Posts made by raphjd

@isdraugr:

How could gays embrace nazism when homosexual men where mocked and killed by nazi?  :blink:

Do your research.    There are extremely few actual Nazis around.    The extreme vast majority of "Nazis" are those who dare disagree with the left.  Even basic journalists who do nothing but film events are called Nazis, beaten and have their equipment stolen or destroyed.

If you support free speech, then you are a Nazi according to the left.

If you don't support Islam, then you are a Nazi according to the left.

Everyone the left doesn't like for any reason, is a Nazi.

This is nothing more than leftists trying their Antifa antics here.

They lie on a regular basis, such as the leftist that claimed I called him a "faggot nigger" then admitting he lied, then claiming I did, then admitting he lied, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc because I disagree with the Democrat party and BLM.

I was called a racist because I pointed out that a 30+ year Congressman told 2 proven lies (near the time of the incident).   I never mentioned his race or made any racial comments.   I was a racist because he (the congressman) and the name caller were black.

I was called a Nazi because I condemned the bike lock professor's actions.

I was called a Nazi because I condemned the left for setting an occupied building on fire to prevent speech they didn't like.

If you don't support Hillary, you hate all women.

If you condemn proven false rape claimers, then you support rape.

The list is never ending.

This is what the left is like here.

Well, the left are finally starting to admit that their own are violent.    Of course they are blaming everyone else for it, but it' a start.

Merkel could cut up and eat a live baby on TV and liberals would still love her.  There's nothing she could do that would piss off the left.

They worship that cunt.  Maybe it's because she has a face like a pug.

Why is it that leftist automatically believe that if you vote Democrat, you are a good person?

My mom is a life long Democrat, but she's completely a social conservative.    She would rather kill herself than vote Repub.

This is common with people from working class backgrounds.

The UK's Labour party is filled with social conservative "liberals" who are only concerned about workers' "rights".    They would be far right if they were from a well off background.

Leftists keep telling us how evil conservatives are, yet my cousin and a bunch of her friends and neighbors drove down to Texas with their boats to help rescue people.

I bet Antifa hasn't done anything like that.

Why would Fred create a new account when he has more than enough ratio not to worry?

Ravena1 has to forum spam because of his low ratio.

Also, we have very good dupe account detection software and it's not triggered for either.

:police:  As someone previously banned for fighting will everyone, you sure don't seem like you have reformed.    Clearly you don't want to hang around very long.

You won't be banned this time.  You're account will be disabled so you will get caught for having a dupe account if you come back.  :police:

One of her absolutely worst things is when she said that women campaigners to end FGM should have their vaginas removed because they aren't real women, but she's a feminist.

The Cockroach has absolutely no redeeming qualities.    Everything about her is vile.

What I said about the BBC was true, until a few months ago.

Let's hope Ofcom isn't as completely useless at dealing with complaints as the BBC was.

PS You can, and have, called me lots of the things and you can get away with it because you are a moderator.

If you want to get into your history on this site and why you were banned under your old account, we can.

I will tell you that except one person (not you), I have never banned a person without asking the opinion of all the staff first.

The US pays so much in military arms because like we see with NATO, the UN and everything else, the US has to pay for the rest of the world.

India needs welfare because they refuse to spend their money on welfare for the "untouchables" so the UK has to pay for it.

@TroopK:

@Frederick:

Are you mentally ill?

Sometimes when reading this forum I do question my sanity. Actually not just mine  :cheers:

You remind me of someone who was banned from the site under a previous name.

Certain laws are deemed "universal" in the UK, such as libel.  There are blanket bans on many things that are not just limited to the media.  I can't call you a "child molester" and get away with it simply because I'm not in the media.

Why did Ofcom deflect ALL complaints about Jeremy Clarkson and Chris Moyles back to the BBC?  Both made blatantly homophobic comments, but Ofcom didn't want to know and the BBC defended those comments.    Clarkson repeatedly made racist comments and Ofcom never touched the complaints.  They referred them back to the BBC.

Parliament votes on the new TV tax rates.    The BBC tells parliament how much it wants to increase the tax, because they always want to increase the tax.

The TV tax people are run by the BBC itself.  They are known to lie to people, such as myself when we bought this house.  They demanded that we pay the TV tax for the people we bought the house from and sue them to get our money back.  They told us we were legally responsible for the debt, as it was based on the house, not the person.

Except in relation to election laws (legally required to be "neutral"), the BBC is extremely partisan.      They whore themselves to the feminist agenda, they de-muslim terrorists like the Paris McDonald's killer and so on.    They are so extreme far left that even Stalin is extreme right wing to them.

++++

I see.  You got me on a technicality.

The rules for the BBC changed a few months ago.

HELL NO!!!!

I need my maple syrup.

If you're a drug dealer or making a skin suit so you can dress up as your mother, pay your TV tax.  :cool2:

She said that ages ago, during the campaign.

I'm not interested as long as it's fair and honest, and those found to have done illegal things get prosecuted.

That's my mantra regardless of the case and who it is.

In the UK, the BBC is self regulating in all things.    Media laws made by parliament don't affect the BBC.    Parliament has virtually no powers over the BBC except "TV tax" rates.

The rest of the media is broken up into their groups; ie TV new, newspapers, etc.    Except as above, there are laws that govern truth and non partisanship in the media.

I don't know if this applies to cable TV or just normal TV.

Arpaio is accused of being a racist because most of the people he held for illegal immigration were "brown".    Well, fucking duh!!!!

In 2009, 78% of illegals were from Central and South America.  Only 7% were clearly not Hispanic/latino.  The remaining 15% are unknown from the chart because any country that made up less than 1% of the total of illegals, were lumped into "others".    The only thing we do know about the "other 15%" is that Canada has between 69k and 73k illegally living in the US in 2009.

This is how the left can artificially claim that he's a racist.  Most of the people he arrests for violating immigration laws are hispanic/latino, because they are most of the illegals.

It would be racist if he was mostly arresting non hispanic/latino people for violating immigration laws.

++++

Racial profiling is always bad, according to the left, unless it's anti white.