• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. bi4smooth
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 3
    • Topics 53
    • Posts 2113
    • Best 328
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by bi4smooth

    • RE: Biden's leaked phone call - liberal hypocrisy

      @raphjd said in Biden's leaked phone call - liberal hypocrisy:

      @bi4smooth

      If Biden single-handedly did these things, it would be fascist. But this ain't that.
      Good luck on your 3rd Grade vocab test anyway!

      Ah, there's the rudeness you claim you only do "in return".

      Nope, not only are you a liar, but you are also a combative old twat.

      Also, there is nothing in the definition of "fascism" that requires it to be singlehanded.

      We know your narrative, "Trump bad, Honest Joe wonderful".

      You really don't like it when you're lampooned... and I love it!

      “When I use a word… it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.”
      .. - Humpty Dumpty (Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland [1865])

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Marc Bernier - Conservative talk-show host - dies of Covid-19

      @raphjd said in Marc Bernier - Conservative talk-show host - dies of Covid-19:

      As for Trump and C-19, let's not forget that Democrats fought him tooth and nail at every turn on every topic. Nothing Trump did was ever the right thing, even when he did what the nasty ass Democrats wanted him to do. Anyone who says that's not true is either a fucking liar or an absolute idiot or both.

      OK, so let's look at this like reasonable people: Dems fought against Trump on a lot of areas, but they never claimed that Dr. Birx or Dr. Fauci were making shit up, and they never claimed that Trump's vaccines would hurt people. THAT was QAnon and wack jobs on our own Right Wing.

      I've said it before: Trump had no "moves" or decisions that were going to "salvage" his Presidency or his re-election. I DO think he saw this fact in early 2020 and refused to believe that inevitability and chose to use the virus to more sharply divide people in the hopes that he could rile up his base and maybe be re-elected.

      His decision doomed thousands - mostly of his own followers - because he chose to "fight Science" vs. "fight Democrats"...

      And for all the vitriol directed at Trump while he was in power, it is now being directed at Biden - because HE is in power. Check out THIS from CNN (a liberal-leaning source) - its a piece focused on all of the failures of Biden's administration. (I'm sure it had to be edited for length - there have been SO MANY failures!)

      It's OK that you don't see these - you've shown that your News sources are all hard-right-leaning, and while they're also saying the same things, they also have to continue to claim that they're the ONLY GOOD source for your news because that's how they make money.

      I look at news sources from multiple viewpoints - including FOX and CNN. Unsurprisingly, those outlets NEVER claim the other is right, or that they agree in any news reporting! Instead, they highlight the gaffs each other make... which both do, because both want - DESPERATELY - to be the first to report things... I trust NEITHER source implicitly! Both have been right from time to time, and both have always had a SPIN on their reporting to support their "editorial viewpoints". That's just what news is today.

      Pelosi did the "y'all come to Chinatown so we can party with Chinamen and thank them for C-19, cuz Trump is a racist".

      Ridiculous - not worth a reply.

      Biden promised that if he was elected he would cure C-19 within a few months. Of course, he would not share that plan with the country unless he was elected. Here we are nearly 8 months into his Presidency and C-19 is still here and nothing has gotten better. I mention 8 months because it was 8 months into C-19 that Biden said all this shit.

      Biden made ridiculous statements about COVID-19, and so did Trump. COVID-19 should not be being looked at as a POLITICAL problem. It is a PUBLIC HEALTH one, and we should be following the Science, while still respecting people's individual rights - within limits. If you're going to lambast Biden for ridiculous COVID-19 claims, why not include things like Trump's suggestion that injecting disinfectants might be a good idea?

      Sadly, the one area where POLITICS is actually LEGITIMATELY having a COVID-19 component is in vaccine and mask denials among Republicans... and it's costing us THOUSANDS of voters. Not because they're becoming Dems - no, they're becoming DEAD! Because of our own party's vaccine denial and mask refusal, we're the ones filling the ICUs around the country. We're the ones dying.

      Biden, Harris, Pelosi, and countless other Democrats said they would not take the vaccine if Trump had anything to do with it.

      Here you go again, regurgitating ultra-right-wing propaganda that's been disproven already.

      Here's the full quote, with the part you've been told about in bold:

      "If the public health professionals, if Dr. Fauci, if the doctors tell us that we should take it, I’ll be the first in line to take it. Absolutely. But if Donald Trump tells us that we should take it, I’m not taking it." - Kamala Harris, Oct 7, 2020.

      This is what happens when you trust your sources and those sources have an agenda (note: they ALL have an agenda!)

      Now, that most certainly IS an example of Dems trying to politicize COVID-19 - and that's a bad thing! (We can agree on the core belief - just not your messaging) It's wrong now, and it was wrong then. But to be clear, she IS saying to follow the Science and not the Politician.... but in a way that is clearly political, and it was a bad choice of messaging.

      But, she/they can be wrong without being evil! She/They can make a mistake without being accused of undermining all that is good and right in this world!

      They criticized Trump over the vaccine at every turn, but then took credit for it when Biden took office.

      I think you're conflating things here... they derided Trump's response to the vaccine once he turned against the science. In the beginning, Trump leaned on the Scientists (Drs Birx and Fauci)... then they started saying they were wrong about certain things - and Trump doesn't tolerate being WRONG! So, he started turning to ... I don't know what to call them ... WACKOS, who are the ones who pointed him to things like hydroxychloroquine and other "alternatives"...

      That said, people were DESPERATE for answers, and the science was being slow...

      But that's the part of Trump's response that Dems (and many Republicans, too) argued with him about - the part that turned "anti-science" and started turning medical professionals into global terrorists on a James Bond level. (The vaccines have microchips in them. The vaccines cause your skin to become magnetizes. The vaccines kill more people than the virus. The list goes on and on...)

      But we're losing focus here: this post isn't about Trump bashing or a Trump defense...
      I know, because I started this thread!

      BOTH SIDES have politicized COVID-19 - I'll give you that... but its US (the Republicans) who have taken to getting ourselves DEAD over it!

      And THAT was the point of this original post... Marc Bernier was one of those "science is evil," "vaccines are hurting people" mouths... and it literally killed him. And he's not alone in Republican circles...

      WE ARE the ones who are dying...

      and we're doing it to ourselves!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Marc Bernier - Conservative talk-show host - dies of Covid-19

      @raphjd said in Marc Bernier - Conservative talk-show host - dies of Covid-19:

      @bi4smooth

      I call bullshit.

      You aren't rude "in return" as you often start the rudeness.

      Your arguments most often are based on me, not on what I post.

      I disagree - I post rebuttals (except when I post articles myself) to your claims. My posts nearly always include examination of your "facts" or "claims" and provide alternative "proof" that they are often exaggerated (or wrong, or made up). I think the ones that upset you most are the ones when I can show that you've fallen for propaganda or even a hoax (like when you posted that Trump had been CLEARED by the FBI - and I showed you that the FBI just doesn't do that!). But that's just my opinion based on the virulence of your replies! 🙂

      When you post factual, reasonable things - without the hyperbole - I either don't reply (even when goaded by you to chime in), or I reply in support. Sometimes I don't agree with them, but if they aren't "offensive to a reasonable mind" I let them go... I don't need to argue about EVERYTHING, after all!

      Go ahead - look back at your - say 20 - most recent posts/articles... there are a few I never replied to. I assure you I read them... I passed on the opportunity to reply - even when you attempt to goad me to do so ("waiting for our resident fake conservative...")...

      I think nearly all of my objections to what you post fall into one of 3 categories:

      • you argue against a "straw man" - you make up people (often claiming its me) who believe things that only you say they believe (like when you say that "I hate Trump" or claim that I am a fake Republican)
      • you scream FIRE, when it's really little more like a match - like when you claim that one bad actor in Michigan (or 3 consecutive incompetent supervisors in Florida who have each been removed for incompetence - but not election fraud) is proof that the entire US election infrastructure is rife with fraud (and the follow-on implication that Trump actually won in 2020)
      • you use a reference that actually doesn't support your claims - usually because you've only read the headline, and not the actual article itself. This is another category that seems to really get you riled up! 🙂

      Do I hurl insults too? yup - and since I have chosen to "fight fire with fire" you haven't found me complaining that you do too... My mind is sharp enough, my wit quick enough, my satire biting enough that I don't object...

      What I find funny is that we sometimes (far more often than you realize) agree on your core belief - like: Government shouldn't require vaccines without alternatives (like routine testing).

      But expressing that belief doesn't mean I call the Government fascist, or claim that the vaccines are ineffective, harmful, or a sign of the apocalypse! It's enough to say that it's government overreach and infringement on personal rights - we don't have to LIE about the vaccines to make "them evil and me right"... The people who WANT to mandate vaccines for EVERYONE can have good intentions (they are, in fact, trying to save lives)... they can even be be good people! And i can still think that their methods are government intrusion on some people's rights.

      That said, (and I know, there is a nuance to my position here) I also believe that LOCAL governments mandating masks in certain - public - areas, is completely reasonable from a public health perspective. Masks do no harm (bullshit claims about CO2 or Oxygen depletion aside), and are not THAT uncomfortable... further, while early research was inconclusive - current research clearly demonstrates that masks WORK WELL in curtailing the spread of COVID-19. That said, notice that I was clear that this should be a LOCAL GOVERNMENT decision, not a FEDERAL or STATE one...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Biden's leaked phone call - liberal hypocrisy

      @lololulu19 said in Biden's leaked phone call - liberal hypocrisy:

      @raphjd Fascism is: dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and of the economy. Biden destroying the economy by shoving through entirely PARTISAN legislation is the definition of fascism, not to mention the mask and vaccine MANDATES.

      If Biden single-handedly did these things, it would be fascist. But this ain't that.
      Good luck on your 3rd Grade vocab test anyway!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Broward Officials Stop Scheme to Register Dead Voters as Democrats (2020)

      @raphjd said in Broward Officials Stop Scheme to Register Dead Voters as Democrats (2020):

      @bi4smooth

      Do you mean like how you have done that to me?

      You fucking hypocrite.

      Both are garbage, but that's who YOU voted for.

      Oh, I call you names - but never without facts!
      Once again - there is a difference a 3rd Grader could notice... but it escapes you...

      One of these things is not like the others...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Broward Officials Stop Scheme to Register Dead Voters as Democrats (2020)

      @raphjd said in Broward Officials Stop Scheme to Register Dead Voters as Democrats (2020):

      @bi4smooth

      Says the fake as fuck conservative-libertarian, who hasn't met a liberal talking point that he doesn't worship.

      And, as always, you ignore the parts of the story that doesn't fit your liberal narrative.

      You are an ass clown, at best, who constantly proves the modified Godwin's Law.

      When you can't win an argument (or debate) with facts or logic, call the other person names...

      It's my LIBERAL ass that's warning AGAINST impeaching, or in any way removing Biden from office before 2024! Because my LIBERAL ass thinks the ACTUAL liberal - Kamala Harris - would be a NIGHTMARE compared to Biden.

      When you see the world in black & white, you miss so very much... and clearly, you see everything in black & white... I'm sad for you...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Marc Bernier - Conservative talk-show host - dies of Covid-19

      @serenity said in Marc Bernier - Conservative talk-show host - dies of Covid-19:

      @raphjd said in Marc Bernier - Conservative talk-show host - dies of Covid-19:

      @serenity

      The topic of politicizing the C-19 vaccines is what we were discussing. The politicizing of the vaccines happened while Trump was in office, by Democrats.

      I guess that is too difficult for you to understand.

      Trump is relevant in some discussions, but not every discussion.

      I was against voter fraud pre-2020 and post as much many, many times over the last nearly 16 years I've been on this site, but our resident ass clown fake conservative claims I am only against it since Trump lost.

      He also believes that just because Trump says or does something, that his supporters must blindly agree. It's a stupid ass comment, but he's a liberal and Rachel Maddow told him that's how it works.

      Why is it always necessary for people on the right to be rude? You are not even trying to be civil here.
      Also Trump made the covid19 political from the start. He didn't want Americans with covid19 into the country, because he didn't want the covid19 numbers to go up. He said that on live tv, I saw that. He was only worried about the numbers of covid19, not the patients. He was against masks, lockdowns. He wouldn't send help to states in need.He downplayed the pandemic, and look where that got the US. Trump lost the election, because he ignored the pandemic. Or he would have won. It was his own fault.

      I can agree that @raphjd is often rude... (I am often rude back, as well!)... and I can agree that Trump lost in 2020 because of COVID-19...

      It's the middle-part I don't necessarily agree to: that it was HIS REACTION to COVID-19 that lost him the election... I honestly (as a Republican) don't think he really had a chance with COVID-19... no matter WHAT he did!

      I also (cynically, I'll admit) think HE saw the writing on the wall and MADE the COVID-19 response political - INTENTIONALLY - because he saw it as a way to rile up his supporters and MAYBE get himself re-elected... it didn't work, but he really had no good options when looking SOLELY at his re-election.

      That he "sacrificed" the COVID-19 response in an attempt to get re-elected should surprise no-one. Trump is for Trump first, second, and third... and anyone else after.

      Had he put country before Trump, there would be thousands of fewer deaths and likely much less overall animosity regarding COVID-19... but he would still have lost the Presidency.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Biden's leaked phone call - liberal hypocrisy

      @raphjd said in Biden's leaked phone call - liberal hypocrisy:

      @bi4smooth

      Biden lied and you support him.

      Thanks for making that extremely clear.

      Yeah - that's the take away - I support a congressional inquiry, so I support Biden.

      But I don't support destroying the Presidency (or our country's ability to conduct foreign policy - by this President or the next)...

      Your 2nd Grade reading skills are a SHINING EXAMPLE of your superior intellect! You go boy!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Broward Officials Stop Scheme to Register Dead Voters as Democrats (2020)

      @raphjd said in Broward Officials Stop Scheme to Register Dead Voters as Democrats (2020):

      @bi4smooth

      You are an ignorant douchebag who NEEDS to lie about everything.

      The threads are here, so stop making shit up.

      More proof that liberals are nothing but liars.

      you are so pathetic... there is truth out there... but you have to look for it. When your pathetic right-wing outlets send you hyperbolic trash, you have to look for the source, and find the truth... there is usually a LITTLE truth to what they say... but they (like you) need to blow every little match up into a fucking forest fire...

      Their need for this is to drive ratings and viewers to their pages because that drives their revenue...

      Your need for this escapes me...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: This is what liberalism does to people

      @raphjd said in This is what liberalism does to people:

      @shami94 said in This is what liberalism does to people:

      @bi4smooth

      I don't have children and I wouldn't comment on anyone else's but when it comes to sex education, there are three sources:

      A) parents
      B) teachers
      C) their peers
      D) the internet

      A would think that most parents would prefer as much of A and B to counter the unrealism and misinformation of C and D as possible.

      If the subject is dildos, BDSM and kink, the same applies.

      Strangely conservatives routinely object to both A and B as we can see in @raphjd's replies.

      Typical liberal has no problem with teaching preschoolers about "kink".

      Silly @raphjd - you edited your quoting (poorly) and attributed that list to me... it came from @Shami94

      Is that FRAUD? Or INCOMPETENCE? Or just an honest mistake...

      I'll let the "Gentle Readers" decide on their own...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Broward Officials Stop Scheme to Register Dead Voters as Democrats (2020)

      @raphjd said in Broward Officials Stop Scheme to Register Dead Voters as Democrats (2020):

      @bi4smooth

      Why would a person commit voter fraud, unless they intended to sway the vote? You must be sharing a crack pipe with Hunter.

      You silly child... when a 90 y/o forgets that she voted by mail, and shows up to vote in person - that's voter fraud! She didn't intend to "change the outcome of the election" - she just forgot - somethting 90 year-olds do from time to time.

      Now, if she showed up and dropped 30,000 ballots into the box, all marked for the same candidate(s) - THAT would be voter fraud!

      We've discussed many cases here and you just keep downplaying them all because no proof will ever be good enough for you because you love voter fraud as it helps your party.

      You haven't presented any cases of fraud - you've presented cases of potential fraud - and in each case they have been detected and prevented.

      An entire election, except for the President, was thrown out because it was so dirty. Sadly, the judge in the case didn't explain how the entire election was dirty, but the President's part was totally clean.

      As has been explained multiple times before: there is no such thing as a perfect election (except, perhaps in your sick & twisted mind)

      We talked about the woman in/near San Antonio paying for ballots. This was a Project Veritas video of her giving her prices and what she will do in return.

      Yup - and her one vote stopped Trump from winning! Yeah! That's the ticket!
      Where are the numbers? Show me how she's one of 10,000 people who all conspired to sell their vote, and I'll pay attention... but this is actually just another 1-off -- another idiot (in a country with no shortage of idiots).

      I'm not familiar with your Veritas story there - but she only gets one vote, and while she can request dozens of ballots, only 1 can be used (we've exposed the farce that 2 ballots = 2 votes before - multiple times!)... Also, I am pretty sure the dumb woman would have been just as happy to vote Trump for her price as Biden or anyone else! That makes her an idiot (and morally corrupt), not a Democrat!

      We talked about the woman election official in Wayne County who confessed that she committed voter fraud over 20 years she was in the job.

      LOL - that story continues to "have legs" in Trumpist circles, even though it has been de-bunked.

      THE TRUTH - she admitted to entering birth dates of 1/1/1900 for significant numbers of absentee ballots. What she apparently DID NOT KNOW was that this was an intermediate step in the ballot verification process and was perfectly NORMAL in the Wayne County Supervisor of Elections process.

      Was she responsible for hundreds of cases (even thousands?) of voter fraud? Or just a "line worker" who didn't understand the process. FACTS have shown the latter...

      We talked about Broward County having 3 dirty ass Dems in charge of their elections, in a row.

      Look, you're talking about Florida... and the fact is (and remains), this place is a shit-show when it comes to keeping politics out of our elections.

      Broward County is HUGELY Democratic - by a 2-1 margin if not more! So that they keep electing Democrats to the position of Supervisor of Elections is unsurprising. That these people have been incompetent for so many years IS surprising... and shameful. But incompetence isn't "dirty"... and there have been NO complaints of FRAUD from Broward County in the past 20-30 years... just incompetence.... complete and total incompetence. But hey, THIS IS FLORIDA! Sometimes it isn't just "Florida Man" - sometimes it's "Florida Woman!" 🙂

      While no one (no, not even Brenda Snipes or Miriam Oliphant) has ever been charged with actually throwing or defrauding an election, they have been shown to be incompetent (or to have allowed for severe incompetence in their office - and they hold responsibility)...

      So what kinds of offenses did they (both) do?

      • Oliphant helped create and approved of the disastrous "butterfly ballot" used in 2020 that contributed to the utter chaos of the 2020 election
      • they hired homeless people to work in the office (during election cycles) - people with no credentials and no experience. And some of these people did dumb things... like losing boxes of absentee ballots (Now remember: this district is nearly 70% Democrat - so losing those ballots PROBABLY hurt Democrats in statewide elections more than anyone else!)
      • they both repeatedly failed to recruit sufficiant poll workers for elections - resulting in long lines and thus polls that sometimes had to remain open for hours after they were supposed to close (by State Law - if you are in line when the polls are supposed to close, you are still allowed to vote... the polling place must stay open until the last person in line at the cutoff time completes their vote.)
      • a worker for Snipes accidentally posted online election results (partial results, no doubt) 10 minutes PRIOR to the close of the polls - a violation of state law because it could influence people in-line to vote!
      • She (Snipes) permitted the destruction of physical ballots - which was prescribed by law - in spite of a court order to retain them. She thought the the DIGITAL COPIES were sufficient for the court, and was trying to stay "true" to the law...

      So what's the take-away? Broward County elections are incompetent, not necessarily fraudulent.

      Lookup those 2 prior Supervisors of Elections: Miriam Oliphant & Brenda Snipes online and read... it's not pretty! They were both CLEARLY incompetent for the job (note: Snipes was appointed by Republican Governor Jeb Bush before she won the position by election... oh yeah, right... by @raphjd's measure, Jeb Bush is a RINO, a Liberal, and a closet Democrat! my bad!)

      Yeah, but it doesn't happen.

      I've said repeatedly that fraud does happen - and that is not new! The TREND for the AMOUNT of fraud is sharply DOWN though... not UP! (We keep getting BETTER at this!)

      But your assertion that one dude who stole 300 absentee ballots and got caught with them in his car is proof that there is widespread fraud, or that Wayne County, Michigan alone swayed the Presidential election in 2020, or that heavily Democratic Broward County Florida NOT COUNTING absentee ballots hurt Republicans in the State... or [insert 1-off case of incompetence here].. is ridiculous!

      You are a fucking idiot liberal.
      You are a desperate, factually ignorant, pathetic, Trumpite... your guy LOST - fair and square! (I could mention that he lost the POPULAR VOTE... TWICE! Or, more correctly: BOTH TIMES!!!)

      Build a bridge and get over it!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Biden's leaked phone call - liberal hypocrisy

      @raphjd said in Biden's leaked phone call - liberal hypocrisy:

      Where is all the outrage (like you losers had about Trump's call) for the full transcript of Biden's call with Ghani?

      Jen Psaki is clearly a hypocrite over all this since she tweeted back when that Trump must release the entire unedited transcript with the President of Ukraine. Now she's 100% against that kind of thing.

      Biden lied, yet again, and you clowns are still slurping his pucker.

      Really? Biden trying to get the President of Afghanistan to support his plan and manage perceptions of his own country - in Afghanistan - is your moral equivalent to Trump asking the Ukrainian President to claim to investigate a political rival - of Trump's - in the US? (That's a moral reach from Kansas to California! - e.g.: that's quite a stretch, dude!)

      I don't know that Biden didn't cross any lines - and I would support a Congressional inquiry (if appropriate members of Congress think there is cause) - but the transcripts between Trump and Zelenskyy should never have been leaked outside the White House and Congress, and these transcripts between Biden and Ghani likewise should never have been leaked like this. (Reported - like Vindman did on Trump's call - yes, but leaked to the public? no way!)

      Leaks like this undermine the ability of the President (any President) to conduct Foreign Policy. It doesn't take a Rocket Scientist to see how this hurts our Country - regardless of who is in the White House!

      Extremists on both sides need to remember: there WILL come a day when a Republican sits in the White House again! And if you've damaged the Presidency because you want to damage Biden, then you will have damaged the Republican who holds that position next just as much!

      We don't have autocracies (Trump's attempts therein aside) in the US... the President cannot serve more than 2 terms. There WILL be someone NEW in that position in 4 or 8 years - not maybe, DEFINITELY! And historically, that next person is more likely to be a Republican than a Democrat!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Broward Officials Stop Scheme to Register Dead Voters as Democrats (2020)

      @raphjd said in Broward Officials Stop Scheme to Register Dead Voters as Democrats (2020):

      @bi4smooth

      Typical liberal, you have no valid response.

      Oh, I see - because you repeat yourself, I should repeat myself?

      Show us the evidence of significant fraud! Not hearsay, EVIDENCE! Somewhere where someone was charged in court of perpetrating fraud with more than a handful of votes! More importantly, perpetrating fraud with the intent of swaying an election result!

      Why that last caveat? Because some lady in Texas is being accused of fraud because she volunteers in a nursing home and she transported patient ballots to a ballot box. No one actually influenced (or even helped in any way) their votes - she just drove them to the ballot drop-box... and for that, she is charged with election fraud (ballot harvesting). The case remains unresolved in the TX courts...

      Finding a sock under the dryer does NOT mean that there are 1000's of socks hiding under there, or that all dryers have socks under them... If you want to make an argument that there is a voter fraud problem, prove it with statistically significant proof!

      We keep hearing from the Trumpites: "We have the proof"

      The time to show the proof was in Nov-Dec of 2020, not Sept of 2021!! So, I call bullshit! Show it in court (without being sanctioned for abuse of the courts!) and I'll change my tune (remember, i am a scientist: I DO change my mind when given new facts! But if you want me to change my mind, use FACTS not insinuation and hearsay!)

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: This is what liberalism does to people

      @shami94 said in This is what liberalism does to people:

      Oh, and i object to the idea that Political Conservatives teach their kids about sex differently from Political Liberals... This is a societal issue, not a political one... and in my experience most American parents are simply scared to talk about sex with their kids because they've been taught by American Society (both Liberal AND Conservative) that sex is BAD... TABOO... NOT to be talked about!

      While I was born in America, and generally raised here, I traveled as a teen - to Europe, Africa, and in my early 20's, Asia... THAT is where I learned about sex and sex education. Sadly, NOT from my own parents!

      I learned MORE about how to teach children about sex when I took parenting classes - ICYMI: I was a foster parent and adopted & raised 8 children from foster care, in addition to one biological child of my own...

      When I have sex with someone for the first time - and they're American - I almost ALWAYS have to tell them - repeatedly - "tell me if you like this". When my new partner is non-American, I mostly DO NOT have to say this - because they do it WITHOUT being prompted!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: This is what liberalism does to people

      @shami94 said in This is what liberalism does to people:

      @bi4smooth

      I don't have children and I wouldn't comment on anyone else's but when it comes to sex education, there are three sources:

      A) parents
      B) teachers
      C) their peers
      D) the internet

      A would think that most parents would prefer as much of A and B to counter the unrealism and misinformation of C and D as possible.

      If the subject is dildos, BDSM and kink, the same applies.

      Strangely conservatives routinely object to both A and B as we can see in @raphjd's replies.

      There is a difference between "this is a penis" and "this is how you make the penis ejaculate"...

      What I teach my kids is that:

      • Sex is natural - it is how our species reproduces, so if we didn't do it, there wouldn't be anyone here!
      • Sex is supposed to be enjoyable - we're PROGRAMMED to enjoy it! If we didn't do it OFTEN, there wouldn't be so many people here!
      • Sex makes babies - and it IS NOT HARD to make a baby! The fact that there is a lot of publicity around some women having trouble conceiving is MARKETING, not truth! If you have sex and ARE NOT CAREFUL - VERY CAREFUL - you likely WILL get pregnant!
      • There are LOTS of ways to have sex that CAN'T make babies... and they're JUST AS FUN!
      • WHATEVER you choose to do sexually is between you and you partner (even if they're just in the mirror)... so: no pics or videos please! But that said, PRIVATE doesn't mean WRONG! So long as you're both enjoying yourselves, and no one is hurt or permanently scarred - IT'S ALL GOOD!
      • Forced sex is bad sex - always! Forcing someone (even coercing someone) into having sex - any kind of sex - that they DO NOT want to do is bad. No means NO! Pick something else to do (including NOT having sex at all!)
      • If you have questions, ASK ME!! You already know I have a varied sexual background! I'm not interested in details - I'm not your confessor - but if you want to know if something is "normal" or "ok" or "harmful" or "might get you pregnant" - ASK! If I don't know, we'll look for answers together.
      • There is NO SHAME in sex or nudity. 100% of people are naked under their clothes, and 100% of people have sexual thoughts and desires. It's biological, not social, and there is NOTHING WRONG with ANY nude body!
      • Learn to differentiate between being PRIVATE and being ASHAMED! Sex should be private, but not shameful!

      Notice: nowhere in there is "how to stimulate her clit to hake her squirm", or "how to cradle his balls to get a bigger cum shot"! THOSE topics need to be explored TOGETHER with a PARTNER!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Broward Officials Stop Scheme to Register Dead Voters as Democrats (2020)

      modules:composer.user_said_in, @raphjd, Broward Officials Stop Scheme to Register Dead Voters as Democrats (2020)

      @bi4smooth

      Keep justifying voter fraud.

      Oy, dumbass, do you remember the NJ election where the entire thing, except for President, was thrown out because it was so dirty? Funny how that works. An entire election is so fucking dirty that a judge throws out the entire thing except for President because that was the only part that was "clean".

      Broward County had 3 dirty-ass Dems in a row running their elections.

      We have discussed many dirty ass fucks involved in voter fraud and each and every time you justify and downplay it.

      LOOK! @Raphjd has a plan for PERFECT elections!

      But ONLY HE knows how to do it - so HE should be President??

      Sieg Heil! Sieg Heil!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • Right-wing pushing for Biden impeachment - just DUMB!

      As a "Reasonable Republican" let me react to the right-wing idea of removing President Biden before the 2024 elections - by impeachment, 25th Amendment, or otherwise:

      Are you fucking insane?

      That would make Kamala Harris the President of the United States! And it wouldn't take long for AOC, or some other - equally awful left-wing extremist - to become the new VP!

      There is ABSOLUTELY NO WAY that impeaching and removing Biden ends well for us (Conservatives and/or Republicans)!

      We can dismiss the idea of impeachment before the 2022 elections: the Dems control both houses, so it just wouldn't happen. PERIOD...

      But even AFTER the 2022 elections - and presumably (hopefully) Republicans gain control of one or both houses of congress... even then, it is just an AWFUL idea!

      Think ahead people! Realize that if you remove the dam, there's a HUGE WALL OF WATER behind it!

      Biden took on Harris as a VP to "solidify" and "fire up" the ultra-liberal wing of the Democrat party... he needed them to get fired up and to show up at the polls to win in 2020 (and it worked)...

      But make no mistake: Kamala Harris would be 1000x WORSE than Joe Biden is for Conservatives were she to become President of the US!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: This is what liberalism does to people

      @shami94 said in This is what liberalism does to people:

      @dretafari Also funny how worked up he gets about an obviously fake article. It's the typical conservative media motif. Make up a story about "liberals" so that they can all get outraged about it.

      The only place I found this posted was on "funny.com".

      You can read the actual, un-conservative-doctored article here:

      https://www.mindbodygreen.com/0-21924/why-i-taught-my-daughter-what-a-vibrator-was-when-she-was-10-years-old.html

      Interesting that the original article had no "options" for the child to choose from (between a "white dildo and a black one" as described in the false narrative @raphjd propagated...). Indeed, I looked for, and couldn't find, ANY racial undertones in the original (actual) article - in fact, IMHO, it could have been written by a White mom or a Black mom - I couldn't tell!

      News flash for parents: you THINK you hide your sex toys well... you don't! If you have them, your kids know you have them and snicker behind your back! Hell, my kids even know (and tease me about) my fondness for bondage play! 🙂 And those "toys" aren't obvious as to their use - at least not like, say, a dildo! (NOTE: My youngest child is now 15...)

      Still, I can't say that, as a parent, I'm cool with "training" my daughters (or sons) about how to please their boyfriends sexually! And I would certainly not appreciate another parent doing so with my children. I wouldn't dream of teaching my child "how to suck dick" or "the best way to tease his anus"! OMG no!

      When my kids and I talk about their "sex lives" it is in terms of relationships, not specific sexual acts... indeed, I tell my kids that I have my own sex-life and I do not want, or need, to "live vicariously" through theirs! And when we have discussions and they venture into "sexual bragging" or overly detailed descriptions, I tell them to "change the channel" (a reference to the phrase we use as a family: "You've been listening to WTMI, your source for Way Too Much Information... signing off, this has been your reporter: <name here>")

      Most of my kids talk to me openly about their relationships - including 2 daughters who have felt pressured to have sex, and we've discussed how to deal with that - including how to proceed if they are ready and want to themselves! Not all do though... Every child is different!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Pfizer-BioNTech Still Immune From Lawsuits Over COVID-19 Vaccine After Federal Approval: Lawyers

      @lololulu19 said in Pfizer-BioNTech Still Immune From Lawsuits Over COVID-19 Vaccine After Federal Approval: Lawyers:

      The vaccines are no longer effective... you heard it here first...

      Why are there no NEW vaccines? They make new vaccines for the influenza flu every year.

      Reasonable questions, and I certainly don't have ALL the answers... but let's start with the first assertion: The vaccines are no longer effective...

      The COVID-19 vaccines are just as effective as ever... it's that their "lasting" influence on your immune system wanes over time. The "Booster" is supposed to kick your immune system hard enough to "make it stick" - and the booster is just another dose of the same vaccine.

      Many of our vaccines are 3-dose vaccine.. the difference with COVID-19 is that the 1st 2 are so close together. It's my understanding that they're re-examining that protocol. (Remember: this is all NEW science with respect to COVID-19... we're still learning about this virus! That COVID-19 is another coronavirus doesn't really help much: we have vaccines against the flu, but not the cold - but both are caused by coronaviruses!)

      As for the Flu analogy, if the same flu was infecting us each year, we wouldn't need new flu shots every year... but that's not the case. The flu that infects the world every year is different from year to year, and they cannot (yet) predict which one will be the "dominant" flu in any given year... thus, not only do you need a flu shot (of a different kind) each year, but there's a decent chance that it won't be effective against the flu that comes out THAT YEAR. (Edit: FWIW: I do NOT get the flu shot every year... I wait and see how BAD the flu "epidmic" is that year and the effectiveness of that year's shot and then make my decision. MOST years, I do NOT take the flu vaccine...)

      Compare that to COVID-19 - which is (in spite of the variants) essentially the same virus world-wide, and there hasn't been a "new" one yet... just mutations, and thankfully the existing vaccines work on the mutations (so far) as well.

      Finally, if (or perhaps when) COVID-19 mutates again (S. Africa is seeing a new strain that's potentially VERY dangerous), we may need NEW vaccines... let's keep our fingers crossed... that would add a whole new chapter to this ongoing, slow-rolling tragedy...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: This is what liberalism does to people

      @raphjd said in This is what liberalism does to people:

      @bi4smooth

      You will downplay anything a liberal does, won't you.

      Who is more likely to buy their 10yo child a dildo; liberal or conservative?

      Who is more likely to indoctrinate their kids into "diversity"; liberal or conservative?

      Who is more likely to stereotype people based on race; liberal or conservative?

      I will let the readers determine which is more pathetic...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • 1
    • 2
    • 56
    • 57
    • 58
    • 59
    • 60
    • 105
    • 106
    • 58 / 106