• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. pornofan
    3. Best
    P
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 1
    • Topics 173
    • Posts 433
    • Best 1
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Best posts made by pornofan

    • RE: Which type of Porn turns you on the most?

      jazuko: Young top and older bottom especially if theres a size difference

      Right. I love seeing youth in the prime of their power. But that's a personal preference. So is wanting
      the man to have all the body hair puberty provided.

      What surprises me constantly is the number of porn videos that don't pay attention to the Important Stuff.

      I like seeing the players in street clothes, watching them become aroused (perhaps while still dressed).
      When they fuck, we should see the dick enter. More important, we should see the top ejaculate inside without
      cuts or fades so there is no room for cheating or chicanery from the camera or editing. We watch the hard,
      wet dick come out, and then the fresh juice drains out to verify that the orgasmic bodywork was not faked.

      Felching is nice. Feeding the cum to the bottom to slurp is nice. What is important is that we see the faces at
      the critical moment, or at least just after. If there is barebacking, using the first load as lube for a prompt
      repeat is outstanding. Meanwhile, the bottom cumming hands-free because the top is fucking the sperm right out
      of him. Very nice.

      Maybe I make this sound like purely personal interests, but I believe a fucker should be able to complete his work
      without interruption. I believe the bottom should cum, too. And we should get to look at the freshly deposited cream.
      That does not mean pulling out for some squirting and then pushing the dick back in; it means going for the gold
      though hell should bar the way.

      If a condom is involved, by all means let us see it being put on. And after the internal cum shot, once the protected
      dick is removed, let's see the end sagging heavily with its contents. Then it can be unloaded, shared, slurped, or
      whatever.

      If there the ejaculation is from a blowjob, let's not have a facial, but a deposit as deep and hard as possible. Let's
      have the cocksucker swallow his reward for a job well done. We can see what fills his mouth or view the soaked
      penis upon withdrawal. And we should see the faces and bodies immediately post coitus.

      Strait porn often focuses on the woman for some reason (go figure, huh?) which means we may never see the dick
      come out. May never see the amount and quality of the load. May never even look at the guy again because who cares
      about him? All they want is the girl…. Grrr.

      Esp. with facials, whatever amount does not land in the mouth usually just makes a mess and there is no evidence the
      cocksucker actually wants to swallow, taste, savor, or otherwise enjoy the boiling fresh cum newly erupted. Instead,
      we often get someone with clenched eyes drearily submitting to a drenching and hoping not a drop gets beyond the lips.
      This is not how sex is supposed to be.

      I want to see people having a good time, holding nothing back, pleasuring each other, and I want to see their satisfaction
      afterwards. The convulsions of some Marines being blown for pay near Camp Pendleton suggests some of them have never
      had anything close to that powerful an experience before. In such cases, the look of utterly drained, knocked out, tension-free
      bliss on their relaxed post-O faces is wonderful.

      That little smirk of accomplishment, the thumb's up validation of having successfully done their breeding thing for the camera,
      the little laugh that sometimes follows as the final reservation and tension is released and the forceful quality of the man's
      performance is acknowledged. Those followups to the ejaculation itself can be memorable and incentivizing.

      I don't see why the climax is often faked or fudged or compromised by the director getting in the way of the natural drive
      toward glory, that's all. The rest of my remarks are mere commentary.

      It is probably too much to ask that there be more than one camera, more than one angle or point of view. Apparently it is not
      always even obvious that we should see the dick sliding in and out, that the camera be held steady, and that there be enough
      light that we can tell what is going on. Simple, minimal evidences of filmmaking competence. Considering the seemingly endless
      array of hunky young Marines beating off, getting sucked, and even fucking Bobby and others, it is a damn tragedy that the
      lighting and focus and camerawork are so often not even up to the level of being subpar.

      If those technical things are handled correctly and the people are attractive, horned up and ready to complete their mission
      enthusiastically with plenty of passion, all is well. But if some dude pulls out, whisks off the condom, and then wanks for ten
      minutes while his partner nods off in bored frustration, resigned to put up with the situation as the cameraman or editor has
      repeated fades and cuts to hide the very long limp time involved, that's not hot. Is it?

      Oh. And no cockring!

      posted in Porn
      P
      pornofan
    • 1 / 1