Posts made by Frederick

@aadam101:

@Frederick:

A new law is needed.. to automatically "pardon" all actions that took place during a campaign after the election is over.

Have you seen that movie The Purge?  That's pretty much what a law like that would get you.

I'll take a look for that movie.  I haven't seen a good movie that didn't involve 8 inch cocks for years.  Today I watched "Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them" which grossed $810 million and won an Oscar and there will be 4 more movies in that franchise.. It WAS TERRIBLE!  The plot is VERY weak, the special effects are poorly matched with the live actors, and the dialog is difficult to hear and nonsensical.  I am watching King Kong with John Goodman and Sammy Jackson now.. and that sucks too.  The movie is already halfway over, and I have yet to see Samuel L. Jackson fuck John Goodman up the ass.

It looks like John McCain pulled the ultimate in grand standing.  First he cast the needed vote to debate Obamacare… and then when it came time to start debating.. he got out of his chair, stood before all the senators, drew attention to himself.. and gave an emphatic thumbs down.. much to the delight of the moonbats who clapped, cheered, and celebrated McCain's defecation.  McCain was later seen laughing with the two other republican women who voted with him.
McCain is a slug.  He is 100% envious of Trump for becoming president when he FAILED...

But.. what will be the result of all of this? 
McCain will either undergo chemotherapy which will keep him alive but so sick he will be forced to leave the senate, or he will refuse chemotherapy which will prevent him from being sick, but result in the cancer growing and killing him within a year.  Good riddance!

About Healthcare.  There is no solution to healthcare.  The democrat's Obamacare FAILED.. and I promise you that any Republican plan would also FAIL, only not as fast.  Healthcare is like a "Kobiyashi Maru" on Star Trek - a battle that has no winning outcome.  What will result is no new healthcare plan from the Republicans, and Obamacare will die, and no new healthcare plan from the Democraps.  Healthcare will revert to what it was in 2008. 
Once Obamacare is gone, the only way you will ever see at attempt at socialized medicine again is with both a Democrat president and Democrat Senate and Democrat House of Representatives.  Good luck with that!  And.. if those 3 things did happen.. there would be "Obamacare2" which would also be doomed to failure just like Obamacare is now. 
The problem is.. socialized medicine doesn't work unless you have a dictatorship in which healtcare costs are controlled by the government.. doctors are paid low wages, people can't sue, there are no fancy medical procedures, and doctors can't leave to go work someplace else.

Medicare is loaded with fraud, the VA system is a disaster, the education system is a disaster, and the military is a money pit.  The more government stays the hell out of people's lives.. the better.

@aadam101:

This man never changes.  For decades he has made money off the backs of hard working people by simply not paying them.  Now he is doing it again with ObamaCare.  He had his usual Saturday morning Twitter tantrum and announced he will not make any ObamaCare payments to insurers next year which will effectively cause prices to skyrocket and people will die without care.  He is a very sad man.  This is not how a leader should behave.

Where do you get your garbage from?  Or do you just make it up?
Trump's SONS are now in full control of his businesses.  The premise that Trump is not paying his contractors is pure crap.

@aadam101:

Trump has done nothing to help the economy.  The only REAL job announcements that have been made are from Walmart and Amazon (warehouses).  These are very expensive jobs for taxpayers.  Walmart employees alone use $6 billion in public assistance every year.  Bezos and the Waltons are just a bunch of welfare queens.

I tend to not be as tough on Bezos because Amazon also has a lot of good paying jobs in other areas of the company.

Trump has made a lot of fake job announcements. He announced that he saved Carrier and then they layed off 600  workers.  Then he announced he saved Boeing and they layed off 200 workers.  Then Microsoft layed off 2000 workers.  Then Macys…..and JCPenney.....and Kmart.......and Sears.......and many other retailers.

FoxConn is just a big lie.  They have made these announcements before.  Here is one from 2013.  It never happened.  It was never built.

http://money.cnn.com/2013/11/22/technology/foxconn-plant/index.html

The economy is booming since the election, but you never hear the media talking about it.  And.. one of my predictions has already come true…  Reince Prieubus is GONE.  Look for Sessions to go next.

FINALLY they are going to investigate the goons who really need to be in jail.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/28/republicans-call-for-second-special-counsel-to-probe-clinton-lynch-and-more.html
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/27/obama-official-made-hundreds-unmasking-requests-gop-chairman-says.html

Here's an idea.. have those investigations done by Herr Mueller as well.  Then Mueller can't get away with giving the Clintons, Lynch, and the DNC free passes while standing on his head trying to stir up any dirt on Trump and his sons.

A new law is needed.. to automatically "pardon" all actions that took place during a campaign after the election is over.

There is a big problem though.  Hillary Clinton was being investigated by the FBI during the campaign.  If that was made official, it would have destroyed her candidacy, and Bernie Sanders would have been the democrat's candidate.  Lynch literally ordered the FBI clown Comey to refer to it as a "matter" instead of an investigation to defuse it, white wash it, and bury it.

@aadam101:

Lol. No it's not 30%. Obamacare put a cap on the medical loss ratio. Insurers can't spend more than 15% on administrative costs. However, your point remains. The administrative costs are too high and way too much of it is spent on billing.

This is why ObamaCare addressed some of these problems by creating the Financial Alignment Initiative and Accountable Care Organizations. It's still too early to tell if these programs actually save money.

Have you read this?  https://www.singlecare.com/blog/30-medical-bills-go-administrative-costs/

But.. I would not be surprised if administrative costs are now 15% (which is still outrageous).  Not because Obamacare reduced administrative costs.. but doubled healthcare costs overall… so what was 30% of  100% is now 15% of 200%

@mhorndisk:

Different vision here… No offense. T
I don't know much about the Federal Reserve so I can't comment.

As for the Vatican.  This current pope is to the Catholic Church what Obama was to the USA.  He seems to be intentionally trying to destroy the Catholic Church.  In the USA, figureheads such as the Queen of England and the Pope are popular only as celebrities.. and not taken seriously.  In fact, there is another prediction.  After Queen Elizabeth ][ dies, the role of they "Royal Family" in England will be reduced to only a very thin ceremonial status.

Very soon…
Attorney General Jeff Sessions will resign
Reince "The Leaker" Preibus will resign
The new attorney general will fire Herr Mueller
North Korea will get pounded. 
Healthcare will go nowhere.. Obamacare will die.. and health insurance will revert to what it was in 2008
"The Wall" will not get built...
Tax Cut will get passed
Economy will continue to improve
And eventually.. Trump will be re-elected because when it comes down to it.. all people really care about is the economy.

@raphjd:

I'm not sure how I feel about it.

I fully support former trans (completed trans) joining the military.

I'm not sure I support joining the military so the taxpayer has to pay for your transition.   Not to mention all the time you will not be able to work.

What do we do when the loony "trans" like Elliot Cope, Milo Stewart, Riley Denis and Dakota want to join?

It would be nice to have an all female military like the Amazon Women.  Let them get their asses shot off for a change.

@royalcrown89:

@Frederick:

@royalcrown89:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/27/nyregion/justice-department-gays-workplace.html?action=Click&contentCollection=BreakingNews&contentID=65627985&pgtype=Homepage

Is it really surprising after the "#45 supports LGBTQ individuals" lie that this administration does not support us? Why is the president not taking up for us now? Why is he not defending us from what Jeff Sessions wants to do? If he needs a reason to fire Sessions, shouldn't this be it? Or has this president once again shown he's a coward and a liar?

Who supports this? Who wants to see other gays lose their jobs, benefits, etc. just because they are gay or if their employer assumes they are gay? Yet another indefensible action by this president and his administration.

Here we go again…
On the one hand.. people are complaining that Sessions is attacking gays..
While on the other hand.. people are attacking Trump for criticizing Sessions and warning him not to fire Sessions.

This is exactly the same two-faced logic that reared it's head with firing James Cumonme.

Didn't the president say he was going to be a president that stands up for LGBT individuals? Did he not make the promise that he would not let his administration discriminate against LGBT individuals? He is a coward and a liar like I said. If he was a man of his word, he would come out and say "AG Sessions is WRONG to file motions with ANY court to make the legal argument for discriminating against LGBT individuals." He has not been saying that and you are wrong for attempting to twist my point. The president has been criticizing AG Sessions for recusing himself from the Russia collusion investigation, not for being a disgusting bigot. The longer the president remains silent on this, the more he himself is going to come off as a disgusting bigot. He says he's done with Sessions, then he needs to prove it. Come out against what Sessions is trying to do to LGBT individuals, not just about Sessions recusing himself.

Like I said before,  Trump gets attacked for what Session does.. and Trump also gets attacked for criticizing what Sessions does.  Trump is being threatened with catastrophic mutiny if he fires Sessions.  Expect Sessions to resign soon.

@royalcrown89:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/27/nyregion/justice-department-gays-workplace.html?action=Click&contentCollection=BreakingNews&contentID=65627985&pgtype=Homepage

Is it really surprising after the "#45 supports LGBTQ individuals" lie that this administration does not support us? Why is the president not taking up for us now? Why is he not defending us from what Jeff Sessions wants to do? If he needs a reason to fire Sessions, shouldn't this be it? Or has this president once again shown he's a coward and a liar?

Who supports this? Who wants to see other gays lose their jobs, benefits, etc. just because they are gay or if their employer assumes they are gay? Yet another indefensible action by this president and his administration.

Here we go again…
On the one hand.. people are complaining that Sessions is attacking gays..
While on the other hand.. people are attacking Trump for criticizing Sessions and warning him not to fire Sessions.

This is exactly the same two-faced logic that reared it's head with firing James Cumonme.

I have a new theory about Bieber after this weeks events.
Bieber has terminated his tour, resulting in a loss of $70 million.. It would be difficult if not impossible for him to go on tour again because nobody would insure him after doing this.  He has cut his ties with his parents long ago.  I previously thought Bieber was gay, but only having sex with black guys - namely the 3 that he lives with (Lil Za, Lil Twist, and Tyler the Creator).  However, I have an updated theory.. that Bieber has been only associated with black guys to throw people off the assumption that he is gay.  If he associated with white guys and lived with white guys, people would assume he is gay.  By associating with black guys, gullible people might assume it was for artistic reasons (yeah.. Bieber is all about being artistic) or his body guards.  But now.. he has at least temporarily quit performing, and is inseparable from his new white daddy… my GAYDAR is screaming.. GAY GAY GAY... about to come out of closet. GAY!
http://www.tmz.com/2017/07/27/justin-bieber-pastor-carl-lentz-father-figure/

No trans in the military…

That reminded me of the greatest fighting force of all time.. a tiny group of men who were extremely successful - The SPARTANS - who were a band of merry Marys.    There was Troy, Lucius,  Bootius, Maximus, Cutius, Brucius, and Percius.

@mhorndisk:

Over 2,300 allegedly are trans in the military. I don't like the idea of a pervert taking advantage of the process or the taxpayers funding the bill, and not saying that trans are perverts, but some are, when you pay a doctor to do something and he's part of your organization, the cost is just a day, not 70 thousand dollars. I don't think it's as pricey as they claim. I'm not really that upset about it, but I wish Trump would have just left it alone. It's not really saving millions of dollars and there are far more important things to take care of.

Imagine having a drag queen as a general.. that bitch would nuke everyone!

@Devken:

On Wednesday, the Department of Justice filed an amicus brief in the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals arguing that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964does not prohibit discrimination against gay and bisexual employees. The DOJ’s brief was not solicited by the court or any party to the case. Rather, in an unusual move, the Trump administration elected to weigh in with an aggressively anti-gay stance, arguing that gay Americans have no protection against workplace discrimination under federal law. Its decision is unsurprising in light of Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ vigorous opposition to LGBTQ rights.

Title VII does not explicitly outlaw sexual orientation discrimination in employment. However, it does forbid “discrimination … because of sex.” which the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission interprets to encompass anti-gay discrimination. For at least 15 years, many federal courts have agreed, and in April, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Title VII does, indeed, protect gay employees. Both the 7thCircuit and the EEOC relied on three theories of sex discrimination:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2017/07/26/trump_administration_argues_federal_law_doesn_t_protect_gay_employees.html

https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=http://files.eqcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/417-DOJ-Amicus-Brief-iso-Appellee.pdf

How about being discriminated against for being a white male?  I've been the victim of that.  A month or two ago I posted a long message about how it was impossible for a white male to get a job working for the county where I live.

@mhorndisk:

I am a Trump supporter, but I'm not ok with him banning trans. Dammit.

I agree.. it was something that Trump should have kept his nose out of.  It is not a significant issue. 
I can't resist mentioning one thing… J Edgar Hoover who was the head of the FBI for 48 years was a cross dresser, and homosexual - who was notorious for blackmailing other people for being homosexuals.  Takes one to know one.  I wonder if he would be banned from being in the FBI because he liked to wear pink lace panties and a bra.

@raphjd:

I'm not sure how I feel about it.

I fully support former trans (completed trans) joining the military.

I'm not sure I support joining the military so the taxpayer has to pay for your transition.   Not to mention all the time you will not be able to work.

What do we do when the loony "trans" like Elliot Cope, Milo Stewart, Riley Denis and Dakota want to join?

I wonder how they are defining Trans…
men who wear women's clothes
men who have had breast implants
men who have had their penises removed
men or women taking hormones  (estrogen, testosterone)
and what about gay people?  or bi?
What about people who are born with both a penis and a vagina?
What about males that are born with undeveloped penises which are raised as female?

My understanding is that very few men go through with having their penis removed.  It is not clear whether or not Caitlyn Jenner had his/her penis removed.

Seems to me, that the number of people involved in being trans is VERY small.. certainly under 100.

I can see how a person wanting to become trans would join the military, then say they discovered they are trans - just to get their transformation paid for by the taxpayers.

Sessions recused himself from anything related to Russia…however, he didn't recuse himself to matters related to the Ukraine...
Seems that Hillary and the DNC were in collusion with the Ukraine... leading Trump to ask  "so where is the investigation AG?"

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/26/trump-s-not-alone-congress-digging-into-dnc-ukraine-connection.html

One way to greatly reduce STDs is to never have sex with females.  They are incubators for diseases. 
Unless someone wants to have children, they should never have sex with a female.  In fact, they could resort to artificial insemination to avoid sex with women.

When you protect little girls by not allowing grown men calling themselves "women" to use the same bathroom… that creates a problem with transgender men who look like women being forced to use the men's room.

When you provide subsidized healthcare for people who need MILLION$ in healthcare services..  that puts a massive burden on healthy people earning minimum wage and have enough troubles paying for food and rent (and making it extremely difficult for them to ever get a house).

While I'm sure Trump means well, and is much more honest than 99% of the politicians.. I don't think he considers the consequences of his actions.  Just today.. he came out with this:
""After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow...Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military. Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming..victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail. Thank you.""

Here is one reason why that is a disastrous policy... anybody who wants to get out of the military, or if there was a draft - wanted to avoid being drafted - only has to pull a "Klinger" and get out.  I recall that when I was living on campus at my University.. it was quite common for ROTC cadets and people already in the military to declare that they were gay, just to get out of military service - whether or not they were gay.
I would point out that roughly 11% of people are gay, and 35% are bisexual.  That's a LOT.  Imagine if this was the Vietnam Era.. and all someone had to do to avoid being drafted was to say they were gay.    I know that I would say I was straight if that got me out of military service. 
That brings up one other related issue...  females in the military.  Isn't it just great that females can be in the military and get promoted and fly planes, etc.  ?  But... whenever there is a heavy battles going on.. suddenly a very large number of females get pregnant.. which relieves them of military service.

Youtube Video