Posts made by ianfontinell 0

@cp2000 idk mate i just used reverse search to find this one

@jokuihmemies not a studio, the "MP" in the logo stands for Marcus Pollack, he is not strictly gay and sells clips in various platforms. His vids have all types of kinks, everything goes everywhere and it's overwhelmingly messy.

His twitter: https://x.com/marcuspollackFF

I had a similar case but I was the hookup, it started all just nice, after the sex dude started talking about past romances, I honestly don't know why people do this. I thought it was bad enough but then he started to teach me about League of Legends out of absolutely nowhere.

Just like you, I don't actually care, but I do my best to listen, but in my case it was a oner, while with you things seem to be developing a pattern, exchanging sex for emotional support, if anyone is using the other it is happening mutually.

Even though you don't particularly care for his problems, if you're at least somewhat of a nice person, you'll be interested in not help making his problems worse by taking part in his harmful behavior.

You could simply ask why he is on Grindr when he clearly has not got over his ex. Maybe he thinks this is what he needs to overcome it, or maybe he just wants the sex as he works on it somewhere else. Probably he didn't even put much thought to it.

I do wonder how they allegedly manage to identify GT users, my best guess so far is that they are targetting people who gave thanks?

When you join the swarm you only have access to IP addresses, you cannot possibly see any peer's passkey which is the only way to identify a member. And can we bring in CG-NAT to the table? Most home users are behind a NAT, they share their IP with multiple other clients from the same ISP.

When all you have is an IP, even if it's a unique IP attributed to a single home, that's still not enough to pursue a copyright claim unless you have means to prove exactly which resident commited the crime, you cannot assume it was one or other person.

It's strange that no one is willing to take them to court for this predatory behavior since it is extremely harmful for the defendants and to the judicial system.

helpdesk shadowban

@eobox91103 said in OK to upload music soundtrack along with a film?:

@raphjd OK...thanks; message received and understood. Downloaders who want the soundtrack can search Amazon or eBay on their own.

Amazon or ebay

@geniusacamel no sir, just a smartass with one brain and a pair of eyeballs:

also it's an awful moment to consume porn from that platform as nowadays it is flooded with bot accounts, fakes and AI generated "creators"

talented, brilliant, incredible, amazing, show stopping, spectacular, never the same, totally unique, completely not ever been done before, unafraid to reference or not reference, put it in a blender, shit on it, vomit on it, eat it, give birth to it.

and i thought i had a type

@undercoverfl the tops are @geoscarxxx and @theinkedpig, and bottom is @JacobKingXXXX.

I will send the link to the video in your pm

i am actually broke so i'm sorry if i sound stupid but what exactly do you gain with VR porn? When you turn your head around you see the production crew, or what?

activate your windows bro

@EchoAxel said in How many people watch multiple porn videos, while they jack off?:

Sometime I open so many that the computer freezes and then closes them. I hate when that happens because I have to start over.

LMAO

@macron I couldn't find it myself so asked back in LPSG which has way more active members than here, and a kind soul managed to id them:

https://x.com/Voyager254/status/1726456059798192352

@EchoAxel I can tell you that definitely you're not alone, I know a few people who have different videos side by side, sometimes in both the PC and phone. Also a few guys I met online who like to watch porn while wanking in a zoom call with other wankers.

Me in particular, I really don't understand how their (yours included) brain works, not only I can only watch a single video at a time, it also must NOT be an orgy. There's something extremely overwhelming about having too many people on screen, guess I'm too anxious

@cp2000 his twitter: https://x.com/ffaanthony

@eobox91103 said in Freeleech request, please:

• Sometimes I connect directly to the ISP at one of my homes, and at other times use (Proton) VPN. Is one way more or less likely to use a NAT?
• Is there a way to tell if I'm behind a NAT?

Both ISPs and VPNs rely on NAT for home customers, in the case of VPNs, some providers offer a unique IP at an additional cost. NordVPN charges an extra €4 for a dedicated IP. ProtonVPN only offers dedicated IPs on its business plans.

The most practical way to know if you have a unique IP is going through the router's settings, under the WAN page:

In my case you can see that I am assigned an IP starting with "100.68".
Anything from "100.64" to "100.127" is reserved for NAT use.

@eobox91103 said in Freeleech request, please:

I don't fully understand this, although given that this is the case, more leechers (encouraged by a free-leech) would increase the likelihood that one could connect. I shall have to study "NAT issues" in my copious spare time

Every machine connected to the internet has a public IP address, but sometimes that IP is shared between multiple machines. To cut costs, Internet Providers often assign a single IP to multiple customers using NAT (Network Address Translation). But this comes with a big drawback:

If you're behind a NAT , every time a connection is established between you and another machine, it was initiated by you. Anyone trying to initiate a connection with you will be blocked by the NAT.

A good analogy would be: Imagine you and your neighbor are throwing separate parties, and NAT is the gatekeeper. When you invite guests, NAT keeps track of who belongs to which party and lets them in accordingly. But if a random stranger shows up uninvited, NAT turns them away at the gate.

So imagine you're the only seeder in a torrent. If you're behind a NAT, leechers will never be able to contact your client. Your client might proactively initiate a connection to the leecher, so even behind a NAT it is possible to seed. But if both the seeder and the leecher are behind a NAT, they will never be able to contact each other.