• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. Frederick
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 2
    • Topics 654
    • Posts 2497
    • Best 1
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by Frederick

    • RE: Not only is Obamacare a disaster.. so is Medicaid.

      @raphjd:

      It's strange how Americans keep demanding that we go to an NHS system, even though the reasons they hate the American system is also a major problem in NHS systems.

      Asset stripping is the normal in NHS systems for long term care.    The only way to prevent this is to have private insurance to protect yourself.     It defeats the purpose of the NHS when you have to have private insurance as well.

      It's natural that people always want it both ways.. in this case, to not be paying if they don't need insurance, and to have full coverage if they do need it.  The problem with moonbats is that they can't accept the fact that they can't have it both ways.

      From what I can see… the republican's healthcare plan is getting so watered down that it will be essentially the same as Obamacare.

      I think the way they seize assets is limited to seizing property - not iras.  That is not a problem since I own this house.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Not only is Obamacare a disaster.. so is Medicaid.

      @flozen:

      Not sure if this article would help your father, Frederick, if he's already Medicaid-enrolled.  It certainly could be useful for those Forum members with retirement and potential Medicaid-eligibility on the horizon.

      If anything, it's an interesting look at how the Medicaid system can be manipulated by those who employ a specialized lawyer, a strategy, and some specific financial moves.

      http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/healthcare/the-ethics-of-adjusting-your-assets-to-qualify-for-medicaid/ar-AAoINFG?li=BBnbfcN&ocid=spartanntp

      He qualifies because of his age. 
      Shifting assets around is quite common, especially to avoid having the government seize one's property when nursing home care is needed.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Not only is Obamacare a disaster.. so is Medicaid.

      @aadam101:

      Also they did tell him.  They sent a letter in the mail.  He likely received a lot of letters in the mail and didn't know what any of it meant.    It's a confusing mess.

      If Medicaid was paying and then stopped they likely told him too in another confusing letter.

      He doesn't read his own mail.  I remember getting the letter about the $110 increase in Social Security.    I either did not get or did not see the one about the $110 increase in Medicaid.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: A win for Trump.. one more hurdle cleared! Whoo hoo!

      @aadam101:

      I assume that because you said your dad needs insurance that he now has a pre-existing condition that will prohibit him frm buying it under Trumpcare?

      I said MEDICARE.. and his condition is that he's old.

      I see that you are perpetuating the moonbat like that Trumpcare doesn't cover pre-existing conditions.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • A win for Trump.. one more hurdle cleared! Whoo hoo!

      :cheers:

      In case you had not heard… the Senate voted in Trump's favor to begin the process of dismantling Osamacare. 
      When it comes to debating, Trump is the master.  Just call him the master debater.

      I have a HUNCH about something else, which I could be wrong about.  Trump will pressure Sessions to the point where Sessions will resign, and then the new Attorney General will dispose of Herr Mueller and his nazi propaganda machine.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Get on with it… solution

      @aadam101:

      I completely disagree.  Trump should lock her up.  That's what he promised to do!  He LIED.

      At least we agree that Hillary deserves to be locked up!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Does anybody think this is NOT outrageous and unacceptable regarding healthcare?

      @spam17:

      I never expected such high costs for administrative costs by a country like the US..

      :cheesy2:

      Especially now that just about everything is automated, paperless, and computerized.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • Does anybody think this is NOT outrageous and unacceptable regarding healthcare?

      You may have wondered.. just where does all that money paid into healthcare go?  I bet you will not believe this.. but 30% of healthcare costs are just the BILLING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!      INCREDIBLE!
      That is even more mind-boggling when you consider how astronomically high the healthcare costs are!
      That means.. that one hour procedure on my dad combined with his 2 day stay in the hospital that cost $78,000… resulted in $23,400 in administrative fees!  You can hire a whole lot of people doing data entry for $23,400. 
      Let's extrapolate that..  $23,400 in just administrative fees covering a 2 day hospital stay equals $8,541,000 in administrative costs per patient per year.    The hospital my father went to has a capacity for 687 patients.  If all those beds were filled all year long, that hospital would be raking in $5.9 billion per year in just administrative costs.. and if you add the other 70% for the actual healthcare.. that would be $19.7 billion for just that one hospital to operate for one year!

      One number I left out was the total healthcare costs per patient in that hospital per year...  $28.5 million!

      https://www.singlecare.com/blog/30-medical-bills-go-administrative-costs/

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • Not only is Obamacare a disaster.. so is Medicaid.

      Obviously the cost of living increases over time.
      This year, my father got a $110 per month increase in his social security benefits..
      But.. his Social Security checks are exactly the same as they were last year.
      The reason?  Medicare Part B health insurance INCREASED another $110 per month!

      Here's an easy solution to healthcare.. take all their fees and salaries, etc.. and divide by 10.  That would be about what they SHOULD be.

      A BIG problem with health insurance is that the person paying for it almost never knows how much they are paying into it, nor what services
      are covered, nor how much those services cost!  Do YOU?  If you do, please share that with us! 
      I'm outraged that they take the medicare payments out of his social security benefits without even telling him.

      Do you know that some people INTENTIONALLY commit crimes and INTENTIONALLY get caught just so they can go to prison and have their healthcare taken care of for free?  That is a VERY risky thing to so, because the healthcare in prisons is horrifying.. and one probably will not survive it.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Will Sessions be Fired or will he "Resign"?

      @aadam101:

      It's pretty obvious that Trump wants to get rid of Sessions.  He is doing everything he can to publicly undermine him in order to prompt a resignation.  It's very sad this this poor man who has devoted his life to public service hitched his star to the failing Trump train.

      Will he be fired or will he "resign"?

      It's fascinating that the moonbats have been attacking Sessions for decades, and opposed his nomination vehemently.. and yet when Trump expresses his displeasure with him, Sessions is suddenly this wonderful shining star.  Good grief!
      It's the same situation with James Comey.  The moonbats hated him.  One week before Comey was fired, Hillary made a speech blaming Comey for her loss.  The morning of the day Comey was fired, John Pedosta was attacking Comey with a fervor… but then.. when Trump fired him.. suddenly Comey is this wonderful man of impeccable qualifications.      EEK!

      I think Sessions will resign.  Even worse that Sessions is that idiot deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein - who appointed Comey's bestest buddy Herr Mueller to orchestrate the Trump Witch Hunt.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: RULES for this section

      @royalcrown89:

      @pppucci:

      @raphjd:

      @wafflez:

      Should a rule be added regarding spamming threads/posts? I'm seen one user post multiple times in a row on the same thread when he could have modified the original post.

      If possible, perhaps the forum system can be changed so that posts are merged if they are both by the same user and posted one after another.

      That would be nice.

      Maybe I'll have to start editing threads for this.

      I started my own thread on this.  https://forum.gaytorrent.ru/index.php?topic=51089.0
      I think it is too much for the moderator to be editing multiple posts by the same user before others can reply, but there should be some guidelines put into place and enforced. Like giving them a time-out if they repeatedly violate the guidelines after several warnings.  Even one reply might be permissible for clarification but 3, 3 and 5 in a row is just ridiculous.

      I agree, I've also seen posts where there's between 3 and 7 replies in a row by the very person who started the thread, which is borderline outrageous. I back up the call for more guidelines put into place and enforced on this issue.

      I know what you are getting at and I somewhat agree.. but you seem to only complain when certain people do it.  The two worst offenders in recent history are DrAss and Sutieday.  One of the things hat has driven me nuts for decades is when people make empty messages with no relevant content that amount to pure spam.  I remember when I used to do real time chats with people.. and I would have 3 computers running at once, trying to get things done, and someone would keep leaving tiny turd comments such as "OH?"  or "LOL" on the chats causing an alert to go off interrupting my train of thought.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Does Russia want to "adopt" the United States?

      @aadam101:

      I'm a little uncomfortable with all of this "adoption" talk.  Do Americans adopt Russian babies?  Is this a common thing?  I've heard of people adopting babies from China and from African countries but never Russia.

      First the lawyer talks to Don Jr about Russia and then Trump talks with Putin about adoption?  Why is this even a topic?  Does Russia want to adopt the United States?

      http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40673583

      People, like my father and his 2nd wife, wind up "purchasing" babies from other countries when they are designated to be UNFIT to be parents in the USA.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: What do people really need?

      @spam17:

      Insurance is a must!

      You never know what is planned for yourself!

      😄

      Insurance is not a must.  I've never needed health insurance, and up until 2 years ago, my father did not either. 
      Besides.. just because you have insurance doesn't mean you are insured…    you are only insured for what is covered.  Try to find an insurance plan that covers vision, hearing, or dental.  GOOD LUCK!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: This puzzles me… Debbie Wassermann Schultz

      @aadam101:

      I'd be more interested in seeing the laptops of the Trump children.  Jr already lied to the FBI and I'm sure he is preparing his lies for next weeks Congress testimony.

      Lies about what?

      If you are talking about some nonsensical worthless meeting.. go plant your turnip in a minefield.

      How about that 30 minute private meeting that Bill Clinton had with Attorney General Loretta Lynch?   Why don't you bitch about that for a change?

      "It's not an investigation.. it's a matter".. pfffftt!!!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • Thanks for NOTHING Obama!

      Obama was supposed to be the savior of those in need of financial assistance and healthcare.

      However, in his 8 years instead of:
      Healthcare costs going DOWN.. they have SKYROCKETED!
      Food Stamp assistance going up.. they have gone DOWN!
      Social Security benefits increasing..  they have stayed the SAME (and if you factor in cost of living - gone DOWN).

      Just this week, I was looking at my father's social security payments and I was confused.  I had previously gotten a letter saying he would be getting $110 a month in cost of living increase.. but I noticed that he's getting the same as he was last year.  I contacted the Social Security people and found out why.  Although he DID get an $110 a month cost of living increase.. he also got an additional $110 a month taken from his Social Security checks to pay for Medicare Part B!  So..  ZERO increase!  (actually a loss because of cost of living).

      Healthcare costs were already astronomical when Sheik Obama began his occupancy of the White House in 2008.  The idea was to bring health care costs D O W N…  instead, they have skyrocketed!  Thanks for nothing Obama!

      I tell black people that I hate Obama.. and that he didn't help black people at all as it was expected he would.  I tell them that Obama is half white, and it is that evil white half that screwed them over!  Damn that white devil Obama!  (actually.. Obama doesn't give a damn about white or black people.. his buddies are muslims)

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Gays in the KKK.. and would you hire a black man to mow your lawn?

      @flozen:

      @Frederick:

      It is a fact that both Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln were not pro black.  It is absurd for people to characterize Jefferson and Lincoln in that way.  They were both extremely racist.  As a lawyer, Lincoln referred to black people as "niggers".  Jefferson had kept thousands of slaves himself.  Neither of them considered black people to be people.  While that may sound outrageous, you need only look at publications from the civil war.  One article that caught my eye was one where a ship sank, and the article said three people, two dogs, and eight niggers were killed.  That is unbelievable in the context of today, but was typical of that time.  The History Channel recently did a documentary about Jefferson.. and despite liking black people enough to bear children with them, he did not consider them to be human.  When he wrote "all men are created equal", he didn't take black people into account.   I would add that he didn't include WOMEN either.. he was referring to white men.  I don't support Jefferson's racism, but it is important to realize that the true meaning of the U.S. Constitution has been twisted severely.  Both Jefferson and Lincoln wanted to abolish slavery.. not to free black people, but to prevent more black people from coming in to the country.  They wanted to send the black people already here back to Africa. 
      It isn't healthy to have a distorted view of history.  Jefferson, Hamilton, Adams, Lincoln were all fairly despicable people by today's standards.  One interesting thing.. George Washington was an extremely clever man, an expert as espionage and deception, and this country would not exist without him, because the US was grossly outnumbered and outpowered by Britain.  I didn't even get into how vice president Aaron Burr murdered Alexander Hamilton. 
      Oh, and then there is president Andrew Jackson - who is on the $20 bill.  He called for killing every native American Indian man, woman, and child.  He pretty much did so.  That is the same Andrew Jackson who is the father of the Democratic Party.

      https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2e9ac8

      I'm sorry, what are we supposed to interpret from your Early Presidents' Review?

      Are you suggesting that since the Founding Fathers held imperfect views on what constituted true equality, and their actions were sometimes in opposition to modern humanitarian goals, that these historical examples provide people, today, with a "bookmark" to validate their own prejudicial views or actions toward minorities and women?

      It sounds like all your puffery about the "true meaning" of the Constitution is to suggest that it was a purer and superior document in its original form, speaking only to white men.

      But you see, over the years, the U.S. realized the need to broaden the notions of liberty and fairness in the original Constitution through Amendments.  While I'm sure you're familiar with the Thirteenth Amendment (abolishing slavery), and the Nineteenth Amendment (granting women's suffrage), you don't seem as excited about recalling those landmarks.

      And what is up with your thread's name?  Did the 40-second Dave Chappelle clip on those topics make you laugh?  More, likely, angry and threatened – over a comedic satire?

      Are you genuinely concerned about gays in the KKK?  Sure, they exist as self-loathing sub-humans.  Hiring black people to mow lawns?  Today, I see gardeners, pool techs, etc. of every race and ethnicity.

      No, I'm afraid this is just another nonsensical thread of yours, with the purpose of venting thinly veiled race- and gender-bias allusions.  (And not like a comedy sketch, as found in your link.)

      If I'm wrong, please be more specific about the discussion we should be having, as applied to this modern Politics & Debate forum.

      Just like Pinocchio's nose grows longer every time he tells a lie, so does your red line every time you post more garbage.

      I made my point very clear, and don't appreciate you shitting on it.

      I will summarize it again.  The meaning of the constitution is being grossly distorted.  One example of that is the utopian ideal that "all men are created equal".  The person that wrote that is Thomas Jefferson, and what he meant is that all white males are created equal.  He did not consider black people to even be human, and he certainly didn't include women in that.  Don't blame me, blame Tom.  I don't think that is right. but that was Jefferson's thinking.  Jefferson, Lincoln, and many others were terrified of the prospect that minorities would move into the inner cities and Washington D.C. and take them over.  White people are now a minority in at least 22 of the top 100 metropolitan areas in the country.    In the 2000 census.. Washington DC was 31% white and 60% black.  That is something considering that nationwide just over 12% of the population is black.  On the other hand, if minorities were given voting rights as citizens.. there is no way that they would ever have been brought over as slaves.

      A few other issues related to the constitution.. free speech.. that amendment was written before anybody ever dreamed of telegraphs, radio, television, the internet, or even an efficient postal service.    In regards to gun control.. the guns at the time were single fire weapons which took a minute to load and were very inaccurate.  They never dreamed of handguns, machine guns, semi-automatics, clips, assault weapons, etc.

      What I am really trying to get out is that people need to use their own COMMON SENSE.  Moonbats and a lot of Republicans often try to justify their insanity by dragging the constitution into it..  Ignoring the fact that the Constitution is in many regards.. being grossly misinterpreted.

      I am going to end this with something I tell black people frequently.  "Up until a few decades ago, black people were treated like garbage, as if they are not even human, while white people were treated with civility and fairness.  But now, after decades of struggles and protests.. we finally have equality!  Now both blacks and whites are treated like garbage as if they are not even human!"

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • Gays in the KKK.. and would you hire a black man to mow your lawn?

      It is a fact that both Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln were not pro black.  It is absurd for people to characterize Jefferson and Lincoln in that way.  They were both extremely racist.  As a lawyer, Lincoln referred to black people as "niggers".  Jefferson had kept thousands of slaves himself.  Neither of them considered black people to be people.  While that may sound outrageous, you need only look at publications from the civil war.  One article that caught my eye was one where a ship sank, and the article said three people, two dogs, and eight niggers were killed.  That is unbelievable in the context of today, but was typical of that time.  The History Channel recently did a documentary about Jefferson.. and despite liking black people enough to bear children with them, he did not consider them to be human.  When he wrote "all men are created equal", he didn't take black people into account.   I would add that he didn't include WOMEN either.. he was referring to white men.  I don't support Jefferson's racism, but it is important to realize that the true meaning of the U.S. Constitution has been twisted severely.  Both Jefferson and Lincoln wanted to abolish slavery.. not to free black people, but to prevent more black people from coming in to the country.  They wanted to send the black people already here back to Africa.  
      It isn't healthy to have a distorted view of history.  Jefferson, Hamilton, Adams, Lincoln were all fairly despicable people by today's standards.  One interesting thing.. George Washington was an extremely clever man, an expert as espionage and deception, and this country would not exist without him, because the US was grossly outnumbered and outpowered by Britain.  I didn't even get into how vice president Aaron Burr murdered Alexander Hamilton.  
      Oh, and then there is president Andrew Jackson - who is on the $20 bill.  He called for killing every native American Indian man, woman, and child.  He pretty much did so.  That is the same Andrew Jackson who is the father of the Democratic Party.

      https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2e9ac8

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Anonymity solution

      @raphjd:

      I wouldn't doubt that CNN's anonymous sources are CNN themselves.

      I mean, we've seen how "honest" they are with stories like the black chick calling for blacks to burn down places white people live, but CNN report it as her calling for peace and calm by editing the video.

      Of course white people can never be victims of hate crimes on CNN.

      They refuse to question the narrative of BLM and the Evergreen loonies, even when there's video proving they are liars.

      I wonder if it is possible for a member of the same race as the victim to be charged with a hate crime?

      https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3a3f0f

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • Anonymity solution

      Quite often, stories are being reported about Trump with "anonymous" sources.

      This reminds me of "wiretapping" laws.  It is illegal to record another person's conversation - UNLESS you are taking part in that conversation.

      That relates somewhat to the issue of anonymous sources.  Although it is valid for sources to remain anonymous for various reasons, the person being reported about should be told who the anonymous sources are.  Isn't that fair?

      This is on CNN's page today:
      "But two sources who spoke to CNN on condition of anonymity over the weekend said they would not be surprised if there was a "Rexit" from Foggy Bottom sooner that that."

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • 1
    • 2
    • 72
    • 73
    • 74
    • 75
    • 76
    • 124
    • 125
    • 74 / 125