• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. bi4smooth
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 3
    • Topics 53
    • Posts 2104
    • Best 326
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by bi4smooth

    • RE: Florida to Enact "Don't Say Gay" Bill

      The problem with this bill is that it (like so many other "social engineering" attempts) solves a problem that either doesn't exist at all, or is already handled by other means.

      Let's be clear about this bill though:

      • the PRIMARY FOCUS of the bill is not to ban the teaching of LBGTQ+ concepts to grades K-3... no, that's a no-brainer, and a false-flag designed to disguise the real "meat" of the legislation - which is to empower parents to sue school districts over the teaching of LGBTQ+ positive messages.

      This is not unlike the Texas law that empowered pro-lifers to sue abortion providers independently and separately as a method of driving them out of business.

      Even so - what, exactly, is a Florida Kindergarten teacher supposed to do next year when 5 y/o Billy draws his family - with himself, his dog, and his two mommies?

      Oh, and I want to lend my support to those who correctly identify the "grooming" concepts being touted by some in the media (and the Governor his idiot-self) as being anti-Science (like that's new for them) and fear-mongering at its worst!

      You cannot "learn" to be homosexual - but you CAN learn to accept homosexuality as a natural occurrence! One seen in nature far beyond humans and other primates!

      posted in Gay News
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Trudeau says Canada will stand against authoritarianism

      @raphjd said in Trudeau says Canada will stand against authoritarianism:

      It's been discussed here many times before. We were originally told that the vaxx would prevent us from getting/spreading covid.

      You continue to be a whore to your Russian masters... forever more!

      We've been through this before:

      The COVID-19 vaccines do exactly what every other vaccine does, and has done, since 1798 (the first smallpox vaccine - the first ever human vaccine - was invented in 1798).

      Let's be clear... first about what vaccines ARE NOT:

      • Vaccines (not COVID-19, not Chicken-Pox, not MMR, not the 1798 Smallpox, not Polio, not even the Anthrax vaccine!) do not prevent pathogens (bacteria- or viral-based) from entering the body - that's why researchers and scientists wear "space suits" (protective gear) when researching pathogens - even when they are known & they have been vaccinated!
      • Vaccines are not (ever) 100% effective
      • Vaccines do not (directly) fight actual diseases or infections!

      It's helpful in understanding those statements, if you understand what vaccines are actually developed and designed to do: vaccines are designed to trigger an immune response in those who receive the "treatment". That is: the point of the vaccine is to prepare the host (human body) to more effectively fight (by itself) the targeted pathogen. As a result:

      • People with compromised or weak immune systems are not helped (or at least not as much) by vaccines. These are people like the elderly, the very young, and people with certain diseases - like leukemia or HIV (especially if it has progressed to AIDS).
      • People who receive a vaccine do not immediately receive a benefit - it takes time for the body to react (and build white-blood-cells as a result).
      • Some vaccines can provide a lifetime level of protection - that is, the body "permanently" learns how to "fight" the pathogen. Other vaccines (like the early Polio vaccines, and all "modern" Flu vaccines - and the current COVID-19 vaccines) require a "booster" to "remind" the body of how to fight the pathogen, and to trigger the "correct" immune response quickly enough to prevent illness.

      So, why is it Scientists say that vaccines "prevent" the disease? Well, in most cases the pathogens multiply inside the unvaccinated human host, who then spreads the pathogen to others. The longer the infection lasts, the more infectious the original host becomes.

      Things work differently in a vaccinated host: when the vaccinated host detects the presence of the pathogen, the vaccine-boosted immune response keeps the levels of pathogen growing in the body much lower. For some pathogens, this means that the level of infection never rises to the point where the host is contagious, in others (with particularly virulent pathogens), it reduces the period of time that they are contagious.

      Most pathogens do not make the host sick immediately upon infection... it takes time for the pathogen to "build up" before the effects are noticeable by the infected host. Again, the "pathways" for vaccinated and unvaccinated hosts differ:

      • in unvaccinated hosts, the pathogen multiplies quickly and the host is often contagious long before symptoms of illness are felt. Once ill, the infected host often has an inadequate immune response that often contributes to the spread of the pathogen to others: coughing, sneezing, vomiting, diarrhea, etc. The "natural" immune response may - or may not - be effective against the pathogen. Even if it is effective, it takes "some time" for the immune system to successfully eliminate the pathogen, or if it cannot, the host often dies as a result.
      • in vaccinated hosts, the pathogen triggers a quick immune response - one that the vaccine has "programmed" to be effective against the pathogen. As a result, the host often "defeats" (clears) the pathogen before it has replicated enough to make the host either contagious or ill. However, some pathogens work very quickly, and it replicates quickly enough that the host DOES become contagious and/or ill - but the immune response (if the vaccine is a good one) still allows the body to effectively eliminate the pathogen with minimal illness and a greatly reduced level and/or length of contagion.

      THIS IS HOW THE COVID-19 VACCINES SAVE LIVES

      Not through some magic that creates a barrier that prevent the virus from entering the body. Not by directly attacking the COVID-19 virus itself (that would be a TREATMENT - like an antibiotic for some bacterial infections - not a vaccine!).

      No, just like all the other vaccines we already have in our lives... by strengthening our own bodies' immune systems! Like we have been doing for over 200 years, now!

      No vaccine (and, indeed, no treatment) is 100% effective. But Trump's new m-RNA based vaccines are EXCEPTIONALLY effective, and require a TINY FRACTION of the research and testing time needed to adjust (tweak) for variants - or even for whole other diseases!

      The m-RNA technology that Trump jumpstarted will be a game-changer in immunology research! (No, he didn't invent it - but he gave it the funding and attention needed to move it a decade or more along in its research "path"! And that has saved untold thousands - perhaps even millions - of lives!)

      And your whining that it doesn't "prevent all infection" (it never could - not even by design!) or "prevent all contagion" (also never could - also by design) won't change any of that! We won't "unlearn" the science, and 10-years from now, MOST of our vaccines will likely be based-on the m-RNA vaccines developed for COVID-19!

      Trudeau has been photoed/videoed without a mask, despite his mandates for his own people. It's not just him, but all world leaders.

      Again, you act as-if Liberals were the only hypocrites! OK, maybe they're more hypocritical of mask-wearing rules - but that's just one example! Conservative lawmakers are hypocritical in all sorts of areas too!

      That doesn't make their hypocrisy any less important or any more acceptable... but dogs who bite need to be handled too - but aren't worthy of headline-level attention!

      OK, so some ass clowns joined in. But did the truckers do any of the violence BLM and Antifa did and still do? Your government gives them money while calling truckers "domestic terrorists".

      OK, so the Canadian Gov't doesn't list BLM or Antifa as official Terrorist Groups (domestic or otherwise) - and neither do they list Truckers (See here)

      Who they DO list includes the Proud Boys and the Three Percenters - organizations who support the overthrow of the current Gov't, vs protesting for change within the current Gov't. (It's a subtle difference - I doubt @raphjd will get it!)

      For the record, the Canadian Gov't never called the truckers "domestic terrorists" - they said they were acting like domestic terrorists! There's a difference! I can say @raphjd acts like a Russian agent without meaning that he is actually a Russian agent! (I can show the former, but I cannot prove the latter!)

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Case Fans Going Top Speed

      @Arago44 said in Case Fans Going Top Speed:

      Hey, so after every time I log into my pc and It gets to the log in screen on windows 10, my case fans start to spin up really fast to their maximum rpm. But after I login they go back to normal. Also when the computer is shutting down, the fans spin up again. Can anyone here tell me what the problem is with this? It's kind of an annoyance. And the kind of case fans I have are the Corsair ML120's assuming that info would help. They are also plugged into the commander thingy. 🙂 Someone please help.

      When you first startup your PC, the fans run full speed because that's normal - the software that controls the fan speeds (based on temps) hasn't loaded yet, and it's necessary to be "better safe than sorry" - a PC can overheat to a disaster point in SECONDS without cooling!

      As for the end, I suspect that's just the fan monitor/driver software unloading...

      posted in Computer Discussion & Support
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Hello

      @524144 said in Hello:

      25 years old Canadian, happy joining here.

      Welcome to out site, eh?

      We're a pretty friendly lot - so long as you stay off the Politics boards! Lots of folks here willing to help out - just ask!

      In the meantime, order some more lube, download some porn, and polish yer knob! 🙂

      posted in Introductions
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Revenge Fuck - Definition?

      @vortensen

      Within "mainstream porn", revernge-fucks are just attempts to give porn videos a "plot" (and usually fail miserably - if porn stars have any actual ACTING ability, it's purely coincidental/accidental - it is NOT why they're hired or cast usually!

      But in real life, a "revenge fuck" is different from what is commonly referred to as "revenge porn"

      A "revenge fuck" is, by way of an example, sleeping with your ex's brother (or father or son) and "letting it slip" to him... or seducing your ex's NEW b/f on Grindr...

      "Revenge porn" on the other hand is usually some form of publicizing what once were "private" pics or videos of your ex - often to places like here, or twitter, or facebook ... but somewhere for the "public" (although, more specifically acquaintances of the "victim") to see.

      To be clear, it is my understanding that THIS SITE's rules prohibit the publication of people's actual names, locations (addresses), and non-sexual social media information (including your own!)

      So: want to upload that homemade video you and your ex made 2-years ago? No problem - so long as you don't identify him (with a real name) or contact information.

      If either of you have an OF account, you can post that... Got a XXX Twitter handle? Fair game! Got a GayTube channel for your amateur content? Cool!

      But pics of his Drivers's licene, or home address, or "real" twitter handle... not so much...

      We're all about PORN here - and porn is fantasy! There is little room (or tolerance) of "reality" here! ROFL

      posted in Sex & Relationships
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: A giant real cock

      @jc2o said in A giant real cock:

      I had never seen anything like this, and did not think cocks could get this big:
      https://xhamster.com/videos/ignorant-xhI8eV8

      "normal" penises don't get that large...

      Honestly, is that thing even useful? What could you put it into? A farm animal? maybe! A human? unlikely - not into any human orifice I could think of - not mouth, not vagina, and certainly not an anus! Not without there being something seriously wrong with that orifice: no jaw, no hips, or whatever...

      posted in Chit Chat
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Infatuated with a straight/bi guy. Mixed signals. What to do?

      To the folks saying: "Just get out - run away - give up all hope"...

      You're thinking with your logical mind and the original poster is clearly thinking with his heart.

      I've had only a handful of times in my life when my logical mind and my heart were at serious odds... I have to say that, while I lost out financially when I went with my heart, I was overall much happier.

      ALL relationships are risky - you're entrusting another with your "heart and soul", and they may (honestly, usually do) wind up showing themselves unworthy of that trust... but it's the journey that makes life (and love) worth living - not JUST the destination!

      That said: like ALL risks, its about your "risk tolerance" - how far are you willing to go?

      When I was in my 20's, a co-worker was "outed" by a jilted lover... this was the 1990's, and we worked in a high security government location - and the result was, he lost his security clearance (and his job) over the incident.

      10 years later, he was still working in his field, was very successful, and had a long-time lover - whom he lived with in a very "out" manner. However, that lover was NOT the one who outed him, and at least until I lost touch with him several years ago, he still despised the guy that did that to him... even while admitting it was likely the only way he'd have ever come out!

      My point is: it's complicated... it's always complicated! And no 2 situations are exactly alike.

      As I noted above - I've been lucky in that my heart and my "logical brain" have usually been able to come to a consensus... and when they haven't, it's been chaos (no matter which one "wins", or for how long)... I wish I could tell you there was some logic, or planning, or conscious decision-making involved in my own "figuring out" what to do when they were so diametrically opposed... but I can't... sometimes my heart wins, sometimes my brain wins... that is the human experience!

      posted in Sex & Relationships
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Been barebacking too long

      @realstik said in Been barebacking too long:

      @pasha Get tested. Get on PREP. Get a condom that fits. Put lube inside the condom.

      All excellent suggestions:

      • Get PrEP to protect against HIV infection... as a positive side effect, you'll visit your Dr once every 3-6 months and get std and other blood tests to help make sure you remain healthy!
      • Try to have sex with other guys who ALSO take sexual health seriously - either on PrEP, on HIV meds (e.g. Poz-Undetectable), or who are otherwise aware of, and manage the risks of human sexuality (which is nothing new - sex has been "risky" since the beginning of time!)
      • Use condoms when you can - and lubricate yourself BEFORE your put on the condom (as well as after) - this increases the sensations exponentially and should eliminate the "dull" sensations you're experiencing now
      posted in Sex & Relationships
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Tracker returned failure reason: unregistered torrent

      Unregistered torrent is the tracker's way of saying that sometime between the point where you downloaded the .torrent file and now, the torrent has been removed from the tracker.

      SO - if you get this error, and the file is still showing on the website, delete the torrent in your client (delete, but do not delete the files - even partially downloaded ones), then re-download the .torrent and re-add it.

      Far more commonly, you'll get this error and find the torrent has been removed. A very VERY common reason for that is that it's a duplication... if you see that, look again and USUALLY the original torrent will be "promoted" (pushed to the top of the listings again)...

      posted in Downloading
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Bareback sex...

      @di3di3di3 said in Bareback sex...:

      its never safe for gonorrhea chlamydia herpes hpv mycoplasma genitalium - hominis, and UTIs. hepatitis b and c only when blood present (aka big dick / traumatized /infected mucosas)

      if u mean safe for HIV - with prep it is mostly safe.

      Odd that @di3di3di3 overlooks the available treatments for all of these - including the HPV vaccine - in what appears to be an argument against bareback sex.

      Your question tho (Is bareback sex safe) is deeper than that tho... sex - even masturbation - isn't "safe"! There is risk in EVERYTHING you do! So, the implied question is actually: "Is bareback safe enough?"

      Quite honestly, that's not really a good question to ask here - not because you won't get answers, but because you won't get GOOD answers!

      Other than herpes, all of the ailments mentioned above are risks that can be mitigated/treated. (Herpes is incurable and largely untreatable, tho thankfully almost always non-lethal).

      IMHO, I look for partners who understand "risk" and take actions to lessen them... that's why I'm on PrEP, and I prefer partners who are either on PrEP or who are Poz-undetectible... in other words, guys on anti-viral meds...

      Not entirely for the protection the HIV meds provide, but even more so because it's also proof-positive that they see their Doctors & get tested frequently for other STDs... it's a requirement to remain on either set of drugs!

      What's safe enough for you? That's a decision you have to make for yourself...

      posted in Health & Fitness
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Get circumcised or not?

      @di3di3di3 said in Get circumcised or not?:

      no. never change for anyone. especially not for religious nutjobs . lol

      ''unclean'' ,...umm did he ever hear of soap and water?

      anyways, we arent middle ages now. we have clean running water, soap and access to it 24/7/365. cleaning pennis foreskin etc means its as clean as a circumciced pennis

      Imma say this again - by the time you reach adulthood, having YOURSELF circumcised is a purely personal choice.

      That said, the results are even more permanent than a tattoo! (There is no putting that foreskin back!)

      But, like a tattoo, the purpose is purely visual and personal... if you like it better, cut it!

      But also, all of these purported "medical" reasons are pathetic excuses to explain INFANT circumcision, and they are bogus...

      posted in Health & Fitness
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Black Nationalist and liberal darling charged with attempted murder of Louisville mayoral candidate

      @raphjd said in Black Nationalist and liberal darling charged with attempted murder of Louisville mayoral candidate:

      @bi4smooth

      You do love to defend everything liberal.

      dude, if a liberal dog licked his own balls, you'd shout from the rooftops how disgusting and perverted he was...

      COMPLETELY overlooking the fact that most all male dogs lick their balls!

      In other words (since I know you seldom understand similes):
      I'm not defending the fact that the dude may have attempted murder, nor am I defending BLM for bailing him out...

      No, what I'm saying is that this is a "dog licks his own balls" kind of "story" - and I put "story" in quotes, because this is "fake news" - it's not newsworthy!

      "White Supremacist bailed out of jail by KKK lawyers" isn't a story either!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Proof that black privilege is real

      @raphjd said in Proof that black privilege is real:

      All racism is bad, even when it's against whites.

      That's the first rational thing you've said in here in months... though the "even if" part is unnecessary... try using a period there... "ALL RACISM IS BAD. -- no caveats needed!

      Now, put your money where your mouth is and stop defending White Nationalists and their propaganda!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Black Nationalist and liberal darling charged with attempted murder of Louisville mayoral candidate

      @raphjd said in Black Nationalist and liberal darling charged with attempted murder of Louisville mayoral candidate:

      Back on topic.

      Imagine how liberal media would have reported on this if a white guy tried to kill a jewish Democrat.

      Oh no! There's a story about "one of our team" doing something bad... better come up with a story about "one of their team" doing something bad too... preferably the same thing, if not worse!

      This is the same "what about-ism" and "zero-sum" bullshit you keep dumping on us!

      A liberal, black "activist" was arrested and bailed out by a liberal, black activist group...

      OK, so you're going to cry as much about Trump pardoning convicted criminals? Oh no! That's different! (HINT: NO! it isn't!)

      If you were arrested today, what are the odds that a conservative white guy would bail you out? (OK, or a conservative white woman?)...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Proof that black privilege is real

      @lololulu19 said in Proof that black privilege is real:

      @msoft It's people like you who are the most racist.
      You have the idea that if you hate white people, that makes you non-racist. How racist is that?

      And at the same time.. you excuse all racist activity of other races.. as if they are entitled to be racist.

      But getting back to the topic.. why are you on this site for 10 years, and not doing anything but being a troll? Personally, I would ban anybody from this site who never uploads nor downloads anything.

      @lololulu19 and @raphjd are both making the same argument... either:

      • it's OK to be racist against <insert minority here>, because <minority> are racist against me! Here's an example of <insert single minority person> being racist!

      - or -

      • I need to protect my White Race against these other <insert minority here> people because they're all racist against me! Here's an example of <insert minority group> being racist!

      The simple concept of "racism is bad: for all, from all, to all, about all" is incompatible with their beliefs - beliefs that hold that the old "status quo" was "good and equitable", that things were "better" in the past, and where their Whiteness and White Privilege wasn't challenged.

      Mind you, they didn't learn these opinions and beliefs as adults, they were ingrained into them as children... thus, these are infallible beliefs that cannot be challenged in their minds... Neither @lololulu19 nor @raphjd are particularly "young" - which means that these "modern fights" for "equality" are seen by them as an attack on what they hold as fundamental, core belief systems!

      What's worse, they see it as a zero-sum-game! For there to be "more equality" for other minorities, there must be "less equality" for Whites.

      It's this last area that I BELIEVE is the most damaging...

      • allowing women the right to vote didn't dilute or threaten Democracy, it strengthened and re-invigorated it!
      • allowing blacks and natives to become lawyers, and later judges, didn't damage or demean our legal systems, it strengthened and legitimized them!

      The examples are many... there are no limits to how "high (or far) we can go"... giving liberty, freedom, and equality to all only gives more fuel to the engine!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Trudeau says Canada will stand against authoritarianism

      @raphjd said in Trudeau says Canada will stand against authoritarianism:

      @bi4smooth said in Trudeau says Canada will stand against authoritarianism:

      Y'all are morons - of the highest (or lowest) caliber!

      Trudeau may be a Liberal, and he may want to FORCE people to protect themselves and others against COVID (thankfully, the need for that seems to be abating ... for now), but he's nothing like Putin and Russia.

      And for you to want to compare the two is hilariously idiotic.

      That you would stoop so low, just because he's a political rival - in a free and fair, democratic (small d) society is a clear indication of where your education stopped... 3rd Grade, maybe?

      Once again, you are name-calling to defend liberal authoritarianism.

      No - I am not excusing Trudeau's overreach - I've called it out here before.

      But was his overreach worse than Trump's (albeit in other areas) or Biden's (in the SAME area)??? NO!

      The point wasn't whether Trudeau overstepped his authority in Canadian law and society - it's that he's not comparable to Putin and what he's doing now!

      In very many (scarily many) ways, Putin's behavior here mirror's Hitlers when he invaded Poland, and just before he invaded Norway and Belgium. (Esp in the excuses he's giving for doing so...)

      As a free world, we can stand up against this kind of thing - and sacrifice lives now - or, we can cater and cowtow to them and lose everything later. The choice is up to our leaders.

      In 50 years, will Putin be the "Great Father" or the "Reviled Dictator"? Personally, I'd rather it be "forgotten footnote", but that'd require a very VERY skilled sniper! 😉

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Replace .ru domain

      Please see discussion here:

      https://community.gaytorrent.ru/topic/57849/ru-domain/4

      the .ru domain name doesn't mean the site is hosted in or around Russia. (Doesn't mean it isn't, either).

      This site name was registered in 2006 (easily looked up in the Internet WHOIS database)... at a time when sex-related sites were under somewhat of an attack in the .com and other common TLD domains (as they were controlled, in great parts, by US companies).

      A great many sites changed to ccTLDs - esp from obscure countries (and Russia was not the threat then that it is now).

      Read what I wrote in the other thread....

      I doubt very much that Putin would even approve if this domain's existence if he knew about it (or cared, or had any control!)

      While I'm at it - wanting to hate on all things Russian because of what their Government is doing in Ukraine is every bit as bad as blaming all Asians - even American Asians for COVID-19...

      This act of war is being perpetrated by the Russian Government, not it's people.

      I'm not saying to go out and support your local Russian Army Soldiers, but I am saying that boycotting Russian Dressing because of this war is absurd...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Trudeau says Canada will stand against authoritarianism

      Y'all are morons - of the highest (or lowest) caliber!

      Trudeau may be a Liberal, and he may want to FORCE people to protect themselves and others against COVID (thankfully, the need for that seems to be abating ... for now), but he's nothing like Putin and Russia.

      And for you to want to compare the two is hilariously idiotic.

      That you would stoop so low, just because he's a political rival - in a free and fair, democratic (small d) society is a clear indication of where your education stopped... 3rd Grade, maybe?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Adequate penis sizes

      @nf16 said in Adequate penis sizes:

      @bi4smooth : With all due respect, the whole "selective breeding" thing is mostly a myth. Even if it were not, there is no evidence that male slaves were bred for penis size. Large-scale studies of penis size have not found any statistical significant differences between black and white penis sizes.

      Not so much - being born & raised in the American South, and educated in the 1970's and 80's - when we weren't being so prudish about these things, I was exposed to this information in both HS and college.

      The printed flyers (advertisements) from the slave auctions, as well as the documented sales of slaves, often mention their estimated age, precise height & weight, and an "other" category that was PRIMARILY used for their breast or penis size & usually filled in as U for unremarkable, L for large, or XL for extra-large. Sales receipts from the auctions show a clear correlation to the "other" having an L or XL entered to higher sales prices.

      NOTE: sometimes the "other" field would have a "H" entered - indicating that they were "household trained" - that is, trained to work inside the owner's home. The field would also sometimes have a number - which was used solely for women, to show how many live children she had birthed - women who had successfully had children were highly prized, as the children were "free slaves".

      History aside, remembering that the immigration of dark-skinned people has not abated since the abolition of slavery 155+ years ago, it's fair to say that there has been ample time for the "law averages" to come into play, and the percentage of Black Americans who can trace their ancestry to slaves is decreasing (statistically speaking: they are being diluted). As a result, the differences are "evening out" over time.

      That said, many of the "studies" you refer to were flawed on 2 counts:

      1. they were run by white men who had an interest in showing that there was no "real" difference - because of an ill-formed belief that a larger penis was somehow "superior" - and they couldn't have a study showing blacks as being superior! If you read the statistical details, you'll see that they "threw out" specimens that were "abnormally large or small"... in other words, they pared down the samples so as to all-but-guarantee the result they wanted!
      2. the more modern the sample, the more "diluted" the pool of Black men who are the result of the selective breeding exercise in American slavery.

      I've looked for it, but there was a Japanese study from pre-WWII that looked solely at Black American men descended from slaves - and they DID find a statistically significant size difference - in penis length, overall height, and low BMI (associated with muscularity). We saw the study in my college statistics class (these studies were being used to show how filtering, or not-filtering, the source data can be used to skew results), but I haven't found it in my Google searches.

      Since this discussion has the potential to get quite ugly, can we please go back to the original topic? Personally, yes, I'm happy with what I have. As a top, I'm perhaps not as concerned about the penis size of my partner as some might be. His ass, on the other hand.....

      I agree that the topic could get uncomfortable - but that doesn't mean it should be ignored either!

      Again, as a study in American culture: isn't it amazing that it's OK to refer to Asian men's smaller endowments, but not to Black men's larger ones? (Isn't it even MORE amazing that we throw ALL Asians - from Chinese and Japanese and Korean, to Thai, Vietnamese, and Indo-Chinese, to Indian and Pakistani! These are NOT all one "race" of people!)

      Personally, I couldn't care less about penis size. My ex-fiance was Black and about 8.5" in length (erect). My current b/f is Vietnamese and is about 6.5" in length (erect)... I fall in between those 2 measurements (I was smaller than my ex-fiance, and I'm slightly larger than my current b/f).... and all of that means didly-squat!

      Although, whenever this comes up, I'm reminded of a segment from a live concert by the a cappella group The Flirtations. They have a segment called "One of us," in which they say things like, "One of us was a high school wrestler." One of those statements was, "One of us thinks size matters," at which point, the individual in question piped up, "And the rest of them are lying!"

      It is sad, but true - men have been comparing penises pretty much since we realized we had them! One of the things I try to teach my children is that - it is important for your lifelong mental health that you come to terms with, and like your own body: height, complexion, eye color, body-style, hairy or not, large-breasted or small, large penis or small - these are all aspects of your body that are generally (without surgery) unchangeable! Learn to like it, appreciate it, and do not envy others for the body THEY got! It was all an accident of nature... it doesn't make them superior to you in any way... just different!

      A related question: when you're reading an online profile hookup site, how much do you automatically subtract from their stated penis length?

      That's an excellent question... but, alas, I don't add or subtract anything - because I don't care so much... I'd rather know about their chest and face vs their penis! (I know that's just me - I don't intend to speak for others!)

      posted in Sex & Relationships
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • 1
    • 2
    • 16
    • 17
    • 18
    • 19
    • 20
    • 105
    • 106
    • 18 / 106