She was fired because she used her account as part of her job. If she had used her account as just a personal thing, she would not have been fired.
:police: BTW, I removed the post quoted due to the user spamming for forum points. :police:
She was fired because she used her account as part of her job. If she had used her account as just a personal thing, she would not have been fired.
:police: BTW, I removed the post quoted due to the user spamming for forum points. :police:
We can't have a proper discussion on this when the left has a history of acting in such horrible ways to enforce their view on the topic.
The left committed countless vile deeds to make sure only their version was presented. Email-gate and many others exposed the nasty antics the left did to prevent any descent.
In email-gate, we found out (along with countless other things) that East Anglia University was lying on Freedom Of Information requests by saying that the information requested didn't exist. They laughed and joked at how much lying they were doing and how easy it was to get away with it.
We learned that they used "Mark's number trick" to get the data set to come out the way they wanted it.
The UN's bi-annual report on climate change has to have constant edits to correct proven lies. One of the most famous lies was the photo-shopping of a glacier to show it as virtually gone, when in fact it grew over the span of the 2 photos. This was how we went from "global warming" to "climate change". No one ever gets punished for these lies.
There was an article where scientific journals refused to peer review sceptic papers. They then use that as proof that their claims are junk because they aren't peer reviewed.
+++++
While I agree that climate change is real, I fucking despise the way the left has acted over this.
It makes society unable to trust them when they are using shit like "Mark's number trick", photo-shopped pics and countless other things to lie about the "proof".
One side is purposely and dishonestly muted, so how do we know that what we do hear is even remotely true.
In the UK, TV news is legally required to be unbiased but it's not, not really.
The BBC de-muslimed the Paris McDonald's killer. This is the norm in the west.
Breakfast type shows aren't counted as "news" so they can put whatever slant they want, as long as their official news slot is unbiased.
++++
Other than literally killing off a bunch of liberal twat bags and replacing them with centrists, I don't know how to solve the problem.
For clarification, Noah wasn't raped.
Noah was a drunkard who liked to get naked while drinking. Ham saw this and told his brothers, rather than covering Noah up and keeping it secret. That was Ham's only crime.
For this, all of Ham's descendants were to be punished by being made the slaves of the descendants of the other 2 brothers. Ham's only punishment was knowing this would happen to his descendants.
The bible flip flops on punishing others for the crimes of 1.
There are 2 types of conservatives, but in this case I think we're talking about religious conservatives.
I think it's a crock of shit (hypocritical) that they want to have their freedoms, while denying others the same rights. It's the same thing we see with modern liberals. They want to have their right to free speech, while denying it to those they disagree with.
It doesn't take a woman 9 hours to eat a large order of chips/fries next to the dumpster behind the chippy.
Women have 100% of the say in if the baby lives, so they have ALL the power. Women quite often use children as a weapon against a man. If a man wants to have the kid, the woman aborts or goes to Canada and puts it up for adoption. If the man wants to abort, the woman keeps the kid so she can keep her claws in the man for 18-21 years. Let's not forget all those gold diggers that screw celebs and rich men to get that monthly check.
Sadly, everything is "rape" now. It's lost it's meaning, like countless other words.
It was stupid of her and the producers to waste an entire episode on it. There was nothing "smoking gun" or even questionable in it.
The liberal news media is extremely guilty of anti white racism when reporting (or not) the news.
If a racist cunt white guy shoots up a black church, we never hear the end of it.
If a racist cunt black guy shoots up a white church, we barely hear of it.
If blacks kidnap a mentally challenged white guy and torture him, while shouting "fuck white people" or "fuck Trump", the mainstream news outlets don't want to know about it for at least 2 days. When they finally report it, they claim it's not a hate crime despite the video and the confessions of the kidnappers.
When 9 blacks drag a white guy out of his car, beat him up and steal his car, the mainstream news media don't want to talk about it until the story gets too big in the blogs. Then they say shit like "oh, oh, poor, poor white people". Imagine if the event was the opposite. The news media would have reported it instantly and they would NOT have said "oh, oh, poor, poor, black people".
If whites do something bad, it's always about "toxic whiteness", but when people of other races do the exact same thing, they never claim it's "toxic blackness" or whatever race.
We already talked about this, but last year we had the racism test on social media. Fake accounts were made to make racist comments. The comments were all the same except for the race; FUCK ALL (insert race) PEOPLE!!! Anyone care to guess which race they had no problem with being put into that sentence? YEP, that's correct, They didn't ban the accounts that said FUCK ALL WHITE PEOPLE!!!.
Criticizing ISIS (or whatever they are currently called) would get your account banned, but ISIS could post videos of beheadings and other pro islam propaganda.
Let's not forget that Trump's tax return(s) was "leaked" a while back. I remember Rachel Maddox doing a show on it.
Trump did show his tax return, through the "leak" a while back.
I'd say it could be at least 75% of the Eurovision guys.
Let's not take the agency away from women. They threw themselves at him for a chance to get some of his money.
Regardless of his motives, he did get sexuality into the mainstream.
Larry Flint is a true hero with his 1st Amendment fight.
As far as I know, Texas didn't ban sex toys. They do have very strict rules on where sex shops can be located, though.
CNN used to be the most respected news outlet in the world, now it's just leftist bullshit shit.
It's my understanding, from living in TX, that the issue is regulations on insurance. Texas is the most protectionist against interstate stuff.
If we have interstate insurance sales, then we end up with the same situation we have with credit cards, where a couple states make their laws so lax to draw the insurance companies in. Delaware and South Dakota control (at least they did 16 years ago) the entire credit card industry because they made their laws benefit the companies and not the customers.
Also, it's a huge loss in tax revenue for the states that don't pander to the insurance industry.
As for benefits, if you move to a country that is part of the "partnership" then your SSI counts toward that countries state pension.
If I stay in the UK, my US SSI credits go toward my UK state pension. If I return to the US, my UK pension credits go toward social security.
As far as Medicare, that ends once you leave the US.
They're doing it, at least originally, not now, to protest how police officers disproportionately shoot, attack, arrest, target black people.
The protest is based on lies and purposely misleading stats.
Blacks make up 13% of the US population.
Blacks make up 54-56% of the violent crimes.
Blacks make up 43% of cop killers. I haven't seen an stats on wounding police by race.
Blacks make up 26% of the people shot (wounded or killed) by police.
Black cops are the most likely to shoot, while white cops are the least likely to shoot.
Less than 0.9% of ALL police shootings are "unjustified".
Studies have shown that there is no "kill all da blacks" mentality in the police.
The only thing studies have shown is that cops are more physically aggressive when arresting blacks. This is due to the fact that blacks resist arrest more.
This is the problem. When talking about the issues, you can't leave out huge chunks and have an honest conversation. It's something we see with BLM, feminists and every other SJW. They are purposely dishonest.
She stopped being funny 20 years ago.
Now she plays the victim while attacking everyone she doesn't like.
The left doesn't care about facts and reality. They are all about feelz and buzz words.