• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. raphjd
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 1
    • Followers 34
    • Topics 2697
    • Posts 12710
    • Best 795
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 2

    Posts made by raphjd

    • RE: Anybody dare say why this is so?

      Over the last year, especially, I have given countless examples why people have hated Don "Lady Butt Hurt" Lemon.

      He and his beloved guess, Simone Sanders, constantly race bait and they have no regard for the truth if it stands in the way of their narrative.

      **Aww, poor, poor white people.  BOO HOO!!!**is how Simone Sanders, with a smile from Lemon, reacted to a white man being dragged and beating by 9 (including the girl filming the video and shouting encouragement) black people then having his car stolen.  WHY?!  Because he was white, so he must have voted for Trump.

      THAT AIN'T NO HATE CRIME!!! was how Simone Sanders and Lemon describe the Chicago kidnapping, even after watching the video and the statement by the black lead investigating police detective into the incident.

      They never shut up about the shooting at the black church, but never mention the shooting at the white church.

      They play up anti-non white racist incidents, but ignore anti-white racist incidents.  If they do finally talk about anti white racist incidents, they drag out the well worn "you can't be racist toward white people" bullshit.

      Lemon gets sooooo butt hurt he floods the studio with ass blood, when people, even fellow blacks, mention wrong doing by blacks.

      They run screaming to broadcast a story about racism against non-whites, but forget the story as soon as it's proven it was a crock of shit, like the 4 black girls on the college campus bus.  Of course, they left the narrative there that blacks are always the victims of crackers.

      Lemon and Co don't give a fuck about the truth.  They only care about the honkeys are the devil narrative.

      A few different stories of muslim girls getting threatened by crackers makes the news.  When it's prove they were false flags, Lemon and Co never mention it again.  Narrative made, who fucking cares about the truth.

      ++++

      Back in the 1980s, we had the Tawana Brawley "case".  She was out whoring and didn't want to get in trouble with her religious dad, so she and her mom made up the story that she was gang raped by 7+ NYC cops and they wrote NIGGER on her chest with dog shit.

      Every news outlet went spastic over the story, but CNN said that we needed to wait and see how the story panned out.  CNN was the only news outlet that didn't just take the word of Tawana and her mother.    They did cover the story, completely, but they never treated is absolute fact.    When the truth came out, CNN was the only news outlet to come out looking good, while the rest looked like shit.

      30ish years later and CNN is the worst of the worst.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Do we need a word like "cis" or "cis gender"?

      CIS translates into (basic definition) that you identify with what you sex is.

      As we have seen over the last 5+ years, it's been used to demonize "cis" people and not as an academic phrase.    "Die CIS scum!!!" became an internet thing when that thing shaved her head and put on black make up.  Oddly, the girl in that video was CIS, but hated all CIS people for whatever reason.

      CIS white males (even gays ones) were banned from diversity events in the UK, despite it being illegal.  HOWEVER, and as usual, nothing was done about this but there would have been mass arrests if the reversed happened.

      Minorities can break the very laws designed to protect them.

      We see the same kind of shit with the "white people go around" event at Berkeley.    (go fuck yourself, you can look it up for yourself, as it's been talked about so much here and you should know what it is).

      Even with SJWs redefining "racism",  the shit we are seeing matches their definition, but not in the way they (SJWs) intended.    Anti-white racist events/incidents are being protected by ALL levels of the government.

      The Obama administration dropped the charges against the 2 New Black Panthers who were brandishing weapons and threatening white voters outside the Philly voting place in the 2008 election.

      Berkeley police were at the anti-white racist event to prevent uppity whites from trying to cross the bridge.  They were not there to enforce equal rights laws.    The city and university, also, fully supported this anti-white racist event even though it's against equality laws at every level.  Obama and his administration didn't give a fuck because it was done to honkeys.    No one was arrested for setting buildings on fire.  No one was arrested for beating and stomping those 2 already unconscious men to a bloody pulp because "Hey, they look like Nazis" as can be heard in various videos of the incident.

      Evergreen College had similar things and no one was arrested, even though the President of the college admitted in the state Senate hearing that lots of laws at all levels were broken.    Gangs of black students and their cucks roaming the college campus with baseball bats looking for disobedient whites and no one was arrested.      The only criminal charges being looked at are the ones for the person(s) who reposted the various videos the freaks uploaded themselves committing the various crimes, like holding the college President and other staff hostage, telling them they can't go to the bathroom and that if they had to, to piss themselves.  There's no question who the guilty are, they are on video that they themselves uploaded bragging about what they did.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Something Trump is wrong about..

      (queue fake angry black woman accent) Giiiirl, don't you be putting words in my mouth. (imagine emjoi of said black woman doing that head bob thing)

      On the previous page, I quoted you saying that and I replied.

      I want to be clear, I'm telling you there are two principle ways to write laws. One writes them to avoid putting the innocent in prison, releasing the guilty who go on to become repeat offenders. The 10% was a hypothetical, arbitrary number. The other option is to create a strict penal code that keeps the guilty in prison with a higher number of innocent.

      Repeat offending is extremely high, even with the current system where we allow innocent men to go to prison.  Even in Europe where the motto is "we don't punish, we rehabilitate", repeat offending it extremely high.

      I might agree with your "just lock them all up" preference, if the state didn't do illegal things and also prevent people from investigating the case properly.  If we start locking corrupt DAs, police, etc, etc, then your stance would have more "juice".

      DAs, police and others actively fight against DNA testing even when a private group is willing to pay for it.    Take a time machine back to when GWB first ran for President as Gov of Texas.    There was a man scheduled to be executed and GWB wouldn't delay the execution to wait for the DNA results.  The man was executed on scheduled.  About 3 weeks later the DNA results cleared him of the crime.  GWB maintained that he never executed a guilty man because LEGALLY the man was still "guilty" when he was executed.

      I've told the story of the 4th of July 76 rapes in my home town.  The police stitched up a well known and extremely lovely mentally disabled man in the town.    The police manipulated him into confessing, even though he didn't do it.    20ish years later,  one of the Innocence Project type groups proved he never did the rapes and that he was stitched up by the police and the DA 100% knew about it.

      Those two options are on a continuum. As long as people are judged by circumstantial evidence, our choice will remain on that sliding scale. The feminism argument you keep going back to (sigh) puts a higher number of innocent in jail; it also adds an element of tribalism to the argument and if you're going to insist upon that, then you must also bring into this discussion the disproportionate number of blacks in jail, which complicates things a lot.

      Discussing groups/people that advocate for innocent people to be sent to prison disgusts me so I'm gonna always talk about it.

      I was falsely accused of rape by a vindictive cunt because she wanted us to take her our "gay clubbing" and I didn't want to go to the other side of town.  Under the feminist campaign of JUST BELIEVE, I would have been locked up FOREVER just on her claim.    I was arrested and thrown in jail for nearly 24 hours while I waited for the police to view the pub's CCTV.    The state refused to prosecute her for making a false statement to the police and wasting police time.  Both are felonies.  I couldn't do a private suit against her because no lawyer wanted to take the case because I would be viewed as the evil penis man who's victimizing her.

      Black people make up 13% of the US population.

      Black people commit 56% of the murders in the US and 54% of all violent crimes in the US.

      Blacks make up 44% of cop killers.  I can't find a stat for wounding cops by race.

      Blacks are 26% of those shot (wounded or killed) by police.

      Whites only out pace their portion of the crime stats in what I would call pretty minor crimes, like sex in public places and drinking alcohol in public/public drunkenness.  Whites are by far the biggest bootleggers of moonshine.

      Blaming whites for the crimes of blacks is racist by saying that blacks have no agency.    We could go back to before the welfare days when blacks committed far less crimes and they were married at a high rate than white.

      Prior to welfare, blacks had 8% to 10% higher marriage rates than whites.  Blacks had the 2nd highest marriage rates after far east Asians.  Now blacks have by far the worst marriage rates in the US.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: "Planned Parenthood"?

      @Icc:

      @Frederick:

      Why would an organization that exists to ABORT babies from UNPLANNED pregnancies be called "PLANNED PARENTHOOD"?

      I should hope that there is nothing PLANNED about an abortion  (although I can think of at least one woman who said she was going to get pregnant just so she could exercise her right to have an abortion).   Abortion does not lead to PARENTHOOD.

      I'm trying to think of a better name for their group.     Hmm…   how about "Snip My Baby's Brain Stem To Prevent Parenthood"?
      SMBBSTPP
      It's kind of catchy...
      "S-M-B-B....   S-T-P-P"

      Youre not very smart. You think you are but no. Just more bullshit.

      :police:   Either add something of value to the conversation or leave the thread.      Your post borders on flaming because it has nothing but insults without further comment to justify what you said.   :police:

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: "whites move to the back"

      That's the thing.  Blacks especially, but Hispanics as well, are calling for special rights and even segregation ala Jim Crow.

      There's that infamous video of the black students all butt hurt at Yale and the one black chick screeching that it's not a place of learning but a home.

      I believe it was Yale as well where they were all gathered around and an Asian student got their turn and lit into the black students for being racist toward them.  The mike was snatched away and told the event wasn't about in fighting but fighting against white people.

      In Portland, one of the colleges had "anti whiteness" seminars.

      At Evergreen college they had the event were whites were told they weren't allowed on campus because they were white.  Of course, Evergreen has had a lot of anti white shit happen over the last 2 years especially.

      More recently, there's the group of mostly illegal Hispanics screeching that exams are racist and that the non white students should be able to simply do an essay using their textbooks at home, while the cracker students take the exams like normal.    These idiots were screaming that exams were "white supremacy".

      The sad part is, SJWs are too stupid to see what is actually going on.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: "Planned Parenthood"?

      I realize a number of your recent political threads – some about Trump, and all of them far more more interesting -- were commandeered to off-topic screeds about the pernicious evils of women.  But it's a very tired bandwagon.  And as far as this Planned Parenthood nonsense, I fear I must put the receiver down.

      LIAR!!!!!

      Let's ignore for the fact that you, yourself took this thread off topic with this crap.  No one, despite your blatant bullshit has blamed ALL women for anything.  Let's be honest for a sec, if you can manage for that long.  The complaints you refer to are about feminists and their cucks.    It's never been about ALL WOMEN, as you claim.

      You are a typical religious fanatic.  Your religion gets attacked and you claim we are attacking all people.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Something Trump is wrong about..

      So the feminist cuck demands that every time I mention that Lacy Green raped 4 million people, I have to provide sources for it.

      I've never claimed to be a celeb, so don't put words in my mouth.  HOWEVER, when things like the "white people go around" event is mentioned for the 5 billionth time on this site, a normal person would  think you idiots would know what it is without the need for sources every fucking time.

      cteavin said he supports 10% of those executed being innocent.  This goes hand in hand with feminists and their cucks advocating that we JUST BELIEVE and send men to prison simply on a woman's say so, claiming that only 2% to 8% will be innocent.  In your cuckery, you either can't see how the 2 are directly related or, and most likely the case, you are so dishonest that you don't want me shining a light on the issue.  You don't really have an issue with me disagreeing with cteavin, you are just butt hurt that I show feminists for the kind of people they truly are.

      How dare you tell me I can't take issue with a person who says something I disagree with, you hypocrite.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Something Trump is wrong about..

      Gotta love the uneducated misandrist left.  They claim that western women are oppressed, but can't give even 1 issue that hasn't been debunked or that's not laughable.

      ANYWHOOOOOO,

      As a feminist cuck, you should already know all this.  Or are you one of those cucks that just pipe up in agreement whenever your feminist overlords says something without caring what she says?

      Lacy Green (and many other feminists) did a series of videos about sexual assault and rape and the JUST BELIEVE campaign.  JUST BELIEVE is where you don't question a female who cries rape, you just believe.    Anyway, Lacy said that no one, but especially females, never, ever lie about sexual assault and rape.

      Anyway,  as a backlash, people (males and females) flocked to Lacy Green's various social media accounts and accused her of sexually assaulting and/or raping them.  It was estimated 4 million people this.    Based on the JUST BELIEVE campaign, Lacy Green should have been locked up immediately, but because she has a vag, she got away with it contrary to the campaign she was an active leader of.

      Most feminists say that only 2% of rape claims are false.  If you do a bit of Googling, you will see that this is comes from a judge's speech and he got the figure from a pamphlet by a feminist group.    A few years ago, some feminists finally started admitting this.  As far as I know, Rebecca Watson was the 1st to admit that is was higher, but still only 8%.    Of course, there are studies that show it's higher than than the 2% to 8% feminists claim.

      We've gone over this stuff here plenty of times before and it still shocks the fuck out of me that feminist cucks never seem to know any of this stuff.    In another couple of weeks I'll have to explain this exact same shit to another feminist cuck, because they've never heard of it.  yada, yada, yada…..............  It's never ending.

      It's like the "white people go around" anti-white racist event at Berkeley.  I posted about it when it happened and have to explain it countless times because SJWs have no fucking idea what it is.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Something Trump is wrong about..

      Nothing was taken out of context.

      You support executing innocent men.  I say, MEN because women most often get the pussy pass and avoid the death penalty, even for the most heinous crimes.

      You don't mind if 10% of those executed are innocent.  That is fucked up.    Even feminists only want to punish 2% to 8% of men who are innocent.

      To answer your question;  NO INNOCENT MAN SHOULD BE SENT TO PRISON OR EXECUTED.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: More woe for crooked Hillary.. seems Hillary isn't the only one who wrote a book

      I prefered Bernie of all those running in 2016.

      That was until the video of him cucking to those BLM bitches.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Something Trump is wrong about..

      Sounds like we have a closet SJW/feminist here.

      JUST BELIEVE, despite Lacy Green never being thrown in prison for raping 4 million people, demands that whenever a person (feminists really mean; WOMEN because they don't care about males) claims to have been sexually assaulted or raped, we automatically throw the accused in prison for life.

      Under that system, I would be in prison, even though CCTV proved I was totally innocent.    The cunt who accused me was being vindictive, not just "mistaken".

      Oddly, cteavin wants to wrongfully punish more people than feminists.    Feminists only want to punish 2% to 8% (their figure) of falsely accused, but cteavin wants to wrongfully execute 10%.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: "whites move to the back"

      On or off campus, she should sue.    She was hired by the event organizers to take photos of the event and was labeled a racist for doing so.

      The same with the "white people go around" event.  All the white students should do a class action suit against the university, city, and police.

      ++++

      I also think that everyone affected by the "Dear Colleague" letters bullshit should sue as well.    The US Dept of Ed admitted that the letters, despite the claims in the letter, had no legal basis and their threats toward the universities would not and could not hold up in court.  The letters were purposely worded to mislead.

      The Obama administration illegally stripped young men of their constitutional rights.

      This goes hand in hand with them dropping the charges of the 2 New Black Panthers who brandish weapons and making threats to whites at the 2008 polling place in Philly.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: More woe for crooked Hillary.. seems Hillary isn't the only one who wrote a book

      The DNC Primary was rigged against Bernie.    Lot's of people have been saying that for ages.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Is this fair? Or is it Forced / corrupt?

      Mentalism is the practice of using the way people naturally act and manipulation.

      Most magic requires manipulation.  Usually this comes in using distraction tactics.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: "whites move to the back"

      I posted this thread because of the recent event where the black female singer told the crackers to get to the back and got extremely  butt hurt that the white female photographer refused to obey her black overlord.    The cucks that ran the music event apologized for the racism by the cracker fish they hired to take pictures of the event.

      This shit is getting extremely common and the mainstream see nothing wrong with racism against whites.

      I haven't been in college in a long time, but to say "college is where racism should be done at" is insane.    Everyone with a bit of power over the situation should have treated it like they would if whites had done it.

      Racism, even against whites, is always bad.

      ++++

      There's a video of some Hispanic students, of the not so legal type (wink, wink), at Berkeley scream and shouting at the professor and other students because it's racist to test the non white students.  The students, of any color, who sat for the exam were propping up white supremacy.  Anyway, the upset students wanted to write a simple essay at home with their textbooks rather than have a proper exam.  As many of the people who posted the video said, we've catered and pandered to these losers for so long that they think (know in most cases) that we will cave into their demands to avoid being called a racist.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Something Trump is wrong about..

      I say it's worth it that one – or ten -- men in a hundred be wrongly executed than to let the guilty go free.

      Are you serious?!  That is fucked up.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Something Trump is wrong about..

      I support the death penalty in principle, but not in practice.

      Too many innocent people are wrongly convicted for me to support the death penalty in the current state of the criminal justice system.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Is Cory Feldman responsible to lead a charge against pedophilia in Hollywood?

      No "repair" needed.  You made the claim that women are disadvantaged, which is clearly a lie in the west.    Western women are extremely privileged.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Is Cory Feldman responsible to lead a charge against pedophilia in Hollywood?

      You don't have to use those exact words to push the leftist SJW narrative.    The fact that you are a feminist says it all.

      What did your goddess Hillary say?  Oh that's right, women are the real victims of war because men go off to fight and end up getting killed.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Is Cory Feldman responsible to lead a charge against pedophilia in Hollywood?

      @flozen:

      @raphjd:

      Ah, the usual "just ignore that bit" crap from a feminist.

      As a feminist and SJW, you should DEMAND that the inequalities be gotten rid of.   Then again, you're a feminist and SJW, so you DEMAND we ignore the inequalities.

      I do favor the elimination of inequalities in justice, as applied to any gender, race and so on.

      Can you point me to even a minor trove of examples – among your many, valued contributions here at GT -- where you have advanced any solutions to issues that disadvantage women in particular?  Because, from what I've seen, you're quite the one-note flute.   :dick:

      Western women are not oppressed.

      Feminists don't give a shit about women in the 3rd world because then they'd have to face the reality of their bullshit about western women.

      Other than calling me a dick, what have you done here other than push the SJW narrative of "all white men are evil"?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • 1
    • 2
    • 453
    • 454
    • 455
    • 456
    • 457
    • 635
    • 636
    • 455 / 636