@raphjd said in Teen shreds school board over mask mandates:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1455382258131644419

STEM School Highlands Ranch, Colorado school board was happy to go along with the mask mandates put in place by the health bard, screaming "follow the science". Now that the health board ended the mask mandate, the school board is suing them to put it back in place, the school board doesn't want to follow the science.

Mask mandates are "science" when they are in place, but garbage when they are not.

This shows the truth about maks mandates.

We already know that masks are part of the cult.

Hell, Joy "I was hacked" Reid, Rachel "mad cow" Maddow, the Bopsy Twins, and Fatboy over at CNN and countless DNC politicians. Rachel Maddow even said, on-air (pre-recorded, actually) that because of mask mandates going away, she would have to change her mindset and stop viewing unmasked people as evil Trump supporters. Countless others have said similar.

Here's a shocker - people (in groups) abhor change (ref: Who Moved My Cheese?)

For those who insist on retaining mask mandates, I ask this simple question:

Wasn't this the purpose of wearing masks to begin with?

The goal of wearing masks (and getting vaccinated) was to defeat the spread of the virus.

Argue, if you will, that the Trumpite anti-vax, anti-mask mantras slowed down the progress in slowing the disease progression (and cost many tens - if not hundreds - of thousands of lives as a result), but the GOAL of all the anti-COVID protocols was to "get us back to normal" -- NO?

That's not to say that COVID is beaten... but like politics, all COVID should be local. (Trump's national shutdown was a mistake - only about 1/3 of the geography and 1/2 the population was in the throes of a serious COVID outbreak - for the other 2/3 of the geography and 1/2 of the population, it was an expensive boondoggle, and contributed to the anti-[other measures] efforts as well.)

I believe the "magic number" is supposed to be 3%? (That's 3% positivity in those being tested for COVID-19)

I presume the CO Health Board says they've reached that for the requisite length of time... in which case, the mandates can be lifted...

That doesn't stop people still concerned about getting the virus from continuing to wear masks... it's their choice, their freedom (maybe not a bad idea for Flu season!)

In any case, populations of people don't like change - and here we're still getting adjusted to the "change" to needing to wear masks and the scientists tell us we can change again (and, of course, the politicians - elected and otherwise - insist we MUST change).

Don't worry - Science won, but both political parties will claim that they are responsible:

• DEMS will claim that their mask mandates and forces vaccinations are the reason...
• Republicans (because of Trumpites) will publicly claim it was all a DEM hoax

The SCIENCE is: it was always going to burn itself out - that wasn't the issue. The ISSUE was whether it "burned through" 1-million human lives, 5-million lives (where we are now), 20-million lives - or even more!

Sadly, if this were a test, we failed. We will likely eventually reach 6-7 million lives lost (while the virus is "under control" in many areas of the US, that is not the case in other areas of the country, much less the globe!)

We ARE NOT OUT OF THIS YET - but there are some bright spots, and while we shouldn't all jump out of our masks and ditch the booster shots just yet, we can look with some joy at the fact that the "return to normal" is beginning...

@raphjd said in Virginia Gov election is all about Trump, not the issues, says Biden and other DNC:

Biden, Kamala, and countless other DNCers say that the Virginia Gov election is about Trump, not about the actual issues.

Biden has even expressed his love and admiration for Gov "blackface", the outgoing DNC governor. You may remember the photos of the governor in college dressed in blackface, but his excuse was that he wasn't the one in blackface, but rather he was the one in the KKK outfit as if that made it better. Other photos proved it was him in blackface though, so he lied, and Democrats still loved him.

Of course the Dems want to paint this election (VA Gov) as a Trump race - they win when Trump is on the ballot!

If you didn't see it, the DNC mailed out flyers to NOVA (No. Virginia) residents touting (falsely) how close Republican candidate Glenn Youngkin is with Trump! It VERY MUCH looked like a typical candidate mailing - something the RNC might have put out, were Trump a positive in this election... but he is NOT, so it was the DNC sending out that mailer in a kind-of reverse Trump "booster"...

Time will tell if it works...

But hopefully this tactic fails - Youngkin is a good candidate. He should have no trouble beating well-known McAuliffe - even in a State that's been leaning Blue lately. The Dem (McAuliffe) comes with a lot of baggage!

@raphjd said in Minnesota surgeon fired from hospital for saying parents, not government, .....:

I wonder if Feng Feng realizes that virtually no US hospital is 100% private. I would say that 100% of them get at least some government money, which makes them quasi-government agents.

It's the same for ALL businesses, schools, hospitals, etc, etc, etc, etc that gets government money.

Also a correction. About 1/3rd of UK hospitals are privately owned and this number is rising. Most doctors at private hospitals double-dip by working both at the NHS and privately. My private ENT doctor is also the head of the ENT depart at the NHS for my city.

It doesn't matter who owns the hospitals in the US, because the hospitals don't actually hire DOCTORS to staff them! They hire "consulting companies" to provide the physicians...

It's all part of a corporate shell game intended to thwart personal injury attorneys from getting massive payouts for medical mistakes/failures/omissions/malpractice/etc.

SOMETHING had to be done to stop the PI lawyers, and attempts at legislating a solution were successfully blocked by the PI Attorney lobbies... So, this is the "fix" - wrap everyone around "corporate shields" that insulate each layer from liability from any other layer.

Unfortunately, as I pointed out, this Dr is now employed by a private company, meaning he has no 1st Amendment right to free speech. His employer can fire him for his speech, for his haircut, or for having improperly groomed pinkie fingernails... and his employment contract makes that very clear.

This isn't right - he shouldn't have been fired. Don't take my description of why it's legal as an agreement that it should be!!

Hmmm... filed 24-hours before the on-site voting happens in Virginia...

Certainly worth investigating, as accepting foreign funds for campaigns in Federal Elections is illegal (not so sure about State campaigns - I think that would be up to States' own laws - but I'd be shocked if any State did NOT make it illegal!). Despite the claims of some of the sites contributing to Breitbart's story, I don't think Federal Elections laws apply to non-Federal elections. That's a hallmark of our democracy: elections are local, and our system is entirely de-centralized... making the kind of system-wide "conspiracy" that is central to the "Trump 2020 lie" almost impossible to achieve!

That said, I'm not a lawyer at all - and that means I'm definitely not an elections lawyer.

But the timing of the complaint smells...

I don't think the Republican Candidate against McCauliffe (Glenn Youngkin) needs any "shady" help... he should be able to defeat this Dem fair and square! Even in a State (VA) that's been leaning Blue lately...

@lololulu19 said in Rep "CryBaby" Kinzinger won't run for re-election:

Pelosi committed itself in a 2016 deal to stepping down as the leader of the House democrats in 2022.

I wonder how that will affect her influence over the democrat lemmings in the House. Since they know she is toothless after 2022, they don't have to fear her reprisals anymore.

We can only hope that Pelosi actually adheres to her 2018 "campaign" promise to NOT seek re-election to Speaker in 2022... then again, we can also hope that the point is moot, as Dems shouldn't be in control of the House in 2022 to begin with! (NOTE: Technically, the election happens in 2022, the next Speaker election won't happen as a result until early 2023!)

Love her or hate her, Pelosi has been an effective Dem leader... in all the ways that make Republicans revile her!

So, losing her would be a benefit to us! But again, the point should be moot and she should retire from Congress and annoy her grandchildren!

As for Kinsinger, as you noted in your piece above, he was essentially gerrymandered out of his seat. And that comes as a surprise to anyone?

Dem States are gerrymandering their delegations to be more Dem, Republican States are gerrymandering their delegations to have more Republicans... shocking!

What REALLY should happen is that we should fix this broken system where partisan politics feeds on itself and extremes on both sides get to advance their agendas because of a lack of a NEED for there to be a middle-ground.

If we drew our district boundaries in a less partisan (non-partisan is a pie-in-the-sky impossible dream) fashion, we'd have more competitive districts and the Legislature would be able to accomplish more... more that's GOOD for America - all of America, not just one extreme or another.

Let's get something straight:

Vote Fraud Is Bad

All vote fraud is bad - we can (maybe) agree on that?

Maybe we can even go so far as this: We all would like to see vote fraud reduced, and confidence in our election systems increased.

Where we seem to differ is where we are at now!

• You (Trumpites, in general) would have us believe that, in spite of DECADES of history of running free & fair elections, something changed in 2020... and the primary evidence of that is that Trump lost!
• Elections officials of all parties in all states generally agree - there was nothing unusual about the 2020 election, except that far more people voted by mail. But 10's of millions of votes have been cast in the same way in prior elections... including in 2016 when Trump won. The only difference is the shift (not creation of) of voting methodology to mail-in vs. on-site voting (and, as I've noted above: mail-in is often a misnomer, as most of those ballots never saw a postage stamp! They were hand-delivered to a collection box - usually, but not always, monitored)

Election (vote) fraud is bad... but so is rape and murder... and if you have a solution that can solve all vote fraud, then the same process can be used to solve all rape and murder! (And you will rightfully so earn the Nobel Peace Price for a decade!

But, let's be equally clear: not all "vote fraud" is created equally:

• the old man who showed up to the polls on election day, having forgotten that he mailed in his ballot 3-weeks earlier

Is a far cry from:

• the old man who showed up at the polling center 3-hours after casting his own ballot, wearing a "disguise" and claiming to be his son.

And that is a far cry from:

• someone attempting to mail in 100's (or even 1000's) of fraudulent ballots, or
• someone attempting to fool (or hack) the vote tallying equipment.

And none of that addresses the "vote accountability" issue that this Sheriff is accusing the Wisconsin Election Board of creating/violating!

I know @raphjd will pull out his hair and teeth over this, but as a quasi-governmental body, they (the Election Commission as a group, as well as each of its members) are immune from prosecution for doing their governmental function - even if it turns out that a court agrees with the Sheriff, and their decisions violated Wisconsin law. (The original use of "absolute immunity" under US law!)

I would caution my fellow Republicans who are so keen on letting partisan politics enter our election mechanisms though... your assumptions in allowing partisan politics into that "world" - where it has been kept out for so long - are faulty! You assume, for one, that Republicans would control those partisan bodies (like State Legislatures)... that will not always be the case! Won't we (Republicans) be screaming bloody murder if the makeup of the legislatures in, say TX, NC, PA, IA, AZ, & MI -- all of whom are less than 10-seats away from flipping Democrat - were to change and all-of-a-sudden it's Democrats overruling Elections Supervisors and declaring their own victors in elections? That's a very slippery slope and you can't "have your cake and eat it too!"

I'm not sorry Trump lost... but attacking the very voting infrastructure that put him into office (in spite of losing the popular vote) in 2016 is disingenuous at best, and just being a sore loser in any case.

Can we PLEASE move on and focus on 2022! If we're laser-focused on 2020, we'll LOSE in 2022 - even though we have ALL KINDS if historical trends that say we should win BIG in 2022!

@raphjd said in Sheriff Presents Evidence of Felony Fraud in Election Commission's Actions: Wisconsin:

@blackheart88

The Carter/Baker Commission was absolutely against pretty much everything that happened in 2020, because, as they said, it would lead to and allow rampant voter fraud.

My older brother and my dad were on the 2020 voter rolls. My brother died at 14, so he never registered to vote. My aunt reported my dad's death and he was taken off the voter rolls, but through some miracle, he was back on it in 2020. This happened in 2 completely different states.

As I noted above - y'all seem to imply that mail-in balloting was NEW for 2020.

PRIOR to the 2020 election cycle, FIVE States authorized local jurisdictions to hold all-mail elections (Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Utah, & Washington)... in those states, the localities don't even HAVE TO OFFER in-person voting!

ANOTHER THREE States and DC also had "automatic mail-in ballot distribution" policies already in place (by law, not by executive actions): where every voter receives a mail-in-ballot by default. In these places, you still have an in-person option. (Those States are Nevada, Vermont, & California)

Also: "mail-in ballot" is almost a misnomer... I received such a ballot in Florida - I didn't put it into the US Mail, I put it in a collection box (that was monitored) at my local library.

Mind you: I am TOTALLY IN FAVOR of increased voter ID requirements - but that's a double-edged sword: if you REQUIRE the use of a "State issued Drivers License or ID", then obtaining one of these IDs has to be free to low-income voters. (One State - I don't recall which - is moving towards this: low income residents can get a free State ID card (but not a free DL!) if they are on Gov't assistance already).

In many States, the cost of getting a State ID can be over $100 (it's nearly that high in Florida)... if you make having that kind of ID a voting requirement, and it costs $100 - then you have a Poll Tax - which is unconstitutional (see 24th Amendment).

Personally, I think giving poor people a (free) State-issued ID card could be useful in stopping all kinds of fraud - not just voter fraud! There is MASSIVE fraud in the public assistance systems - people claiming children who don't exist, or exist in multiple households simultaneously, people continuing to claim benefits after someone dies, and so on... in The Information Age we shouldn't be allowing this!

@blackheart88 said in Sheriff Presents Evidence of Felony Fraud in Election Commission's Actions: Wisconsin:

@bi4smooth what are you trying to imply? since republicans (commission/judge) involved, it's somehow less severe or 100% fair? "there were FEWER in 2020 than there were in 2016" this statement has no basis because there was a mass mail-in in 2020 due to covid-19, none in 2016. If anything, mass mail-in created a higher potential for errors or irregularities, yet you claimed fewer. My granny lives alone but received a total of 4 ballots (2 for her and other 2 for the previous occupants). Same thing happened at my place, people who rented our basement moved out a few years ago, yet their ballots came in regardless. sign you name on the back of your credit card, then give it to someone and tell them to buy something at some stores, see if they can commit fraud; the same concept leads to dead people voting, out of state voting, and non-resident voting. BTW if you watched the video, the main fraud event is cognitive impaired elders cast the ballots with the "help" of nursing home staffs which you conveniently left out, assuming you watched the video at all.

You downplay my facts that the OVERALL numbers of irregularities (challenged ballots, recounts that had statistically differing results, charges of attempted vote fraud [mind you, those are actual charges, not partisan claims that never made it to court) were LOWER in 2020 than in 2016.

And then in the same breath (paragraph) claim that mail-in-ballots are inherently irregular! The fact that your "granny" received multiple ballots IS NOT irregular! Anyone who has done vote-by-mail in the past knows this! The issue isn't how many ballots you RECEIVE, it's how many you RETURN! ICYMI: Those mailed out ballots aren't just blank pages with a list of names on them - they are coded... the local Supervisor of Elections knows exactly who each ballot was mailed to... and when they get them back, they are checked to ensure that - if 100 ballots were mailed to "Granny" by accident, only 1 would be allowed to count as a vote.

If you don't believe me - PLEASE in 2020, take one of your "Granny's" mail-in ballots and return it as your own! Go ahead! Then show these discussions to the Sheriff's investigators who come find you... "It was just a test" you'll tell them... "It's voter fraud" they'll tell you while they fit you with some fine new silver bracelets!

I know this is a shocker - but Elections Officials didn't "invent" vote-by-mail for 2020 - it's been a staple of our elections for over 30 years! They've had plenty of practice in rooting out ways to "fool" it, and as opposed to the 3.4 seconds you appear to have spent "thinking critically" about this, they've had entire staffs considering these things for decades.

But let's get back to the article here:

This Sheriff isn't claiming any knowledge of any voter being intimidated or influenced... he's claiming that the elections board erred in their ruling that staff at the nursing homes (which were in lockdown to protect the residents from COVID-19) could assist their residents in filling out mail-in-ballots.

This isn't an accusation of FRAUD so much as a disagreement over interpretation of the voter laws of their State... which is why ALL of the board members - Dem & Republican alike - have decried the accusation and affirmed their unanimous collective belief that they acted properly.

As I noted above: this will be determined by a Court... and if they were wrong, and the Court determines that they overstepped their bounds, there will be penalties of some sort.

But lets look deeper here: Is your intent to show that these older people shouldn't have been allowed to vote from within their retirement home? That if they WANTED to vote, they should have had to expose themselves to COVID-19 "like the rest of us?"

Voter fraud (REAL voter fraud) is an ongoing ISSUE in every election - and EVERY election has some people trying to "game the system"... Elections officials in general around this country do a damned good job of rooting out irregularities and detecting fraud.

One last comment: Because of the extra scrutiny of the 2020 elections, there HAS been an up-tick in FELONY attempted voter fraud charges filed so far... but in a "people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones" bit of karma, it's been our own Republicans who have - by a wide margin - been caught attempting to illegally vote!

@raphjd said in Republicans demand answers from Biden Cabinet on reported $450,000 payments to illegal immigrants:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/murphy-letter-cabinet-secretaries-horrific-decision

While $450K seems a bit steep, paying something families who were illegally separated by Trump Administration officials that violated US laws and UN rules does seem reasonable. We really wouldn't want to be hauled into the US or World Courts with what they did... they potential payouts could be MUCH MUCH higher!

NOTE TO @raphjd and other Trumnpites: when Trump told his Federal Employees to do things that were a violation of US law, he didn't protect them, or the US Government from lawsuits arising from those illegal activites. Doing something illegal because the President told you to might protect the individual, but will not protect the US Government itself from liability.

Remember: he was President Trump, not Emperor Trump!

@raphjd said in Sheriff Presents Evidence of Felony Fraud in Election Commission's Actions: Wisconsin:

Youtube Video

I know our very own Feng Feng will be posting insults at me, despite him playing the victim the other day.

He doesn't like to look at videos that don't match what his Chinese/DNC masters tell him is "reality".

He will claim that anyone against voter fraud is that way because Trump lost, even if you have a long history of being against voter fraud before Trump ran in 2016.

Typical of your posts - your "summary" here assumes no one will actually watch the video.

Well, I did - and the Sheriff has made allegations that the Election Commission (made up of both Democrats and Republicans) broke the law by allowing for "special circumstances" for voters in nursing homes to enable them to vote.

Needless to say, the commission (all of them - including the Republicans) say otherwise.

@raphjd continually promotes remote incidences of voting "irregularities" as-if they were part of some broad-spectrum mass voter fraud... all in support of the continued "Lie of the Century": that the 2020 election was somehow "stolen" from Trump.

Were there voting irregularities in 2020? Sure! There always are! But there were FEWER in 2020 than there were in 2016 (broadly speaking) - even though millions more people voted in 2020 vs 2016.

Did the Election Commission overstep their authority to allow these nursing home residents to vote? Maybe - but that's for the attorneys and a judge to decide.

BTW: When these things have been brought up and heard in OTHER states, the judges - many of whom are Republican appointments - have ruled that there were "exigent circumstances" and found no evidence of fraud or other illegality.

That's not to say a Wisconsin judge might differ... but you'd think the Tumpites would tire of wasting money on attorneys at this point!

As for @raphjd's other attempts to provoke me back into an "insult war", I'll defer... I'm not that bored tonight...

@kekkaishi said in $10mil "reverse" discrimination win:

@bi4smooth Good for him. Did they tell him outright that they wanted a woman to replace him?

They argued (in court) that it wasn't because she was a woman, but because of WHO she was... but that was easily refuted by their own communications with my Dad. They were eager to hire a woman - any woman - and this woman wanted to work HERE!

One of the reasons my dad's next job paid so well was because they also (in addition to paying) had to release him from his non-compete... so he went to work for a competitor!

@rnd256 said in Why is everything new being deleted from the "Fan Sites" category?:

• I know some of the uploaders spend a lot of time and effort to put together your torrents. It really is appreciated by the community - thank you!!

I was remiss in not also expressing my sincere appreciation for ALL uploaders! Even if your content isn't my cup-o-tea, or is removed for whatever reason, I know it takes a LOT of time to properly upload a torrent!

I thank you, thank you, thank you!

@massafera said in Why is everything new being deleted from the "Fan Sites" category?:

@bi4smooth

Lmao you really went off didn't you?

First of all, I'm not demanding anything. I'm not complaining about "the volume of content being uploaded by users". I'm very aware that this is illegal sharing and so are you and guess what, we are both still here. Actually, we are both still here since 2008. I've been contributing with a lot of content here and helping users with their requests since then without expectations.

As I said, if users were choosing to upload fewer files I wouldn't be complaining at all. This is not what this is about and we both know it, so don't try to make it sound like I'm complaining because there aren't 'enough' torrents being posted.

I'm just saying that me, as well as other users, would LIKE TO KNOW why every single file is being deleted, that's all. I was very polite both times I messaged the admins. The only one being agressive and with an attitude for no reason here is you. There's just no need for that.

Anyway, I won't message you anymore. This is not why I created this thread. I'm only going to say that in MY opinion I think it would be fair for the admins to let us know why this is happening. Specially to avoid waste of time to download and upload files that are ALL gonna be removed in a few hours. This is MY opinion. Feel free to not agree with me but don't tell me what I should or shouldn't say. If you can have your opinion on rhat matter, well... So can I.

My apologies if I "went off" on you - but it annoys me when people complain about things they're getting for free. If you honestly want the content that isn't here, pay for it! It's the "sense of entitlement" that riles me - and that comes from my job... sorry if it rubbed off here.

What I was trying to make clear is that the STAFF here aren't taking down videos because they don't like them, or the uploaders, or anything else - with the exception of uploaded content that is barred (like duplicates, and illegal stuff [pedo, snuff, etc. - read the rules yourself])... in fact, you likely can't see it, but there are categories for straight porn here, as well as (nasty to me) scat!

This place goes OUT OF THEIR WAY to allow almost
anything!

@raphjd - a site administrator - confirmed above that the suspicions aired here from the start were correct... the removals are because of DMCA takedown requests.

An argument could be made that, "hey, we know we're "stealing" content here, why not ignore the DMCA requests?" - But the site advertises that copyright holders can request, and they will comply, with valid DMCA takedown requests! They own the site, they make the rules!

Also, as has been pointed out already as well: while the current "fad" seems to be targeting the OF content, they are far from the only content pulled. I have uploaded probablty 2-3 TB of Helix and NextDoor content (my collections there are nearly complete), and another 4-5TB of Sean Cody and Corbin Fisher content (my collections there ARE complete) - and because I post in "collections", they usually get DMCA'd after a month or 2...

But, I get a notice in my mailbox that the content was removed for a DMCA complaint. Also, there's no penalty on here for losing an upload due to a DMCA complaint.

If you are an uploader of OF content and your posts are disappearing -- WITHOUT a note from the staff as to WHY it's gone, -- open a helpdesk ticket! 100% of my uploads that have been taken down in the past have been explained to me why they were removed.

IMHO, the ONLY people due an explanation for removed content are the uploaders themselves. (And in my experience, the staff has always done that for me.)

@raphjd said in $10mil "reverse" discrimination win:

Youtube Video

White male marketing VP fired for being a white male and replaced with 2 women; 1 black and 1 white.

My father won a reverse-discrimination suit in the 1980's. I won't list the company, but it was in the medical industry.

They told him he had to move to keep his job, because they wanted a woman to have his job at this location.

When he refused, they fired him. He got revenge LOL
Especially since his next job paid a LOT MORE!

Hear hear! The staff of this site do a great job!
They deserve a raise! (they're volunteers...)

Double their salaries!

@kekkaishi said in Rules for you, but not for illegals:

Yes. illegals don't have special rights, so you can't enforce vaccine rules, yet democrats support more illegal immegration

The issue is that if Democrats are so concerned about covid, hence the vaccine mandates and lockdowns, then why import more and more illegals that cannot be vetted properly and tested for covid (we all know why....). That is why it's furiating. It's not about covid, it's not about the health of the people or their safety, it's about taking control of the individual's freedom and mindset.

It is ridiculous to say that even Dems are inviting illegal immigration... do they want looser laws (stupidly!)? yes... but "open borders" is something only the ultra-far-left (AOC crazies anyone?) are in favor of...

Dems are not "importing illegals" - remember that Biden's southern-border strategy isn't very different at all from Trump's! (Lots of finger-pointing pre-election, and ass-covering post-election! - As I've said repeatedly: it's easy to point fingers at the ones in power, when you're NOT in power and say "that sucks" - it's another thing entirely when you're the one in power and have to have (and implement) a "better solution"!)

To be clear: I'm not supporting the Dems in their desires to increase immigration - but I'm not going to make absurd claims against them either!

@raphjd said in Minnesota surgeon fired from hospital for saying parents, not government, .....:

@lololulu19

Minnesota got loaded up with Somalis by the Obama Admin. There are several places around the US that had this happen, though most are smaller places, so the burden of the forced Somali relocations was even harder on them.

Obama and Co lied, when they promised to support the places they dumped off these "refugees". NOPE, instead, they dropped them off and told the local governments "Here they are ya bitches. Now take care of them and leave us alone".

I'd love to see that memo - was it on White House stationery?

Oh the look on their face when they learned they'd been horns-waggled by the Dems again! Oh wait, that's Minnesota? Yeah - mostly Dems there anyway... they get what they deserve!

@raphjd said in Rules for you, but not for illegals:

Biden and Co has put in stricter rules for people coming into the US.

If you come into the US from another country, even if you are a US citizen, you must be fully vaccinated and have had a negative test in the previous 72 hours.

Illegals are exempt from these rules. They are also exempt from the other vaccine mandates.

I self-identify as an illegal so I have more rights and privileges than US (as well as every other country in the "west") citizens.

You moron - Illegals don't have special rights! They don't come in legally to begin with, so how would you propose to enforce these vaccination rules? If we can catch them before they enter illegally, then they most certainly DO have to meet the same rules.

Did you know that people who steal cars AREN'T PENALIZED for failing to register them in 30-days? (OUTRAGEOUS to an idiot like you, but to regular people, we understand that they'll be prosecuted for the auto theft,. not the failure to register)

BTW: Is it fair that people who are biologically men, but have no Y chromosome don't have to pay taxes in @Raphjd's town? They also get gov't paid for Free Beer!

SPOILER: Being "biologically male" means you have a Y Chromosome... someone without that chromosome is biologically female... so, 100% of the 0 people who qualify get those benefits in @Raphjd's town!

I could as a teen - and it earned me about $5k in college tuition money (I did some porn)... I could get about half into my mouth comfortably - if I pushed hard, I could get to the root!

I could suck myself off back then - these days (maybe because of that) I'm VERY hard to get off orally.

I lost the ability to suck myself in my 30's....

@lololulu19 said in Black TX school shooter was a drug dealer, not victim:

@raphjd it is possible you are Bi4smooth's momma.

In the bible, Moses was found floating in a river as a baby.
Likewise, it is possible that you took a big shit, and when you flushed it, it wound up in a river, someone scooped it up and raised it as Bi4smooth. Your excrement waste could be B4S.

I frequently warn people that males can get pregnant from anal sex. The only thing is, almost all the resulting babies grow up to be cops or lawyers.

@lololulu19 Are you off your meds?