Posts made by Spintendo

@asdfghqwer:

What I want is a program I can install that will let one player's audio continue to play through the speakers, but send the audio of another program to the headphones."

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-pictures/output-to-2-sound-cards-simultaneously/4e57dd01-a68c-4ffe-af3e-66d7f895584b?page=3

@alienyjena:

my downloading rights are taken, so can't seed anything.."

The ability to seed exists regardless of ability to download.

@alienyjena:

is there a place where i can request people to download my file?"

This site, with torrents posted and reposted in cyclicality everyday, already serves as that place. What's needed for you more than a 'place' is a 'people'.

Seeding a torrent that no one is downloading is like announcing your file's availability to an empty room. If the torrent is dead, you need to continue the cycle by re-uploading it. This will announce the file anew, and to a much greater audience.

@Spintendo:

This must be due to our changing ideas about what’s public and what’s private. The concept of nudity in today's society is less private than it used to be."

And seeming to confirm my assertion that today's societal concept of nudity is changing, was this article in yesterday's New York Times:

Shirtless Goes the City
By Guy Trebay of The New York Times
July 31, 2013

California strikes. Manhattan is becoming Malibu. Once, in the long-gone “Mad Men” days, it was considered de rigueur for New Yorkers to wear a hat and gloves in town. Now dress codes have devolved to the point where folks wear fleecy slippers on the subway, flip-flops to the ballet, running tights for every occasion, repurposed pajamas as daywear and, recently, very little at all.

We are referring here to a curious trend among men in the city to go walking about without shirts. Note, for instance, recent tabloid pictures showing Orlando Bloom strolling through TriBeCa with his dog on a leash and son in a stroller. The British actor was dressed in shower shoes, a baseball cap and cargo shorts slung low enough to brand-check his red briefs and to see a solar tattoo inked south of his navel. And that was about all.

Sure it was hot. Temperatures had been hovering in the 90s for seven days running. Furnace blasts radiated off sidewalks. To stand on a subway platform felt like getting too close to a Weber grill. Naked above the waist, Mr. Bloom was doing what a sensible person might to stay cool, if that person lived on the Pacific Coast Highway and was headed to Malibu Country Mart for an iced cappuccino. But Mr. Bloom was not in the 90265 ZIP code. And historically, inhabitants even of laid-back 10013 have not been in the habit of walking around semi-naked. Those were the old days, a time before everywhere one went in the city men saw men who’d lost their shirts.

There, on Bastille Day, was a shirtless guy checking out the windows at Bergdorf Goodman; there, on Lafayette Street one Tuesday morning, ambled a shirtless shopper hauling Urban Outfitter bags; there, on the R train, was a rider wearing nothing but jeans and sandals; there, on Astor Place, a cluster of topless men flaunting their abs and pecs.

“I was on my way to the bank and I saw not one, not two, but three guys” walking shirtless across Eighth Street, said Rob Morea, a personal trainer and an owner of Great Jones Fitness in NoHo. As might be expected of someone in his line of work, Mr. Morea’s own physique resembles that of a bendable action figure. Despite that, he would never go shirtless in New York, he said. “It doesn’t feel right. It’s like going to a business meeting in your underwear.”

It is all a predictable part of the dressing-down of America, said Patricia Mears, deputy director of the Museum at the Fashion Institute of Technology. “It’s great we live in a democratic society, but we’ve lost all sense of decorum and occasion,” Ms. Mears said. “To be on Fifth Avenue is now about the same as being on the Coney Island boardwalk.” To display your unclad torso on Fifth Avenue is also, she added, to give proof of the proposition that in the evolutionary arc of masculinity, men are no longer the oglers; they are the object of the gaze.

Signs of this are everywhere: on Broadway, where male frontal nudity is now so commonplace it evokes fewer cries of outrage than yawns; on television, where bare-chested male stars are standard fare both on shows like “Hawaii Five-O,” where shirtless himbos might be expected, and on series like “Chicago Fire”; and in advertising, where male pulchritude is used to hawk everything from Diet Coke to salad dressing.

And yet what’s disorienting about all the peekaboo, said Ms. Mears, is “a blurring of lines,” of decorum and the demarcation between public and private space, lines crossed long ago in places like Southern California, where sweat pants are more common than suits and no one thinks twice about wearing a bikini to go to the mall. “Reality TV has had an effect here,” Ms. Mears said. “I don’t know if there’s much distinction anymore between what you see on television and what we used to call reality.”

In her own New York childhood, the only acceptable urban setting for a shirtless man might have been a city beach, Ms. Mears, 52, added. Certainly in an era that now seems definitively kaput, it would have been unthinkable for a man in possession of his senses to walk up Madison Avenue, New York’s great retailing rialto, shirtless on a Friday afternoon. Yet there on a recent steamy day was Jean-Luc Constant, a boxer and model, standing bare-chested outside the Ralph Lauren store. If Mr. Constant’s state of semi-undress did provoke some perplexity among passers-by, he himself was fully nonchalant.

“Maybe it’s because of my profession,” he said. “I don’t really mind being naked at all.”

A Rainbow Over Catholic Colleges
By Kyle Spencer of The New York Times
July 30, 2013

“COME out of the closet in style!” read the poster, and on a crisp fall day, dozens of students on Georgetown’s Red Square did, metaphorically at least. They formed a winding conga line and sashayed through a life-size closet door. That afternoon, they gathered for same-sex smooching in a campus “kiss-in.” The day’s events were part of “OUTober,” a month jam-packed with celebrations related to all things L.G.B.T.Q., or lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning. “Every month is a good month to be gay at Georgetown,” said Thomas Lloyd, president of the campus pride group. Indeed, there’s a Gender Liberation Week, Gay Pride Month, a popular drag ball called Genderfunk and a Lavender graduation ceremony attended by the university president.

Not so long ago, relations between the university and its gay students were strained. In 1980, the students had to sue for equal privileges for their organizations. In 2007, they stormed the steps of Healy Hall, protesting what they saw as an inadequate response to antigay incidents. And a 2008 survey found that 61 percent of students thought homophobia was an issue. That year, the administration began to address the problem, opening an L.G.B.T.Q. resource center with a full-time staff. Further honing its current image as a gay-friendly campus, in March Nate Tisa became Georgetown’s first openly gay student body president. Mr. Tisa, who clocked numerous hours at church retreats and religious summer camps as a boy in Rochester, N.Y., has called on the university to lead the church toward a new interpretation of homosexuality. “Society is changing,” Mr. Tisa wrote in The Hoya, Georgetown’s student newspaper, “and God is in that change — do not reject it.”

As the national gay rights movement touches down in state legislatures, the Supreme Court and even the Boy Scouts, it is also being felt at many of the nation’s 267 Roman Catholic colleges and universities, where students and administrators are grappling with what it means to be young, gay and Catholic in 2013. Perhaps nowhere has the movement been more visible than at the country’s oldest Catholic university.

“Georgetown has made a huge commitment to its L.G.B.T.Q. community,” said Shane Windmeyer, executive director of Campus Pride, a national nonprofit group. “It has a history. It has a past. But today it is pushing the needle forward.”

The support for gay students has elicited nods of approval from many alumni, but it has agitated others. Some say that Georgetown is losing sight of its Catholic mission and has become a hotbed for viewpoints that conflict with church teachings. “The Catechism of the Catholic Church” says to “respect” homosexuals — an attitude suggested by Pope Francis in his remarks this week regarding gay priests. But it denounces homosexual sex as “contrary to the natural law”; homosexuality is thus, some argue, not part of God’s plan. Shortly after Mr. Tisa’s victory, William Peter Blatty, the octogenarian author of “The Exorcist,” and Manuel A. Miranda, a fellow alumnus, circulated a petition and 198-page memorandum condemning Georgetown for promoting a culture of “moral relativism” and an ideology of “radical autonomy.” More than 2,000 alumni have signed the petition, which was sent in May to Cardinal Donald W. Wuerl, archbishop of Washington. The petition calls on the archbishop to better regulate the university or strip it of its Catholic identity, an unlikely but technically possible outcome.

“The petition’s primary aim is very much akin to pressuring someone that you love very much into going into rehab,” Mr. Blatty wrote me in an e-mail. He has deep roots at Georgetown. He attended on full scholarship, set his blockbuster horror story on campus and named his new watchdog group, the Father King Society to Make Georgetown Honest, Catholic and Better, after the late Thomas M. King, a beloved theology professor. Other groups, too, have made it their business to monitor Catholic colleges. The Fellowship of Catholic Scholars was critical of Notre Dame for inviting President Obama, who supports abortion rights, to give a commencement address. The Cardinal Newman Society, founded in 1993 by a Fordham University alumnus, has attacked Boston College for turning a blind eye when students distribute condoms and DePaul University for allowing a production of “The Vagina Monologues.” The Cardinal Newman Society has also taken aim at Georgetown for Genderfunk. This year, a male student went as a high-heeled Mary and danced to Madonna’s “Like a Virgin” while Jesus (a woman) looked on.

Several pages of the Georgetown memorandum are dedicated to Mr. Tisa, his “irrepressible and well-trained gay agenda” and his attempts at “cleverly redefining what Catholic means.” Cardinal Wuerl declined to comment, but Rachel Pugh, a Georgetown spokeswoman, pointed to the university’s two required theology classes and up to seven Sunday Masses at the main chapel as evidence that it is deeply connected to its Catholic identity. The university also organizes church retreats and regular Eucharistic adoration ceremonies. Dozens of priests live on campus and serve as spiritual mentors.

“Our Catholic and Jesuit identity on campus has never been stronger,” Ms. Pugh said. “Academically, we remain committed to the Catholic intellectual tradition.”

Many students have an entirely secular experience at Georgetown. Sitting on a knoll overlooking the Potomac River, the university is a magnet for political junkies wanting access to the Capitol. But the obsession with politics is only part of the Georgetown story. Half of undergraduates identify as Catholic. The university’s religious underpinnings are embedded in its philosophy, and so, too, is what some students refer to as “the God conversation,” a dialogue about Jesuit values that regularly arises inside and outside of class. The Jesuit educational model created by St. Ignatius of Loyola has a distinctly humanist bent. Todd A. Olson, Georgetown’s dean of students, says he is confident that providing gay students support, freedom of expression and a place to celebrate who they are does not conflict with the university’s Jesuit heritage. He cites cura personalis, the Jesuit tenet that loosely translates into care of the whole person, saying that Georgetown has an obligation to concern itself with the well-being of all its students.

“What is important and what is behind that is that each person has individual needs,” Dr. Olson said. “It’s not a one-size-fits-all approach.”

The university, he said, is careful not to take positions or advocate behavior that contradicts church teachings. The resource center, for example, does not distribute condoms or provide safe-sex counseling. Its guides are Pope John Paul II’s 1990 document outlining administrators’ roles and responsibilities and a sister report, released in 1999 by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, exploring how the Pope’s words ought to be applied. The latter document urges administrators to “enjoy institutional autonomy” and foster academic debate but to consistently uphold teachings about homosexuality, abortion, family planning and premarital sex. These seemingly contradictory missions have caused tension in recent years, particularly as Catholic institutions seek to educate and protect the health of their students, many of whom are sexually active.

LAST year, Ryan Fecteau became the first openly gay speaker of the General Assembly at the Catholic University of America, which is run by the church. Mr. Fecteau spent much of his term urging the administration to recognize the university’s gay-alliance group. Ultimately, administrators denied the request, counterarguing that a gay advocacy group really wasn’t part of the Catholic mission. He says he achieved a partial victory: a universitywide debate on the issue. Mr. Fecteau is one of a growing band of student leaders who are Catholic, gay and seeking institutional changes through a mix of political maneuvering and theological debate.

In 2011, students at DePaul, the largest Catholic university in the country, elected Anthony Alfano as its first openly gay student body president. Mr. Alfano lobbied successfully for a resource center and also worked to raise awareness about high suicide rates among young gay Catholics. Gay leaders at Our Lady of the Lake University in San Antonio last year persuaded administrators to alter the code of conduct to include language condemning violence stemming from sexual orientation. During his sophomore year as vice speaker of the student senate and his junior year as speaker, Mr. Tisa helped produce a report on the challenges that incoming gay students face when they arrive. While students found a welcoming environment in the L.G.B.T.Q. Resource Center, with its beanbags, Diet Cokes and lots of students to share thoughts with, Georgetown was still a scary place to come out. Some complained of intolerant, sometimes verbally abusive roommates, and resident assistants unskilled at addressing altercations.

The report proposed several initiatives — a gender-neutral dorm and a Safe Spaces program that would designate rooms on every dorm floor where gay and minority students could retreat if needed. Last spring, Mr. Tisa began vigorously pushing for both. There are other issues on his agenda. At the last student government meeting of the school year, Mr. Tisa and his cabinet members gathered in their usual conference room, decorated with a basketball net, ratty couch and long wood table on which sat a copy of “The Politics of the Presidency.” Mr. Tisa polished off a slice of cold pizza before launching into a discussion on several green initiatives and a report outlining ways to make the campus friendlier for students with disabilities. One cabinet member suggested that a neighborhood cleanup drive, intended to soothe perennially tense community relations, had gone so well they might do them more often. Mr. Tisa shook his head an emphatic “no,” adding dryly of the neighbors, “I don’t want them to get too dependent.”

Later, I asked Mr. Tisa about the petition sitting on the archbishop’s desk. Had he been offended by the remarks about him? “No,” he said dispassionately. “They just don’t get it.” Many of Georgetown’s straight students say they are proud of the university’s work on behalf of gay students, largely because they see it as a civil rights issue. Maggie Cleary, a senior and former head of the Georgetown University College Republicans, said she thought it was important for gay students to feel welcome on campus and for those who might not have a lot of experience with openly gay people to be exposed to them.

According to a recent Quinnipiac poll, 62 percent of 18- to 34-year-old Catholics favor legalizing same-sex marriage, compared with 48 percent of those 35 to 54, and 39 percent 55 and over. But in a much-talked-about opinion piece in April in The Hoya, titled “Marriage an Institution Defined by Procreation,” Andrew Schilling, a government major from Iowa, argued in support of the church’s stance on homosexuality. “True compassion for our L.G.B.T. friends,” he wrote, did not mean turning “marriage into a legal tool for social inclusion.”

Mr. Schilling said he was chastised for his opinions. “I can feel like my voice is being silenced,” he said.

Asked about this, Mr. Tisa said he thought it was crucial that all students express themselves on these issues. Still, he said, for gay students, certain viewpoints can be difficult to hear. “For a lot of people these are not abstract debates,” he said. “They’re personal.” At a Formica table in his split-level dorm suite, wearing khakis and a Georgetown sweatshirt, Mr. Tisa was eager to discuss his own coming out. He attended a Jesuit high school, where, tall and broad-shouldered, he played football. Early on, he began to suspect he was gay. It was as tortuous internally as it was externally. Would he have to choose between God and a happy life?

His faith had brought him strength as a child dealing with his parents’ divorce. Once again, he found solace in prayer, and in conversations with other Catholics. The first person he shared his story with was a layperson he had grown close to during weekend youth retreats. “She said, ‘I love you. God loves you. And I’m here for you,’ ” he recalled. “Then we cried.” That encounter, he said, reminded him that Catholic teachings were “based on love, not condemnation. I really wanted to be part of that,” he said.

During Thanksgiving break his freshman year, Mr. Tisa broke the news to his parents. This past year, he wrote an opinion piece telling the entire campus. “Baby, we were born this way,” he proclaimed, calling on Georgetown to become a voice for a new Catholicism, one that supports the entirety of a gay person’s life. Diane Butler Bass, author of “Christianity After Religion,” says many gay students find it too painful to stay in the church. “Those who do,” she said, “remain because there is something about the church they find beautiful and soothing. And they end up determining for themselves the things that they believe are central to being Catholic.”

Kimberly Blair, a gay junior from Atlanta, remembers the discomfort she felt at a Bible study group freshman year. Club members were reading from the Book of Leviticus and discussing the morality of homosexuality: If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.
“I was sitting in the front row and I honestly started crying.” she said.

Mr. Lloyd, the pride group president, says he is often tempted to join the more tolerant Episcopal Church. But for many young Catholics, particularly of Irish or Italian descent, Catholicism is interchangeable with identity. “You stay Catholic because you have a love of the institution and you want to change it,” he said. It has taken Mr. Tisa years of reflection to work through how his sexual orientation and his Catholic faith can coexist. He refuses to accept that his relationship with another man is “intrinsically disordered,” as described in church catechism. And he is quite sure of this: “God is not a child in a sandbox, making sculptures and throwing them away.”

It is a message he is intent on spreading across campus with evangelical verve. As he often tells students: “We need to bring the Catholic identity into the 21st century.” Can he do that from his perch at Georgetown? “Yes,” Mr. Tisa said. “I have a lot of faith.”

@D12345:

"What a shame all the new videos have this flaw."

In recent decades there has been a clear trend in the sex media towards less hair. Looking specifically at gay porn you see a lot of hair through the 70s and 80s; then starting around the 90s to the present you see a steady trend toward less and less hair.

My guess is that this trend in porn is heavily influenced by the exact same trend over those same years in the public sector with regards to shaving acceptance. This must be due to our changing ideas about what’s public and what’s private. The concept of nudity in today's society is less private than it used to be.

When women’s clothing began showing bare arms and legs in the 1920s, leg and underarm shaving followed soon after. So nowadays even though not every woman shaves their legs and armpits, most do. As nudity continues to be more of a public thing in today's world — nude beaches, nudity in film — I’m not surprised to see that trend accelerating…. it’s probably here to stay.  :cool2:

Britain legalizes gay marriage / Queen Elizabeth II gives Royal Assent

House of Commons Speaker John Bercow told lawmakers on Wednesday that gay marriage had become enshrined in law— the day after the bill to legalize same-sex marriage in England and Wales cleared Parliament.

The Queen's approval of the Marriage (same sex couples) Bill was a formality, and now clears the way for the first gay marriages, the first of which are expected to be conducted by Summer 2014.

The bill enables gay couples to get married in both civil and religious ceremonies in England and Wales. It also will allow couples who had previously entered into a civil partnership to convert their relationship to a marriage.

However, religious organizations will have to 'opt in' on performing gay marriages.

The British government introduced the bill in January and proposals were finally approved by MPs and peers on Tuesday.

Prime Minister David Cameron had backed it, but it divided his Conservative Party and touched off strident debates in the House of Commons and House of Lords.

from Heather Saul, The Independant

@leatherbear:

Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council in Washington, suggests it’s too soon to conclude that same-sex marriage won’t be harmful to society:

“As the American people are given time to experience the actual consequences of redefining marriage, the public debate and opposition to the redefinition of natural marriage will undoubtedly intensify.”

Mr. Perkins is a poster child for life lived under a rock.

Gay Couples Who Sued in California Are Married
By JENNIFER MEDINA of The New York Times
June 28, 2013

SAN FRANCISCO — The two couples who sued to overturn California’s ban on same-sex marriage were married late Friday afternoon, just hours after the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, lifted the stay that had been in place.

The court had stopped same-sex marriages while the case wound its way through the Supreme Court, which issued its decision to clear the path for same-sex marriages in California on Wednesday. Attorney General Kamala Harris rushed to San Francisco City Hall within minutes of the ruling to perform the wedding for Kris Perry and Sandy Stier, who have been together for more than 15 years and have four sons.

Many legal experts and advocates had expected the court to wait for an official decision from the Supreme Court, as is the normal practice. But after the initial ruling was issued on Wednesday, Ms. Harris urged the Circuit Court to act immediately and said she would ensure that all counties in the state were prepared to issue licenses to same-sex couples.

Just after 3 p.m. Friday, the three-judge panel issued a one-sentence ruling lifting the stay on a district judge’s injunction to not enforce the ban on same-sex marriages. Gov. Jerry Brown issued a statement late Friday afternoon saying that he had directed the state’s Department of Health to notify all 58 counties in the state that “same-sex marriage is now legal in California and that marriage licenses must be issued to same-sex couples immediately.”

@leatherbear:

The risk of slowly breaking him into Spanking and Discipline considering his bad past experience could be dangerous for your relationship and his mental well being."

This observation is a prescient example of the illuminating effects of pure reason: a likely-cause and effect circumstance that when identified, most reasonably-aware people would immediately take notice of and show caution for. Anyone that is except Spankofakes, who sees this detail not merely as an obstacle to his own pleasure, but more as an unsightly and inconvenient delay, one destined to be overcome by any means and as quickly as possible.

As time-consuming as that task likely was, if he proved successful in the end Spankofakes could of taken-to-heart one singular fact of comfort:  That his unfortunate boyfriend should fail to discover for himself the oncoming spectacle planned of poor foresight and accompanied by venal self-introspection, is plainly but true testament to the powers of his own persuasion.

Mozel Tov!

@Spintendo:

A bench trial may have been the better choice

Actually no trial would have been the better choice. This is at best a civil tort, and not a criminal matter.

@MrMazda:

an accused person is allegedly supposed to be considered "innocent until proven guilty"

The 'innocence' as used in innocent until proven guilty should be seen as an adverb (a person's status during trial) and not as an adjective (a person's ultimate state of being as innocent of any crime). As an adverb, the presumption of innocence requires that any person who makes an allegation be the one responsible for 'proving' it. That same presumption protects the person who is denying an allegation from having to 'prove' anything, since the presumption lays with them.

@MrMazda:

Because of a biased jury, it is very well possible that I could end up going back to jail"

A bench trial may have been the better choice (I know, I know, hindsight is always 20/20)…. but I agree with you that the details of this case were just too complex and multifaceted for a group of lay person's to decide.

Somewhere, deep inside his tomb in the Panthéon I suppose, Voltaire is proclaiming "Enfin il est arrivé!"

@weetabix:

I personally do not appreciate false information, which is what it is. Just put the clip up with the facts and leave people to make up their own fantasies if they wish!"

Even though this thread is 531 days old, I think Weetabix has misunderstood a key point about these "misleading" descriptions.

Suspension of disbelief is an essential ingredient for any kind of fiction. In order to be entertained with porn, the viewer has to ignore the reality that they are viewing two or more paid actors performing simulated sex acts on the screen and temporarily accept as reality the video's fictional narrative.

As Weetabix rightly mentioned, there is a segment of the population that takes enjoyment from the idea of incestuous sex. For this narrative to work in porn, the viewer is helped by believing that what they read in the video description is true within the reality of the video's fictional world. It is through the torrent's "misleading" description of incestuous sex that an internally consistent fictional world is created to help make that belief possible – a description most likely written not by the torrent's uploader, but by people closer to the video's original source and simply pasted into the description by the uploader.

manhunt.net
gayromeo.com
gayroyal.com
grindr.com
growlrapp.com
adam4adam.com
gkiss.com
gaycupid.com
mancrunch.com
planetromeo.com
boyahoy.com
atraf.com
benderapp.com *
jackd.mobi *
misterapp.com *
staggapp.com *
gethornet.com *

• mobile app only

@trukr:

where the head of the penis isn't divided/indented/cleft on the backside. Looks like the term might be glans meatal cleft"

There was a post last year about glans-related enhancement issues i'm remembering, about HA gel injections

https://forum.gaytorrent.ru/index.php?topic=17414.msg77985#msg77985

@trukr:

So maybe he shouldn't worry about explaining it then. "

Not giving explanations while also not wanting to get questions is a bold move, wanting to eat your cake and have it too. Bold moves often win the day. As there's nothing to suggest it wouldn't provide him occassional success, he should use it as often as he likes. People can also be given an opportunity to do more and give more if they know more. 

On second thought, I think Ayn Rand contemplates the more superior action plan when compared with Kübler-Ross's:

Do not let your fire go out, spark by irreplaceable spark, in the hopeless swamps of the approximate, the not-quite, the not-yet, the not-at-all. Do not let the hero in your soul perish, in lonely frustration for the life you deserved, but have never been able to reach. Check your road and the nature of your battle. The world you desired can be won, it exists, it is real, it is possible, it's yours.

@Spintendo:

Only when they pass the third level do they―and by extension all Americans―gain remedy. They might finish by July 2013."

During oral arguments this week, the three different pathways of resolution open in the Prop 8 case were illuminated by the justices, through the types of questions they asked. This graphic shows those pathways.

Adam Liptak and Alicia Parlapiano / NYTimes

@charlesperr:

He doesn't want to have to explain to everyone he sleeps with whats wrong. He's into random sex and doesn't want relationship sex only. "

Acceptance is like relationship currency, purchased and sold by each person in all relationships, big and small, and the cost is factored by time invested.

The acceptance that family members give each other is based on time invested that measures into years, and as such, is vast, unending, and emotionally expensive. The acceptance that two people on a one nite stand give each other is on the opposite side of that spectrum—barely any—because the time invested is measured in hours. Emotionally speaking, this makes short-term and one-nite stand relationships the better bargain.

The acceptance that he wants from the people he chooses to spend time with will be offered in much the same way, a relationship where acceptance is wholly dependent on how much time both participants see fit to purchase.

@charlesperr:

he has seen many docs but nothing further can be done to revise it. "

His hypospadias is not a functional disorder, but a medical one that has treatment options. But if he's exhausted every conceivable one then his only remaining option according to Külbler-Ross is acceptance – undoubtedly, a most-protracted and difficult stage to get to – but one he can with support.

hxxps://facebook.com/Hypospadiasgroup

@Speedmaster8:

there are so much studios and sites,  I really would appreciate, if the upload rules would contain a point, where abbreviations should be avoided, in order to prevent any confusion and guesswork."

The use of studio acronyms can be a very effective mnemonic device to assist in locating media files. Once you are familiar with the major studios, information about their videos can be stored in long-term memory in a structured fashion – with elements of knowledge chained together and organized in schemata related to a studio's variegated themes (the look of the actors used and the well-recognized feel and tone of their videos). For them to become useful to you, it is important to actively interact with each studio as an identity, forming a representation in your mind of whom these studios are, and what themes they represent.

Up till now, the main obstacle for you in familiarizing yourself with studios has been that they change too often. But I have found this not to be the case. Of the three elements used to identify any media– the studio's name, the video's name, or an actor's stage name– it is the studio's name that most often remains a constant. Granted, new studios come and go, but the frequency is not that great– meaning you can count on knowledge of a studio's identity being useful to you for 2 or more years.

With this identity in place, I can move quickly through a database's title-only page, either selecting or disregarding each torrent based on my own _pre–_understanding of what content is likely to be found. For instance, while perusing the list, I am able to disregard everything labled "TT" because my _pre–_understanding of Tim Tales identity as a studio makes it unlikely I'll appreciate those torrents and their contents. This process merely saves seconds off my search, but these seconds add up to wasted time and bandwidth in unnecessary page requests for media that I am not interested in. Efficient ways of navigating media is the better use of everyone's time.