• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. bi4smooth
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 3
    • Topics 53
    • Posts 2113
    • Best 328
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by bi4smooth

    • RE: Minnesota surgeon fired from hospital for saying parents, not government, .....

      @raphjd said in Minnesota surgeon fired from hospital for saying parents, not government, .....:

      Minnesota surgeon, Dr. Jeffrey Horak, was fired from his job at Lake Region Healthcare Hospital for saying that parents, not the government, should be making medical decisions for their children.

      He was fired after speaking at the Fergus Falls school district meeting earlier this month.

      On its face, this is a 1st Amendment violation - Lake Regional Healthcare is a Gov't run hospital. The 1st Amendment protects citizens from Gov't reprisals for exercising their free speech rights.

      However, if you get more facts, you'll see that Dr. Horak's employer is a private company: Lake Region Medical Group - who are contracted to provide Doctors to the Gov't owned hospital.

      This is a convoluted and complicated system of shuffling papers and shell corporations - all primarily designed to protect the hospital (and the Gov't) from malpractice and other types of lawsuits. The Drs don't like it, the hospitals don't like it, and the plaintiffs attorneys don't like it... only the defense attys (who are employed by the hospitals) like it - because it helps them hide from lawsuits!

      Because the ACTUAL employer is a private company, and because he signed an "at-will" employment contract - 16 years ago - there isn't anything the Dr can do but put up a new shingle elsewhere... which is sad.

      Again, this is an issue where @raphjd and I will agree that it's "wrong", but he will want to have some kind of Gov't interference (laws or rules), where I think that, although it's unnecessarily convoluted - and done so for a nefarious purpose - it is, as the laws are right now, perfectly legal.

      We need to fix our medical system in the US - if this were the UK, or Canada, or Australia, then this Dr. would have been employed by the Gov't owned hospital, and would have been protected by the 1st Amendment... But THAT is not why we need to fix our healthcare system! It would just be a byproduct.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Liberals are the kind loving people - not violent terrorists at all, oh no

      @raphjd said in Liberals are the kind loving people - not violent terrorists at all, oh no:

      Here's the US criminal code the definition comes from;

      18 USC ยง 2331(5)

      So - the nutjob who drove his car into the demonstrators wanted to change the Government policy?

      Shithead (pronounced: sheh-thead): the Government policy ALREADY requires the masks... the PROTESTERS were the ones wanting the change in Government policy...

      That said, no one is arguing that the dude acted badly... only that this might not rise to the level of "terrorism"... which your quotation would seem to support... but I'm no lawyer (and neither are you)... we shall have to wait and see what the LAWYERS decide! (and if you can find a lawyer who ISN'T a "scum-sucking lawyer" wrap them in plastic and send them to a museum!)

      Before you get your dick in a knot - I'm not supporting the use of a vehicle as a weapon against people you're arguing with (or who are demonstrating against your point of view) - I'm ONLY arguing that your use of the term domestic terrorism may be overstating the case here... but to be clear: this one is at least close enough to argue about, which is a far cry from your other accusations of "domestic terrorism" which you've ascribed to everything from a botched robbery attempt to a protest march that remained peaceful throughout...

      But you do you, @raphjd - if you've proven anything, you've proven that you cannot be corrected, and you equally cannot be agreed with... you just want your voice heard - without interruption or interference from anyone else!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • Porn site Flava Works ordered to liquidate

      Quick read:
      Miami-based Flava Works (formerly Chicago-based, and owner of several gay porn sites, including: CocoDorm, MixItUpBoy, RawRods, & PapiCock, among others) has been ordered by a Miami Federal Court to liquidate its assets (including IP) to pay Adam4Adam the monies due as a result of a lawsuit. This is a "final action" taken by the court because Flava Works has consistently delayed and otherwise defied prior court orders.

      Details:
      Back in 2014, the owners of FlavaWorks filed suite against Adam4Adam.com (a gay hookup site, as-if you didn't already know that!) alleging copyright infringement - specifically that Adam4Adam was using their (FlavaWorks) content in advertising, promotions, and other online content for Adam4Adam.

      FlavaWorks further claimed that multiple DMCA notices were filed with Adam4Adam and were ignored.

      Long story short, FlavaWorks lost in court - badly. Further, the court awarded Adam4Adam court costs (that's a very bad sign). But as-if that wasn't bad enough - FlavaWorks essentially ignored the court awards and judgements, then thought that playing musical lawyers (6 different attys since 2014) would let them continually delay... it didn't work.

      In 2019, out of frustration, A4A filed for a "seize and sell" order to get what they were due from the earlier court judgements, which the court has now granted, as-of this past July (2021). [Courts DO NOT move quickly!]

      Needless to say, FlavaWorks is appealing... the owner released a statement to the effect that they are trying to "clean up this mess, not going out of business and have filed Chapter 11 to reorganize these" debts. (NOTE: the actual quote said "reorganize these debits", but that's a word-choice error).

      Stay tuned - but if I was a paying subscriber to those sites, I might be worried about my investment there...

      posted in LGBT News
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: The "tax the rich" lie

      @raphjd said in The "tax the rich" lie:

      https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/08/18/61percent-of-americans-paid-no-federal-income-taxes-in-2020-tax-policy-center-says.html

      In 2019, 44% of American "taxpayers" paid zero federal taxes, and that is without Covid.

      in 2020, 61% of American "taxpayers" paid zero federal taxes.

      Before anyone says something stupid, CNBC is a leftist "news" outlet.

      It's OK to call CNBC "Liberal" - it's a label they use for themselves and aspire to "show"! The same as Newsmax and OAN claim the label "conservative" and aspire to "show"...

      Contrary to @raphjd's beliefs, I know q few liberals, and they each proudly wear their "liberalism" on their sleeves, and do not take being called a "liberal" as an insult!

      But on to the story... again, I am confused by your headline, Comrade...

      The US Tax Code is about 2600 pages of the Government trying in influence people's actions by increasing or decreasing their taxable incomes. Added into that publication are 6500 MORE pages of "interpretations" of those original 2600 pages - regulations and rulings from past tax court cases.

      The issue with the US Tax Code is... EVERYTHING

      As noted above, the Tax Code has become WAY TOO LARGE and unwieldy, and it is primarily a conglomeration of 50+ years of Government interference into how people act!

      The result is that 61% of people - people like Joe the homeless guy who actually didn't make enough money to buy a pair of $20 shoes last year, as well as people like Warren Buffett and Jeff Bezos - who made enough money to seriously dent the National Debt! - but who have an army of accountants who scour the tax code and find ways to make all of that income non-taxable (or offset by Gov't "tax credits," "tax deductions," or "write-offs.")

      It is true: the only people in the US who pay taxes are the working poor and the working middle-class. The poor don't and the wealthy don't... and it's all legal - which is a crime against humanity!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Liberals are the kind loving people - not violent terrorists at all, oh no

      @raphjd said in Liberals are the kind loving people - not violent terrorists at all, oh no:

      https://thehill.com/legal/578389-man-arrested-after-vehicle-runs-into-vaccine-mandate-protesters-in-california

      We know that if the ideologies were reversed, liberals wouldn't shut up about it, and rightly so.

      Palmdale CA police arrested William Aslaksen, 64, after he drove his Jeep into a crowd of vaccine mandate protestors.

      Despite what our resident fake conservative will say, this is Domestic Terrorism, even though a liberal did it.

      Finally, you've found someone who's actions at least come close to "terrorism" to claim the mantle of "domestic terrorism"!

      Although, technically, to be a "terrorist" attack, the people attacked are supposed to be "mostly innocents" and the intent is supposed to be to further a political view. In this case, the only people he hurt were people he was "protesting?" against... no "innocents" (in his mind - I don't think for a moment that the protesters deserved this attack - they were all "innocents" to a point!)

      Still, this isn't exactly a "bomb a government facility" or "march down the streets in [insert minority: black|asian|gay] district, burning down everything" incident... no, this looks more like the guy just lost his temper over the issue (hot heads are not hard to find at these rallies/protests!) and did something stupid (and bad).

      Summary: Guy did a bad thing... a very bad thing... domestic terrorism? close call, maybe barely, maybe not - depending on how broad you want your definition.

      But it's an improvement for @raphjd! In the past, he'd look at a slice of bread on the floor and declare the whole building a bakery!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Black TX school shooter was a drug dealer, not victim

      @raphjd said in Black TX school shooter was a drug dealer, not victim:

      Youtube Video

      Dude, just posting a link to a youtube video under a headline that exaggerates the content of the video is so... well, sadly, "that's so @raphjd"... and sad... and lazy...

      1. your headline says the shooter was a "drug dealer" - shocker, but the video says only that he was "involved in high risk behavior"... maybe there are no other "high risk behaviors" in your mind, but that's understandable - there isn't much room in there...

      2. The MOTHER of the PERPETRATOR (maybe Aunt - it's not worth re-watching the video to get that part perfect) claimed this was a "bullying" issue - that the perp was being bullied.... shocker, but 90%+ of family members of perpetrators say "s/he didn't didn't do it" or have an excuse... NO ONE wants to think your loved one can be legitimately portrayed as "evil" by the press and it be true.

      You didn't get #2 wrong, but it's kind of a "dog bites tail" fact to the story... and I never saw MSM do anything but show the perp's mom (or aunt) say the same thing...

      That's all YOU wrote about... but the video goes farther... long story short: this was not a "mass shooting in a school** as it was originally portrayed (although one could forgive that assumption, what with what's going on in the US today!) - No, rather this was a 1-on-1 crime... the perp didn't come into the school to "shoot people", he came into school to shoot one-particular-person, and one girl tried to intervene and got hurt too.

      If you listen carefully to the police chief's comments (included in the video), all 3 (perp and 2 injured victims) were known to each other and involved in "high risk behaviors"... and no one was killed. Long story short there being... they'll all be back!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Snopes released from Fed lawsuit - with a vengeance

      @raphjd said in Snopes released from Fed lawsuit - with a vengeance:

      @bi4smooth

      Please, Mary.

      You are such a loser that you refuse to look at any evidence that doesn't support your liberal crackhead worldview. You have repeatedly shown that here.

      Blah blah - I'm a liberal... I'm anti-Trump... I'm a RINO... I'm a [insert attempted insult here]...

      My posts show facts and opinions (the primary ones, anyway)... yours spout opinions... you go boy...

      The problem now is that the only opinion you want to share is the one that you don't like my facts... too bad.

      You can win the insult war - I couldn't care less about your opinion of me...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: DNC and Hillary Campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann indicted for lying to FBI

      @raphjd said in DNC and Hillary Campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann indicted for lying to FBI:

      @bi4smooth said in DNC and Hillary Campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann indicted for lying to FBI:

      @raphjd said in DNC and Hillary Campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann indicted for lying to FBI:

      @bi4smooth

      You are so fucking boring.

      I'm only boring because you're so repetitive! (and predictable!)

      Oh, and you repeat yourself

      Over and over again - you buy into the Trumpist idea that if you claim it often enough, people will start to believe it!

      I'm not people... ๐Ÿ™‚

      Every time you re-spout the same lie, I'll re-write the factual rebuttal... and you'll keep calling me a liberal, a RINO, or some other useless name... as-if my political stances affected the FACTS!

      So says Bejing Bi4smooth.

      Considering that FACTS don't exist for you liberals. Just ask Joy "I was hacked" Reid and the rest of your thought leaders.

      This is sad... and pathetic... you haven't said anything on-topic in at least 6 threads in a week This is a waste of good bandwidth! You can win the insult war - I couldn't care less about your opinion of me...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Colin Powell dead at 84 due to COVID-19

      @raphjd said in Colin Powell dead at 84 due to COVID-19:

      @bi4smooth

      Blah, blah, blah.

      You are so tiresome.

      Ask Feng Feng to help you come up with something new.

      Maybe you need to spend more time snorting sprinkle cheese from Hunter's carpet.

      You haven't had an original post - other than a re-hash insult of me - in a week. You can win the insult war - I couldn't care less about your opinion of me...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Biden's polls historically (almost) low...

      @raphjd said in Biden's polls historically (almost) low...:

      @bi4smooth

      I don't have access to Russian and Chinese government computers, unlike you.

      This is a waste of my time... You can win the insult war - I couldn't care less about your opinion of me...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: St Fauci, yet again, proves he's evil

      @raphjd said in St Fauci, yet again, proves he's evil:

      @bi4smooth

      LIAR!!!!

      You and Feng Feng need to come up with a better lie.

      I never said anything is "against" me.

      You never did answer if you can taste Swallwell's cock when you snortch Feng Feng's vag.

      You're pathetic ... this has devolved into nothing but a trading of insults - the last discussion of facts or opinions was days ago... this isn't worth the time

      You can win the insult war - I couldn't care less about your opinion of me...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Biden's polls historically (almost) low...

      @raphjd said in Biden's polls historically (almost) low...:

      @bi4smooth

      I bet you had a desperate search for a poll that put Trump below Biden. Then again, you probably got your "facts" from Moscow and Bejing.

      Look it up, asshole...

      The fact remains, taking Trump for the anomaly he was, Biden's numbers are REALLY BAD!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: St Fauci, yet again, proves he's evil

      @raphjd said in St Fauci, yet again, proves he's evil:

      @bi4smooth

      Still sucking Fauci's ass, I see.

      Anything not 100% in-line with your hyperbolic spin is against you... paranoid much?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Colin Powell dead at 84 due to COVID-19

      @raphjd said in Colin Powell dead at 84 due to COVID-19:

      @bi4smooth

      You are so fucking boring.

      Just go back to licking Fauci's mangina.

      You're so repetitive - and did I say you say the same shit over and over again? Oh, and you repeat yourself.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: DNC and Hillary Campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann indicted for lying to FBI

      @raphjd said in DNC and Hillary Campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann indicted for lying to FBI:

      @bi4smooth

      You are so fucking boring.

      I'm only boring because you're so repetitive! (and predictable!)

      Oh, and you repeat yourself

      Over and over again - you buy into the Trumpist idea that if you claim it often enough, people will start to believe it!

      I'm not people... ๐Ÿ™‚

      Every time you re-spout the same lie, I'll re-write the factual rebuttal... and you'll keep calling me a liberal, a RINO, or some other useless name... as-if my political stances affected the FACTS!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Snopes released from Fed lawsuit - with a vengeance

      @raphjd said in Snopes released from Fed lawsuit - with a vengeance:

      @bi4smooth

      Yeah, SNOPES has gotten things wrong before, because they are biased.

      They play word games to justify their "false" claims.

      There are plenty of videos out there that show it.

      Anything not 100% in support of your Trumpist views is "biased"... Snopes is, in my experience, one of the LEAST biased sites out there...

      • when a fact can be supported, they say so
      • when a fact can be disprove, they say so
      • when there isn't enough to say definitely one way or the other, they say so!

      Videos from right-wing (or left-wing, for that matter) sites who don't like Snopes setting the record straight are hardly "unbiased" reviews...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • Biden's polls historically (almost) low...

      So here we are: 9-months into a Biden Presidency... one that, as has been the norm very recently, coincided with his own party being in control of BOTH houses of congress...and what have they accomplished?

      • We got out of Afghanistan! (We looked totally incompetent doing so, but we are out!)
      • We gave out more Federal Money in an unnecessary 3rd Stimulus - leading to inflation numbers we haven't seen since the 1970's (yay?)
      • We passed a (insert here) bill... oh, no... wait... we're still trying to "negotiate" between a Dem Senator (or 2) and a Dem Rep who is as liberal as they come and won't accept ANY partial victory! (You GO Girl!)

      The end result is, Biden's poll numbers are (almost) historically low...

      Here are the Presidents of the past 50 years RANKED by their poll numbers at 9-months into their (1st) terms:

      • George W Bush - 2001 - 88% (mind you, this is admittedly inflated, coming just after 9/11)
      • George HW Bush - 1989 - 70% (also admittedly inflated, coming just after Tienanmen Sq)
      • Jimmy Carter - 1977 - 54%
      • Ronald Reagan - 1981 - 53%
      • Barack Obama - 2009 - 52%
      • Bill Clinton - 1993 - 47%
      • Joe Biden - 2001 - 42%
      • Donald Trump - 2017 - 37%

      That ranks him 7th out of the past 8 Presidents...

      Is it just me, or are the Dems (excluding Trump-the-outlier) always on the bottom there? 8 Presidents, and 3-of-the-4-lowest are all Dems!

      Here's to hoping the Dems can't find a way to get off their own dicks, and continue in this "do nothing" Congress...

      If it weren't for the incredible shrinking Republican Party (still killing ourselves over stupid COVID-19 denial bullshit), I'd say we Republicans were looking PRETTY GOOD at getting BOTH CHAMBERS of Congress back in 2023!

      Suck on those lemons, AOC and Manchin!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Cock blocking servers

      @lololulu19 said in Cock blocking servers:

      Recently, I noticed that I have been unable to access some of my favorite sites. In some cases, I would get pop ups on my screen explaining that the sites were blocked because they contained pornography. That is shocking, because I only come to this site to chat in the forum. Who knew that there were images of naked men on this site?

      Anyway.. I found out WHY I was getting blocked. It was due to DNS servers. One way to get around that is to use a proxy server - at the cost of having very slow speeds. A much better way is to run the utility DNSBENCH (remove the redirecting servers) run that, and select the 2 or 3 fastest DNS servers. Then, go into your ethernet and wifi adapter, and insert those DNS addresses into the IPV4 section. A much better option is if you use a router.. go into it's setup, which is typically 192.168.x.x (in my case it is 192.168.1.1 but it can also be something like 192.168.1.100... the x's always seem to be either a 1, 0, or 100) Then, go to the local connectivity and insert the DNS addresses there. The DNS addresses which were blocking me were 208.67.222.220 and 208.67.220.123 which are identified as being "opendns"

      NEVER use your ISP's DNS servers... that you were using OpenDNS tells me that someone (maybe even you, accidentally) turned on their "safe browsing mode" - a specific DNS service designed for people who legitimately DO NOT want to see naked people in their Internet feed (or parents, perhaps)...

      Some excellent choices of "alternate" DNS servers are:

      • Cloudflare: 1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1
      • Google: 8.8.8.8 & 8.8.4.4
      • OpenNic: 206.125.173.29 & 45.32.230.225
      • Level3: 4.2.2.1 & 4.2.2.2 & 4.2.2.3 & 4.2.2.4

      And there are the "standard" OpenDNS (Cisco) servers (without the filtering): 208.67.220.220 & 208.67.222.222

      I personally use the Cloudflare ones: 1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Snopes released from Fed lawsuit - with a vengeance

      @raphjd said in Snopes released from Fed lawsuit - with a vengeance:

      @bi4smooth

      Snopes has been proven to have lied on several occasions. There are threads here on the subject. Tim Pool and many others on YouTube have made videos about it.

      Of course, you being a Chinese operative, want us to worship Chop Suey Joe.

      Snopes has gotten things wrong in the past - and when proven wrong, they have corrected their site! Not with some little add-on later... they update the original post so that anyone ELSE who searches for it, only gets the correct content.

      If you want infallibility, look to FOX NEWS!

      If you want provable facts, Snopes isn't a bad place to start. And if you're butt-hurt because they expose your Russian Troll Farm dirt, so be it!

      They expose Leftist lies as much as they do Rightist lies - and the research shows that to be true!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: DNC and Hillary Campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann indicted for lying to FBI

      @raphjd said in DNC and Hillary Campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann indicted for lying to FBI:

      @bi4smooth

      It's funny how you have nothing worth posting, so you keep claiming I'm a Russian troll.

      Say hi to Feng Feng for me. Does her vag taste like Swallwell's cock?

      If you would just stop re-transmitting the KGB's mis-information news-feed, we'd all spend less time arguing about your Russian ties...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • 1
    • 2
    • 43
    • 44
    • 45
    • 46
    • 47
    • 105
    • 106
    • 45 / 106