Posts made by Eridanos

Was nice I guess.  Not overly action packed.

I also like how Dr. Strange defeated the Big Bad.  Totally different from the usual action movies.

@brianboru72:

If you choose to ignore hate speech and not confront it- before long it could be happening to or be directed at you in person. Just because you are out and proud doesn't mean that someone calling your lifestyle evil and perverted, even if they don't know who you are, will have no effect on your life. If left unchallenged, it's very easy for hate speech to spread, and worse, to turn into action. 

Hate speech should be confronted even if it comes from other minorities like women or other races.  Of course, the religious nutjobs don't care no matter how logical you are or how flawless your evidence is, since they feel they are 'annointed ones'.

I think is ironic that this self-called 'pious' people think they can decide who is good and who is evil.  That is Pride, the sin that leads to the fall from Grace, and they utterly fail to realize that.

I like both.

Though dogs are more attention seeking so they are more lovable in general.  Don't get me wrong, cats are lovable too, specially when reared right (grumpy cats, no thanks) but their independent nature makes them a little more distant.

So they are adamant to label it a 'hate crime'?

It is a fucking hate crime, against white people and people with disabilities.

The cowardice is exemplary, take a person who can't defend himself and subject him to torture and degradation.

I wonder, will the black members of this forums (or the SJW's, no matter the race), condone this aggression and justify it? Let's see if those who have the nerve to do that can even be logical.

As for myself, I'm done. I used to look forward to live in a multicultural country where the inhabitants could have the same level of respect, but I know, that at least USA is not an option, I will forever be wary of any American that is not white, and of American Liberals in general)

So this Seneca Club gets a free pass because it is 'non-profit and serves more than being a social group'.

So there's no male-only groups with the same characteristics? Also, they don't explain what makes the Seneca group 'more than a social group'.

Then the Crimson Women's Coalition states that welcoming men opens the chances for their female members to be sexually assaulted.  Thus demonstrating that they view all males as potential rapists. (And implying themselves are useless to promote a healthy co-ed environment for their members…but of course, radical feminism doesn't want men and women experiencing healthy relationships with each other, they want men and women against each other)

@PumpingMuscl

IF there was something bad regarding masturbation I'm pretty sure the world's male population would be dying before they reached adulthood.

(And no, I'm not the one who downvoted your comment)

Truth is society has made people feel bad regarding self-pleasure and porn.  From the youth days due to religious or moral codes to the adult days where some people regard the use of pornography and masturbation as unfitting. Some examples:

If you're an adult, you don't need porn anymore, you can just hook up with someone.

Wanking off alone is for losers.  Studs get full on sex.

Partners who feel bad when the other one uses porn to jerk off because they think they're unable to completely satisfy them. ( I think this one is prone to happen more in heterosexual relations)

Why not both?

You have to admit that the 'rainbow' (because afaik, not all of the colors featured are those of a rainbow) is the most known globally (to the point a milk carton with a farmer and a rainbow was banned in Russia)

On the other hand the inverted triangle aludes to the Holocaust and could be viewed as taking a symbol of pain and dark days and then turning it around into something positive.  :hug2:

Maybe a rainbow colored, inverted triangle?…Wait I think we already have those...but as souvenir merchandise.  :afr:

Well, at least it shows that there are women who actually advocate for true equality. (And I'm refering to the author, since she actually pointed out stuff in the most neutral way possible)

So…male-only groups have to actually admit women, while women-only groups just need to accept applications and then throw them into the recycle bin without facing administrative consequences. And even got the permission to do that?!

Yeah because admitting males to female only groups would be akin to open the door of a barn full of lambs to big bad wolves.  Is funny how supposed these women who claim are 'liberated' and 'empowered' call the 'weak, helpless victim' card whenever they see fit.

Gender-only groups already polarize the sexes (though there might be gender-specific groups that actually have a reason of being if their cause is related to issues pertaining one gender exclusively)

If college is teaching students how to move in the real world, I'm afraid they got it wrong when it comes to work and live with others.

@rick71142:

Could this year get any worse?  :cry2: :cry2: :cry2: :cry2: :afr2:

First, the musicians…now the actors (of iconic films)... a dark year for the Arts as a whole.

@alibix:

Has anyone ever asked you to refer to them as 'Xer' or 'Xel'?

Luckily those kind of issues haven't made their way down here.  We don't have those non-binary, non-comforming, gender-neutral stuff down here in Mexico.  We just got the upper class kids claiming they're vegan while the rest of us are meat-eating murderers or our Ecologist Green Party passing out laws that supposedly help animals but instead have resulted in animals being put to sleep.

And no, simply because we do have indeterminate pronouns and we use gender pronouns according to what we see and no one gets offended by it.

Maybe that's why I find the pronoun thing utterly stupid.  And giving more thought to it, is almost self-segregating, since you're putting yourself apart from the others on the basis of your sexual identity.

@grimey:

I don't see the issue.

The issue is that minorities are actually advocating for segregation.  The same thing they battled to get rid off.  And by some sort of twisted logic, they don't see it as segregation.

@bob5678:

Who cares? Whites have had a safe space in this country for 240 years…

And some of them rallied with the black, asian, native and latino people in order to all share a space, a safe space called a 'country'.  But now, these same minorities want to shut the whites out, allegedly on their need to be 'safe' from them.  In this times of political correctness they are being pandered to and basically being pampered by the same 'whites' they so claim they need protection from.  On the other side if cisgender, male white people where to ask for the same 'safe spaces' they would be immediately labeled as racists, chauvinists and neanderthals.

And believe me, it goes first against the biggest group (whites in the USA case) but then it deviates into hating anyone not like you. Blacks hating on latinos, latinos hating on asians, asians hating on blacks and so forth. (And I'm just using races here, add sexual orientations/identities, even religions… and it just turns into a mess)

Pokemon HeartGold, just last month.

Never had the chance to play this revamp when it came out, so now I'm enjoying it.

@Zachman:

May she rest in peace, and May the Force always be with her.

Indeed.  We say our most sincere goodbyes to the most important female figure in Star Wars history.  She might have been Leia in the movies, but forever she will also be the Leia in the comics, the Leia in the novelizations and the Leia in our hearts.

@alibix:

The quote says that the hate crime needs to be a serious one. Refusing to use someone's preferred pronoun isn't serious. You are over exaggerating this bill to make it seem like the spooky scary SJWs are breaking down doors shotgunning people who don't say the right pronouns in front of their family.

One question, and answer honestly:
Have you met an SJW in real life?

Considering how some groups are acting, is just a matter of time before they throw you a glove because you forgot to refer to them as 'Xer' or 'Xel'.

And I've known a few SJW throughout my life.

The 'friends' who say they have your back when you come out and are supposedly soo liberal that they don't care about being seen with the 'gay' boy, but they barely do things with you anymore, or ended up being irked if you ever tap their shoulder again.

My Macroeconomics teacher in Uni.  Always talking about how females had the less opportunities and received the less help.  Always shaming the male students in one way or another.  Btw, she always talked about the poor females living in poverty, but never said anything regarding the poor who were also male.

My Economic Analysis teacher, supposedly a Marxist, indigenist (pro-native mexicans)…last time he actually did something to help the poor ethnic groups he always talked about, he hadn't even finished college yet.  Now he just sits in his cubicle comfortably without any care to visit the marginalized zones.  Of course he keeps mentioning the Conquista and how the 'evil WHITE spaniards, raped the poor native mexican women and basically fucked up the soo called greater destiny the Aztecs would have had if the europeans didn't had shown up.

A perfectly healthy woman in the subway once defended her 'right' to sit on the Elder/People with disabilities/Pregnant or child-carring women Seat.  Because she was a woman. (A young, healthy, non-pregnant, non-child-carrying woman)  while there were elderly people INCLUDING OTHER WOMEN, standing up.

By not voting, you're basically giving your consent to whatever happens.

I guess that annuling your own vote is the only decent way to show you disapprove all the canditates.

But yeah, I mean….not even voting and then you whine and protest? What if your party might have won if you just had gone to vote?

And violence in protests always happens.  There's the chance that people who have nothing to do with the protest or don't even care at all get in just to provoke and cause damage. (Which might mean that if you plan a protest, you need to do it in a formal and administrative-like way to keep tabs on the people who join...but really, that's very hard to do)

@Spintendo:

So far these 'safe spaces' have included such highly trafficked areas of Claremont as the Motley Coffeehouse sitting room and ASCMC's office annex.

I think barring white students from at least two locations that 40% of them have probably never heard of/or been to just might be a restriction they can live with.

But Spintendo…that's not the real problem, the problem is that this so called 'safe spaces' can be used as nests to hatch hate propaganda.  We are talking about minorities (race, sex) that are claiming spaces to be free of white people (or basically any other person who doesn't cater to their exclusive group demographic) because they see them as an enemy (which ironically has pandered to them so much that they're are actually able to this this kind of crazy things.  Let the hate speech pump them to the point were they will enact it outside of their 'safe space'.

Even worse we talk about those spaces funded by colleges with the money of ALL contributors (all the sexes , all the races).

@stefaan:

lots of people end up having asymmetrical abs.

But I thought asymmetrical abs were actually dependant on the individual's genetics.  :blink:

Gee…I don't know...

See if they swallow the 'but with a condom I don't feel the same' excuse? How about the ' I run out of condoms but I'm so horny' one? Turn then on so much that their better judgement fails them?

Sorry, but in my book, trying to have someone do BB when they already stated they want to use condoms is pretty low.

Nowadays, concern for HIV and AIDS make condoms a rule of thumb.  Maybe in some 1st world nations where you have PrEP and can pay for your Truvada you can go and have bareback (provided you take the Truvada religiously).  Usually, individuals would rather choose condoms, specially with strangers, since you don't know if they really do PrEP or are 'clean' (people lie, and more so when it means having sex)

My only advice is that if you like BB so much it's mandatory, then find like-minded individuals who also only do BB.

If you find someone who really turns you on and you want to have sex with, and he asks you for a rubber (or brings his own) you either comply and have protected sex or make some believable excuse and go away.

Myself I won't rule BB out of my possibilities but in order to BB with someone I would need to really trust and know a person.

Sex is fun, yes…

BUT SEX ISN'T LIFE. SEX IS A PART OF LIFE.

Indeed you can be without sex for a long period of time.  Last time I had sex I was 19, I'm 31 now, I'm just starting to have sex again.

From your short paragraph I might dare to say (and please don't feel offended) that you migt have a sex addiction, as you say your sexual encounters leave you out of focus and are interfering with your career. You said it: 'I often fail to do other things'.

Staying without sex is definitively doable, but in the rare case you feel the need to unload with another person (is not the same as just wanking off),and you stray from your 'no-sex' goal you might feel guilty and that would hurt you in the long run.

I would advice you try to analyze WHY sex makes you put other things on stand by, so you can learn to rule your urges instead of them ruling you.  That way you might not even need to quit sex at all!  Meditate about it and maybe ask professional help.

Best wishes and all my support to you. :3 :hug2:

@raphjd:

I hope you realize that posting that link helps me, not you.

And indeed it does.  Such venom-filled statements and one of those girls having the nerve of calling them 'healthy discussions'.  That FB group doesn't even deserve the right to be called a 'Safe Space'.

The girl saying her white stepfather makes jokes at her expense is troubling though…but if someone cared enough to adopt a child that is not theirs, let alone of their same race, I highly doubt they would even dare to make hurtful jokes about them.  My only guess regarding that girl is that her SJW identity has overwhelmed her sensibilities and now EVERYTHING her white father says is a direct insult to her,always a joke at her expense.

Then we had that 'RobinPollack' SJW, who got wrecked by the other commenters. On of the replies of such men 'Ben Michaels' hit the nail:

"...creating an echo chamber where much of the rhetoric is spiteful, belittling, and self-righteous doesn’t make people feel better, it doesn’t help them cope with problems, and it doesn’t create a positive path forward for dealing with problems. It makes people feel worse, not better."

Not to mention the part where he pointed the fact that some 'Safe Groups' become platforms for bigoted rhetoric.