Posts made by raphjd

https://rumble.com/v16tuat-persons-headmates-goes-by-paintpaintself-pronouns.html

Paint & paintself are now pronouns.

@michelbraga said in Site changes 7 March 2022:

omg, i cant post img.

Please post this in the correct place.

@parishanover

We could say the same thing about left-wing "faggots".

You get your news from left-wing media that lies to you and vote for Democrats that hate you.

https://resistthemainstream.org/retired-federal-agent-may-have-known-of-buffalo-shooting-in-advance

https://resistthemainstream.org/black-lives-matter-turns-on-joe-biden-over-recent-executive-order

While I support the idea, it fails miserably.

It does nothing to prevent a dirty cop from being fired and getting a job at another police department. Nor does it make police accountable for their actions.

Too often police are found to have done no wrong, by their fellow police, who "investigate" the complaints.

https://resistthemainstream.org/democrat-resigns-after-fbi-arrest-becomes-public/

Rafiei lost the support of Democrat Party leadership after news surfaced that the FBI had arrested her on suspicion of bribing public officials in 2019. 

https://resistthemainstream.org/high-school-reportedly-banning-unvaccinated-students-from-graduation-ceremony

https://resistthemainstream.org/nancy-pelosis-husband-arrested

Drunk driving

Considering who his wife is, I'm betting the charges will disappear.

@serenity

True, it was posted by a group admin/mod on Reddit.

What is not true is that Reddit's updated rules and policies had no bearing on this, unless you are calling the author of the post a liar.

Please provide proof that the author of that is a liar.

Over the last few years, Reddit has routinely changed its rules to suit the liberal agenda.

Now Reddit is not allowing showing non-whites (not sure if this includes women) as the criminal aggressor, such as Boulder mass shooting by a Syrian.

Once again, the left is trying to hide the truth, so they can spew their anti-white narrative.

It's like how feminists claim that women are always innocent victims, never the bad guy, because in counties like the UK, Israel, India and many others, women can legally not commit certain crimes. As an example, you can "legally" say that women have never, ever committed domestic violence in Israel, India and other countries. Or that no woman in the UK has ever committed rape or other severe sex crimes.

I can't talk about the comparison/similarities between Dylann Roof and Emanuel Samson. I can't say that Emanuel Samson shot up a white church in a racist attack.

@hubrys

Federal courts are not the same as federal laws.

Marriage equality advocates were pushing for states' rights, and part of that was to overturn DOMA and restore FF&C when it comes to marriage.

This became important when Mass. legally recognized marriage equality in 2004.

Unlike abortion, now, there was no push at the time to make marriage equality a federal law. It was states' rights based on Massachusetts.

@hubrys

AH, I get it now.

You only want to focus on a tiny part of the marriage equality push.

You want us to ignore everything that doesn't gel with your narrative.

You aren't deluded, just dishonest.

@hubrys

If he was basing his comments on my "proven" track record, then he's just deluded as I have posted anti-voter fraud stuff prior to 2015 when Trump came down the escalator.

Ah, but you are innocent despite calling me an asshole and misrepresenting my stance.

You're no better than anyone else, despite you believing liberals are wonderful and perfect.

@hubrys

Ah, because you framed the original post as being in high school libraries, we can't talk about the full context of the argument.

And liberals pretend they aren't control freaks.

@hubrys

There was no push to make marriage equality as a federal law because Clinton and the DNC-controlled Congress were homophobes.

If Clinton and Congress were friendly to marriage equality, there would have been a push for it on the federal level.

This is why the abortion argument is not about the states, but about federal law. Biden and the DNC-controlled Congress love abortion.

I don't know if you are deluded or just being dishonest.

@hubrys

Ah, liberals and their cancel culture are wonderful, but when conservatives do it, it's evil.

Why are you so blinded?

Why do you have to defend putting a graphically detailed teen porn book in an elementary school? There are plenty of non-porn books you can defend.

Why do teachers NEED to have secret conversations with young students, like some sicko groomer?

I never knew my teachers' political leanings, so why must kids today be indoctrinated into their teachers' dogma?

LGBTs are not being erased.

I think you are confusing "my 2yo is trans" with "kids at that age don't even think like that".

@hubrys

He always dismissed EVERY post made about actual, proven voter fraud.

He also accused me of only ever caring about voter fraud because Trump lost, despite my long history here (and everywhere else) of being against voter fraud, even long before Trump ran for office.

He would take a topic that had never been discussed here and assume my stance, and use that to slag me off. At least I based my comments on his proven track record on actual discussions here.

I know, you're a liberal, so you can't see the difference.

@hubrys

If you want to think you did.

The only thing you "won" was not admitting that you people flip-flop on states' rights and federal rights, as the situation suits you.

Marriage and abortion are not enumerated to the federal government, so marriage is a states' rights issue, but abortion is a federal issue.

LOL, yeah you "won", alright.

@hubrys

But it is and was relevant that the graphically detailed teen porn book was not just provided to high schoolers. It was provided to K-12.

Your CNN article failed, intentionally, to mention the full argument, so I had to add the context.

As always with the left, you fail to frame things in their full context, so you don't look so bad.

As I said in the last post on the 1st page of this thread (to someone else), if the book was obscene enough to threaten a mother simply for reading the book out loud at a school board meeting, then it was too obscene for kids to read.

@hubrys

Nope.

You won't admit that if the DNC under Bill Clinton wasn't so hostile to gay equality, you would have gone the federal law route to make it the law of the land.

It's the same thing we see with abortion.