The difference though is that liberals down vote anything their enemies say, not matter the topic or what is said. They do this while hiding in the shadows.
Hell, liberals down voted their own for condemning the violence on both sides.
RoyalCrown got down voted for supporting free speech.
downvoting is not against forum rules.. i was more talking about that - being uncivil is against the rules and trash talking should be under the civil rule, but is not seen that way
didn't realise the investigation was over
When trying to upload the following - https://www.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=9c6b309ba9de31e638de53b654d1a634c6c1c807cf0f4a67
it came up as an error re : permissions, would only work once i uploaded it with 1 picture - anyone else facing same thing ?
So congratulations, you've proven a point. You're just as meaningless a poster as DrWas
Your mind is blown, I'm sure.
Wow! My mind IS blown! The first person to call out DrWas.
It's almost as if I know some online debate etiquette!
Yup, I'm intimately familiar. Which is how I know which buttons to press to get people like you so mad, and to get people to realize how hypocritical they are. You know my entire post shows clearly how I was doing this on purpose right? To prove a point, which I think everyone now gets. HOPEFULLY, the spamming will stop now that it has been beaten to death. If it doesn't? Well I'm still here.
You trigger people.. you admit you enjoy triggering people.. then when they react you complain
just take it as a win and move on
All any poster does on this political forum is post to trigger reaction then complain at the reaction they wanted.. makes no sense
You mean porn has audio?
I almost always turn the audio off.The classic porn star Jeff Stryker is the exception- his voice alone can get me off. An audio file of him reading his grocery list would be porn to me.
he is the only porn star i can hack the "you like my big dick" kinda talk from lol
Look at what happened in Oregon on Friday.
When will Traitor tRump start denouncing all these right-wing extremists?You haven't denounced the violence by your side.
I'm not the President!
Ah, so only the President can condemn the violence. Gottcha.
noone actually said that.. he asked when is the president going to condemn violence from his side of politics.. two different things - he seems to only condemn the violence that it suits him to do so
ALL violence is violence and should be condemned.. but everyone seems to have excuses, or worse, weird justifications - there is no justification to be had..EVER - BOTH sides should be condemning BOTH sides
debating politics always seems to forget that these are PEOPLE - if you are ok with someone being dead, because there views were different to yours or they "deserve" it somehow… then you need therapy
I love how liberals hide in the shadows down voting comments rather than having the balls to debate topics.
I guess it's like how they are so butch when they have their faces hidden and feel free to smack people over the head with bike locks.
That is their prerogative to thumbs down, not sure why you bring it up so much, especially since i am sure the non "libtards" also downvote what they do not like.. but we cannot see that, so we are are at a disadvantage to you. In fact I am surprised less left inclined folk speak out..
that was a lot of effort to define a word that has no actual meaning in the political world.
It does actually, sorry, but you're wrong… Especially when we have people on here saying it's offensive. Just like when they claim the word "nutjob" has no political meaning, and then some claim it's offensive, because the left is offended by "nutjob," just like they're offended by everything. Conservatives don't get offended by anything because they KNOW it isn't True. Liberals get offended by such terms because they KNOW it's True. Otherwise they wouldn't care. We know what you're doing. It isn't going to work.
Please point put where someone said it was offensive?
I did point out that it was rude - but never did i say i was offended
Although I'm not a liberal, it is possible to be liberal and be credible (believe it or not!)
However, these days, the problem isn't so much the liberals / democrats, it is the massive influx of libtards that just make things, up, twist them, and spew hateful, anti-Trump crap every day, ad nauseum!People can have differences of opinion and both sides have good points and credibility.. but that isn't happening.
Truth, accuracy, and fairness have been cast aside by the libtards. They will say and fabricate anything to try and undermine the government.I can concisely tell you what is going on:
In wars, when one side has lost, sometimes instead of surrendering, they do what is called "scorched earth" and destroy their own country rather than allow the winners to take it. This is exactly what the libtards are doing. Even though they might SAY that they accept that Trump won, they do NOT accept it. They do NOT want Trump to succeed at anything. The libtards and snowflakes would rather see the country fail than allow Trump to fix it.Mate
I am not sure the 1st 3 times I told you but I am telling you again.. left bash all you freaking want but PLEASE stop using the word libtard - it just makes you look like an ass
What word do you use to delineate liberals and democrats who act and behave like whining, malcontent, crazy, lying, delusional babies?
Call them "Modern Liberals" like Raph does - or use any generic term like "Capital L Liberal" or other stuff - point is if you have to insult people you do not know just to make a point then you have already lost
Although I'm not a liberal, it is possible to be liberal and be credible (believe it or not!)
However, these days, the problem isn't so much the liberals / democrats, it is the massive influx of libtards that just make things, up, twist them, and spew hateful, anti-Trump crap every day, ad nauseum!People can have differences of opinion and both sides have good points and credibility.. but that isn't happening.
Truth, accuracy, and fairness have been cast aside by the libtards. They will say and fabricate anything to try and undermine the government.I can concisely tell you what is going on:
In wars, when one side has lost, sometimes instead of surrendering, they do what is called "scorched earth" and destroy their own country rather than allow the winners to take it. This is exactly what the libtards are doing. Even though they might SAY that they accept that Trump won, they do NOT accept it. They do NOT want Trump to succeed at anything. The libtards and snowflakes would rather see the country fail than allow Trump to fix it.
Mate
I am not sure the 1st 3 times I told you but I am telling you again.. left bash all you freaking want but PLEASE stop using the word libtard - it just makes you look like an ass
Clinton never did. In fact, she's been open to partial-birth abortion bans before. Which is dumb as hell because they're extremely rare and always because the mother's life is at extreme risk.
Bullshit on all counts.
Hillary has consistently proudly and boldly defended the right of women to have guilt-free, taxpayer paid, abortions on demand, up until the very day of delivery.Third term abortions are NOT rare at all. The number of abortions per year varies between 1 and 3 million. That is 1 to 3 million too many.
Just how many 3rd term abortions do you consider to be "very rare"?
What IS extremely rare is when the mother's life is at risk during a pregnancy.
By the way.. what is considerably dangerous is having an abortion to begin with. It's far riskier to have an abortion than to carry a baby full term. When they go up that snatch with their scissors, knives, vacuums, scrapers, and chemicals.. all sorts of things can go wrong.Also.. 3rd term means 6 to 9 months. Hospitals can now take 6 months old unborn babies, put them in an incubator, and they do just fine. Assuming that the mother's life is at risk in the 3rd trimester, there is no reason why they could not do a cesarean and stick the baby in an incubator. About half of hospital births are cesarean anyway.
An opinion piece on youtube is not telling me when she said what you said she said.. Anyway, My understanding is that 3rd term abortions are illegal in most places.. so it is going to be kinda hard to know numbers
FYI: re: c section - its 1/3 not 1/2 but i get your point - if a baby can be saved in an incubator and mum is fine then this is the way to go
(asking for a friend
)
Is there any thread in this section where the intent of the poster is to have an actual discussion about something rather than to post some whacked-out, innuendo-/rumor-filled, and/or vitriolic attack that is only tenuously based in reality and to which 90% of the population would respond with a sigh and an eye-roll?
Because that's fine and all, and if that is what everyone considers this part of the forum for, great. Maybe this subforum should be re-titled in that case, though, because it definitely is not a place for "debate."
Regardless of political leanings - I think some want to debate but I have to agree that there is a lot of baiting, then insults, pointing & laughing when people respond with anything other than pure agreement.. which makes it somewhat tense & even kinda scary around here sometimes
You are so sadly mistaken. Most unwanted children end up in between A and B. They up in and out of foster care their entire lives. They get abused, the state takes them away, the parents (usually just the mother) cleans herself up, they get sent back, they get abused again and the process repeats itself over and over. In the meantime she is still having more children and they are all going through this (and sometimes not at the same time). Foster care has an extremely low adoption rate. Most kids never end up on an adoption track. It costs states $40k per year per child. An abortion costs $600.
I could get behind the anti abortion folks if they were willing to pony up the cash and fund that $40k per year. They only care about fetuses. They don't give a damn about actual children.
Genuine question.. when did she say this ?
Anybody who would even consider allowing a full term baby to have it's spinal cord severed hours before birth is beyond contempt. Hillary Clinton is such a person. I dare anybody to say that they defend the right to have such an abortion.
SJWs will hate me for this, but not for me, thanks.
I don't want a chick with a dick or a guy with a vag.
Totally agree - do not want that in the slightest.. I think most people, including SJWs, would respect the fact that you do not.. I think the issue the "SJW" kinda characters would have is if you put these people down or somehow made them out to be freaks, not whether you would sleep with them.. simply not being attracted to them is just life - some would be some wouldn't be - who are we to judge? 
not sure how this is even political tbh
Smack his face ans say, "Get on your feet lazy hat. Your coworkers are working and you take your paradise in here." He said, "I'm sorry sir. My girlfriend keep me wake all night."
"Fuck your girlfriend. It ain't my problem if you can't satisfy your gf, but you will satisfy me. Now, get out and on your knees!"
"Yes sir…"
Zipper open.
"... bu sit I never do this..."
"Shut the fuck up. Open your mouth bitch!"
......................................................................CUT.............................................................
2222 - ever the romantic LOL
as someone i know i would wake him up so he can go home .
as a stranger i would ignore him .
ROFLMAO
Thanks for this.. you just made my night
Bobby
I have heard the same from travellers.. that it seems to be not as bad as people say.. They are not not running down the street screaming for it or having sex in the streets etc but neither are we LOL
I think some of it is a fear campaign - but also a way to get some minorities onside with the hate against the middle east - even politicians are starting to see it as such but the hate/fear is already there 
I think that the extremists ARE doing some awful things but that is a small percentage or more so, I should say, limited to smaller areas that are more extreme
believe me I tried to google it first and watch videos on YouTube
but they talk too fast for me to understand
so how do I pronounce LENGTH correctly?is it lenth or lenkth (with the sound of k)
thanks.
Using your example of the k - that is how I pronounce it.. but think a soft K - like another poster said.. exactly like strength
She takes ages to pronounce it but says it a few times - helps to pronounce Strength and Length
We're about to see just how "presidential" the wild, crazy and almighty Cheeto looks on his first foreign trip as president. I have a feeling it's not going to be pleasant since he's ticked off quite a few countries :fight:
He gets along fine with other countries. By the way, you seem to enjoy denigrating Trump by calling him the "almighty Cheeto". That is as low as calling Obama the "Nigger In Charge".
A bit of history for you. After 9/11, under the presidency of George W. Bush, pretty much the entire WORLD respected, liked, or feared us. Under Obama.. even our closest allies such as Great Britain and Australia lost respect for us, and Obama pretty much brought back the cold war with Russia, in addition to allowing ISIS to be created and flourish throughout 35 countries in the world.
The two other major powers in the world - Russia and China - both HATED Obama and had no respect for him.
Frederick… Australia LOVED the USA until GWB - he ruined it all with his WMD etc - in fact it was Obama that made most Aussies start showing any respect to the USA.. Part of the reason our conservative party lost so hard in 2007 was because of our prime minister and his constant ass kissing of GWB