Posts made by MrMazda

@nickys1177:

how come the governments are busy sowing conflict among its people rather than managing the aids problem

Well… Simply put, political decisions are never about what is best for the people anymore. Instead, every political decision that is made these days is all about someone making money off of it. The medications that keep me alive run anywhere from $1200 - $3000 for a 30-day supply, depending on what pharmacy that you go to. When you consider how many thousands of people who are HIV+ and on medications, each one of which will be paying at LEAST $1000 every 30 days in some way, you start talking big-time money to be made. If they were to release a cure for HIV, they would not be able to keep milking this cash cow for all they can, in order to side-line their own pockets.

@SUPERurbano:

Like many others before me said, barebacking is extremely dangerous, you may think yourselves clean of STD´s, but these deceases have very long time of incubation, and a window in witch they are not detectable. So you may have been tested negative, but still have some STD (hepatitis C, witch no one takes seriously and is even more dangerous than HIV, for example).
People thinking that HIV is the ONLY issue in barebacking is one of the greatest issues, like the belief that if you ejaculate outside the body you don't transmit the decease or believing that tops can´t get infected.
All I said before leads us to one logical conclusion, the big issue is LACK OF KNOWLEDGE witch comes as a result of LACK OF REAL SEXUAL EDUCATION.
Love bareback movies and I suppose that if you are porn model you should get information of quality and know that you have no assurances that you´ll be fine. IT´S A HIGH RISK ACTIVITY AND SO THEY NEED TO BE INFORMED RESPONSIBLY.

:cheers: AND, OF COURSE, NO PROHIBITIONS, WE HAVE FREE WILL WHETHER CENSORS LIKE IT OR NOT.  :cheers:

While I do understand where you're coming from, I'm going to have to disagree on this point…. at least in part anyway. Medical science has shown that Hepatitis C is actually a BLOOD-BORNE illness, and unless you're dealing with an open wound to an open wound during sexual intercourse, the risk of transmission of Hepatitis C is actually pretty much nonexistent. Now if you're talking going to the party and participating in the use of drugs administered by a needle, there are still great risks of Hepatitis C.

Now... As for your point about people thinking that the only "big thing" to worry about is HIV, I understand where you're coming from. What I think you might be overlooking on this point though is that by comparison to HIV, any of the other STI/STD's that you can get can be treated and cured. While I cannot dispute that they are still a risk associated with bareback sex, when compared to a life longed chronic condition for which there is no cure, they're not as serious. This of course also assumes that you follow up with regular STI/STD testing regularly, in order to catch anything that you may catch before it has a chance to do some serious damage.

Lastly, on that note, while I do not necessarily agree 100% with your view, I also am an avid believer in a person's right to choose what is right for them. I will respect a person's right to opt not to engage in certain activities as a matter of personal preference, however for me personally, condoms simply do not feel the same and do not provide the same kind of experience for me, especially as a top. So… It's all a matter of how you look at it.

@nickys1177:

can a top who is safe get hiv when he fucks a bottom bare who has hiv? what about a person with hiv giving blowjob, can the other person gets the hiv?

The risk of contraction either way from any form of oral sex (such as a blowjob) is virtually nonexistent. That being said, when it comes to anal sex, the risk depends on a few factors. The most important of these is the person's viral load. If they both maintain an undetectable viral load, there is no risk of transmission of a new strain from one partner to the other.

By the same token, as long as the person who is HIV+ maintains an undetectable viral load, the risk of transmission to the partner is HIV free is nonexistent.

Also, the higher the viral load, the greater the risk. Generally speaking, anything under 50,000 carries a minimal risk, and it goes up from there.

@misweetcheek:

First of all it is not AIDS, the main virus is HIV.  You can't catch or get AIDS withouth having first been infected with HIV.  So truthfully the answer to your question is YES.  AIDS does not live outside the body (the only way for someone to have AIDS instead of HIV is for an infant to be born with it due to they have no immune system when they are first born).

Just to point out a technicality… The CDC defines AIDS as having a CD4 count below 200. An advanced case of HIV can drop the CD4 count below 200, however there are other things that can do this as well, including some cancers such as a lymphoma blastoma. So technically, while AIDS by medical definition does not technically require the presence of HIV, the two generally do go hand in hand, once it progresses to an advanced enough stage.

Short of asking a moderator for assistance and providing them the torrent link, or filing a helpdesk request and providing a link for them to verify whether or not the account is still known, there is no way for a normal user to verify if the account is still known. This is largely for privacy reasons. While we cannot disclose information about who the individual is, we should at the very least be able to confirm whether or not the uploader is still known.

It sounds like just like with Vuze, you need to adjust some of the default settings. Namely, the settings that handle what to do when seeding the torrent. If there are no peers, the torrent will stop by default. When this setting is enabled, the client never updates with the tracker that it has completed the torrent. It simply stops the torrent when complete, which also does not accurately report all the data to the tracker.

I would strongly discourage this practice. Not only is this a great way to land yourself into trouble, but PayPal also has a clause in their terms of service that prohibits their service from being used in any way to promote the delivery of adult content, so doing this would also violate PayPal's terms of service.

@Bonk:

I tested the port with http://canyouseeme.org and it says it's open, but still no uploads in Tixati.

1. You are not seeding any torrents

2. The torrents that are in your profile do not actively have any leechers.

I can try to work on number 2, but if you do not seed your torrents, there is nothing anyone can do to help with the problem.

As I said, you need to forward the port BOTH in TCP AND UDP

@nivram:

Let's smoke it up!  :cheers:

Been there… Done that....

This could also be a sign of a port forwarding issue. You need to ensure that the port that your torrent client uses (which I can PM you with if needed since it's listed in your profile) is forwarded from your router through to your computer. Most home network setups use a single router to bring together all of your devices within your home, and mask them all behind a single internet connection. The problem with this is that if you do not have the correct port forwarded both in TCP and in UDP, your router does not know which device to forward the packet to, and thus the connection gets dropped.

When you're downloading the torrent on the other hand, you establish an outbound connection to the other peers that you're downloading from, and in turn can send upload traffic through the return paths from that connection. Sending data in this manner does NOT require any special port forwarding, as the port is already open through the active connection. Once you stop downloading content, there is no longer an active connection that you've established with those other peers, and thus the seeding stops.

Just a thought…

For the longest time, I have heard rumors about DMCA notices being given to the site that are totally fictitious, are submitted out of spite, or are just outright wrong. For the longest time, I didn't want to believe this, however recently, something has happened that has left me wondering how legitimate the DMCA process really is.

Get this… The other day, I received a DMCA takedown notice FOR MY OWN PRIVATE VIDEO!!! That's right!!! A PRIVATE HOME VIDEO that I MADE MYSELF was the target of a DMCA takedown request. Imagine that... Apparently, my own private videos are copyright of some studio? SHIT!! When did that happen?! When do I get paid for whatever studio it was that had my video taken down for having apparently purchased the rights to my video?

Now I'm calling out to other users... Has anyone else received a DMCA takedown for THEIR OWN VIDEO?

It was a PRIVATE HOME VIDEO of myself, that I had filmed myself, which I subsequently published myself as the creator of the video... I just don't understand this process anymore. I had heard that fisting videos of all sorts were being taken down, and the other day, I finally got proof of that... Imagine that... My own video that I created myself and posted myself being taken down by DMCA... It really makes me question how legitimate this process is, or if it's just a cash grab for someone...

There are a few factors to consider… They are...

1. Your torrent client only updates with the tracker once every 30 minutes. For this reason, you may notice some delay in your stats updating.

2. Your torrent client will also include your overhead traffic in the total counts, which sometimes will leave a slight variance between what your torrent client reads and what you will see on the tracker.

3. The stats on the tracker in your profile are per session. This means that if you stop the torrent then restart it again for any reason, the stat count on your profile page will be reset to zero. That being said though, all amounts transferred DO count towards your total overall ratio. If you have stopped then started a torrent, this will account for the difference, as your torrent client will count everything since the day that it was added to your torrent client.

It has been discussed in the past, however as I recall, nothing ever came of it. As I recall though, our most popular option was to rename "Shemale" to "Transgender" so that it covers all aspects of the category, rather than just a stereotypical label that may or may not necessarily apply to every video in said category.

You mean sexercise isn't cardio enough for you? hehe

If using Windows 10, I would be inclined to recommend using something like qBitTorrent

You do not seem to have downloaded more than 250 torrents, so it would appear that the list in your profile of completed torrents is as complete is it possibly can be. The only possible exception to what may be missing is any torrents that were removed either because they were a duplicate, or were subsequently subjected to a valid DMCA removal request.

You can find this list by clicking on [you] in the top left corner of the page, then by scrolling down towards the bottom of the page and clicking on "Show Completed Torrents".

Here's a funny question… Have you checked your computer's date and time? Most often, this message is the result of your date/time being set wrong in your computer.

When you're in a low ratio status, the system will only allow you to download two torrents at a time. This is to try to prevent you from digging your ratio hole so deep that you cannot recover.

I would suggest trying some freeleech torrents to improve your ratio. Downloading any other torrent will result in your ratio dropping even farther than it already has.

The session stats that you see in your profile are the stats since the torrent was started. As soon as you stop the torrent for any reason, the stats on your profile are reset to zero.

Also, uTorrent shows the stats including all of the overhead traffic, which sometimes results in a slightly different total reading per session. The value you will find in uTorrent will be the calculation of the total traffic since the torrent was added to uTorrent, even if the torrent is stopped and restarted.