Posts made by raphjd

Al Jolson was the fist "trans-racial" hero.

Talcum X and Rachel Dolezal are just worthless copycats.

If all the murderers in Illinois (Chicago) were executed, the moonbats would be complaining that it was racist.

NOPE!!!

Blacks are innocent of everything and when they are guilty, it's whitey's fault.

I wouldn't doubt if Don Lemon and Simone Sanders haven't claimed that all the crimes committed by black people are false flags.  You know, honkeys in black face committing violent crimes in crazy amounts to make poor innocent, victimized blacks look bad.

Simone Sanders said that the DNC shouldn't have white people in any positions of power, cuz "diversity".

Of course she's also butt hurt about the Hispanics that vote GOP, so they really shouldn't have power in the DNC either.  Asians tend to vote GOP, so same thing with them.

That means that (according to Fact-Check figures) 8% of the US population should run the DNC.

According to Fact-Check, 28% of blacks vote GOP in the last few elections.  That means that of the 13% of blacks in the US, only 8% are DNC supporter.

Property and/or sales tax states don't get to write off their state tax burdens.

Northern New England states get subsidized heating, but the Midwest states don't.

Southern states don't get any subsidized A/C.

"A few notable case" is just bullshit.

There were more cases, but those 2 really hit home why the death penalty sucks ass and needed to go.

Illinois stopped the death penalty due to the shear number of innocent men on death row.

Your "logic" is WHO GIVES A FUCK HOW MANY INNOCENT PEOPLE WE EXECUTE, KILL 'EM ALL, GOD DAMNED IT.  KILL 'EM ALL.

The more you say, the more I'm leaning toward the thought (cringe) of hoping you and your ilk get what you are willing to do to others, wrongful imprisonment and/or execution.  You'd sing a different tune if it happened to you.

You believe in "net fishing" justice or the "kill them all, god will know his own" crap.    Maybe I should start wishing people like you get the justice you demand others suffer.

Tax money is used to fund PP, I pay taxes, therefore I pay to fund PP.

Kim Davis has nothing to do with this.  She was an office holder who violated her oath of office.  NOT THE SAME THING.

No one is denying anyone services, as the vaginalists who testified before Congress admitted that these services are available through various means and PP isn't NEEDED for this to continue to be the case.

Abortion is a right, sure, I agree.  You have not shown why I need to pay for it.

The USSC said I have the right to get married in the US.  Using your logic, why do I have to pay to get married, you loonies need to pay for it so I don't have to.

The USSC said I have the right to have gay sex.  Where's my fucking rent boy?  You people need to pay for my rent boys, god damned it.

The USSC said many things are a right, so you bitches need to get to paying for my rights.  NOW, GOD DAMNED IT!!  NOW!!!

BTW, I'm still waiting for my cute rent boys!!!!!

Not just federal taxes, but any tax money.

I'm not against women having these services, but why should I pay for it?  I'm mostly "pro choice".

Why PP?  As we saw in the previously mentioned video, vaginalists admit that these services are available elsewhere.  So why do we specifically need PP?

Why is it ok for the founder of PP to be anti-black racist (paraphrase;  blacks are weeds that need to be eradicated), because that's "historical", but a celeb can't say "nice tits" in a historical case?    Hypocrite much?!  NOTE:  not directed at anyone specific, just something I've seen when discussing PP.

OK, so you are pro death in all cases.  You support abortion and executing innocent people.  At least you are consistent, you believe in killing those who have done nothing wrong.

For clarity;  4th of July 1976, not 76 rapes on the 4th of July.

++++

DAs, police, etc, etc are just as corrupt as always.  That is why I would rather side against them than side with them.

The US government has severely limited the number of appeals there are, especially in the death penalty cases.

++++

The UK got rid of the death penalty, in a major part, by the execution of Derrick Bennett.    A 16yo friend of his and he were out and about, when the 16you decided to break'n'enter a shop.    The police were called and Derrick gave up peacefully.  His friend didn't and killed a cop.  Derrick was 21'ish but due to an accident when he was young, was mentally 7yo.    Since the friend was too young to execute, they pined the murder on Derrick in a "joint enterprise" thing.      If Derrick was convicted, the judge had to sentence him to death because he was part of killing "a person with/of standing" (aristocrats, politicians, police, doctors, council workers, etc).    Anyhoo.  Because he was mentally disabled, the Home Secretary was legally required to commute the sentence from death to life in prison.  Even still, Derrick was mentally too young to be sent to prison as his mental age was too young for the UK's then "legal age of responsibility" of 8yo.    HOWEVER, the Home Secretary refused to do this and Derrick was executed.

There were a couple of other cases that caused upset and the final nail in the UK's coffin was the case of the Army soldier convicted of murder and sentenced to death.  The reason this became a problem was that legally the crime didn't fit the definition of murder, but manslaughter, so no death penalty.  The real kick in the cunt was that Army records proved he was not even in the UK at the time of the "murder".

Oddly, the UK banned all executions, but allowed those already sentenced to death to be executed.    As the UK banned executions, those already sentenced were stuck in a CATCH 22.  They were going to be executed, but legally NO they weren't because it was banned.  This meant they had no right to appeal something that legally was not happening.

++++

Unlike you, I hope you (nor anyone) never, ever wrongfully get sent to prison.

People who have never faced the possibility have no fucking idea what it's like to sit in a jail cell for something you never did, but knowing how easy it is to falsely convict someone, especially on crimes against women.

Her "honesty" is intact, despite the police proving she lied.  If I say her name in a public manner, I go to prison.  My name and the fact that I was accused of rape (not that it was proven to be a lie) is out there in the public domain.

Even before all this, I was against wrongful convictions against people.

It disgust me when I hear people like you and feminists saying there's nothing wrong with sending innocent people to prison.

Since abortions are such a tiny part of what PP does (feminist narrative), then we can get rid of it and not make a difference.

The truth is, feminist don't protest about losing "the pill" if PP is defunded.  They only protest about losing the ability to have abortion on demand.

There's a video of Congressman Trey Gowdy questioning some vaginalist about PP and defunding it.  She admits that birth control is done through countless venues; clinics, PP, and whatnot.  In the end, she admits we only need PP to provide abortions, since all the other bits are done, and done well, in other venues.

Over the last year, especially, I have given countless examples why people have hated Don "Lady Butt Hurt" Lemon.

He and his beloved guess, Simone Sanders, constantly race bait and they have no regard for the truth if it stands in the way of their narrative.

**Aww, poor, poor white people.  BOO HOO!!!**is how Simone Sanders, with a smile from Lemon, reacted to a white man being dragged and beating by 9 (including the girl filming the video and shouting encouragement) black people then having his car stolen.  WHY?!  Because he was white, so he must have voted for Trump.

THAT AIN'T NO HATE CRIME!!! was how Simone Sanders and Lemon describe the Chicago kidnapping, even after watching the video and the statement by the black lead investigating police detective into the incident.

They never shut up about the shooting at the black church, but never mention the shooting at the white church.

They play up anti-non white racist incidents, but ignore anti-white racist incidents.  If they do finally talk about anti white racist incidents, they drag out the well worn "you can't be racist toward white people" bullshit.

Lemon gets sooooo butt hurt he floods the studio with ass blood, when people, even fellow blacks, mention wrong doing by blacks.

They run screaming to broadcast a story about racism against non-whites, but forget the story as soon as it's proven it was a crock of shit, like the 4 black girls on the college campus bus.  Of course, they left the narrative there that blacks are always the victims of crackers.

Lemon and Co don't give a fuck about the truth.  They only care about the honkeys are the devil narrative.

A few different stories of muslim girls getting threatened by crackers makes the news.  When it's prove they were false flags, Lemon and Co never mention it again.  Narrative made, who fucking cares about the truth.

++++

Back in the 1980s, we had the Tawana Brawley "case".  She was out whoring and didn't want to get in trouble with her religious dad, so she and her mom made up the story that she was gang raped by 7+ NYC cops and they wrote NIGGER on her chest with dog shit.

Every news outlet went spastic over the story, but CNN said that we needed to wait and see how the story panned out.  CNN was the only news outlet that didn't just take the word of Tawana and her mother.    They did cover the story, completely, but they never treated is absolute fact.    When the truth came out, CNN was the only news outlet to come out looking good, while the rest looked like shit.

30ish years later and CNN is the worst of the worst.

CIS translates into (basic definition) that you identify with what you sex is.

As we have seen over the last 5+ years, it's been used to demonize "cis" people and not as an academic phrase.    "Die CIS scum!!!" became an internet thing when that thing shaved her head and put on black make up.  Oddly, the girl in that video was CIS, but hated all CIS people for whatever reason.

CIS white males (even gays ones) were banned from diversity events in the UK, despite it being illegal.  HOWEVER, and as usual, nothing was done about this but there would have been mass arrests if the reversed happened.

Minorities can break the very laws designed to protect them.

We see the same kind of shit with the "white people go around" event at Berkeley.    (go fuck yourself, you can look it up for yourself, as it's been talked about so much here and you should know what it is).

Even with SJWs redefining "racism",  the shit we are seeing matches their definition, but not in the way they (SJWs) intended.    Anti-white racist events/incidents are being protected by ALL levels of the government.

The Obama administration dropped the charges against the 2 New Black Panthers who were brandishing weapons and threatening white voters outside the Philly voting place in the 2008 election.

Berkeley police were at the anti-white racist event to prevent uppity whites from trying to cross the bridge.  They were not there to enforce equal rights laws.    The city and university, also, fully supported this anti-white racist event even though it's against equality laws at every level.  Obama and his administration didn't give a fuck because it was done to honkeys.    No one was arrested for setting buildings on fire.  No one was arrested for beating and stomping those 2 already unconscious men to a bloody pulp because "Hey, they look like Nazis" as can be heard in various videos of the incident.

Evergreen College had similar things and no one was arrested, even though the President of the college admitted in the state Senate hearing that lots of laws at all levels were broken.    Gangs of black students and their cucks roaming the college campus with baseball bats looking for disobedient whites and no one was arrested.      The only criminal charges being looked at are the ones for the person(s) who reposted the various videos the freaks uploaded themselves committing the various crimes, like holding the college President and other staff hostage, telling them they can't go to the bathroom and that if they had to, to piss themselves.  There's no question who the guilty are, they are on video that they themselves uploaded bragging about what they did.

(queue fake angry black woman accent) Giiiirl, don't you be putting words in my mouth. (imagine emjoi of said black woman doing that head bob thing)

On the previous page, I quoted you saying that and I replied.

I want to be clear, I'm telling you there are two principle ways to write laws. One writes them to avoid putting the innocent in prison, releasing the guilty who go on to become repeat offenders. The 10% was a hypothetical, arbitrary number. The other option is to create a strict penal code that keeps the guilty in prison with a higher number of innocent.

Repeat offending is extremely high, even with the current system where we allow innocent men to go to prison.  Even in Europe where the motto is "we don't punish, we rehabilitate", repeat offending it extremely high.

I might agree with your "just lock them all up" preference, if the state didn't do illegal things and also prevent people from investigating the case properly.  If we start locking corrupt DAs, police, etc, etc, then your stance would have more "juice".

DAs, police and others actively fight against DNA testing even when a private group is willing to pay for it.    Take a time machine back to when GWB first ran for President as Gov of Texas.    There was a man scheduled to be executed and GWB wouldn't delay the execution to wait for the DNA results.  The man was executed on scheduled.  About 3 weeks later the DNA results cleared him of the crime.  GWB maintained that he never executed a guilty man because LEGALLY the man was still "guilty" when he was executed.

I've told the story of the 4th of July 76 rapes in my home town.  The police stitched up a well known and extremely lovely mentally disabled man in the town.    The police manipulated him into confessing, even though he didn't do it.    20ish years later,  one of the Innocence Project type groups proved he never did the rapes and that he was stitched up by the police and the DA 100% knew about it.

Those two options are on a continuum. As long as people are judged by circumstantial evidence, our choice will remain on that sliding scale. The feminism argument you keep going back to (sigh) puts a higher number of innocent in jail; it also adds an element of tribalism to the argument and if you're going to insist upon that, then you must also bring into this discussion the disproportionate number of blacks in jail, which complicates things a lot.

Discussing groups/people that advocate for innocent people to be sent to prison disgusts me so I'm gonna always talk about it.

I was falsely accused of rape by a vindictive cunt because she wanted us to take her our "gay clubbing" and I didn't want to go to the other side of town.  Under the feminist campaign of JUST BELIEVE, I would have been locked up FOREVER just on her claim.    I was arrested and thrown in jail for nearly 24 hours while I waited for the police to view the pub's CCTV.    The state refused to prosecute her for making a false statement to the police and wasting police time.  Both are felonies.  I couldn't do a private suit against her because no lawyer wanted to take the case because I would be viewed as the evil penis man who's victimizing her.

Black people make up 13% of the US population.

Black people commit 56% of the murders in the US and 54% of all violent crimes in the US.

Blacks make up 44% of cop killers.  I can't find a stat for wounding cops by race.

Blacks are 26% of those shot (wounded or killed) by police.

Whites only out pace their portion of the crime stats in what I would call pretty minor crimes, like sex in public places and drinking alcohol in public/public drunkenness.  Whites are by far the biggest bootleggers of moonshine.

Blaming whites for the crimes of blacks is racist by saying that blacks have no agency.    We could go back to before the welfare days when blacks committed far less crimes and they were married at a high rate than white.

Prior to welfare, blacks had 8% to 10% higher marriage rates than whites.  Blacks had the 2nd highest marriage rates after far east Asians.  Now blacks have by far the worst marriage rates in the US.

@Icc:

@Frederick:

Why would an organization that exists to ABORT babies from UNPLANNED pregnancies be called "PLANNED PARENTHOOD"?

I should hope that there is nothing PLANNED about an abortion  (although I can think of at least one woman who said she was going to get pregnant just so she could exercise her right to have an abortion).   Abortion does not lead to PARENTHOOD.

I'm trying to think of a better name for their group.     Hmm…   how about "Snip My Baby's Brain Stem To Prevent Parenthood"?
SMBBSTPP
It's kind of catchy...
"S-M-B-B....   S-T-P-P"

Youre not very smart. You think you are but no. Just more bullshit.

:police:   Either add something of value to the conversation or leave the thread.      Your post borders on flaming because it has nothing but insults without further comment to justify what you said.   :police:

That's the thing.  Blacks especially, but Hispanics as well, are calling for special rights and even segregation ala Jim Crow.

There's that infamous video of the black students all butt hurt at Yale and the one black chick screeching that it's not a place of learning but a home.

I believe it was Yale as well where they were all gathered around and an Asian student got their turn and lit into the black students for being racist toward them.  The mike was snatched away and told the event wasn't about in fighting but fighting against white people.

In Portland, one of the colleges had "anti whiteness" seminars.

At Evergreen college they had the event were whites were told they weren't allowed on campus because they were white.  Of course, Evergreen has had a lot of anti white shit happen over the last 2 years especially.

More recently, there's the group of mostly illegal Hispanics screeching that exams are racist and that the non white students should be able to simply do an essay using their textbooks at home, while the cracker students take the exams like normal.    These idiots were screaming that exams were "white supremacy".

The sad part is, SJWs are too stupid to see what is actually going on.

I realize a number of your recent political threads – some about Trump, and all of them far more more interesting -- were commandeered to off-topic screeds about the pernicious evils of women.  But it's a very tired bandwagon.  And as far as this Planned Parenthood nonsense, I fear I must put the receiver down.

LIAR!!!!!

Let's ignore for the fact that you, yourself took this thread off topic with this crap.  No one, despite your blatant bullshit has blamed ALL women for anything.  Let's be honest for a sec, if you can manage for that long.  The complaints you refer to are about feminists and their cucks.    It's never been about ALL WOMEN, as you claim.

You are a typical religious fanatic.  Your religion gets attacked and you claim we are attacking all people.

So the feminist cuck demands that every time I mention that Lacy Green raped 4 million people, I have to provide sources for it.

I've never claimed to be a celeb, so don't put words in my mouth.  HOWEVER, when things like the "white people go around" event is mentioned for the 5 billionth time on this site, a normal person would  think you idiots would know what it is without the need for sources every fucking time.

cteavin said he supports 10% of those executed being innocent.  This goes hand in hand with feminists and their cucks advocating that we JUST BELIEVE and send men to prison simply on a woman's say so, claiming that only 2% to 8% will be innocent.  In your cuckery, you either can't see how the 2 are directly related or, and most likely the case, you are so dishonest that you don't want me shining a light on the issue.  You don't really have an issue with me disagreeing with cteavin, you are just butt hurt that I show feminists for the kind of people they truly are.

How dare you tell me I can't take issue with a person who says something I disagree with, you hypocrite.

Gotta love the uneducated misandrist left.  They claim that western women are oppressed, but can't give even 1 issue that hasn't been debunked or that's not laughable.

ANYWHOOOOOO,

As a feminist cuck, you should already know all this.  Or are you one of those cucks that just pipe up in agreement whenever your feminist overlords says something without caring what she says?

Lacy Green (and many other feminists) did a series of videos about sexual assault and rape and the JUST BELIEVE campaign.  JUST BELIEVE is where you don't question a female who cries rape, you just believe.    Anyway, Lacy said that no one, but especially females, never, ever lie about sexual assault and rape.

Anyway,  as a backlash, people (males and females) flocked to Lacy Green's various social media accounts and accused her of sexually assaulting and/or raping them.  It was estimated 4 million people this.    Based on the JUST BELIEVE campaign, Lacy Green should have been locked up immediately, but because she has a vag, she got away with it contrary to the campaign she was an active leader of.

Most feminists say that only 2% of rape claims are false.  If you do a bit of Googling, you will see that this is comes from a judge's speech and he got the figure from a pamphlet by a feminist group.    A few years ago, some feminists finally started admitting this.  As far as I know, Rebecca Watson was the 1st to admit that is was higher, but still only 8%.    Of course, there are studies that show it's higher than than the 2% to 8% feminists claim.

We've gone over this stuff here plenty of times before and it still shocks the fuck out of me that feminist cucks never seem to know any of this stuff.    In another couple of weeks I'll have to explain this exact same shit to another feminist cuck, because they've never heard of it.  yada, yada, yada…..............  It's never ending.

It's like the "white people go around" anti-white racist event at Berkeley.  I posted about it when it happened and have to explain it countless times because SJWs have no fucking idea what it is.

Nothing was taken out of context.

You support executing innocent men.  I say, MEN because women most often get the pussy pass and avoid the death penalty, even for the most heinous crimes.

You don't mind if 10% of those executed are innocent.  That is fucked up.    Even feminists only want to punish 2% to 8% of men who are innocent.

To answer your question;  NO INNOCENT MAN SHOULD BE SENT TO PRISON OR EXECUTED.

I prefered Bernie of all those running in 2016.

That was until the video of him cucking to those BLM bitches.

Sounds like we have a closet SJW/feminist here.

JUST BELIEVE, despite Lacy Green never being thrown in prison for raping 4 million people, demands that whenever a person (feminists really mean; WOMEN because they don't care about males) claims to have been sexually assaulted or raped, we automatically throw the accused in prison for life.

Under that system, I would be in prison, even though CCTV proved I was totally innocent.    The cunt who accused me was being vindictive, not just "mistaken".

Oddly, cteavin wants to wrongfully punish more people than feminists.    Feminists only want to punish 2% to 8% (their figure) of falsely accused, but cteavin wants to wrongfully execute 10%.