@jjohnson84uk-0 there is a technique called steganography, which consists of watermarking the file image noise, that is, slightly alterating the value of specific pixels, so it is completely spotless and only the person who encoded it has the password to decode it.

For images it is a very simple process, but for videos it's super tricky, complex and expensive.

Chances are that adult sites use stenography for pictures, but for videos the most likely way that they use to track the user ID would be video metadata and file names.

So if you decide to share, I'd advise you to skip the pictures, only share the videos. And before doing that, use ExifTool to get rid of all metadata, and rename every file.

If this is going to become yet another place for this miserable autistic edgelord parrot to keep rage baiting with the only subject he's ever learned to talk about I am gonna have to request a mod to delete the topic

consists of watermarking the file image noise

consists of watermarking the file using* image noise

@Varrtan007 finally found him, he's Arno Antino.

Here is the full scene: https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=dbafbf8236a8f93c8cca2248b61a61e3b8f76a9045dd870f

I don't mind huge torrents as long as they come with contact sheets for everything. There's no way in the world that I am interested in all the 2000 files from the Sean Cody collection. I can instead download the contact sheets and check which ones I want and go directly to them without the need to download 1TB worth of mysterious files.

If something is too big and you're unable to grab it it's unfortunate, but you are not entitled to object to people taking a file and uploading it as is. That's already a time consuming task, not everybody has the time and technical skills required to re-process a file aiming for a smaller size while retaining visual quality.

Suggesting that the site should limit file sizes, or torrent sizes, is just as reasonable as suggesting you to hire a better internet service.

After downloading, you are completely free to re-encode the file yourself, and if you want to benefit from the ability to seed it you only need to upload it to the site.

@blablarg18 Seeing this as a weakness, it's almost as if you're saying "if something's annoying you, you must face it and be annoyed indefinitely instead of doing something that'll effectively fix the issue"

But since the subject popped up, what I think truly shows weakness is making a rule that says people are not allowed to block you. I'm not talking about you of course, just a vent... God knows I tried

@kalayaan finally my time has come

I could not find the specific scene from the twitter clip but I am 100% sure that this is Frank Towers aka Mark Slade.

https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=e1b68c57e91b46e98cca2248b61a61e3a27a7bee63b87663

@kuda01-0 daily upload/download is not what you think. It does not mean that the max you have uploaded in a day was 2.5GB... It is simply a calculation of your total upload divided by the number of days that your account exists.

For instance if you have an account that is brand new, with only 1 day, and you upload 1GB, it will show:
Total upload: 1GB [daily: 1GB]

If on the next day you don't upload anything at all, this will change to:
Total upload: 1GB [daily: 500MB]

To me, the numbers are far too complex for accounts older than 2 days, so I hope my simple example was enough to clear your doubt.

@remixafter-0 go to the main website and check the header, how many torrents it says you're downloading, 2 or 8?

If it says 8, before downloading anything you will need to pause your downloaded torrents, I can explain later if you're interested, but pausing them and waiting a few minutes will get you able to download new stuff.

If it says you're downloading 2, means you need to upload more before being able to get more stuff.

@raphjd did u just leak your category preferences

@PrototypA5 that is a very old build lol, i know it's not worth upgrading to newer versions as utorrent itself has become a cryptojacking junk. Consider moving to a newer client, I suggested qbittorrent because it is the most popular, open source and maintained with regular updates.

As I mentioned before the padding files are created by the client itself, never downloaded.

It's still worth pinging @vancer to suggest making the v2 protocol optional in the settings or sticking only with v1 for compatibility issues.

@PrototypA5 said in [Software Release] GayTor.rent Upload Utility:

So when trying to seed this torrent then, it says missing files (because those pad folder and files dont exist.

I will try to explain this.

Starting from the very beginning, the bittorrent protocol utilizes something called piece size to increase sharing efficiency. Suppose you have a 100MB file. During the torrent creation, it will split this file into multiple pieces. When seeding, you can send different pieces to different peers. This allows peers to share pieces with each other, increasing the theoretical download/upload speed of all peers, regardless of the initial seeder's bandwidth.

For single files, this is very simple, as everyone is downloading the exact same thing. For multiple files, some users might download all pieces, while others only choose a few files.

The problem is: those pieces can store parts of more than one file. Meaning that, to download one file, you are required to download a portion of a different file. And worse than that, let's suppose you downloaded 3 files and deleted one, in hopes that you'd still be able to seed the other 2, but since one of the files share a chunk with the deleted file, the client will report that the file is incomplete, even though it's not.

To fix this, Bittorrent V2 introduced padding files. Those are created by the client ONLY WHEN NECESSARY, creating empty pieces, with the purpose of increasing piece alignment efficiency. So different files will never be stored in a same piece, preventing peers from having to download parts of files they don't want, and allowing them to be able to seed all files they have without the need for downloading extra bytes from other peers.

THAT SAID....

The reason why you cannot seed your torrent is: you are either setting the download location to the wrong directory, or you are using a torrent client that does not support bittorrent v2. Try migrating to qbittorrent, it that is the case.

Apparently, AI made "influencers" are now a thing, they are spreading across fansites such as OF and JFF and making tons of money. First time I came across @dr__enzo I had such a good laugh because of how janky and obvious it was, didn't give much attention... Today I came across his profile once again by accident, only to find out he has a "boyfriend" as real as himself called Nico, take a look:

Nico:

Dr Enzo:

What really worries me is the amount of big creators that follow them on X, I'll name a few:
beefypeaches 177K
Baysexcali 119K
Emiliano Terra 736K
DiscoDick 318K
VICTXR 330K
XXL Top London 457K
Jordan 575K
Luc & Alex 735K

The ones I mentioned are merely the ones I follow, there are many more huge names, who are constantly interacting with these accounts, no one addresses the fact that all their posts is computer generated.

I don't usually make posts like this but I just can't feel like I'm living the Truman Show alone, you're coming with me!

Connor Maguire and Diego Hawkins

https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=3440ffdac42da3c08cca2248b61a61e38623f19fca24ac45

https://x.com/Hungodey/media?lang=en

@jokuihmemies lol

@MrMazda said in there is something wrong with the tracker:

It may be possible that your passkey has been compromised.

I just wasnt downloading anything atm lol

I'm just complaining about the time it takes for the tracker status to change when you stop an unfinished torrent, sometimes it takes up to one hour, while stopping completed torrents takes effect almost instantly.

It's Mark Rivera: https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=ed0be9c07ac8f1a78cca2248b61a61e3ae7f3248e1af438f

Act Nº 2257 is not retroactive and content made prior to its passing can still be made available for distribution, but there are further laws such as the PROTECT Act from 2003, to avoid this from being used as a circumvention for distribution of porn featuring underage actors.

This law makes it illegal to knowingly distribute any material involving or appearing to involve minors, even without explicit recordkeeping. Notice the use of the word appearing. It is at the studios' discretion to distribute films with actors that are/look underage, but they are at risk of legal prosecution and if they fail to provide proof of age then they are screwed.

In theory, if a consumer in 2024 legally acquires a pre-1988 adult film, believing it involves only actors of legal age, and later learns some actors were underage, liability for the consumer could be somewhat mitigated if they had no reasonable way to know. The strict liability nature of child pornography laws, however, still generally means that mere possession is illegal, regardless of intent or prior knowledge.

If authorities become aware of such a scenario, they might evaluate whether the consumer could have reasonably known about the content's legality. Yet, strict liability can mean that even reasonable assumptions don’t fully exempt a consumer from risk.

tl/dr: if you want to avoid accidentally seeing something illegal, stay away from vintage porn.