Impeachment nonsense
-
Trump hasn't been found guilty of any wrongdoing, and there isn't even any evidence that he did anything criminal. There are just a load of libturds making assumptions and accusations.
The first thing to do is get real evidence.. then if that emerges, determine if Trump was behind it.. then determine if that was illegal.
What Trump is being accused of is not even illegal!!And yet.. this idiot moonbat Al Green has decided to skip all of that.. and go right to impeachment. What a vagina this man is!
I hope there is some sort of penalty for filing such a severe action without any merit. -
Don't even pretend like "evidence" or "facts" have any place in your vocabulary. Those concepts are meaningless to people who maintain blind loyalty to a party.
-
Don't even pretend like "evidence" or "facts" have any place in your vocabulary. Those concepts are meaningless to people who maintain blind loyalty to a party.
The same goes for those that blindly cling to an ideology.
-
Don't even pretend like "evidence" or "facts" have any place in your vocabulary. Those concepts are meaningless to people who maintain blind loyalty to a party.
man, you are really harsh on yourself there.
-
Trump hasn't been found guilty of any wrongdoing, and there isn't even any evidence that he did anything criminal. There are just a load of libturds making assumptions and accusations.
The first thing to do is get real evidence.. then if that emerges, determine if Trump was behind it.. then determine if that was illegal.
What Trump is being accused of is not even illegal!!And yet.. this idiot moonbat Al Green has decided to skip all of that.. and go right to impeachment. What a vagina this man is!
I hope there is some sort of penalty for filing such a severe action without any merit.First, sitting presidents cannot first be found guilty because they cannot be indicted or prosecuted while in office. They must be impeached first. That all depends on the House of Representatives, which would be unlikely with the republicans in the majority. Obstruction of justice is an impeachable crime, however, and eventually led to Nixon resigning and was a key part
of the impeachment of Clinton -
Most Americans pledge allegiance to the constitution and country but Republicans don't, they pledge fealty to the party like communists.
The day of reckoning is coming from Republican traitors and even Trump can't stop it. Call it the "deep state" or call it "justice" but it's coming and it's unstoppable. Traitors and their enablers are right to be afraid.
-
I will avoid rural/red states when Trump's impeachment inevitably happens!
-
Trump hasn't been found guilty of any wrongdoing, and there isn't even any evidence that he did anything criminal. There are just a load of libturds making assumptions and accusations.
The first thing to do is get real evidence.. then if that emerges, determine if Trump was behind it.. then determine if that was illegal.
What Trump is being accused of is not even illegal!!And yet.. this idiot moonbat Al Green has decided to skip all of that.. and go right to impeachment. What a vagina this man is!
I hope there is some sort of penalty for filing such a severe action without any merit.First, sitting presidents cannot first be found guilty because they cannot be indicted or prosecuted wile in office. They must be impeached first. That all depends on the House of Representatives, which would be unlikely with the republicans in the majority. Obstruction of justice is an impeachable crime, however, and eventually led to Nixon resigning and was a key part
of the impeachment of ClintonIn typical moonbat fashion.. you completely re-write statements to suit your agendas. At no time in my comment did I use the words "guilty", "indicted", or "prosecuted". I'll try to re-state it in an simpler form. Before impeaching someone, they must have evidence - so far, they have none. Before impeaching, that evidence has to be for something that is impeachable - it is not. If you are imagining that there was obstruction of justice by having Trump fire Comey - that is nonsense. Many democraps including Pedosta and Clinton wanted Comey gone and claimed that Comey assisted Trump in getting elected. They did this up until the very day of Comey's firing. If Trump had obstructed justice by giving Comey orders to stop the investigation - then it was Comey's clear duty to report that obstruction of justice when it happened.. and he did NOT. The investigation never did stop, so obviously there was no obstruction. If you are going to cling to the premise of firing Comey… that won't work either. The FBI director is appointed by the president, and he can fire anybody that he has appointed. The act of firing is not obstruction. The act of having someone killed - as dozens of Clinton foes have mysteriously had fatal accidents - is obstruction. Lying to congress is impeachable - such as Bill and Hillary Clinton did. Deleting over 30,000 emails which were the property of the US government off of her home computer's hard drives AFTER being ordered by Congress to turn them over is a major crime which would impeach a president. Having a white house intern suck your cock in the Oral Office and stuff a cigar up her cunt and then lie about it - repeatedly - to Congress and the American people - is impeachable. Raising funds in blatantly illegal ways is impeachable (Whitewater).
So, you and the other moonbats need to activate a few brain cells, and find something else to bitch about.
:fight: -
I will avoid rural/red states when Trump's impeachment inevitably happens!
I doubt you ever leave your cave now.
-
Trump hasn't been found guilty of any wrongdoing, and there isn't even any evidence that he did anything criminal. There are just a load of libturds making assumptions and accusations.
The first thing to do is get real evidence.. then if that emerges, determine if Trump was behind it.. then determine if that was illegal.
What Trump is being accused of is not even illegal!!And yet.. this idiot moonbat Al Green has decided to skip all of that.. and go right to impeachment. What a vagina this man is!
I hope there is some sort of penalty for filing such a severe action without any merit.First, sitting presidents cannot first be found guilty because they cannot be indicted or prosecuted wile in office. They must be impeached first. That all depends on the House of Representatives, which would be unlikely with the republicans in the majority. Obstruction of justice is an impeachable crime, however, and eventually led to Nixon resigning and was a key part
of the impeachment of ClintonIn typical moonbat fashion.. you completely re-write statements to suit your agendas. At no time in my comment did I use the words "guilty", "indicted", or "prosecuted". I'll try to re-state it in an simpler form. Before impeaching someone, they must have evidence - so far, they have none. Before impeaching, that evidence has to be for something that is impeachable - it is not. If you are imagining that there was obstruction of justice by having Trump fire Comey - that is nonsense. Many democraps including Pedosta and Clinton wanted Comey gone and claimed that Comey assisted Trump in getting elected. They did this up until the very day of Comey's firing. If Trump had obstructed justice by giving Comey orders to stop the investigation - then it was Comey's clear duty to report that obstruction of justice when it happened.. and he did NOT. The investigation never did stop, so obviously there was no obstruction. If you are going to cling to the premise of firing Comey… that won't work either. The FBI director is appointed by the president, and he can fire anybody that he has appointed. The act of firing is not obstruction. The act of having someone killed - as dozens of Clinton foes have mysteriously had fatal accidents - is obstruction. Lying to congress is impeachable - such as Bill and Hillary Clinton did. Deleting over 30,000 emails which were the property of the US government off of her home computer's hard drives AFTER being ordered by Congress to turn them over is a major crime which would impeach a president. Having a white house intern suck your cock in the Oral Office and stuff a cigar up her cunt and then lie about it - repeatedly - to Congress and the American people - is impeachable. Raising funds in blatantly illegal ways is impeachable (Whitewater).
So, you and the other moonbats need to activate a few brain cells, and find something else to bitch about.
:fight:Please read again your original post. The fourth word is ''guilty." You also need to educate yourself on obstruction of justice. The law states that the obstruction does not have to be successful to be a crime. And finally, you might be a bit more credible if you stop calling people you disagree with you "moonbats" and other generalized derogatory epithets :blownose:
-
Don't even pretend like "evidence" or "facts" have any place in your vocabulary. Those concepts are meaningless to people who maintain blind loyalty to a party.
man, you are really harsh on yourself there.
Am I? Please, elaborate as if you know me.
-
Most Americans pledge allegiance to the constitution and country but Republicans don't, they pledge fealty to the party like communists.
The day of reckoning is coming from Republican traitors and even Trump can't stop it. Call it the "deep state" or call it "justice" but it's coming and it's unstoppable. Traitors and their enablers are right to be afraid.
So delusional.
-
Most Americans pledge allegiance to the constitution and country but Republicans don't, they pledge fealty to the party like communists.
The day of reckoning is coming from Republican traitors and even Trump can't stop it. Call it the "deep state" or call it "justice" but it's coming and it's unstoppable. Traitors and their enablers are right to be afraid.
Apparently they have legalized weed wherever you live.
Do I need to re-post the photos and videos of Obama repeatedly not putting his hand over his heart during the playing of the national anthem, or repeatedly not returning salutes from marines? or returning a salute to a marine with a Styrofoam cup in his hand? Or Michelle leaning over to Obama during a 911 ceremony where they had bag pipe players honoring the flag.. and Michelle shakes her head and says "All this for a damned flag?" .. and Obama nods in agreement.
Please dispute any of those things, so I have an excuse to repost them. -
Trump hasn't been found guilty of any wrongdoing, and there isn't even any evidence that he did anything criminal. There are just a load of libturds making assumptions and accusations.
The first thing to do is get real evidence.. then if that emerges, determine if Trump was behind it.. then determine if that was illegal.
What Trump is being accused of is not even illegal!!And yet.. this idiot moonbat Al Green has decided to skip all of that.. and go right to impeachment. What a vagina this man is!
I hope there is some sort of penalty for filing such a severe action without any merit.First, sitting presidents cannot first be found guilty because they cannot be indicted or prosecuted wile in office. They must be impeached first. That all depends on the House of Representatives, which would be unlikely with the republicans in the majority. Obstruction of justice is an impeachable crime, however, and eventually led to Nixon resigning and was a key part
of the impeachment of ClintonIn typical moonbat fashion.. you completely re-write statements to suit your agendas. At no time in my comment did I use the words "guilty", "indicted", or "prosecuted". I'll try to re-state it in an simpler form. Before impeaching someone, they must have evidence - so far, they have none. Before impeaching, that evidence has to be for something that is impeachable - it is not. If you are imagining that there was obstruction of justice by having Trump fire Comey - that is nonsense. Many democraps including Pedosta and Clinton wanted Comey gone and claimed that Comey assisted Trump in getting elected. They did this up until the very day of Comey's firing. If Trump had obstructed justice by giving Comey orders to stop the investigation - then it was Comey's clear duty to report that obstruction of justice when it happened.. and he did NOT. The investigation never did stop, so obviously there was no obstruction. If you are going to cling to the premise of firing Comey… that won't work either. The FBI director is appointed by the president, and he can fire anybody that he has appointed. The act of firing is not obstruction. The act of having someone killed - as dozens of Clinton foes have mysteriously had fatal accidents - is obstruction. Lying to congress is impeachable - such as Bill and Hillary Clinton did. Deleting over 30,000 emails which were the property of the US government off of her home computer's hard drives AFTER being ordered by Congress to turn them over is a major crime which would impeach a president. Having a white house intern suck your cock in the Oral Office and stuff a cigar up her cunt and then lie about it - repeatedly - to Congress and the American people - is impeachable. Raising funds in blatantly illegal ways is impeachable (Whitewater).
So, you and the other moonbats need to activate a few brain cells, and find something else to bitch about.
:fight:Please read again your original post. The fourth word is ''guilty." You also need to educate yourself on obstruction of justice. The law states that the obstruction does not have to be successful to be a crime. And finally, you might be a bit more credible if you stop calling people you disagree with you "moonbats" and other generalized derogatory epithets :blownose:
In typical moonbat fashion.. you completely re-write statements to suit your agendas. At no time in my comment did I use the words "guilty", "indicted", or "prosecuted". I'll try to re-state it in an simpler form. Before impeaching someone, they must have evidence - so far, they have none. Before impeaching, that evidence has to be for something that is impeachable - it is not. If you are imagining that there was obstruction of justice by having Trump fire Comey - that is nonsense. Many democraps including Pedosta and Clinton wanted Comey gone and claimed that Comey assisted Trump in getting elected. They did this up until the very day of Comey's firing. If Trump had obstructed justice by giving Comey orders to stop the investigation - then it was Comey's clear duty to report that obstruction of justice when it happened.. and he did NOT. The investigation never did stop, so obviously there was no obstruction. If you are going to cling to the premise of firing Comey… that won't work either. The FBI director is appointed by the president, and he can fire anybody that he has appointed. The act of firing is not obstruction. The act of having someone killed - as dozens of Clinton foes have mysteriously had fatal accidents - is obstruction. Lying to congress is impeachable - such as Bill and Hillary Clinton did. Deleting over 30,000 emails which were the property of the US government off of her home computer's hard drives AFTER being ordered by Congress to turn them over is a major crime which would impeach a president. Having a white house intern suck your cock in the Oral Office and stuff a cigar up her cunt and then lie about it - repeatedly - to Congress and the American people - is impeachable. Raising funds in blatantly illegal ways is impeachable (Whitewater).
So, you and the other moonbats need to activate a few brain cells, and find something else to bitch about.
:fight:Please read again your original post. The fourth word is ''guilty." You also need to educate yourself on obstruction of justice. The law states that the obstruction does not have to be successful to be a crime. And finally, you might be a bit more credible if you stop calling people you disagree with you "moonbats" and other generalized derogatory epithets :blownose:
Although I did use the word "guilty" you incorrectly assumed that was related to a trial. I must remember to chose words that can't possibly be twisted by biased moonbats. Also.. you added the word "successful" to obstruction. I didn't say that. All I did was imply that no ACTION was taken - successful or unsuccessful. I suppose that next you will be wanting to impeach Trump for THINKING he wanted the investigation stopped. That is similar to the plot of the movie "Minority Report" where people are convicted of crimes that they are prophesized to have committed in the future. The main character winds up getting in trouble for killing a man he's never even met nor ever heard of.
As for derogatory epithets… what words do you suggest I use to address these lying morons who spam the forum with venomous, malicious, seditious, traitorous, terrorist enabling comments? Perhaps.. CocoPuffs? Slitherin? Mucus Trails? Snozzberries? Dingleberries, what? I realize that when calling someone who is obviously intelligent an idiot.. it has no impact, but when you call an idiot and idiot.. it really hurts them to be recognized for what they are.
-
Frederick writes:
Although I did use the word "guilty" you incorrectly assumed that was related to a trial. I must remember to chose words that can't possibly be twisted by biased moonbats. Also.. you added the word "successful" to obstruction. I didn't say that. All I did was imply that no ACTION was taken - successful or unsuccessful.Firing Comey is not the obstruction, it was Trump asking Comey to drop the investigation of Flynn. There can be a legitimate debate as whether that truly represented obstruction, but the fact that Comey continued his investigation does not absolve the president of possible obstruction. I also will not dignify your comments on epithets with a reply.
-
Frederick writes:
Although I did use the word "guilty" you incorrectly assumed that was related to a trial. I must remember to chose words that can't possibly be twisted by biased moonbats. Also.. you added the word "successful" to obstruction. I didn't say that. All I did was imply that no ACTION was taken - successful or unsuccessful.Firing Comey is not the obstruction, it was Trump asking Comey to drop the investigation of Flynn. There can be a legitimate debate as whether that truly represented obstruction, but the fact that Comey continued his investigation does not absolve the president of possible obstruction. I also will not dignify your comments on epithets with a reply.
Trump had already fired Flynn. Flynn lied to the Vice President and he had no choice other than to fire him. Obama had appointed Flynn, and Flynn had already been fully vetted by Obama.. but apparently he wasn't vetted properly, because Flynn screwed up.
Flynn was already fired, what else could possibly be accomplished by continuing to investigate Flynn?If you were being honest, which you are not, you would admit that all this horse shit about Flynn and Comey and travel bans are just a flurry of tempests in a teapot attacks meant to prevent Trump from getting anything done. That is no secret. People like Hillary, Pedosta, Schumer, Pelosi all pledged to do whatever it took to resist Donald Trump and never stop resisting aka obstructing him. They have declared a political civil war with Trump. Perhaps all those moonbats should be hung for Treason. In other countries, they would be.
-
Frederick replies: If you were being honest, which you are not, you would admit that all this horse shit about Flynn and Comey and travel bans are just a flurry of tempests in a teapot attacks meant to prevent Trump from getting anything done. That is no secret. People like Hillary, Pedosta, Schumer, Pelosi all pledged to do whatever it took to resist Donald Trump and never stop resisting aka obstructing him. They have declared a political civil war with Trump. Perhaps all those moonbats should be hung for Treason. In other countries, they would be.
First of all, politics is politics, not treason. The Republicans blocked everything they could of Obama's agenda including refusing to give his supreme court nominee a hearing in the senate. Your penchant for hanging opponents just proves you are a fascist.
-
Your penchant for hanging opponents just proves you are a fascist.
Funny coming from a liberal.
-
Your penchant for hanging opponents just proves you are a fascist.
Funny coming from a liberal.
(((Ad homenim)))
-
