Posts made by raphjd

This whole conversasion is racist because (excluding my posts) it makes it sound like only whites do it and it's only racist when whites do it.

According to the Atlantic Black Star, 89% of black people don't have romantic relationships outside thier own race.    When blacks do have romantic relationships outside their own race, it's mostly black men and white women.

PEW also says that Asian men are less likely to have romantic relationships outside their own race/national origin than Asian women.

Basically, (excluding native groups who are pretty exclusive to their own race/group) people have romantic relationships outside their own race about the same amounts.

This topic reminds me of Riley Dennis on YouTube who claims that if a lesbian won't suck his lesbian cock, then she's transphobe.  He said the same thing about people like me who find the idea of eating a guy's vag beyond gross.  He called it "genitalism" and transphobia.

Similarly, it reminds me of the woman (former student union president) who claimed it was homophbic of people like me who won't fuck her because she's gender fluid and sometimes male, because she wears jeans.

I wish the left wasn't so cowardly and would explain their crap.

I was reported for being racist because of my previous post.

How is it "racist" to show that blacks are not victimized in modern times?

I have a feeling that it's more of the same old identity politics where whites are demonized and racism toward whites is justified and when other races do it toward whites, the definition of racism is changed so only whites can be labeled as racists.

It sounds like penetrating a guy doesn't turn you on enough to get/keep you hard.

It could also be the lack of confidence you mentioned.  This is something you'll have to work on (unless above is also true).  If the person you are with knows the situation, then most likely they will understand and not expect the most perfect performance.  As you do it more, your confidence will grow.

Use your imagination.  Pretty much anything can be used if done right and you think about safety.

A lot of guys use their fingers with some spit.

It's legally in incest in most places in the modern world, especially if you live in the same house.    Legally, it's worse if it's step-parent and step-child, especially if the step-parent was deemed as a parental figure.

Some places allow this IF you lived in a different house and you don't have the traditional family relationship.  This is mostly the case where you can marry a 1st cousin.

Like previous posters, it depends on your motives and if you are honest with your partner.

Beating your dick to porn isn't cheating because there is no personal interaction.

I'd enjoy a 3 way with them.

@miang:

@raphjd:

So the jist of the replies is, have your preference, but don't say it because that would racist.

I'm wondering if the same people would say the same thing if a black guy said: "black only".

I wouldn't because I would think of a history of repression and violence there and think that a black gay person might feel safer with another black guy and there isn't history of black men oppressing white men. I don't think the same applies to white men, just like the same things don't apply to straight people as they do gay people. I don't know if I'm explaining it well. I would think it was a shame that the black guy was limiting himself, just like a would the white gay guy.

However I'm just now remembering that there are in fact other races! So thinking a step further I would think that was shitty too. Maybe not as shitty (I'm not black so I would not pretend I would automatically know all the reasons for him saying "black only") but still kinda shitty towards asians etc.

What about white farmers in Africa?

What about Korean shop owners across the US?

I've been mugged twice, by black guys.

Looking at statistics,  blacks really aren't the victims.

The left screams "racist/racism" and "sexism" every time anything is historically accurate based on white people.

THE TUSKEGEE AIRMEN didn't have the scream of "racism" because it was based on the historically accurate events of WW2 based on a black fighter squadron.

DUNKIRK is a historically accurate movie based on events in WW2.  However, butthurt leftists are screaming racism and sexism because the movie doesn't show non-whites and women.  So, we have to destroy history so we can be artificially "inclusive".

KINGDOM COME: DELIVERANCE is historically accurate, but it's deemed racist because they don't have China Town, PRIDE parades, BLM rallies and whatnot in 14th century Bohemia.

I agree.

I'm just pointing out how feminists, SJWs, etc don't care about this issue because it happens to boys.

Jobs are always lost due to technological advancements.

So the jist of the replies is, have your preference, but don't say it because that would racist.

I'm wondering if the same people would say the same thing if a black guy said: "black only".

Like with countless other topics, the fact that the leftists refuse to defend this "boy" shows they have been full of shit with all their identity politics.

There is another option here.   The leftists are extreme hypocrites because like with MeToo and rape claims, they don't always obey their own dogma of "just believe".

@Shami94:

"It's the left that claims the moral high ground but needs to hide their faces."

Do you mean like the KKK?

I'm glad you made the comparison.

Finally, you leftists are figuring it out.

Clearly, this is another rant at white people.

Any other group can have a preference for their own race, but white people are racists if we do.

No one gets butt hurt over chubby chasers, but they get butt hurt over those that aren't.

If a white person claims to be "color blind", they are called a racist.  If they admiot they see color, then they are called a racist.

We can't circumcise girls, despite culture or religion, but we can mutilate the genitals of boys all we like.

I guess some gender equality doesn't matter to a certain group.

We already have this with conservatorships over the estates of the mentally ill.      They can regain control of their affairs once they can show they are mentally fit.    We could use the same kind of system for guns.

While I hate "gun control" as most often defined by liberals, I do support gun control.

We've had this discussion before.  I hate that Colin Ferguson (Long Island RR shooter) can be legally declared a nut case in the state of New York, but he can go to Virginia and buy a gun.    Anyone legally declared a nut case, anywhere in the US, should not be allowed to buy a gun anywhere in the US.

Also, it seems that a lot of school shootings involve kids who were bullied and the schools did nothing about it.

++++

Automatic weapons are illegal in the US, without a special license and extremely strict condition.

If you want to restrict guns like other countries, then you have to realize that violence doesn't end there.  The UK has extremely strict anti-gun laws, but people are still being shot and knife crime is through the roof.

You are 7 times more likely to be physically assaulted in the UK than you are in the US.

@nickys1177:

what did he extort from? i heard of him but which studio is he from

Didn't you read the link?    It's all in there.