Posts made by pornofan

Whoops! Well, that's unfortunate. Pls forgive me. No longer freeleech, but still one heavily filled condom as advertised:

https://www.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=79629d26869272e7721e650ad4175fa3e751a59d5e11f7d2

Yes, the search function IS broken. If I search on a title or anything other than a single word, up will come a zillion responses. If I search all over again asking only for Torrent Name, the same useless result will occur. If I then try by putting the same search term in quotation marks, the same zillion responses will return. Apparently it does NOT filter for Torrent Name Only. Try it youself.

Can someone please fix this problem?

No, there is no such handy sorting, and "rubber" or "condom" at best is only likely to produce a statement related to barebacking or safer sex. Nonetheless, there are videos here that include exactly what I am asking about, and I am still hoping someone will point me to various torrents they may have found. For example:

https://forum.gaytorrent.ru/index.php?topic=31167.msg147570#msg147570

Where two US Marines get busy safely and provide ample proof. At this moment, the torrent is even freeleech.

Nice to see artwork featuring a thick, masculine bush rather than joining the debased trend of the naked, pre-pubescent crotch look that belies the fully mature development of the rest of the body in a fully functional adult male.

Cute? Oh, yeah. Untamed laddish hair, handsome, manly face with a killer smile… His briefs are packed enough to have a suggestive bulge, his treasure trail long, light, and sufficiently suggestive. And of course he has no idea he is an exemplar of masculine pulchritude, his youthful innocence making him even more naturally attractive.

Youthful swimmers below college age who do not yet have much control of their developing bodies often have to stand around all but naked for hours while waiting for their competitive laps. Boners are a natural peril for these men as much as for the upstanding displays wrestlers make at that age, at least in YouTube videos preserved for the ages. Or the aged. Whatever. And yet there do not seem to be photos of rampaging hardons pushing tight, revealing student Speedos to the limit as so many randy dudes wait around together oogling the spectators, if not each other. Someone could make a career out of capturing such moments, but perhaps they are more rare or more carefully disguised than some of us would like.

Those lush lips, those languid bedroom eyes! And, in the next to last photo as well as the first, his lovely diagonal prominence resting, limp but adorable, in readiness for action when he gets a chance. His partners are definitely to be envied. And he's not even the only godlet in these photos who can serve as an advert for what makes athletes famous.

Unlike some of this forum's Speedo pictures where the men seem much too aware of their carefully assembled, heavily groomed, highly deliberate presentation of their bodies, including and perhaps even especially the part oh-so-intentionally unconcealed by any shred of clinging designer cloth, these dudes seem to be pretty much unconscious of how maddeningly beautiful they are in the glow of their healthy, innocent youth.

One of the things that some of us find most attractive is the natural contours, curves, ripples, indents, and bulges of a male body, unshaved, unprimped, decorated only by its own skin and ripe with vitality and potency so natural and artless that it is taken for granted as much as the number of their toes, naively assumed along with all the potency and performance ability that goes with being a virile male in his prime, growing more beautiful almost daily, but without any self-conscious realization that such power and beauty, so easily enjoyed by themselves and so attractive to others, is even more evanescent and fleeting in its inherent splendor as life itself.

The old saw is that youth is wasted on the young, who have no idea what they have until it is gone. Perhaps all of us are unaware of what we have, our unacknowledged joys and blessings so easy to miss among the turmoil, pressures, and burdens of life with all its limitations and brevity, but boy howdy, as they say in Texas, at least sometimes we can appreciate the glory of others whose very existence makes the world a better and more beautiful place.

These two sure would make a nice movie together and would at least be wildly popular in a hidden camera video.
And if she does not want to participate, he could do all right with a few solos.

From Huffingtonpost.com (aka "Huffpoo") today:

As its small pool of viewers expected, "Looking" will not receive a third season. The dramedy, which chronicles a group of gay pals in San Francisco, will instead bow with a "special," HBO announced Wednesday.

Following two seasons of low ratings, author Kevin Sessums took to Facebook on Tuesday to say the show's star, Jonathan Groff, had informed him HBO would make a "Looking" movie in lieu of renewing the show. The network's official statement, released the morning after Sessums' revelation, reads thusly:

After two years of following Patrick and his tight-knit group of friends as they explored San Francisco in search of love and lasting relationships, HBO will present the final chapter of their journey as a special. We look forward to sharing this adventure with the shows loyal fans.

Sunday's season finale pulled in a paltry 298,000 viewers, a steep dip from the 425,000 people who tuned in for last year's closer. HBO, whose subscription-based services ensure it is not as dependent on overnight ratings as advertising-reliant broadcast networks, has proven that earning a third season is a show's true test. The acclaimed Laura Dern vehicle "Enlightened" was axed after its second run, while six final episodes will usher out the similarly low-rated "Getting On" later this year. "Hello Ladies," on the other hand, lasted one season before also receiving a television movie.

When someone is wearing a rubber to fuck, it is often removed so the money shot can be seen. But sometimes the top does not pull out and blasts away inside, Then when he pulls his dick out, rubber intact, it is filled with semen. Other times, someone is fucking and is planning to pull out before cumming, but misjudges or gets carried away, and makes a direct deposit captured by the condom and seen upon removal.

Personally, I think it is hot when fucking deep and hard and under full manpower results in an uninhibited orgasm inside. Hard to find videos with actual internal BB cumshots, and many of those have part, most, or even all of the load placed Outside in full view of the camera, with the orgasm continuing inside or with the cum pushed back inside, as if for lube. Mostly, not the "real" thing.

But a loaded rubber sagging heavily on the end of a still rigid dick as the satisfied top slides out, that is less likely to be faked, seems to me. The question is, how are such videos to be found? Does anyone want to recommend torrents on this site, gay or straight?

"Dinner and three dates."

Reminds me of the allegation that the difference between a str8 man and a gay man is a six pack. Of beer, not….

And that joke seems to be predicated on the notion that "gay" and "str8" are not permanent conditions, but transactional: that there are actions that people do, not solidified psychological states, and that people do whatever it is they do. There is an interesting book on the Invention of the Heterosexual. That notion, of "straits" v "gays," is usually couched in terms of how heteros discovered and labeled homos, but that necessarily involved some limiting and arbitrary definition of "heterosexuality" as both "normal" and ridiculously narrow.

"…most of us want to please as a means to please ourselves, we take pleasure in seeing pleasure in our partner regardless weather it is a smoking guy or a hot chick i guess Cheesy i for one love to hear my partner (girl or guy) moan in pleasure it's the thing that makes me go bananas."

That excitement and satisfaction in performing well for one's partner may be built into lust in some way, which would explain why a bottom or cocksucker who does not get off himself can have greatly erotic sex by getting their partner off. How many bj scenes and handjobs, often involving str8 men hired to be videotaped on certainty specialty sites, there is often a smug smirk of breeder accomplishment after the orgasm, even a thumb's up gesture indicating a job well done, a successful performance of their capabilities as a sexual animal capable of delivering a hot load of the type required for the preservation of the species.

Just as there is a difference between an orgasm and an ejaculation and either is possible without the other (just as either is possible even without an erection), there is a nonphysical component to sex acts. One common belief is that "making love" is different from "having sex," and much to be preferred when possible. Apart from that, "the woman comes first" and profoundly meeting the sexual needs at the moment for someone with a need to breed, even if only to impregnate ambient air by the inherent potency of a man's loins, continues for many to be as rewarding and as psychologically enhancing and validating as the first drops of wet semen that validate a pubescent teenager's sexual capacity.

As an older man, I look back to my youth in the closeted, uptite, pre-Stonewall days when I did not know anyone who was gay (that is, if anyone around me was gay, I did not know it) and had no gay role models, any sex I had with men was with str8s. As a Navy friend was told by the first man to suck him off, "it's just a blow job." Not all men freak out or have an identity crisis over getting their rocks off as needed– hence glory holes at truckstops. Men (and women, for that matter) find ways to accommodate their sexual needs, period. That does not require labels or stereotypes, just an active libido and the courage to satisfy it.

That said, some sexually active men might be curious whether a gay men gives head better than a woman or otherwise be curious about purely sensual "depravity," whether that involves a threesome with two women, another man and woman, or just some available deep throat, they may enjoy having a partner who does not think it is gross to suck a dick, does not think semen is icky or indigestible, and who might even welcome a good pounding.

I used to think strait men were pussy-oriented, but apparently some women like butt sex a lot, so as men become comfortable with doing that, they may figure "a butt is a butt" and, as Woody Allen said in a related context, double their chances of a date on Saturday night. To the extent that men are more rugged than women, it might well be rewarding for a str8 man to be able to fuck with full force and power, rather than have to modulate his breeding tor a more tender partner. And, esp. as men like getting sucked off and women often do not like to provide oral rather than receive it, the mouth most likely for them to feed does belong to a gay man.

Yes, I notice implied stereotypes in the above, and hasten to add that all these generalizations apply, at best, across a broad sample and not to any individual. Similarly, youthful experimentation-- Scouts discovering how to start a fire by rubbing two sticks together, drunken fratboys and other students, perhaps jocks and anyone else secure enough in their self-image that they would rather get laid than panic-- is not the same thing as a husband who has an arrangement with a gay neighbor, or some guy who has discovered the advantages of visiting an Adult Bookstore from time to time.

There are even str8s on Craigslist in the U.S. and on gay dating sites. One man in search of a blowjob told me, "I don't care what you look like; I'm straight." In fact, since tits and looks that matter in their choice of female partners are not relevant to their choice of cocksucker, the "attractiveness" of the relief giver is irrelevant. Everyone thus has an equal chance to slake the needs of such a stud at the right (wrong?) time of month, as a convenient if unexpected opportunity, to satisfy curiosity, or during occasional periods of heteroscarcity (a word invented right here, right now, and recommended for your use if if turns out to fulfill the need it seems to).

As for what makes a person "straight," opinions differ, depending on how much people are committed to labels and narrow categories in defiance of human history (heavy on "any port in a storm" and "a hard prick has no conscience" and "if it moves, fuck it"), and cultural mores specific to a given place and time. Do you really think everyone was celibate during long sea voyages throughout history? Ever heard the joke where the punch line is, "It's your turn in the barrel"?

My own believe, argue with it if you will, is that people do whatever it is they do, and whatever men do is something a man does. Once there was a humorous book titled "Real Men Don't Eat Quiche." In fact, real men eat anything they want. (Wanna make something of it?)

Yes, Spartacus had lots of frontal nudity, not including handsome Dan Feuerriegel, who played an openly gay gladiator who had sex with his bf in at least one scene.

Tom Riley, also v handsome, does not take it all off in DaVinci's Code, though there is a bunch of frontal nudity in this series as well, including the Pope's catamite in the first episode or two.

Oz was a prison drama that had naked men and relevant story lines but it is not Chris Meloni who interested me, it is the attractively muscular Luke Perry, a heartthrob from the original Beverly Hills 90201, who takes his package for a frontal stroll who is "worth the detour," as Baedeker used to say.

Openly gay Russell Tovey ("History Boys") shows his butt in some of his Looking sex scenes with Jonathan Groff, openly gay actor from Glee. You may remember Tovey's big ears from his days as a werewolf in the first Being Human. Cucumber, the recent 8-part British drama about an older gay man and his friends/lovers by Russell T. Davies, who wrote the original (British) Queer as Folk. As usual, the frontal nudity does not feature any of the principals.

Sounds like a video worth checking out, but there is no name and the link is broken.

P.S. There are a few friends I would gladly convert completely. Doesn't everyone know a few people they feel that way about?

Interesting. Not a question of who you want to do it with. Gay or strait, the object of interest ain't gonna do it with me, and probably not with you. That ain't the limiting consideration. I like the idea of turning villains gay so we can enjoy their disempowerment, the shame and humiliation of finding out how it feels to be the object of the same crap they foist on others.

I'm up for Ben Browder, though he is already fantasy enough, and Brendan Fraser, Brendan Hines, Mark Ruffalo, Paul Rudd, Ryan Gosling, Ryan Kwanten, Ryan Reynolds, Taylor Lautner, Stephen and Robbie Amell…. But that is not because I actually want them gay, I just want them. It would be a real problem if any of them showed up on my doorstep wanting to imbue me with a week or two of semen because I won't cheat on my bf, and I happen to know not one of those guys is his type anyway.

Probably I'm the only one stuck on Dan Feuerriegel of Spartacus and Tom Riley of Da Vinci's Demons, but again, would not really do any of us any good if they were as gay as I think we would all like Zac Efron to be. Unlikely, but wouldn't ot do us all a world of good if he was gay as an Ungaro spring frock and flaunted it constantly and publicly like George Takei or Dan Savage for the betterment of all mankind?

xminusone: Thank you for the interesting comments. I, too, tend to post at length, letting my mind wander and drain out through my fingertips as I explore various thoughts and how to put them into words. Unfortunately, as well informed and fascinating as my superior postings always are, I am almost the only person who knows that about the posts because apparently no one reads them, or if someone does read my remarks, they do not bother to share any of their own.

When I ask, as I did recently, what exactly people think "gay sex" means, there was mostly the sound of crickets, the sound of silence in remote areas during the night. As I said, I always liked sucking dick (which apparently is often called a "penis" even on porn sites where medical/clinical scientific terminology is hardly required. Or am I the only person who does not believe any bottom, no matter how prissy, ever said "I want you to put yr penis in me"? OR "Please fuck me with yr hard penis"?

Anyway, it is only in recent times that I have begun to realize that maybe what most people, including gays, think of gay sex is that it involves butt pirates, fudge packing, going the wrong way up a one-way passage. It came as a shock to discover that the str8 people who know I am gay may all be thinking about ass fucking and wondering whether I am, as someone put it in a nonporn Thai movie, I am a king of a queen. (Maybe the subtitles for the gay-themed film were inaccurate).

I don't know what I thought everyone was thinking when they found out I was a fag. Maybe they thought I had designs to abuse their asshole.
Or maybe the afternoon a very hot coworker showed up with a giant boner attempting to bust through his jeans he was hoping for more than a blowjob (which I later realized was v much his minimal expectation, hence his one and only visit to my place). Guess I will never know what people think about any of this, esp. if no one responds to a thread like this one where everyone has an opinion but almost everyone, overwhelmingly, keeps that opinion to himself.

Even around these forums I have seen people make a distinction between blowjobs and "real" sex. As someone told me, back when most of us were still virgins, "Fucking is just like real sex, only you don't have to use yr hands." At the v least, we know from pr0n that ejaculating on someone rather than in them counts as a successful sexual climax, and the powerful awesomeness of some supposedly st8s being paid to have a handjob from a man suggests that many of them are discovering orgasm possibilities they had never previously even suspected.

Anyway, I have not had an orgasm from being fucked, but have liked it a lot. For various reasons I have been reluctant to come right out and ask for that, but when a man wants to do it, I'm thrilled to have him aggressively take charge if getting his rocks off by fucking, as he normally does, even if his attention if all on loading up a pussy. Maybe it is not the familiarity, or a sense that a bj is a fancy refinement that is, however welcome, always supplemental to penetrating between the legs of a man or woman. That may be what they are used to, but it may also be something instinctual, some thrusting and hip action that helps trigger what is not entirely a phallocentric orgasm. (I mean that while men may focus primarily or exclusively on the feelings in their dick, the entire body it at least potentially an erogenous zone. And I'm quite sure that loving yr partner lifts the entire act, definitely including the physical sensations, to another level as well. That's something else people do not seem to talk about, though it is often assumed.)

To the extent that initial penetration has its own appeal and physical sensations, so does the slipping and sliding and thrusting with the full length dick at its widest and longest as it swells toward bursting, and then the huffing and puffing, moaning and groaning, the ecstatic and labored sounds of ejaculation as the… penis... throbs and squirts and thrashes in spastic, nonrhythmic fashion, no holds barred. Now, that feels great and is v exciting because a man brought to orgasm is a man who shares that orgasm with me though some kind of  Vulcan mind meld (R.I.P Leonard Nimoy). Apart from whatever I am thinking or imagining, apart from whatever story or narrative I am telling myself about what is going on, what I think about the top, I love the feeling of that dick in full operation, entering, banging, squirting. And is there anything as thrilling as an instant repeat where, whether oral or anal, the stud proceeds immediately as if starting from scratch, but without ever going soft or pulling out?

Not enough experience here for me to have much sense of whether one partner's orgasm speeds up, brings about, or increases the orgasm of the other. Does the top feel the bottom's contractions when he forces cum out of someone? Does the top's volcanic geysers trigger a response in the suddenly erupting dick he is stimulating as he gets off? Or is that kind of thing only something that happens between men and women?

The question of why being penetrated is so rewarding and satisfactory an activity is also connected-- isn't it?-- to how the top feels when he pushes a hot load out of the man he is fucking in ass or throat. Just as I am grappling with the question of why being the provider is something I seek, as many men do, I am not clear how the fucker satisfying the bottom male or woman connects up. Not to be insanely naive about feeling good and capable and manly about fucking someone to orgasm(s), or having the skill etc. to eat out a woman until she convulses, perhaps repeatedly and often loudly, but is it really a matter of feeling pride in the competence of one's sexual performance so that not only do You get off, but so does yr partner, hence possibly encouraging further occasions of such mutual rewards? Surely it is not a matter of being polite and courteous enough and respectful of yr partner's needs.

With m/f couples, the misogynic view: How can you tell when a woman cums? "Who cares?" is more likely to be "the woman comes (cums) first." And that is not just manipulative in order for the man to get what he wants.

Questions. Yes, we definitely have questions.

There is nothing more exciting than hot, fresh cum directly deposited and used for a second breeding.

xminusone (OTR fan?) writes: I, too, am like the women I described above who really just need a long, hard, sweaty ass-fucking every few days to clear my head; I find it works better than any anti-depressant medication I've ever used.  It's really just a remarkable experience, regardless of whether my man makes me cum or not.

My interest was always oral, but if my partner wanted to fuck, that was fine with me, even though it was not until many years later that I discovered it can stimulate the bottom to orgasm. Maybe if I'd been fucked more than a very few times that could have been figured out sooner, but those things did not happen.

It continues to baffle and fascinate me that I never was interested in penetrating others in any way, so the quoted remark interests me greatly. This may be an utterly stupid question, but I really do not know why it is the ejaculation/orgasm of others that so interests me and motivate me. But a mouthful of cum is not the same as an assload, so maybe someone can explain what it is about being fucked that you find "a remarkable experience." Especially if your own orgasm/edaculation is not involved.

It's not that I disagree, only that I have been unable to articulate what it is that I love about being rogered by a horny man. If anyone has ever thought about that, I'd love to know what you think.

Three related Channel 4 series by the creator of QAF. The titles refer to degrees of hardness of the member, from soft (tofu) through peeled and unpeeled banana, all the way to Cucumber! The main storyline is in Cucumber, Banana is supposedly a series of standalone stories that may or may not involve people from Cucumber, and then Tofu is a "behind the scenes" or making of" meta comment.

Or so it seems from what I've read and seen so far. I have not yet caught up with the gaybashing episode, which is almost de rigeur these days but which sounds more shocking than most. Am not sure what balance they seek between comedy or light-hearted playfulness and more serious and emotionally fraught events.

If anyone actually were interested in a running discussion of the shows, this might be a good place for it, if Moderators have no objection and no better idea. Having only begun to follow along, I am hardly fit to make even these general remarks.

And then there is Looking, with Russell Tovey, Jonathan Groff (both gay actors), and Scott Bakula (Quantum Leap, NCIS New Orleans) among others. Seems to capture the unlikely reality of San Francisco and the Castro district in particular. That's a show I follow more closely.