Posts made by ianfontinell 0

@serge1983
1st pic is: https://www.instagram.com/cram_cam/
2nd pic is: https://x.com/BillDemon

What certainly helps is the fact that I just downloaded a bunch of videos yesterday and he was in some of them, so I know the name: https://x.com/JakeFTMx/

The coach, you can find more videos with him under the name Master Aaron.

As for the naked fag, he used to be a fashion model and is now a politician, so if he's done other porn it will not be easy to find.

Take a look: https://www.instagram.com/alexandermjjones

https://bsky.app/profile/slane74.bsky.social
https://www.instagram.com/jerzeeboi74/

Model Paul Nordgren
i don't think he's in porn, but you'll find lots of nude photos if you google his name.

@rimmer11 hiiiii sorry to break it to you but you came late to the party and the forum is pretty much DEAD

there are a few ID requests per day, apart from this the only activity happens in the politics & debate section, i encourage you to visit it whenever you feel like developing a brain aneurism xD

@ysorandomxP i know this is not ideal but many of the files from the torrent you are looking for are still available in other torrents, you might not be able to find everything because some have cryptic names, but most files are properly labeled.

@leo2003 one last thing, not to echo what was already said by staff and other members, but a practical solution to your case:

even if your torrent has 110GB, downloading it would decrease your ratio, but you intend to add more stuff and re-upload it again (a behavior that is currently acceptable as per the site rules).

So my take is, just download it, use your ratio, and when you re-upload it you will be back to where you were before.

@MrMazda said in Circumventing duplicates aka Fansite collections:

So... When it comes to these collections, I would encourage you to bring such cases to my attention, and I'd be happy to review them on a case by case basis and handle them accordingly. We try to keep things fair for all users, so I'd be more than happy to dig deeper into this if you can give me examples of what you're referring to.

To sum up, my only intetion with this topic was to ask is mirroring a bunch of previous torrents from other users into a single "twink collection" or "euro collection" or "latin collection" allowed?

I know the written rules (the only rules that should exist btw) don't say anything about it, so it does not make sense for me to go through the effort of naming examples to be handled on a case by case basis, it is just trying to ice skate uphill, when there is nothing in the rules that discourages this behavior.

@leo2003 i wrote a reply to your topic before but i changed my mind because i didn't want to upset you even further, but the thing is... the torrent has more than 30 seeders, it is pretty much healthy and not at risk. even though you are the original poster, the torrent no longer needs you to stay alive.

and being such a big collection, whoever decides to freeleech it will have to spend at least 21 thousand bonus points. I only have 6 thousand, for example. Usually the staff is able to freeleech a torrent upon user request, but only if that torrent is at risk of going dead, that is, when it has very few seeders.

on this site in particular, asking other users to freeleech stuff for you is not allowed, but you can request a mod to do it for you if the torrent is at risk.

so for you, the only two possible solutions would be to either consume your own ratio to download the files, or wait indefinitely until enough people have left the swarm and the torrent becomes elegible.

@frostycab that's precisely how i feel, i understand that the site is considerably understaffed when it comes to moderating and reinforcing rules that are not easy to check. i am not a mod and it already feels like a pain in the butt having to go over torrent after torrent just to check if they are duplicates, to only then being able finally make a report, for another mod to have to go through the same effort except that they are already handling a dozen similar cases on their own...

so in a sense it's a misdemeanor situation where, the behavior in undesirable, but to prevent and punish it, it would be required an amount of effort that is currently unfeasible, so it ends up being allowed.

@mihaig110 happened to me in the past, in my case i did not even mention anyone because my torrent was a collection of a bunch of random small creators that nobody really care about. It was super weird that there was a request because no one could possibly be representing any of the featured people... Because no one was mentioned.

Keywords certainly play a role, images can also trigger the dmca bots. In my case I reuploaded the exact same torrent file, didn't change a byte, created a generic title that was still faithful to the content, and provided no preview whatsoever. there was a thumbnails folder, so people could still have a sneek peak. That one torrent is still up.

One reason why you don't see users bringing this up is because it is against the rules, this topic will most likely be locked soon. There really isn't anything we can do, it is the dmca lottery and some of us are more lucky

Question to the site staff, regarding the ongoing trend of re-uploading material that already exists in the site, under the disguise of "US/UK/ fansites collection 39/40/50" containing files from multiple random creators.

You go check the content of each crator, the folder is a mirror of other previously uploaded torrent.

It is a very common practice, so therefore I assume it is allowed, but it seems like just a clever duplicate circumvention, where instead of duplicating one torrent you simply duplicate a dozen at once and get 12 times the credit.

In short I am asking the staff if this is "fine" not in the sense that they think it's fair, but that it's technically not against the rules.

@gabisev this one is really hard, i haven't made any progress towards finding it, the more i look, the more i start to feel like i know who it is, it started to remind me of travis stevens all of a sudden, and now i can't unsee... but i am pretty confident that it is NOT him.

Here I will post one similar image of Travis Stevens rimming another twink, it really looks really similar:

On a similar note, I also found this scene with Jack Rayder, this one finally from cockyboys, where again i see some resemblance, but look at the sheet color, definitely could not be it:

@serge1983
insta: https://www.instagram.com/jimbocooper_gym
OF: https://onlyfans.com/u297838415

I believe this is the man: https://www.instagram.com/sound_ws

@Ignatius there is a clear limit with what can be done with censored porn, rather it's cartoon or not, whenever you try to "decensor" you are simply making an educated guess of what might be underneath. It is highly similar to art restoration: if you are good at it, your work will be completely unnoticed, but ultimately the end result will always be just the interpretation of the person who did it, or tool in this case.

@gabisev said in Please ID the scene:

Just a note: that kind of “ask politely” condescending tone isn’t really how things usually go around here.

i know i know, usually people are more polite in their requests as well.

I do know the mailman is Park Wiley:

And the twink is Kelly Taylor:

The only problem is that I can't find any mention whatsoever of them ever working together. Even sites that are specialized in porn press releases like WayBig, there's nothing. From the little I could find, the studio seem to be NextDoorStudios but I still couldn't find a scene or a DVD containing that scene, sadly.

@gabisev said in Please ID the scene:

@ianfontinell-0
Hi! Could you please share the link for that scene? I'd really appreciate it. Thanks in advance!

the scene is from cjdelco's OF page and features his bf @hungcaleb9 and the bottom is Carter Layton.

You can find the scene here: Breeding and devouring c0nwhores hole on the couch