• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. raphjd
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 1
    • Followers 35
    • Topics 2702
    • Posts 12779
    • Best 807
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 2

    Posts made by raphjd

    • RE: Rape claims

      Come on, let's stop deluding ourselves.

      We all know that ALL LIVES MATTER is deemed to be extremely racist by modern liberals.  When modern liberals hear that, their brain tells them we said KILL ALL N*GGERS.

      As already pointed out, WHITE LIVES MATTER despite being the most accurate when it comes to police shootings, when compared to crime figures, would be deemed extremely racist.    Nothing can ever be "white".

      You can't have Miss White America, but you can have Miss every other race America.  I was told that the reason we can't have Miss White America is because we already have Miss America.  When I explained that the same applies to other races, I was called a racist.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Rape claims

      The problem is, if you show that BLM is a bunch of shit, you are a racist.  It's like disagreeing with feminism makes you a sexist.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Rape claims

      BLM's entire narrative and "facts" are proven bunches of shit.

      The FBI and Justice Depart stats prove it's nothing but shit, but like feminism, fuck the truth.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Opression - SJWs vs reality

      I know rape has been redefined.  Everything is now rape.

      Rape is still a very gendered thing, especially on college campuses.  A girl merely needs to have been within 5 miles of booze and she's deemed unable to have been able to give consent.  A guy gets passed out drunk and he can somehow rape a girl, even though she bragged about it.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Opression - SJWs vs reality

      Ok, so 1 leftist so far is too cowardly to defend his fellow leftists.

      Are there any leftists with the balls to defend the bullshit from their side?

      We know that RoyalCrown89 has defended free speech from his fellow leftist.  That is refreshing to see.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • Opression - SJWs vs reality

      Oppression is very, very real.

      Let's look at how the SJWs view it vs what it's actually like.

      SJWs changed the definition of various words like "racism" to include things like "power" and other things to claim that only whites can be racist, that only men can be sexist, yada, yada, yada.

      As we saw with Berkeley over the last few years, blacks have had the power of the US Justice Depart., the state of California, the city of Berkeley and the police when pulling their racist shit against whites.    In their "white people go around" action, the police were there to prevent uppity crackers from trying to force their way across the bride rather than forced to walk through the creek, as the non white (mostly blacks) demanded they do.  If white people tried this shit, they would have been arrested and declared "racists".

      Evergreen College had what would be deemed "racist" incidents if whites had done the same thing, but leftist justify the actions since blacks and their cucks were doing it.  Imagine if a band of whites and their self hating black cucks roved around the college campus with baseball bats looking for disobedient blacks.  Imagine if whites held a day where blacks were banned from the campus.  Imagine if white students held the black college president hostage and refused to let him go to the bathroom and told him to piss himself.

      BLM can block highways and refuse to let ambulances through, killing at least 1 child that we know about.  The chant about killing cops.  Their entire mantra is based in blatant lies.  This gets them invited with honors to the White House by Obama.

      Imagine if a gang of 4 whites kidnapped, with pre planning, a mentally disabled black young man and live streamed it for several hours making racist comments.  Do we think that white CNN hosts and their guests would screech "IT AINT NO HATE CRIME!!!".    Do you honestly believe that "real news" would totally ignore the story for at least 2 days hoping it would go away?!

      Imagine if a gang of whites filmed themselves dragging an elderly black guy out of his car and beating the shit out of him and stealing his car.  Do you think any "real news" outlet would be saying "Aw, poor, poor black people,  BOO HOO".  Like above, do you think "real news" would totally ignore this story until it got too big to ignore any longer?

      If a white guy shoots up a black church, we never hear the end of it.  A black guy shoots up a white church and "real news" ignores the story.

      If non whites are getting death threats by supposed "alt-right" supporter(s), the "real news" jumps on the story immediately to demonize all whites, but especially all white men.  Once it's proven that it's a false flag by a black guy, "real news" drops the story like it never existed.

      A black church being hate graffitied is immediately reported by "real news" who then go on screeching about how evil all whites, but especially all white men are.  Once it's proven that a black guy is the asshole doing the false flag, "real news" pretends like the story never existed.

      Imagine 4 white girls getting on a bus, starting shit with everyone else already on the bus.  The white girls scream that they were the innocent victims and targeted simply because they are white.    Imagine that "real news" jumps on the story with nothing more than the cries of victimhood.  Now imagine that once the CCTV videos are released the white girls are proven to be the aggressors, not the victim and the "real news" completely drops the story without correcting the story.

      Imagine some white Christian had hate graffittied on her car.  The "real media" jump on the story and scream "bigotry".  Now imagine that CCTV from the store nearby proved she did it herself.  The "real news" immediately drop the story, letting the false narrative remain.

      Leftists screech "JUST BELIEVE" despite the fact that countless stories have been proven to be fake.

      We're told that NO ONE, but especially women (quite sexist, if you ask me), lie about being raped.  The same goes with being victims of any other type of "victimhood" crime.    Lacy Green infamously was shown to have raped 4 million people, including myself.    We've had countless fake hate crimes, including "homophobic" ones.  Even after the Tawana Brawley case back in the 1980s (claimed she was gang raped by white cops, who then wrote "nigger" on her chest in dog shit), people are still demanding that we "just believe".  Even after Duke Lacrosse, mattress girl, Jackie at UVA, and countless others, we are still supposed to "just believe" if they are in a "victim" group.

      If a white person is the victim, even with mountains of proof, we're supposed to ignore it, especially if the victimizer is of a group that is always deemed as victims.  Leftists demand that we ignore it because it makes the "real" victims look bad.

      Women groping men, is empowering women, but those same women are just acting out their victimhood and oppression.

      Feminists, while screeching about gender equality, love to brag how perfect women are.  They love to show that not a single women in India has ever commit any form of domestic violence.  What they will refuse to tell you is that under India's laws, women CAN NOT commit any form of domestic violence.

      Similar things with sex crimes, especially rape.  In the UK for example, to commit the most serious types of sex crimes, you must have a penis, even if the penis isn't used in the act.    Shove a broom handle up someone's ass against their will, it's only rape if you are male.  It's sexual assault for you are female.  The same with most other types of sex crimes.  In India, women CAN NOT commit any form of sex crime.  Israel and several other countries are similar.

      Feminists have fought in the UK and around the world to maintain their privileges, while screeching like lunatics on how oppressed they are.

      Males are toxic.  Everything about being male is evil.    Nothing about being female is deemed toxic.  Everything "toxic" a female might do is solely due to toxic males.    Women are the main killers of their kids, blame men.  Mary Kay Letourneau fucked a 10yo boy and only spent 3 months in jail.  Blame males, even though it was a female judge.  MKL got out of jail and continued fucking the child.  She went back to jail for another 3 years.  AGAIN, blame penis.    MKL, by virtue of having a gash, makes her the victim not the criminal.

      In Portland, during a "protest" to stop people getting to work, a woman punched a man in the face.  He punched back and suddenly she's  a protected class because she has a vag.    She and her cucks demand that the man who hit her back be arrested because she has a vag and you never hit a woman.    The kick in the cunt, in all this, is the bitch does feminism videos talking about how women are equal to men.

      These cunts continued the "protest" when people were coming home from work, shutting down the city, preventing people from getting home.  These fuckers, while claiming to have the moral high group (and covering their faces, as always) thought they had the right to oppress people who had jobs from getting to and from work.

      ++++

      If the leftist on this site do respond, we will get to see some of the total fucking insanity of the left to justify this crap.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Sexual Consent in the Gay Community – have you been...?

      http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/scottish-barmen-banned-wearing-kilts-drunk-women-keep-groping-their-penises-1510817

      You'll find countless articles like this on the internet.

      You will also find countless articles, by feminists, declaring it's ok for women to do this because it's empowering women.  These cunts will justify the double standards with all manner of mental gymnastics.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: If You Found George W. Bush’s Speech Offensive, You’re The Problem, Not Him

      @rapjjd, what kind of wiretaps are you talking about with Obama? He had authority via The Patriot Act, which the American people allowed to pass unless you're talking about something else.

      YES, those.  As well as the other bits included in the Patriot Act and done by executive order.

      Obama campaigned to end all that shit, if elected President.  Obama expanded those program far beyond anything GWB had.

      Obama campaigned against No Bid contracts, except in dire emergency.  I totally agreed with him.    Turns out that was a fucking lie.  He used them for things like routine and scheduled mothballing of ships.    GWB used them for oil fires in Iraq, despite Schlumberger being the best company to do oil fires, giving the contracts to Halliburton.

      The people from what I remember were against most parts of the Patriot Act, as were Obama and Clinton.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Order yours before they run out!

      YouTube just totally removed all the channels of a guy that does historical military combat reviews, claiming the videos are terrorist training videos.

      When was the last time a terrorist dressed up as a 14th century German knight wielding a "skull splitter"?!  Maybe you've seen a terrorist dressed up as one of Gingus Khan's elite horsemen.

      Let's not forget his video showing the construction of a Samurai warrior's suit of armour.

      He went to japan to do a video on how PROPER/real Samurai swords are made.

      YES, all terrorist training videos.

      Of course muslims throwing gays off of rooftops and beheading their enemies and preaching jihad and "death to the west" and shit like that are ok to post to YouTube.  Well, those videos are ok as long as it's "pro islam" and not being critical of their actions.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Isn't PROTESTING a VIOLATION of FREEDOM OF SPEECH?

      I will never change my opinion on this.

      A peaceful protest/counter protest is nothing bad.

      Illegal types of protests are the problem.    NO ONE has the right to use violence/destruction or physical means to prevent others from using their free speech.

      Personally, I think the mayor of Berkeley should be hanged, drawn and quartered in the public square and have his head stuck on a pike for the treasonous acts he has committed against the US Constitution.    He sworn an oath to protect and defend the laws of the land and the constitution, but over the last few years he has clearly violated many of them.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Sexual Consent in the Gay Community – have you been...?

      When I was younger and still went clubbing, I used to get groped by both genders.

      Not surprisingly, women were far, far the worst.    I think this is because women are constantly told they are always the victim and nothing they do can be seen as bad since they are always the victims.

      How many millions of videos, articles and whatnot do we have telling us the women can NOT be sexist (blacks can't be racist, etc) based on nothing more than their genetics.

      I never liked being grabbed, but I would never, ever consider it "rape".

      Hell, there's that video from a couple years ago where some cuck was interviewing some feminist (both sitting on semi facing sofas).  The feminist claimed it was "rape" to speak to a woman without her permission.    Besides the obvious about words being "rape", they never explained how you can get a woman's permission in the first place without raping her by asking her if you can speak to her.

      The "Dear Colleagues" letter from the Obama administration to colleges changed the rules and definitions of what rape was, to include anything and everything.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Order yours before they run out!

      Social media has gotten really odd.    It seems that they can't make up their minds on what exactly is oppression, racism and whatnot.

      The countless videos of muslims throwing gays from rooftops aren't bad, according to the leftist cucks who run social media.    It's only bad when you are critical of the muslims for doing it.

      A video of a black man being critical of BLM, is racist.  A black woman talking about killing whites and cops, is good.

      A woman (don't remember her name, black woman and victim of forced FGM) being against female genital mutilation is bad, Cockroach lady claiming that that same woman should have her vagina taken away is good.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Isn't PROTESTING a VIOLATION of FREEDOM OF SPEECH?

      I agree that Obama tends to get blamed for some things he really wasn't at fault for, such as the economy when he took office.

      HOWEVER, he is guilty of a lot of things, such as lying  his ass off to get elected.  He slagged off GWB (and rightly so) for things like the Patriot Act, warrantless wiretaps, no bid contracts and many, many other things.  Turns out, Obama was nothing more than a liar and far worse than GWB when it came to many of these things.

      When it comes to no bid contracts, they can be acceptable in emergencies, but to simply mothball a ship, isn't one of those times.      The same goes for scheduled maint. on ships.

      Obama used LGBTs as a political ploy to get elected.  Watch his political career and see how he flip flops on the topic depending on the political office he's trying to get.

      Obama, like many other black and/or liberal politicians, race baited things like "hands up, don't shoot" even after the FBI proved they were lies.

      A full look at the FBI and Justice Depart stats, proves BLM is based on nothing but lies and bullshit.    Obama still invited them to the White House, even though we know of at least 1 case where a child was MURDERD by BLM blocking the highway and not letting the ambulance through.    Let's not forget the chants about killing cops.

      Obama, through the Justice Dept's Equalities Division, illegally and dishonestly, changed the way rape and sexual assaults were handled on college campuses.    We went from a court of law to a mentally retarded kangaroo court to persecute young men, because under feminism women didn't have the same rules as men.      A girl is "raped" even if she is sober and she admits she had sex with a man who is so drunk he keeps passing out.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Rape claims

      Actually, under feminism and modern gender equality, you are supposed to hire the butt ugly unqualified female and pay her shit load of cash to sit around, do her nails and gossip.

      In fact, men (especially those of the cracker kind) are supposed to give up their jobs so women and non honkey men can have the jobs.

      We saw a similar thing with the 10 demands BLM has for "the white devils".    GIVE ALL YOUR STUFF TO POCs, YOU EVIL FUCKING CUNTS WHO SHOULD DIE!!!!, CUZ RACIAL EQUALITY.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Rape claims

      Thanks to the feminist RAPE IS RAPE campaign, men can now be raped in the US.    Sadly, males can only be raped by other males but females can be raped by either.  They based their campaign on the UK sex crime law.    Not surprisingly, feminists aren't concerned about gender equality for men.

      The UK has a similar problem.  Say for example a man and woman inserted a broom handle in a person's anus, against that person's will, there's only 1 rapist in the case.  YEP, UK law requires a person to have a penis in order to commit rape, even if the penis isn't used in the act.  3 times since 2003 (as recently as March 2017), there has been an effort to equalize the sex crime laws, but feminists have always fought against it and won.

      The only sex crime law that is worded to be gender neutral, despite it's extremely biased application, is the law against sex with any person under 16.    The law says ANYONE who has sex with a person under the age of 16 is guilty of xxxxxxx (can't remember the exact name of the crime).    However, (I believe it was Panaroma who did the show) that while nearly 1,000 boys under 16 had been prosecuted for having sex with their also under 16 girlfriend in the first decade of the law, no under 16 girl had been prosecuted for the same thing.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Order yours before they run out!

      That was one of them, but I'm not sure she went the "whole hog" as it were.

      ++++

      I got a week ban from Twitter for calling BLM racists and liars.

      I mirrored a video by Terrence Williams where he criticized BLM.  I got a community strike for posting racist content on YouTube.

      A black woman (since been arrested for it) posted a video brandishing guns and machetes talking about killing whites and cops, but that's not racist according to YouTube.  YouTube only took it down after a judge order them to.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Isn't PROTESTING a VIOLATION of FREEDOM OF SPEECH?

      Obama sent 100 FBI agents to Fruguson to find out the truth.    The FBI proved that "hands up, don't shoot" was a total fucking lie.    Obama and many others still maintained the lie of "hands up, don't shoot".

      Obama invited BLM to the White House, even after all the shit they caused.  They blocked roads, and we know they caused at least 1 child to die because of that.  They chanted about cop killing.    BLM is based on the writings of that cop killer who fled to Cuba.

      Obama maintains the feminist lies, even though government stats prove feminism is based on lies.    In the UK, paying women much less than men is rampant.  HOWEVER, in the 13 years that labour was in power, they only prosecuted 16 small companies.    If it's so rampant, you'd think they would be prosecuting 10,000+ businesses a month.

      Yahoo and HuffPo got female CEOs, who then went on to do a male employee purge.  Not a fucking word from Obama and the rest of the SJW panderers.

      Obama spouted the "just believe" bullshit.  HOWEVER, Lacy Green was never prosecuted for raping over 4 million people.

      Obama spouted the "gender equality" bullshit, but like a typical feminist, he totally ignored the areas when men are far worse off so he could keep spouting the debunked bullshit lies.    Countless liberal governments in the west have done the same thing.      Western governments have pledged to tackle the issue of "women make up 24% of the homeless".  They totally fucking ignored the remaining 76%.

      RAPE IS RAPE, a feminist campaign fought to get some rape classed as rape under federal law.    Sadly, as with feminism, they still insisted that men can rape anyone and women can only rape other women.    They used the UK's anti male sex crime laws as their basis.    But let's not forget that feminism is supposedly about gender equality.

      "There's a special place in hell for women who don't vote for Hillary" we were told by Madeline Albright and countless other women.

      Hillary labelled everyone who didn't support her as "deplorables" and countless other things.

      Black students at Berkley did countless protests with the backing of the City, Police and University.  In their "white people go around" where they forced white kids to walk through the creek to get to class, the police where there to arrest uppity crackers who didn't obey their black masters.

      We saw the same kind of shit at Evergreen.  Black students and their cucks went around with baseball bats looking for disobedient honkeys.    They held the President of the college hostage and wouldn't let him go to the bathroom.

      Hillary and Obama (and countless others) saw nothing wrong with Richard Spencer being sucker punched, under the narrative "punch a Nazi".

      Let's go back to when Obama was first elected President.  GWB's FBI arrested 2 "New Black Panther" protesters for brandishing weapons and making threats to white voters in Philadelphia.    Obama/Holder dropped the charges.    This was a clear sign of what Obama was all about.

      Let's not forget Obama belonged to Rev Jerimiah Wright's church.  You know the one.  It's the one where they slag off the US and white people.  Obama was shown in the video of "It's not god bless America, but god damned America" while he was stiffer than most of his fellow parishioners, he was just as much in agreement as they were with what  Rev Wright was saying.

      Obama routinely lied about the "evil" police and the facts and figures.  He didn't care what the FBI and Justice Depart. said, he spouted whatever SJW narratives said.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Order yours before they run out!

      @aadam101:

      How disrespectful to our flag.

      As a leftist, how would you even know what that means?

      It was you people that praised that black chick who videoed herself taking a shit and then wiping her ass with the American flag.  That's just great and dandy.  But a black guy criticizing BLM is racist.

      You guys praise the Cockroach muslim for being such a great feminist when she tells a FGM victim that she doesn't deserve to have a vagina for complaining about FGM.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: If You Found George W. Bush’s Speech Offensive, You’re The Problem, Not Him

      So, Trump should be like every other US President and world leader and pander to North Korea when it threatens the world with nukes.

      Basically, Trump has to cuck to NK so he won't be deemed a bad President.

      Maybe he should massively explode the warrantless wiretaps so he gets as much love as Obama.  You know, how Obama promised to end the program, but did the complete opposite.    Yeah, yeah, but Obama is half black so he's allowed to get away with crap like that.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Rape claims

      Exactly, they are using social media to damage the person.

      Lacy Green (and countless others feminists) claimed that no one, but especially women, lie about being raped.  This was all part of the "just believe" campaign.

      Lacy Green raped over 4 million people, including me.  JUST BELIEVE!!!  But no one took us seriously.

      Women routinely lie about being raped for many reasons.  Just this week, a woman who lied about being raped because the guy rejected her, got sent to 5 years.  Obviously, that wasn't in the UK or Europe where they routinely ignore fake rape claimers (don't prosecute) so it doesn't "harm" real rape claimers.

      There's nothing in the EU that causes a woman to have a 2nd thought about making a false rape claim.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • 1
    • 2
    • 459
    • 460
    • 461
    • 462
    • 463
    • 638
    • 639
    • 461 / 639