Posts made by eobox91103

@cp2000
“Who I’m trying to have sex with is none of your business, unless I’m trying to have sex with you,” Mr. Talbott said.

Best line I've read in a long time!

@dizmiguel-0 Welcome to Gaytorrent and the Forums. I split my time between Calgary (Canada), London (UK), and LA.

I, too, am mildly annoyed by some endless stream of comments. Sometimes, when the number of comments reaches six or so, I'll add one suggesting that if people want to pursue the matter, they create a forum topic on it. Sometimes this works, but alas, a large majority of users do not use the forum at all.

@raphjd said in Forum Topic/Post Bonus:

it's a mixed blessing as it added posts in the forums, but it also added a lot of forum spam.

If it adds topics of interest to the forum, that's a big plus, as traffic has slowed down in the last few years. But spam posts simply to harvest seed posts are a pain in the ass for everyone.

@gabisev Waiting is about the best we can do. If nothing happens in a week or so, you might try it again, and then abandon the cause. Users who have (or have deleted) the material don't want a "please re-seed" note every hour for a month. (OK, that's a little bit of an exaggeration.)

Also, I think you meant to say "zero seeders for a long time." It's seeders who have the material, and you'd like there to be several of them so you can get the material. (This has something to to with "swarms" that I don't fully understand, but that can be the topic of another thread.)

@cp2000 Thanks for your interesting post.

Somehow I had in mind that these videos took place in Rhode Island, but I don't recall how I formed that idea. The accents are clearly northeast US, but hard to localise further.

"Vinnie" might have used bait-and-switch, but not with every lad. My favourite (Tony) must have at least ten cum scenes (in addition to sucking Vinnie several times), so he'd have to be profoundly naive if he thought this was part of a straight porn casting. Some other guys, though, seem fixated on watching straight porn while being wanked or sucked, so perhaps they were baited.

It's a good series, and I'm glad this thread brought me back to it. The only thing I would change in the scenes is to not use the porn-standard "stop sucking before he cums so we can see it shoot," rather than having a cumshot into a closed mouth. I find that sexier, and frankly more real.

@johnmartinez-0 I don't know the back story of the "Sneek Peek" series, only that the 30-ish military guy "Vinnie" seems very adept at finding 20-ish lads to suck off...almost all with a full bush.

I suspect cash is involved, and none of the guys come across as being particularly bright. I can't tell if drugs or alcohol are involved. I see some scenes with poppers, and a beer can on the night table, but no other indication. The guys seem fully conscious. I don't remember a scene where a lad says "I don't want to go that far," but perhaps I missed it.

My favourite is "Tony," who often giggles a bit after he cums. (I had a BF who would do that.) Tony even returns the favour a few times.

I don't recall any of them looking drugged...although some were clearly bored and simply awaiting their paycheck.

(Note that these films are not to be confused with the "Sneaky Peek" series of posed voyeur clips.)

@ianfontinell-0 said in Who is in this meme? Does he make content?:

@gringle that's Bastian Gate, and oh boy he makes content........

and he would make me consent......

I see that this video is now Freeleech for the next week.

My guess would be that it's a preview from "The Best Little Warehouse in .L.A." (1982), which is on here at https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=fb10a56d9b2119783f627acd8bc2072f793e473c076adaf7 with three seeders. I didn't see the particular scene you showed, but I could have missed it. You might want to give it a try.

@blablarg18 said in Luigi Mangione:

Do people find other psychos hot?

I saw the following photo on the cover of a tabloid and I thought he was handsome:

Then I read that he was one of the Boston Marathon bombers, and he became much less attractive to me.

@blablarg18 Note that those words I used were applied to concepts, not to specific people...although I grant it would take above-average reading/grammar skills to notice this.

Note that the preceding post uses "you," or a derivative, seven times...demonstrating my point.

@blablarg18 Once again we see the childish dynamic of, "If you can't discuss something rationally, call the other person names."

As for "comments of value," in this thread there are plenty from PedrocaWest...but replies to them are just old, worn-out copy/pastes from the Anti-Trans Playbook.

Here's an exercise for the reader: Do a search on "you" on this page in your browser. See how many times it shows up in the anti-trans replies? That's clear evidence that, when confronted with facts, the anti-transists simply start calling names. That makes a mockery of the forum--which should be about ideas, not personalities.

@raphd: Perhaps we can create a new board called "Transphobia" (perhaps a subset of "Politics and Debate?" for this kind of discussion.

@Ignatius Welcome! While I think most users here are North American (I identify as Canadian), it is wonderful to have people from all over the world.

Your English is very good, but feel free to post in Portuguese (or your own native tongue, if different), and with GoogleTranslate we can probably figure out what you mean.

@hotmuscletwi I don't know what film it's from, But the electrical outlets and switches look American...so it's odd that it would have English subtitles (unless it was made in Quebec, which is not a big porn production center).

The words in the subtitles are hilarious. If the whole film is like that, I'd watch it for the subtitles alone!

@tnar I can't vouch for the accuracy of the article. It would be interesting to hear from a "creator" whether or not that 80% figure is true.

As for the top five creators listed, I haven't heard of any of them...and I'm not curious enough to search any of them.

https://variety.com/2025/digital/news/onlyfans-porn-site-sale-talks-8-billion-1236408046/

"OnlyFans owner Leonid Radvinsky has engaged in discussions to sell the massive porn-centric content creator site at a price tag that would value the company at around $8 billion, Variety has confirmed. ..."

The article notes that "creators" get 80% of subscription payments, which is higher than I would have thought.

Timothy McVeigh (Oklahoma City bomber in late a990;s) was also easy on the eye.I wish they had sentenced him to be my houseboy, rather than to get the needle.

@cp2000 Thanks very much for the historical perspective, which I didn't address. "Baiting" wasn't a thing 10+ years ago, and while the system is slow to adapt to the rapid pace of technology, it is indeed getting there.

There is also the ethical side to all this: I think it's rude and inconsiderate to violate the privacy of complete strangers for one's own gratification. If this is something that appeals to people, there's enough fantasy porn out there that simulates this--I'm thinking of sites like sleepingmen.com, czechhunter.com, sneakypeek.com, and others in the past.