I support free speech, but I also support the other "rights".
I don't have a problem removing people from the immediate area to prevent the face to face harassment or blocking the entrances. Across the street doesn't bother me.
I support free speech, but I also support the other "rights".
I don't have a problem removing people from the immediate area to prevent the face to face harassment or blocking the entrances. Across the street doesn't bother me.
When we go with the JUST BELIEVE concept, we end up with the shit we have been seeing over the last 20 year of false rape claims blowing up in international media.
YouTube's main "just believe" advocate, Lacy Green, never got into trouble for raping over 4 million people. We were ignored. Many of us got threats directly from YouTube over our claims. They threatened to ban our accounts if we continued the claims against Lacy green. SJW YouTube protected a mass rapist, despite being publicly supportive of "just believe".
As we saw with "Jackie" at UVA, the entire frat was demonized, their frat house had $25,000 with of damage done to it. No one from UVA or the press apologized for the lies. The frat had to pay to fix the damage to their frat house. The faculty that wrote that horrible letter demanding that the entire frat be expelled from UVA, doubled down once the truth came out. They wrote another letter demanding that the entire frat be expelled even though they were innocent to show that they support expelling rapists.
In the opening post of this thread, I listed some cases where "just believe" totally failed society. People's lives were ruined by "just believe".
"Take back the night" girl claimed she was raped and named the supposed rapist. She only changed her tune when he sued her. She now claims that she got caught up in the moment and wanted to join in. She doesn't believe she should be held responsible for falsely claiming he raped her and how that ruined her life.
Mattress Girl had her claims of being raped dismissed by the police and even the college which is extremely anti-male thanks to the Obama administration's "Dear Colleague" letters. However, she was still allowed to drag it out with her mattress girl routine.
Duke LaCrosse players are still stained by the false rape claims by a hooker/stripper who lied for whatever reason.
The head of the IMF (Strauss-Cohn [sp?]) was brought down and totally ruined by a gold digging bitch. She was recorded talking to her boyfriend, who was in jail at the time, talking about extorting money from Strauss-Cohn in exchange for dropping the rape claims. The rape never happened, but it ruined him.
I was also jail immediately, rather than the police waiting to see what the CCTV showed. Thankfully, I was cleared before the press got ahold of the story. In the UK, rape claimers are protected from the press, even when they are proven to have lied. The accused (read; MEN) don't have that protection. Their name is only released once (but not always) it's decided to prosecute them. I'm under a lifetime gag order from revealing the name of the woman who the police proved lied about me raping her. I can get up to 10 years in prison if I do.
++++
Throughout the west, we have criminalized speech. In most of Europe, it's illegal to cause offense. Canada has gone a similar way. US cities and states are too.
Just because no one NYC has been prosecuted under the law, does not remove the fact that they put it into law.
++++
People all over the left have defended "punch a nazi".
If they don't like what you said or might say, they believe they are fully within their right to physically assault you. Clearly, the opposite does not apply.
The left believes it's ok to attack ANYONE who might be the enemy. Smugglypuff did this. After the incident at the college campus, she attacked a retired couple who were out walking their dog nearby. Not surprisingly, Smugglypuff has a bit of history before this. She false flagged her high school with hate graffiti. She was only prosecuted for attacking the retired couple. Again, not surprisingly, in court, she was a girl, not the trans boy she usually claims to be. I guess she wanted to take advantage of the female oppression of lighter sentencing.
The left claims the moral high ground, but have to hide their faces.
++++
An entire political party is based on SJW, BLM, Feminist and other leftist policies. How is that an "outlier"? Europe is filled with that crap, how is that "outlier"?
Hillary and her supporters made some of the most hateful claims against the people who didn't support her. You couldn't support her because of her policies (past and present), it could only be because you are sexist, racist, homophobic, etc, etc, etc, etc etc. You know, a "deplorable". Madalien Albright famously said that anyone woman who didn't vote for Hillary would burn in hell.
The white woman who ran for Chair of the DNC said she would "shut white people down" if she was elected chair. Everyone, including those running against her, applauded this.
In the UK, it's illegal to discriminate against people based on race and sex/gender (and some other aspects). HOWEVER, we have several cases where the Crown Prosecution has no problem as long as the victim(s) is white males (hetero or gay, it doesn't matter). This was famously made clear by the college "diversity" officer who posted the sign saying something like "all welcome, except white males" with a picture of her next to it pretending to cry.
Sweden brought in Affirmative Action to benefit women where they were under-represented. A few years ago their supreme court said AA must also benefit men where they are under-represented, so Sweden got rid of AA.
Scandinavian countries stopped recording the race/origin of criminals to keep people from seeing the obvious trend.
In a lot of Europe, it's illegal to disagree with the official narrative of the WW2 holocaust.
As we know, you can deny the Armenian genocide (a jew invented the word based on Armenia) and create a "news" channel based on the group that committed the genocide; The Young Turks. You can be Armenian and cuck to the Turk who runs the channel and denies the genocide his people committed against your people.
You are in a Catch 22 when it comes to Israel. You are either an anti-semite or an islamophobe. Oddly, Semites are not just jews, but the people of that region (jews and muslims), but that's another topic.
++++
Prior to the freaks coming out to cause problems, there wasn't an issue with trans-SEXUALS using the bathroom that matches them.
NO, trans trenders, gender terrorists and the rest of the assclowns had to kick off because they wanted to be special.
Leftists threw real trans people under the bus, to pander to these freaks.
++++
NO. It's not mainstream. It's just a few outliers.
Let's ignore that mainstream media, the DNC, social media, western government, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc all enforce this shit.
Although I was initially disinclined to post here, I have an observation that spans several threads dealing with gender and social justice.
And it is this:
No point of debate, no personal anecdote, and no attempt at critical thought or persuasion is strengthened by calling a woman a "cunt."
WOW, you are so far left that you are defending this "woman", who claimed that false rape claims are good for men. Clearly, it's people like you that are the problem, when it comes to leftist lunacy.
This is part of the argument I had with RoyalCrown89, which in turn got me labeled a racist.
You are NEVER allowed to be critical of John Lewis because of his civil rights work 50 years ago. That means that we have to completely ignore his 35 years as a Congressman.
I'm a "gun nut" and belong to a shooting club here in the UK. In the US I owned guns. I fully support the 2nd Amendment.
All that said, everyone knows (should know) that I'm pissed about the that the insanity loophole hasn't been fixed even after The Long Island Railroad shooting. Colin Ferguson was legally declared a nutter in New York state, but he was able to go to Virgina to get his guns.
During Clinton, we had some sensible gun control laws that got fucked up because they were too specific to certain guns, rather than the types of guns they were banning. As an example, they banned the TEC-9 and for extremely good reasons. The problem was, the maker stopped making the now banned TEC-9 and started making the TEC-10 which was perfectly legal, even though it was virtually identical. Instead of banning ALL guns that could easily be converted into SMGs, they only banned a few specific guns and not the type of gun.
No one has a legit reason to personally own an SMG (as well as many other types). I'm in favor of well-regulated gun clubs owning them, or as in the UK, you can personally own a gun, but it must be kept at a gun club.
Thanks to recently laws in California, you will now get twice as much punishment for misgendering a person in a nursing home (1 year in jail and/or $1,000 fine) than you will get for intentionally spreading HIV to people without their consent/knowledge (6 months in jail).
Is there still anyone claiming these are "outliers"?
I was falsely accused of raping a woman because she was pissed that my husband and I (especially me) didn't want to take her out "gay clubbing". I had to spend nearly 24 hour in jail and was only released once the cops watched the CCTV showing I never went near the women's bathroom where she claimed the rape took place.
Nothing happened to her by the police for what she did and no lawyer wanted to touch a private/civil case against her because I would look "vindictive".
I forget the cunt feminist's name, but she said that false rape claims against men are a good learning tool for men.
In NYC, Canada and others, the "extreme left" as you like to portray them, are in charge. They got shit put into law, that as you showed, isn't needed. That still doesn't negate the very real fact that the leftist agenda is being put into law.
"Don't worry, they won't enforce it" is kinda funny because the left gets extremely butt hurt that blacks still can't vote in some states in the US, under state law. Gay sex (but not lesbo sex) is still illegal in Texas and 9 other states, despite the USSC ruling. So why the butt hurt over these things, if they don't matter. Adultery is illegal in 14 states, don't worry though, not many people get arrested for it. Sex toys are illegal in at least 9 states (can't confirm the other 2), but don't worry, people rarely go to jail for it.
Imagine is the right made all abortion illegal, but said "don't worry, we won't enforce it".
In many western countries, the political parties frequently only allow people with certain traits (usually women, but quite often race and/or religion) to run. As we saw in Canada, women got 50% of the cabinet jobs just because they had vaginas. Trudeau even said a vag is more important than qualifications when choosing people to be given cabinet positions.
Across the US, we are seeing leftists running amuck. Evergreen is not an exception. It may be extreme in some of their actions, but they. like college students everywhere, control the college. Look at the violent protests on college campuses to prevent Milo, Ben Shapiro, and anyone else on the right from speaking.
Colleges across the west had trigger warnings, about nearly everything. The University of Chicago was the first to ban trigger warnings, after having them for a few years.
The left has shit on real trans people with their bullshit. As an example, there was a trans girl (formerly boy) in the same high school as Elliot Cope. The real trans person had no problems at school. Once Elliot Cope started her attention seeking shit, the real trans person started getting accused to being like Elliot Cope.
Blaire White and Skylar (and real trans like them) are now criminalized because of the left's bullshit. Bringing this fact up is deemed "transphobia". Of course it's not transphobia, because I'm defending real trans people.
Even with the leftist bias in "real news", we are seeing this shit. That means that the problem is real and not just outliers as you claim.
You keep saying that I'm using extremes, but I'm not.
In Canada, NYC and others, it's illegal to mis"gender" someone. While you won't go directly to prison for it, you will be given extreme fees (in NYC $125,000 for accidental misgendering and $250,000 for wilful misgendering; each time). If you don't pay the fine, you will go to jail for contempt of court. This is how SJWs justify the law saying it doesn't "criminalize" speech.
Imagine the nightmare of the gender trenders like Elliot Cope, Milo Stewart, Dakota and the rest. They could destroy people's lives and businesses under this law.
As I said elsewhere recently, imagine if a bunch of white students went around a college campus with baseball bats looking for disobedient non white students. Do you think any of them would be arrested? You know they would be. Not surprisingly, "oppressed" black students and their cucks, at Evergreen College, did exactly that and not a single arrest was made. Hostage taking is a felony. Not a single person in those videos was arrest for hostage taking, despite even the people involved reluctantly admitted it was hostage taking.
What you call "extreme" is actually the norm.
Are we surprised?! NOPE!!!
Feminists said that science needs to be done through feminism or it's sexist and racist.
There's that video of the black South African girl at the college debate saying that science is racist because it doesn't include things black Africans know are fact, like magic.
It appears that Pluto is no longer a planet due to the feminist movement in science.
Ok, so you believe that routine, scheduled mothballing of ships is somehow an emergency. Obama said he would only use NO BID contracts in an emergency. Not even GWB used no bid contracts for that.
You are trying to make it acceptable for politicians to lie to us.
If Obama had the moral high ground, then why hide what he was doing? Snowden would be a non issue if Obama kept his promise to be the most transparent President ever. Again, Obama lied his ass off.
I've pointed out Obama's history with LGBTs equality and his political career. He was willing to throw LGBTs under the bus to get the next political office. Hell, he took credit for LGBT equality in Illinois that he had nothing to do with. Sure, he did some good for LGBTs in Illinois, but only a little. He did nothing like he loves to claim. He claims things that happened before he first got elected. He claims things other people did.
If you notice, I'm only blaming Obama for Obama. I'm not pinning the global economic meltdown on him, and stuff like that.
Come on, let's stop deluding ourselves.
We all know that ALL LIVES MATTER is deemed to be extremely racist by modern liberals. When modern liberals hear that, their brain tells them we said KILL ALL N*GGERS.
As already pointed out, WHITE LIVES MATTER despite being the most accurate when it comes to police shootings, when compared to crime figures, would be deemed extremely racist. Nothing can ever be "white".
You can't have Miss White America, but you can have Miss every other race America. I was told that the reason we can't have Miss White America is because we already have Miss America. When I explained that the same applies to other races, I was called a racist.
The problem is, if you show that BLM is a bunch of shit, you are a racist. It's like disagreeing with feminism makes you a sexist.
BLM's entire narrative and "facts" are proven bunches of shit.
The FBI and Justice Depart stats prove it's nothing but shit, but like feminism, fuck the truth.
I know rape has been redefined. Everything is now rape.
Rape is still a very gendered thing, especially on college campuses. A girl merely needs to have been within 5 miles of booze and she's deemed unable to have been able to give consent. A guy gets passed out drunk and he can somehow rape a girl, even though she bragged about it.
Ok, so 1 leftist so far is too cowardly to defend his fellow leftists.
Are there any leftists with the balls to defend the bullshit from their side?
We know that RoyalCrown89 has defended free speech from his fellow leftist. That is refreshing to see.
Oppression is very, very real.
Let's look at how the SJWs view it vs what it's actually like.
SJWs changed the definition of various words like "racism" to include things like "power" and other things to claim that only whites can be racist, that only men can be sexist, yada, yada, yada.
As we saw with Berkeley over the last few years, blacks have had the power of the US Justice Depart., the state of California, the city of Berkeley and the police when pulling their racist shit against whites. In their "white people go around" action, the police were there to prevent uppity crackers from trying to force their way across the bride rather than forced to walk through the creek, as the non white (mostly blacks) demanded they do. If white people tried this shit, they would have been arrested and declared "racists".
Evergreen College had what would be deemed "racist" incidents if whites had done the same thing, but leftist justify the actions since blacks and their cucks were doing it. Imagine if a band of whites and their self hating black cucks roved around the college campus with baseball bats looking for disobedient blacks. Imagine if whites held a day where blacks were banned from the campus. Imagine if white students held the black college president hostage and refused to let him go to the bathroom and told him to piss himself.
BLM can block highways and refuse to let ambulances through, killing at least 1 child that we know about. The chant about killing cops. Their entire mantra is based in blatant lies. This gets them invited with honors to the White House by Obama.
Imagine if a gang of 4 whites kidnapped, with pre planning, a mentally disabled black young man and live streamed it for several hours making racist comments. Do we think that white CNN hosts and their guests would screech "IT AINT NO HATE CRIME!!!". Do you honestly believe that "real news" would totally ignore the story for at least 2 days hoping it would go away?!
Imagine if a gang of whites filmed themselves dragging an elderly black guy out of his car and beating the shit out of him and stealing his car. Do you think any "real news" outlet would be saying "Aw, poor, poor black people, BOO HOO". Like above, do you think "real news" would totally ignore this story until it got too big to ignore any longer?
If a white guy shoots up a black church, we never hear the end of it. A black guy shoots up a white church and "real news" ignores the story.
If non whites are getting death threats by supposed "alt-right" supporter(s), the "real news" jumps on the story immediately to demonize all whites, but especially all white men. Once it's proven that it's a false flag by a black guy, "real news" drops the story like it never existed.
A black church being hate graffitied is immediately reported by "real news" who then go on screeching about how evil all whites, but especially all white men are. Once it's proven that a black guy is the asshole doing the false flag, "real news" pretends like the story never existed.
Imagine 4 white girls getting on a bus, starting shit with everyone else already on the bus. The white girls scream that they were the innocent victims and targeted simply because they are white. Imagine that "real news" jumps on the story with nothing more than the cries of victimhood. Now imagine that once the CCTV videos are released the white girls are proven to be the aggressors, not the victim and the "real news" completely drops the story without correcting the story.
Imagine some white Christian had hate graffittied on her car. The "real media" jump on the story and scream "bigotry". Now imagine that CCTV from the store nearby proved she did it herself. The "real news" immediately drop the story, letting the false narrative remain.
Leftists screech "JUST BELIEVE" despite the fact that countless stories have been proven to be fake.
We're told that NO ONE, but especially women (quite sexist, if you ask me), lie about being raped. The same goes with being victims of any other type of "victimhood" crime. Lacy Green infamously was shown to have raped 4 million people, including myself. We've had countless fake hate crimes, including "homophobic" ones. Even after the Tawana Brawley case back in the 1980s (claimed she was gang raped by white cops, who then wrote "nigger" on her chest in dog shit), people are still demanding that we "just believe". Even after Duke Lacrosse, mattress girl, Jackie at UVA, and countless others, we are still supposed to "just believe" if they are in a "victim" group.
If a white person is the victim, even with mountains of proof, we're supposed to ignore it, especially if the victimizer is of a group that is always deemed as victims. Leftists demand that we ignore it because it makes the "real" victims look bad.
Women groping men, is empowering women, but those same women are just acting out their victimhood and oppression.
Feminists, while screeching about gender equality, love to brag how perfect women are. They love to show that not a single women in India has ever commit any form of domestic violence. What they will refuse to tell you is that under India's laws, women CAN NOT commit any form of domestic violence.
Similar things with sex crimes, especially rape. In the UK for example, to commit the most serious types of sex crimes, you must have a penis, even if the penis isn't used in the act. Shove a broom handle up someone's ass against their will, it's only rape if you are male. It's sexual assault for you are female. The same with most other types of sex crimes. In India, women CAN NOT commit any form of sex crime. Israel and several other countries are similar.
Feminists have fought in the UK and around the world to maintain their privileges, while screeching like lunatics on how oppressed they are.
Males are toxic. Everything about being male is evil. Nothing about being female is deemed toxic. Everything "toxic" a female might do is solely due to toxic males. Women are the main killers of their kids, blame men. Mary Kay Letourneau fucked a 10yo boy and only spent 3 months in jail. Blame males, even though it was a female judge. MKL got out of jail and continued fucking the child. She went back to jail for another 3 years. AGAIN, blame penis. MKL, by virtue of having a gash, makes her the victim not the criminal.
In Portland, during a "protest" to stop people getting to work, a woman punched a man in the face. He punched back and suddenly she's a protected class because she has a vag. She and her cucks demand that the man who hit her back be arrested because she has a vag and you never hit a woman. The kick in the cunt, in all this, is the bitch does feminism videos talking about how women are equal to men.
These cunts continued the "protest" when people were coming home from work, shutting down the city, preventing people from getting home. These fuckers, while claiming to have the moral high group (and covering their faces, as always) thought they had the right to oppress people who had jobs from getting to and from work.
++++
If the leftist on this site do respond, we will get to see some of the total fucking insanity of the left to justify this crap.
You'll find countless articles like this on the internet.
You will also find countless articles, by feminists, declaring it's ok for women to do this because it's empowering women. These cunts will justify the double standards with all manner of mental gymnastics.
@rapjjd, what kind of wiretaps are you talking about with Obama? He had authority via The Patriot Act, which the American people allowed to pass unless you're talking about something else.
YES, those. As well as the other bits included in the Patriot Act and done by executive order.
Obama campaigned to end all that shit, if elected President. Obama expanded those program far beyond anything GWB had.
Obama campaigned against No Bid contracts, except in dire emergency. I totally agreed with him. Turns out that was a fucking lie. He used them for things like routine and scheduled mothballing of ships. GWB used them for oil fires in Iraq, despite Schlumberger being the best company to do oil fires, giving the contracts to Halliburton.
The people from what I remember were against most parts of the Patriot Act, as were Obama and Clinton.
YouTube just totally removed all the channels of a guy that does historical military combat reviews, claiming the videos are terrorist training videos.
When was the last time a terrorist dressed up as a 14th century German knight wielding a "skull splitter"?! Maybe you've seen a terrorist dressed up as one of Gingus Khan's elite horsemen.
Let's not forget his video showing the construction of a Samurai warrior's suit of armour.
He went to japan to do a video on how PROPER/real Samurai swords are made.
YES, all terrorist training videos.
Of course muslims throwing gays off of rooftops and beheading their enemies and preaching jihad and "death to the west" and shit like that are ok to post to YouTube. Well, those videos are ok as long as it's "pro islam" and not being critical of their actions.