Posts made by ianfontinell 0

@jokuihmemies https://x.com/KinkCaged

@MontanaJones 100% real, one of the most recognizable dicks in porn: https://x.com/teninchtopx/status/1897009984615145577

Max Max Max
Super Max Max
Super Super Max Max Max

@alexisyap he is Jeffrey Lloyd, top is Charlie Cherry. The scene is from Lucas Entertainment, released in january 2025. I don't think it was uploaded here in the site yet, but you can find it on other sites.

@amelia avoid mosaics or blur effects because those can be reversed with AI, instead you should completely replace your face with a solid color

i would be really grateful if people DON'T know

@inkball it's Johnny Donovan. I think this is the scene: https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=8a62d8c2efa013b18cca2248b61a61e35916e42cdde44b36

@zoji3k red the topic again and maybe you'll get what op means, the term collection is being used as a synonym for "dump", with dozens of files that are totally unrelated or simply share a category, like twinks, or bears.

One thing that all those torrents share in common is that the files are massive, it might not be a "nefarious" reason but it is pretty much clear that they're doing it for the traffic.

IMO it only clutters the site and, if anything, makes it harder to find legitimate collections. But no one's forced to download, and it's not against any rule so...

Collin Merp & Angel Elias

the photos are from badpuppy, he is credited as "Theo" as seen in this link: https://www.badpuppy.com/tour/trailers/Theo-01302003.html

I have also seen him credited as "Simão Fogaça" in this DVD: https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=8e91ad9146da57713f40439bf38e7a8ceff0d532b01eec9b

@frostycab i can see it fine, but anyways here's an inline version:

Comparing two things doesn't mean they are equal in nature. Raspey used an argument to demonstrate that homosexuality was once a crime and that homosexuals had to hide or supress their own nature to avoid public outcry, prison or death, and that all of that happened despite the fact that two men being together does not hurt or affect the life of any other person whatsoever, that it was criminal based solely on moral/religious beliefs.

It being a crime back then didn't make gay people stop being gay, as you have pointed yourself in your argument:

"I woke up today wanting A? Wow. I accept that feeling in itself - but A isn't victimless, A has victims. Ethically, I'd better check myself & focus rather on B & C. To start, I'll discard A materials."

No crime is victimless, so for homosexuality to be a crime, a victim must exist, and in this case it is the people as a whole, and God. Now as a gay man you know you're a sick pervert and that you must not indulge in your sinful desires as not to disturb the public order and bring shame to your name and your family, which is exactly what many gays had to do back then, and is what many pedophiles do today.

Historically, neither practices were bashed, it is known that the Romans would engage in homosexual practices publicly and it wasn't either shameful or a sign of a weak moral. And it was not just "regular" homosexual practices as you'd call, because many would turn to the younger males, and it was perfectly fine.

Making that comparison does not signal any virtue or vice in itself. In your head, it seems, you assume that the comparison alone leads to the premise "for A to be okay then B must be equally okay" which is a reductivist interpretation.

No one is asking for you to have simpathy for child rapists, only that you understand that you should not reduce one's urges to a mere moral question. I tell you that you could be a pedophile yourself, and I don't say that implying that you are, and I don't intend to say it as a way to attack you. I'm simply saying that if you are not, you could have been, it is not up to you.

Now, were you a pedophile, you'd go through that path your own way, perhaps you'd be a lawful MAP who is disgusted with yourself for what you desire, but manage to not offend.

Not being a choice one can make doesn't turn it into something that is inherently rightful or that should be allowed. That part I'm pretty sure you get.

But, on the same matter, not being a choice means you cannot not be judged as if it were. Even if offending is wrong, you are to be judged for offending, never for the mere thought of offending.

@Rapsey-0 said in Top CA teacher gets 30 years for sexual abuse:

4. There's no reason whatsoever to try to have an objective good-faith discussion with people who are clearly not interested in doing the same

Proceeds to do it regardless

Carta aka Cartainst, someone even said it in the comment section:
https://x.com/cartainst

@775405984 Andrea Novak

@raphjd said in Top CA teacher gets 30 years for sexual abuse:

Pedos are a frequent topic of discussion here.

oh really? how does it usually go?

adding a impactful catchphrase doesn't automatically turn this into a political discussion, you might need to elaborate your intent

@cp2000 said in Snapchat leaks compilations or ''cam'' compilations:

@di3di3di3 a good rule of thumb from a scientific, physiological standpoint is the head is about an 8th of the body. Although some adult males can look younger than they are.

bro

@di3di3di3 following your flawless logic if you inadvertently download underage porn it's not your fault because you didn't know... the law is more complex than you seem to believe.