Topics created by lololulu19

Call them by their names!

@frostycab Worked fine for me, so for original post I'm leaning toward historical themes like attention seeking or cognitive disarray.

@lololulu19 You just wanna see the cute young jocks getting fucked while you are! LOL

Cause he wants to turn everything, into fiasco ...
why bother ... [smh] ... 😆 [off-topic] ...

What a surprise that you would volunteer yet another aberrant and useless train of thought.

@MrMazda Yes ... Thank You ... for your brief discussion and support ...

However this is [offensive] Topic from anyone who wishes, str8 content ...

and need to be address, stop/alerted or refrain from discussing by/from someone who brought and keep starting a fire [here] ...

With that said, why is there so much straight content here? Who wants it?

We have an option to turn off str8 categories, and skip if we don't want to ...

@lololulu19 : It's a Saturday Night Live skit, starring Dan Aykroyd, as "Fred Garvin: Male Prostitute."

Youtube Video

I don't know that he's faking it. Poor boy just fucked his brains out. That's all.

@lololulu19 So what you're essentially saying is that ever so often you don't feel horny for about an hour? And the rest of the time you're ready to go?

@frostycab Some studios hire law firms that have automated bots which troll websites (particularly known websites) if trigger words come up. Since it's a law firm, versus the studio, that sends these out, some websites (and particularly the web-hosts or the webmasters) have some responses set to automatically comply when these are received - so there's no real review or verification process involved.

As you noted, what searchable terms are used is one thing that prompts these trigger words for law firms.

@lololulu19 If any studio is particularly on-point regarding DMCA infractions, there is no reason to expect them to be any less proactive regarding their older productions than they are their newer scenes.

In the case of this studio, I have noticed a real trend of them releasing "new" films/DVDs that are simply compilations of some of their old scenes. Indeed, they seem to be one of the worst studios for do so. I have seen the same scenes crop up in multiple ostensibly new films. This, to me, seems like a huge "fuck you" to those people who still purchase films rather than simply subscribe to their site as they are charging premium prices for something the customer may already have paid for. It's not unlike those wretched trading card packs for kids that are sold in newsagents. The kids end up just getting the same cards over and over again with nothing new.

Nevertheless, the studios financial interest in those scenes still exists, and as such there is no reason to expect that they will simply turn a blind eye to sharing of scenes they may have shot a decade ago. Also, while I agree that recent work isn't as good as it used to be, I don't see why that should have any bearing on their approach to DMCA breaches.

@frostycab said in Confused about "Bonus Points":

They could use the 600 all in one go to get 10Gb, but they might also trade in 400 for 2 invites.

On point, however, only power users can use the invites.

It could also have to do with not only the speed of your internet connection, but it could also be that one torrent client is using a better open port than the other one. Next time look at what port each torrent client is using and choose to use the one which is downloading faster on both. Then maybe try using that port only on the slower torrent client to see if it makes a difference.