointing (and shouting FIRE when there's just a match there) to go around on this one!

      Mind you, LEFT WING media gets things wrong ALL THE TIME! @raphjd just doesn't post their crap as-if it was true!

      Perhaps I'll start to post more "left wing nutjobs got it wrong again" articles... of course, that'll take away from time I currently devote to correcting @raphjd's postings ROFL!

      But in this case, here's the "match" that everyone is calling a fire:

      • OKC hospitals are filling up (COVID-19, anyone?) and some of those patients are there because of OD symptoms from the use of ivermectin

      All the rest is just people (over)reacting to each other's reactions to that one story... that story wasn't shocking... it's a kind-of "dog bites man" story... no? So how did it get so overblown?

      Liberals looking for anything they can to show Conservatives are evil, stupid people. Followed by Conservatives looking for anything they can to show Liberals are evil, stupid people.

      Would that we could all just calm down and admit that some liberalism in this world is good, and some conservatism in this world is good. What we need to do constantly is strive to find the right mix and balance of the two...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • 1
    • 2
    • 56
    • 57
    • 58
    • 59
    • 60
    • 106
    • 107
    • 58 / 107