Posts made by pornofan

When sucking, I always swallow. Out of the ignorance of youth, for years it never occurred to me to taste my own semen, and once I got the idea, it took me a while because the moment of ejaculation was also the precise moment I lost all interest in doing so. Eventually forced myself and occasional, since then, out of curiosity, but it seems to me a little like trying to tickle yrself. Maybe self-suckers can overcome any such short circuiting, but slurping up My jizz has never fascinated. Savoring and swallowing someone else's, on the other hand…. Now THAT is exciting, delicious, nutritious, bio-beneficial man milk, the ambrosia that kept gods immortal on Olympus. It is a potent youth serum, tranquilizer, mood enhancer, and refreshing hot beverage that makes an excellent protein supplement as well.

Also, supposedly a beneficially moisturing skin conditioner.

While women may not appreciate the goo, and I have seen men work hard sucking only to spit out the freshly released product, keeping a stud's pipes from clogging up (or staying clogged) and helping them to fulfill their biological imperative to ensperminate the full force of their creative yin power into the universal yang (in the form of a fist, mouth, ass, cunt, melon, ambient air, or whatever) can even be considered a holy act and sacred duty.

Which would perhaps explain not just the communion involved in accepting the sacrament, but the tendency toward the bended knee position of prayer. One knee for royalty, two knees in honor of the divine. Cock worship of Priapus, springtime god of the Maypole and the fertile planting of seeds then men are born to do. And you can tell many of those being worshipped and serviced and drained are, however unconsciously, aligned with that righteous ritual by their occasional invocational cries to the heavens-- "Oh, God. Oh, God, Ohhhh, Goddddd!
as they come closer to offering up each fresh and impassioned donation to the harmony of mankind.

If this mythological construct is valid, and it seems at least somewhat more immediately practical than following stoneage procedures in regard to a wrathful and impetuous sky ghost, it is an extra dimension beyond the biochemical forces first described above.

Seems as though the ancient Romans, at least, would not quarrel too much with these metaphysical implications. And they do have the advantage of making insemination by the owner of the cock being sucked into a spiritual ritual where his contribution is an important part of the divine plan.

Obviously, none of this cosmic world view is at all self serving, and thus is available for everyone to promote and thus enable everyone to benefit from, whether they favor the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence once (still?) found in San Francisco, frequenting the chapel of Our Lady of the Evening, or even paying homage to Our Lady of Pain (a canonical title for mother Mary honoring "that of God" in every man."

Thanks Peach13. "Dacking" is the word I was looking for, but while I know what dacks are, I did not know the etymology.

I think "suck my dick" and "fuck me" as expressions used rather metaphorically rather than with direct sexual intent are not so offensive as intended, but boy do I hate the term "cocksucker" as an insult inteded to degrade and smear. Cocksucking is an art and a privilege, even a noble calling. Anyone who can be serviced by a cocksucker, male or female, should be damned grateful.

Much better if, that person "is a real cocksucker" were a term of massive approval and admiration. To say someone is a motherfucker is ambigurous. "Hateful mf" and "hot mf" have different connotations, and no one actually assumes an actual mother is required. In the same way, "She's got balls" is at least instantly comprehensible, despite implied biological confusion. Do you know the children's book about The Little Engine That Could? The one who bravely persisted in bringing breakfast goodies for little children after big macho engines had refused or given up. "I think I can. I think I can. I think I can…."

What most people do not know is that the author and the brave engine were both female. Don't see why she didn't have, so to speak, bigger balls than the male train engines, and while long-haul 18-wheeler trucks sometimes now have balls appended to the back as demonstration (display? boast? advertisement?), since women have joined the profession, one might guess that their vehicles are not all male any longer, whether they have outside testicle ornaments or not. Being able to use truckstop gloryholes the way male drivers on cross-country solo runs where they might otherwise be deprived of sex does not mean these tough truick-drivin' women cannot decorate their vehicles in the same way.

This whole gender thing, I swear.

When a friend of mine was divorced from his wife he declare, with bitter humor, "Pussy is for fags."

Later, with a new girlfriend, he had an epiphany: "Pussy isn't just for fags anymore."

Funny man.

"Suck my dick" as an insult might well make me think of some literal response such as "Yes, please" or "In your dreams." Same thing for what is functionally equivalent as a sexual reference used degradingly in a nonsexual context, "Go fuck yourself."

In the original "Point Break" (supposedly being remade) Keanu Reeves hears something surprising and responds, "Fuck me," meaning something like "That blows my mind" or "Well, you could knock me down with a feather." Of course, when young Keanu says it, SOME of us instantly begin contemplating the literal implications. This str8 actor/musician would get the same reaction from some of us it, even these many years later, he were to say such a thing. Woof!

That movie is also the one where he tells someone he is "Young, dumb, and full of cum," which did make me think, "I can help you with one of those."

For a woman of the female gender to say "suck my dick" is even less biologically possible than "go fuck yourself." Hippie comic Paul Krassner's take on that one is that fucking is a Good Thing and "Unfuck yourself" would be closer to the intended meaning. On the other hand, to get "pantsed" in U.S. slang ("dapped" Down Under when speaking in Strine?) means to have your trousers, shorts, bathing suit, underwear or other similar garment. They are Losing their pants. Perhaps oddly, while they are being "depantsed" in the same way that gramatically one might be "deshirted" or– hey!-- deflowered. Language is a funny thing. Women do not get "flowered" but men do get "pantsed."

As for male-female rhetoric, I've heard women say they have "balls," meaning a metaphor for "courage." Technically they might be groping to say something like, "She sure has ovaries," but the impact for some reason, is hardly the same.

Seems like the kind of thing more likely to be seen done by professionals on camera than in real life. It rather goes with awkward positions rather than simple, direct, and furious rogering.

A gloryhole can be divine relief for scared lads desperate for hot service and lured by the anonymity available in an adult bookstore or by cottaging, but for performing your first blowjob, it is an impediment, separating you from looking at the face and build of your first partner, the opportunity to hold his butt in place while you suck, stroke his fur, suck or tweak his nipples, and, of course, you do not get to see the smugly satisfied face of your happy but exhausted sperm donor.

If there is no online site where you can seek local partners whose descriptions appeal to you, getting a room in a sauna will allow much more extensive and relaxed experimentation, as well as far greater comfort and, probably, cleanliness. So unless you have a dawning gh fetish or some particular fascination with disembodied dicks belonging to strangers who may not be your preferred inseminator, or if it is the risk of discovery, the "thrill" of semi-public fellatio, there really are better first time opportunities, and you might even enjoy a dude's hands on your head as he heads toward blastoff, or your ears being used as a means of control and encouragement.

Of course, that assumes you are one of those people who likes to choose whose cock you will suck, like to look, and think being touched during sex is erotic.

Cartoonists, among others, have joined the celebration.

Of the nine wise solons on the nation's highest court, the vote was the typical razor-thin 5-4 margin between reasonable justices and the court's reichwhinge ideologues, as illustrated in the colored photo of the justices. Men voted 4-2 against equality; women went 3-0 for justice.

A number of visuals noted that while one hate flag is in the process of being removed from polite society, the gay Rainbow Flag (designed in 1978 by San Francisco artist Gilbert Baker) is being unfurled and celebrated. I liked this one.

Dan Feuerieggel, he fine and handsome man who played the beautiful gay gladiator in the "Spartacus" television series tweeted the other photo, commenting on his character:

Dan Feuerriegel ‏@DgFeuerriegel  Jun 26
    New Ending NAGRON heading to the U.S. to get married & start a family.

[Sorry about my earlier photo gallery failure. There was supposed to have been a single post with all six images, but there had to be a correction, which somehow created three postings. As usual, that means a beleaguered moderator will get yet another chance to earn that big paycheck by fixing things, since I am unable to delete the extra item myself.

It says I can modify my posts but there is no obvious way to do that, so while this time I did not post the same thing repeatedly, I did omit one picture and duplicate another instead. Grrr. When photos are selected, they do not display or list their names for me, so things can go awry.

Trying again on Niagara Falls.

It says I can modify my posts but there is no obvious way to do that, so while this time I did not post the same thing repeatedly, I did omit one picture and duplicate another instead. Grrr. When photos are selected, they do not display or list their names for me, so things can go awry.

Trying again on Niagara Falls.

The Marriage decision at the U.S. Extreme Court came the day before Pride is celebrated in many cities at the anniversary of the riots in New York's Greenwich Village at the Stonewall Inn, where a crowd gathered to celebrate.

The White House was fabulously redecorated in rainbow colors, which also graced the Empire State Building, Disneyworld's Cinderella Castle, and the Niagara Falls, which is hoping for a boost to their traditionally popular site for honeymoons. As Indiana and Louisiana are learning, equality is good for business, and bigotry flunks.

Much of the anti-marriage hysteria in the U.S. comes from a sect called Southern Baptists, who think their Get Out of Hell Free card absolves them of all responsibility to be decent human beings.

Do you know that they are not Protestants? That is because they claim to have been a religion before Martin Luther and the Reformation, since they date back to John the Baptist. Yeah, sure they do. And the Masons go back to King Solomon.

First Century Christians were under no illusion that they were called to purify the society they lived in, trying to turn it into Heaven. No, they were told to "render unto Caesar," and pay their taxes like good little citizens, not defy the law. In fact, they had the bizarre notion that they were less than perfect and needed to make themselves behave better in order to love and serve their god better– not parade around with banners denouncing the imperfections of This world.

Too bad that sense of seeking personal salvation has turned into self-righteously claiming to be holier than thou, no matter who thou art, and therefore entitled to cram their interpretation of the Stone Age text onto everyone they meet. Also, apparently, they believe, as one pig party presidential candidate just put it, they should "praise the Lord and pass the ammunition." In church, for example, where they all ought to have guns to protect themselves from their spineless and hapless all knowing, all powerful so-called "god." Who cannot kill blacks at a prayer meeting unless he finds some confused child to do it and accept the consequences of his righteousness.

Also, too, they apparently cannot read and think that card they carry also says "Get Out of Jail Free." That's a Good Thing because it allows them to murder women's doctors with impunity.

Cynical much? Who? Me?

Btw, someone just pointed out that the real reasons these superstitious true believers are so angry at athiests (and most scientists, who tend to say things like Global Warming is Not a Hoax, and dinosaurs and people did not co-exist, and Evolution is the way things work) because if the atheists are correct, the fear of death without an afterlife is overwhelming. What if you sacrifice the whole world and find out there is no pie in the sky bye and bye when you die? All those people you resented for having sex and fun while you played martyr will be right and you will have lost everything. As Ralph says in "The Simpsons," HA ha.

Confusion for the grandkids is the least of the Kardassian family problems.

As for whether Caitlin is a babe, just look at that Vanity Fair cover. Can you tell that she is also the oldest woman to grace the cover of that fashionable magazine?

For those who have forgotten Bruce Jenner in all the fuss about his divorce, the slut children, and so on, go take a look at a movie called "Can't Stop the Music." A big budget musical with massive production numbers, it was released at the end of the disco era and tells a fictious story about The Village People. The numbers are amazing, very camp, and overall the movie is one of the gayest, most homoerotic movies ever to come out of Hollywood.

Besides having handsome Bruce, fresh from his Olympics championship as the world's greatest athlete, it also has the wonderfully hunky box office favorite Steve Guttenberg, who can't get no respect, but whose appearance in a movie generally is a license to mint money. The sight of him in tight, bulging, white short shorts rollerskating through Manhattan traffic is a vision to remember.

Sure has been a long time since Christine Jorgenson launched the new sexually fluid trasformation, don't you think?

"Justice That Arrives Like a Thunderbolt"
Says the uppity Kenyan usurper in response to the latest big news from the Extreme Court. Speaking today, President Barack Obama, fresh from a Great Victory on health care, approved the expansion of liberty in "the land of the free," and congratulated the brave men and women who fought this fight.
Meanwhile, over on the False News Network and throughout the wingnutosphere, heads are exploding and insurrection is being promised. Also, too, the one true god who had no problem with slavery, slaughter, crucifixion, and unbridled sexual excess in ancient Rome is allegedly angry enough to cause the seas to rise and floods, and droughts, and "earthquakes in divers places," esp. those where fracking is going on so humans, now in defiance of God's will as expressed infallibly ex cathedra by God's Mouthpiece on Earth, are plundering the last of the remaining fossil fuel reserves.
Every time these hatemonger soi-disant "Christians" promise swift retribution for something they don't approve, they predecit vengeance from their god of love. In the U.S., that seems to mean tornadoes destroying Kansas– perhaps because of all the gay-married baby killers (aka abortion doctors) in that smug religious heartland. And anyway, it's easier to scourge "Tornado Alley" than gay neighborhoods outside New Orleans (where, you may recall, Hurricane Katrina was punishment for a gay pride parade that, on top of all the others in that city, was apparently the last straw and the end of divine patience.
Anyway, most of the massive GOP (Grand Old Plutocrats aka Republicnts)) field of idiotic presidential candidates have vowed to defy the awful Extremes under what is known as the doctrine of "nullification," the idea that states can do whatever they want, no matter what the national government says. That idea was last tested in the 1860s with a bloody civil war, and the legal theory in question was soundly defeated, drowned in the blood of thousands, many of them marching under a battle flag most recently famous for inspiring the death of nine black churchgoers, at a prayer session, by a 21-yr-old racist who got a gun given to him as a present for his most recent (and potentially final) birthday.
(INTEREJECTION: Have you seen photos of this kid? They look like they were taken by Diane Arbus, photographer of pain. I esp. love the one with him sitting with a pistol on one hand and a Confederate "stars and bars" flag in the other, looking like a very little boy suffering from a world of unhappiness, partly because ""You take all our women," which I take to mean he has never managed to get laid is still still a virgin.)
In the great state of TXass, former governor Rick Perry is again running to be alleged leader of the free world again after disqualifying himself last time around by being frequently drugged to the gills in public and, famously, saing "Oops" in a hilarious and unforgettable moment that will be remembered-- thank Clio!-- by History that you could have fun looking up. During a state drought a couple of years ago, he got everyone together to pray for rain, because that is what politicians do instead of govern or solve problems). Naturally, this year, the god too stupid to figure out what farmers need and people drink finally answered the man's prayer, perhaps because abortion has effectively been banned in the state so that the one true god is appeased).
In fact, the prayer was answered with massive flooding and some loss of life, because that pathetic divinity is also too stupid to know when to stop. Christianists have taken credit for the rain, not for the drownings. Go figure.
So ex-Gov. Oops is among those vowing defiance, but his successor, Greg Abbott, is taking care of business. Yes, the state IS issueing gay marriage licenses today, but the Republicnt has greater concerns.
Having lost the right to ban black voters yesterday and finding health care the law of the land (TXass refuses to be part of Obamacare because who cares about the uninsured (more in his state than any other), "that's not how we keep score", today Abbot today claims, "Five Justices on the Supreme Court have imposed on the entire country their personal views on an issue that the Constitution and the Court’s previous decisions reserve to the people of the States."
Then why did the GOPigs bring this case to the court to begin with? And now that they have made that bed and are stuck in it, even trying to defund the court, as they are attempting in nearly bankrupt Kansas under viviously anti-tax Gov. Brownstreak, will be too little, too late.
Abbott also said, "No Texan is required by the Supreme Court’s decision to act contrary to his or her religious beliefs regarding marriage." With the usual tunnel vision of regressives everywhere, he seems to think religious liberty only applies to his christianist base, not to those who want to marry a partner of the same sex.
This whole spectacle of frothing candidates campaigning for the right to defy the law like any common or garden variety "sovereign citizen" (if you don't look that one up for yourselves, you'd never believe it) is already starting to be vastly entertaining. Those in less civilized countries who lack the freedom (and gun violence) in the US of A are welcome to enjoy jet another spectacle of the political party that has lost its mind to corrupt prions resulting from endemic mad pig disease (related to bovine spongiform encephalitis, but peculiar to the greatest and bestest country ever ever (see YouTube video of our new national anthem, "America! Fuck Yeah!") because Exceptionalism.
Pass the popcorn.

If I asked this some other time, i don't recall reading any answers, so… It's deja vu! It's deja vu!

Started out interested in dicks, wanting to touch them and suck them and swallow their juice. That instinct was natural, innate, and was familiar to me before I even knew what a blowjob was. When some men wanted to fuck me, I went along, but it was not till years later I actively sought such a thing. Even then, none of the dudes gave me any reason to believe there was actually anything in it for me, though once I did start to feel like I was masturbating and enjoyed the feeling, which went away as soon as the fucker finished making his deposit.

Turns out that fucking is not a one-way activity, and as maybe everybody (here) knows, being a bottom is never a passive act. Me, I never wanted to penetrate, not even to get sucked off, so when that happened, it was always because someone aggressively made it happen. Bless them all. Mostly, all I wanted was the experience of being dicked by another man, reveling in his macho, masculinity, and virility. All of which is rather more the emotional content of the act of being drilled by a horny alpha top, than a physically sexual stimulus.

Seems to me men are born to breed, or at least go through the motions, whether with their fist, a cantaloupe, a woman, or whatever they can inseminate, so I feel pretty much an anomaly that I rarely penetrated anyone.

Okay, so a US president famously got blown in his office and claimed "I did not have sex with that woman." Apparently lots of "these kidz today" think blowjobs are not sex, and getting sucked off is not cheating on their partner bf or gf. An attractive youth in Southern California being interviewed on camera prior to being filmed having a wank, said he had never had sex with another man, only women, but he'd had blowjobs before. Upon inquiry, he made it clear that what he meant was that he had never been fucked.

So, I find all this v confusing. What do most sexually active gay men actually DO? Does "everyone" get sucked (or maybe suck) more often than they are fucking/fucked because it is a simpler activity just logistically, faster, etc. or as a warm-up to "real" (anal) sex? And is anal sex the point? All the kissing and groping and touching and sucking and rimming are part of the process of establishing terms of trust and consideration and, of course, preparing the hole to facilitate easy entry, which IS what it is all about?

A majority of mm porn does feature oral sex to a point short of completion and prior to invading the opposite side, but that is no evidence of what "really" goes on between men at play, whether sucking is a substitute or is preparation. After all, Greek vases suggest all those men did was intercrural, and if we are to believe almost every ejaculation involving two men or a man and a woman is completed after the dick is removed so that the evidence is revealed by a "money shot" on a face or ass or some other highly visible landing pad. Hell, even most barebacking scenes CLAIMING deep squirting, etc. etc. involve the visible payload, though possibly the spent or half-spent penis is stuck back where it should have stayed if max satisfaction was the point rather than a good show for the punters.

So what is it? When people found out I was gay (often before I figured out that the label amply and fairly described what I wanted to do), did they all assume I was top, bottom, or versatile? Hearing soi-disant "Christians" rant about gay marriage, they all seem to think it is about anal sex.

This is not a question about what "gay" is emotionally or intellectually, aesthetically or historically, but about what queers DO. What I do know is that sucking is most of what I've done-- and for most of my life, pretty much all I really wanted. Schoolmates I've known from puberty also had an oral fixation and in a couple of cases, also found the alternative difficult and painful, so that was that.

But really I have no idea what anyone else knows or does. And all you have to do is watch solo masturbation by enough dudes to know that there is a wide range of postures, grips, stimulus, delivery point, and ways to process or dispose of the ejaculate. Probably there are at least as many variations in what and how any other sperm release is carried out, but if enough people would weigh in, there might turn out to be some patterns.

ZOMG what's not to like? The first episode took a fair amount of concentration to get hooked, but it was intensely absorbing even though it took even longer to have it become less mysterious. The show IS mysterious, with a sense of magic showing up from time to time and, if you let yrself marinate in it a little, even the famous and overly rare Sense of Wonder.

Also, it has Ideas. Not just the connection between the eight individuals, but other things. East-West German issues. Bullying. Actually, lots of things are touched on and play a role, including lots of aspects of family. Perhaps the viewer is helped by having received a few clues ahead of time to establish a context that actual sequential viewing, with no advance hint, helps a little too.

Yes, some of the stories are less intrinsically linked to the "cluster" of eight. Having now seen most of the episodes, I still don't recall the closeted actor connecting with much of anyone except a couple of conversations. For example.

But I found the episodes gripping and compelling me onward. Once again, the issue is figuring out the backstory, which seems to be the operative factor for lots of shows these days (Lost, Dome…) But most of the highly diverse characters in their highly diverse locations are actually quite interesting, at least to me. Certainly it is hard to understand how someone could pay attention enough to know what is going on in the first couple of episodes and find himself falling asleep from tedium.

Also, this is one of the gayest things ever seen outside of movies directly made to titillate a niche audience. The actor is a shaggy hunk (and reportedly some people like his intellectual companion). The jewel thief is my idea of handsome, as is the cop. To name just three who are very easy on the eyes. Why, there is even full frontal nudity for a couple of the principals -- though not in the orgy scene and not involving enough of the attractive principals, but still more than usual. There is a bunch of TV sex on camera, some fairly explicit lesbian scenes, and the orgy in episode six which is not nearly long enough.

It was a beautiful thing to watch, almost a carnal ballet of glistening bodies, but it was not so much sexual as sensual, and like some of the other sex, fairly loving and emotionally connected, rather than "mere" physical connections. And there are gay bars, bathroom sex, MMF sex, lots of views of the Castro and SF Pride. All of the romantic and sexual activity is shown as equally valid and just another part of life. The various arrangements, couplings, accommodations are sufficiently varied as to suggest that every one of us has something going on so let's all accept it and get over it and get on with it.

Obviously, not everyone had or is having as much fun with the whole thing as I am. And not everyone seems to think it is a story involving a lot of ideas and issues, of which sexual orientation is not necessarily even the most significant, though there sure is plenty of that. Also, since it has not really been mentioned, there is some fine whizbang, which may not be as innovative as Matrix, but can still be pretty fun. And some of the story lines are dramatic and suspenseful apart from the action sequences.

Will see where it all goes from where I left off to write this, but so far it seems as if the various individuals with their stories are, in fact, all meant to be aspect of a larger whole, an exploration of the idea of a "cluster" that Michael Valentine Smith might have appreciated.

A brief footnote on the Hugos, the venerable science fiction awards currently in controversy due to a reich-whinge takeover attempt.
The $40 cost of a supporting membership for the World SF Convention itself provides not only the right to vote against the regressive troglodyte agenda, it also includes a substantial downloadable collection of the novels, shorter fiction, graphic novels, and other material that, for someone interested in the field, may well be a fairly cheap workaround for local libraries that don't cover the ground, and saves you from tracking down lots of individual magazines and books which might well be more expensive even a year or two later when they turn up on the used market.

Why would they not have used Vaseline, Crisco, and KY as lube just like our more recent ancestors? Early condoms were bulky and awkward and made of sheepgut, among other things available, but seems like they would have been a little rough on the woman and have required some form of animal fat or other lube that could as well have been applied to the ancient dildo. Not clear how many people would have been brave enough to  attempt having that thing inside them, though.

BOSTON POLAR: I stand corrected re: the hive mind. Had not watched it and was basing my words on second-hand impressions.

It is never a bad day to mention Theodore Sturgeon, one of the greatest writers in the science fiction field, but someone so good and so far outside the genre norms of his day that as a major literary talent he was absolutely robbed of the glowing reputation he deserved.

Especially in stories like "Thunder and Roses" and "Slow Sculpture," among others, the stories were s-f pretty much only because fans claimed him and mundanes did not. To call them s-f is a courtesy more flattering to fandom than to him, in the same way that Harlan would be considered a great writer if he had never written in the genre. Ask Dorothy Parker, who knew a thing or two.

Sturgeon is also the author of one of the first mass market stories about gay love– "The World Well Lost." When a friend conveyed to him how much the story meant to me, he was reportedly both pleased and moved.

Speaking of fandom, btw, it would be interesting to hear your thoughts (probably on some other thread) about the attempt coup attempt against this year's Hugo awards from conspiring reactivists. Ask not for whom the knuckle drags: it drags for thee.

This searchable free site contains all manner of sexual content, most but not all of it gay, and most but not all of it in the form of videos. But there is also strait porn, bi porn, and there are documentaries, features, books, magazines.

All of these kinds of things can be found on standard generic torrent sites that include Adult of XXX material, only gay-related items are much less common, of course, than they are here, and strait porn massively outnumbers gay options.

With a quarter of more of all Internet activity related to sex, it seems that it must be just my ignorance that has kept me from learning of other sites like this one, that primarily feature hetero torrents of a sexually explicit nature.

Yes, there is ManHunt and MEN and other proprietary male sites, and major players in het porn have pay sites as well. As already pointed out in this thread, there are also places to find home made amateur vids and various generally noncommercial offerings. But really, truly, where are the equivalent sites for people who might want str8 porn– new, vintage, or featuring specific titles ("Deep Throat") new and old, releases from today's top studios, and so on. A site just like this one-- for adults and free-- but simply switching the bulk of the material from gay interest to strait interest.

Go ahead, expose my ignorance. Tell me where else I should be looking for that stuff. Not a matter of specific titles, but of studio names, names of performers, genre categories, that sort of thing-- just like this site, only primarily for that other major sexual orientation and its fans.

Is that a better explanation?

On another thread, about watching straight porn, I just asked about porn sites that feature mostly straight action, but are not pay sites and not limited to the output of a single business or brand name.

The options listed here so far (correct me if I'm wrong) are not paid or proprietary, like Vivid or whatever, but they also feature stuff exclusive to them, right? You and your cam. Hidden cam work by You. Amateur sex with You and friend(s). Or maybe just amateur sex involving friends but not you. Where (other than all-purpose torrent sites) does one go to find, say, all off Jeff Stryker, or shudder a big chunk of Ron Jeremy? And so on. Or are we happy few just specially blessed to have found this place?

Too many words, not enough interest = no comments to my epic grouchy commentary. Oh, well.

Basically, I like dick, okay? I like looking at them. I like looking at the rest of the body they belong. And I really enjoy seeing them being used to improve the universe by shooting sperm. In the hand, in the air, in a device, in someone else.

There is nothing I can think of more exciting than a dick being used effectively, making a mess, feeding and breeding any orifice. That is what dicks are for (besides fundamental plumbing). If a hot man is pumping it out powerfully, effectively, maybe even skillfully, that's just great and I do love to watch.

Years ago, when I was growing my own equipment and discovering how to use it, pretty much all there was was straight porn and nothing. There was no internet. There was no cable. There were no videos. There were not even any movies because porn movies had to be rented and run on a film projector, which tended to make them a party activity for groups like fraternities. And they cost serious money, esp. for an underage kid who was not going to be permitted anyway.

That meant there were "skin books," prose tales of men and women fucking. Picture books did not show fucking or sucking or penetration, and pretty much never even showed men, just women with titties (big deal) and pretty much no men anywhere to distract from the gals.

When there got to be movie theaters for adults, THEN there were men. Men with dicks. Men using their dicks. Hot. I suppose they were using them with and on and in women of the female type, but I'm not sure I ever noticed. And then there was Deep Throat, where handsome, hairy Harry Reems discovered that Linda Lovelace had a clit in her throat. Boy, was he my idol. Later, I discovered that at least one man has a similar biological situation– or at least getting to deepthroat a loaded cock and having the business end deep enough to receive a thorough massage sure makes ME happy. Maybe just a coincidence.

Some would-be porn star stated a YouTube channel a while ago and in his first boring episode, talked about "the early days" of VHS tapes. I guess if you are young enough that you have never seen a dial telephone and do not know how to use one, those may have been the early days, but my belief is that men had pornography before that dude was a sparkle in his father's eye. Check out Pompeii, some time....

An important evolutionary step beyond hetero cavorting on film in movie theaters was dudes-only happiness. Casey Donovan in Boys in the Sand. And movie theaters like the Adonis in NYC where there was always more action off the screen than on. Lots more than in theaters where horny men could find a convenient fag while watching pussy getting rammed on the silver screen, though of course that happened, too.

Anyway, strait porn was the entire game for much of my life. Whatever may have existed for perverted sickos was way too far underground to be encountered by a kid looking for some fun with his new dick. And that is the way it stayed, until eventually there got to be some short story books ("Seven in a Barn") and one might eventually run into physique magazines where the letter columns helped build a community and where "art" photographers like Bob Mizner of the Athletic Model Guild showed naked beefcake. Meanwhile, in the land of the free, the Post Office was busting fledgling gay lib publications which were largely circulated hand to hand to reach a much larger circle of interest than the number of actual subscribers would suggest.

If those kinds of political discussions and support could get you arrested, guess what happened to major photographers, whether or not they offered some "special" images to a discerning few. Also, just as the anti-commie hysteria that swept Hollywood involved some people turned in by friends they owed money, some postal arrests were made at the instigation of competing photogs....

As a result of this primordial oppression and suppression, dick viewing was pretty much limited except in person. And without access to skin books of prose or pictures, an awful lot of jizz was spilled over the underwear sections of the Sears and Montgomery Wards catalogues. Which no longer exist.... Not surprising then that if it took a woman in the picture to have a dick to look at, that is what we got used to.

Now, there are more options, but a hard dick getting enthusiastic exercise and spewing its load still looks pretty good to some of us. One great benefit of This site is the range of material, including strait men getting their needs met with women, the way the vast majority of sexually active swinging dicks do. Str8s who have gay sex or include men in an occasional scene with pussy, can be pretty exciting to watch, men in their natural breeding mode. Hanging out naked in changing rooms, hanging innocently and limp in the showers, draining the weasel at a urinal with other guys having their dicks out and thinking nothing of it (but also maybe checking out the competition)... all good, but better if in the process of working up a hot load to release.

The problem with a lot of porn is not that the dudes are undesirable (they are often stunning examples of competent masculinity in action), but that the camera work pays attention to the "wrong" thing. When the dude cums, we don't see his face, maybe not even afterwards where there may be a smirk of satisfied accomplishment. Or there is an internal shot where we don't get to look at the creamy deposit. That kind of thing. How difficult would it be to go a little further?

There is also, naturally, something to be said for mmf threesomes, or two adjacent mf couplings. Men together exercising their dicks together. Nothing gay about that. Men do what men do, which might be whatever they want, and more likely would be if mm couplings for handjobs or more were less stigmatized or traumatizing. "God was I drunk last night. I don't remember a thing." "Hey, buddy, I had the strangest dream last night...."

There are a number of sites, one discovers, that churn out gay porn by supposedly str8 men in it for the money. Occasionally, the same dudes can be seen treating their gf on camera the way they do at home. Hot, and the fantasy of course is that while they may be devoted to poon, they are sufficiently secure and horny to suggest that they-- or any other hot dude you fancy-- can become available. There are vids of Johnny Rapid and Colby Jansen fucking women, though both are best known for gay sex scenes and have done so many, occasionally (Jansen) as bottom or primarily as bottom (Rapid) that neither calls himself str8 anymore.

Hey, if they're hot, they're hot, and if they learned their hip movements with women, I am happy to watch them show them demonstrate their original lessons.

Two or three final (who said "Thank God!"?) points. As wonderful as it is to be able to revisit the photo stories released in magazine/book format to promote the first generation of gay movies, does not seem as though the strait versions of those fotonovelas can be found anywhere for download. Too bad. Most of mine were gone long ago, some swiped by str8 tricks who sometimes used them for inspiration in the days before VHS and the modern era. Some involved sailors. I remember one with a dude in white pants and a cowboy shirt picking up a woman and showing what he was made of.... Lots of good looking sexually active young men to drive the terrified closet case (not out even to himself) to sensory overload and days of endless fapping. (Ah, youth!) I did not want what they wanted, but I sure wanted them.

Also, it occurs to me that there is a massive amount of "first time" oral and anal for men, gay or strait, and a Marine's first male handjob or blow job, a new recruit venturing to take a more active role and lend a hand, discover the truth Bob Dylan sang ("You will not die, it ain't poison") and eventually daring to "take it like a man" and bottom. But what there does NOT seem to be is a young strait dude's loss of virginity to a woman. Tinseks, Teenburg and others show a lot of bareback mf fucking and sucking and eating out, often with what are supposed to be bf/gf couples who generally seem to be having a good time and even laughing and giggling a lot. Fun.

But young as these (legal?) teams may be, they do all seem to know exactly what to do to please each other, so the scene you are watching is obviously not their first rodeo. Generally the closed het vids come to actual deflowering of a female virgin is first anal. Tattooed Kurt Lockwood may be the porn star of choice within the industry to bust a chick's anal cherry, and he is thoughtful, tender, careful, caring, and thoroughly expert in showing what makes him such a sought-after and highly paid professional. (Hint: It ain't just his ink or his appendage.) Some gay men, lots of them actually, show the same skillful analingus and fingering as they prep tight hole for penetration. And since these are men who are paid to have sex that LOOKS good, whether it is or not, they generally take care to make sure their partner is as happy as possible. I don't mean just fucking a geyser of semen out of the dude by ravishing his prostate either.

A stallion like Rafael Alencar manages to find angles to make it look as if his partner or (alleged) "rape" victim is taking every massive inch, but since he wants to be hired again and make the bottom eager for a return session, whether the dude he is with is virgin or not, it can look like a first time.

Typically long-winded prologue. Why are there so few (none?) virgin boys getting their dick wet for the first time? Are they ashamed to admit their inexperience? They cannot all have been fucking before they became legal. Not all of them. There are MILF scenes where the daughter's bf gets seduced, or the neighbor boy  is made by the older woman, both at their different ages at their sexual peak. And the pool boy and pizza delivery kid.... But none of these dudes is a first timer having a new world opened to him.

Seems like something people might like to see. Something close happens in many of the FAKings scenes, where the boy often looks v young and inexperienced. (Check out handsome, innocently boyish "Jose" some time. Wish I knew enough Spanish to understand what is going on with him.) And Jordi, their main studlet, is nerdy and naive and apparently willing to fuck any woman, young or older and still manages to look like it is a rare treat.

Guess that is just one of the Mysteries of Sex, or at least of porn. And all those gay twinks getting it on? Why is it only older bears with cockrings who stand around jacking themselves while they wait for their turn to slip bareback into a well juiced cumdump? Are mature adults the only ones who want to be a cumdump? No sk8r dudes like to felch? Bukkake for surfers and scally lads?

Never mind. Probably just my ignorance as usual.

At least THIS site lets in the girls as well as the boys (and men!). General purpose torrent sites with an Adult or XXX category typically have a similar preponderance of het porn in those areas just as this site, quite properly in my opinion, has a majority of material featuring men at work together. (Lads at Work however, is more boys romping with girls their own age. Lucky gals.)

Are there actually any sites similar to this one that exist to provide large helpings of XX/XY porn? They cannot all be proprietary sites limited to paid access to the creations of a single company. Can they?

cannonmc – thanks for that link. Talk about harsh!