Posts made by lololulu19

chaturbate

Imagine that the original poster uploaded a 1GB file.
Generally (not always), that poster will have the full 1GB downloaded from him, and in the process several other people will be downloading different parts of that 1GB.  Let's say there are 1 people downloading the poster's file.
Downloader:
#1 is downloading the first 100mb (hypothetically)
while
#2 is downloading the 2nd 100mb
#3 the 3rd 100 mb
etc.
until each of the 10 downloaders has a different 100 mb chunk of the video
THEN the poster and those 10 downloaders grab the parts from each other.
This is the ideal situation, but that isn't what actually happens.
Generally the original poster gets between 2 and 3 times the amount of download as is the size of their upload.
Generally, several people will have a copy of the video after 1 day, so don't expect a lot more download points to result after 1 day.

There are some exceptions to note.  If you have a FAST internet connection, you will wind up getting the lion's share of download points. 
Also, for various reasons which I don't fully understand, different torrent clients will download and/or upload files faster.
For instance, Utorrent and Bittorrent are written by the same company, and look and function identically.. but are compiled differently.  BUT.. the file transfers under Utorrent are considerably FASTER.  There is no best client.  My favorite is Utorrent, but sometimes.. maybe 1 out of 200 torrents, Utorrent doesn't work.. I then use Bittorrent (same company - and LOOKS like the same program).  Qbittorent is a different company, and VERY similar to Utorrent and Bittorent, but is easier to use and "friendlier".  People using android, Apple, or other devices use an assortment of other clients.  Beware of clients that are no longer supported - because at some point they are doomed to be obsolete.  There are a large number of people who insist on sticking with the very old Utorrent 2.21.  They are paranoid about new versions of Utorrent.. because for a long time, Utorrent put out very buggy versions - some nearly non-functional.  Utorrent 2.21 is stable, but old.  They have made a lot of improvements. and the current version which is 3.5.5 is quite stable.  Hopefully future versions will remain stable.  I have a little knowledge of the operations of Utorrent.. and it seems that they had one extremely stubborn idiot working there.. who is now GONE.  That guy was the cause of the bad versions.  Also, for a LONG time they were ignoring the feedback of their users - which is insane.  I used to work for a software company which did NO testing of their own products!  They would churn out software which was used for many things including doing PAYROLLS.. totally untested!  They depended on their USERS to be the guinea pigs to find the bugs and report them.

I strongly advise people to download and seed all NEW Freeleech files whether they like them or not.

Another trick is to keep seeding GOOD huge files.  Even after YEARS.. someone will come along and download that file.. and because it is so old, you will be the only one seeding it.. and get all the credit for it!

I personally think the ratio requirements are a bit too tight here.  I would suggest that people were only "charged" for 50% of what they download. 
Many years ago, this site got a daily flood of awful videos that were garbage - posted by people only interested in getting download credits.  There were so many videos posted, that it was virtually impossible to keep up with all the posts and find the GOOD posts buried amongst the ocean of garbage.  Those days are gone.  The general quality of videos posted here has improved dramatically.

Lastly, I would suggest buying an EXTERNAL 8TB hard drive.  Seagate makes them for about $150!  These drives are slow as mud, but extremely cheap, and do fine for using to seed your vast collection of videos.  8TB of NVME Evo Plus will cost you well over $4000.  Standard NVME about half that.  So.. $150 is nothing compared to other forms of storage.

There is a 12.5 GB set of Phenix Saint movies that has been crawling along for over 9 days.  I would estimate it will take another 3 days to complete.
That set has been "doctored" to be F4V files

There is a nearly identical set only they are MP4 files  that is freeleech.  Because it is freeleech, it was originally posted a week ago - so almost nobody sees that it was posted.  I think it would be a good idea to BUMP a title to being "new" whenever it becomes "Freeleech"

Is there a way to bump a torrent? 
This is the one I am referring to in this case.
https://www.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=2cf009951b65547af6f43426e31267c053f18f715a058a52

There are dozens of people struggling to get those F4V file which they might not be able to play without adding a codec.
The MP4 set can be downloaded in less than an hour.

I don't mind peers, but I can't stand scat!

I don't even know if I should report such files and packs, but I have noticed that very recently, someone or a more that one person is uploading packs that are often 8 to 32 GB in size, which are 99.9% identical to packs found elsewhere, EXCEPT they have been digitally modified to be different enough so that they are not the "same" as the originals.  I have an idea of how they manage this, but I'm not going to mention it because other people mike get the same idea.

Even that is not a huge problem, but what is a huge problem is that whoever is doing it seems to have a dial-up connection that is SLOOOOOWWW.  At the rate they are uploading it would take a week to a month to upload their packs.

Even THAT would not be a problem, except that often these people never complete sending their upload.  THAT is a problem.

There is no BEST torrent client, but I recently found a great alternative to Utorrent when Utorrent doesn't work.

I generally use Utorrent for everything, however, Utorrent has a few annoying quirks, and sometimes can't download about 1 out of 1000 torrents.

When that happens, I suggest using Qbittorrent.  It is quite a bit like Utorrent, but does things in a slightly better way.  For instance, with Qbittorrent, you don't have to stop a file before re-checking it. It does that automatically.. And when it's done checking you don't have to manually restart it, it restarts automatically.

There is one problem thing about Qbittorrent that bothers me though. The file downloads and uploads are considerably slower than with Utorrent. 
Utorrent is even faster than Bittorrent which is made by the same people and looks 100% identical.  Without doing a lot of testing, I would rate the speed of Utorrent a 10, Bittorrent a 7 and Qbittorrent a 4.

Maybe there are some settings in Qbittorrent to speed it up.. or maybe the makers of Utorrent will take a look at Qbittorrent and implement some of the improvements they have made.

I just ordered an extremely expensive laptop.  It is by far the most expensive computer I ever bought.  I need it for a special business project.

Anyway.. when I first turned it on, it asked me a few questions, and after about 30 minutes I was able to use the computer.
When I started installing software onto this new system, I got quite a shock.  It has NORTON pre-installed.. and Norton not only thinks that every EXE file that didn't come from Microsoft is a virus.. it goes and deletes that file without even asking!
The first thing I tried installing was software I have used on hundreds of computers over the last 30 years!  There is no way that is a virus.  I've tried many other anti-virus, anti-malware programs such as Avast, McAfee, System Mechanic, NOD32, and all the big ones.  NEVER has that program been tagged as a virus.

I would HIGHLY recommend that if you have anything related to Norton or Symantec on your computer.. GET RID OF IT. 
Windows OWN anti-malware is pretty good these days.  What happens is.. Symantec PAYS computer resellers to pre-install their Norton crap on your computer - which is extremely difficult to get rid of - and then when the license expires, it nags you to death to renew your subscription.  Mcfee also does this, but at least McAfee doesn't destroy your computer in the process.  McAfee is often supplied for free by your cable TV / Internet provider.

I had a LOT of problems with Utorrent in 2018.  It was not downloading files from this site.
Out of desperation, I installed it's clone.. Bittorrent.. and that solved the problem!  Bittorrent would download the files while Utorrent would not!

Finally, Utorrent started to download files again, so I have been using that.
Recently, a couple of files didn't download, so I fired up bittorrent again.. but Bittorrent didn't download them either. 
That didn't surprise me.

What DID surprise me is now Bittorrent doesn't want to download files from this site..  But utorrent does! 
This is quite frustrating!

@JohnAllenson:

Thanks for the source.  I'll assume it's a scam.

That site has a 3 day trial for $1

I think it's just collections of Tumblr videos - and Tumblr is now deleting all nudity.

I would suggest using a loadable VISA or Mastercard GIFT card with sites like this, so they can't drain your debit account or credit card.

Just in the past week or two, I've started getting the message "To Many Requests" with a captcha
(should be TOO not TO)

I'm sure this feature was implemented to fix some problem, but it's not working correctly. 

I was just watching a high resolution film clip.  The problem is, the resolution was so high that I could clearly see every zit on the actors' faces!  That is a turn off!

Unless a movie is a DVD rip in VOB format, there is very little reason for a movie to me more than 10mb per minute.  That would mean no movie should be much more than 1 gig in size.

It's obvious that some people are trying to get upload credits by taking a movie, and intentionally increasing it's size.  It's not possible to improve the quality of a movie by increasing it's size.  A DVD has a capacity of 4.77 gb, so when someone posts a single file that is 6.5 gigs or even more, you can be sure that the file has been bloated to get more credits.

What these people don't realize is that they are only screwing themselves.  Almost none of the people on this site are stupid, and they download the smaller versions of the same movies.  If you look on other torrent sites, it's quite obvious that the smaller versions get downloaded 10 times as often.

I recommend that if you do download one of these oversized files, convert it to a smaller size and upload it to give yourself a load of credits!

@boxingclever:

So, we all like porn and it's why we're here, but have you ever hired an escort or thought about it? what was your experience like?

Brad Pitt once called upon the late mega porn star Cameron Fox for escort services.  Cameron was a bit more butch in his later years, and Brad just handed him $200 and told him he didn't look like he did in his gay porn movies. Cameron revealed this, and apparently, Pitt was no stranger to gay escorts.  That is what triggered the Angelina Jolie divorce.

I was so horny one night.  I hailed a cab and told the driver "here's $50, bring me someplace where I can get a cheap hook-up, no questions asked!". 
He stopped, I got out, I look around, and as he drove off I yelled at him "HEY!  This is MY house!"

@freslimo44:

Kind of like the other questions about paying or being paid for sex. if a pornstar you fancied or maybe just someone hot said they would only have sex with you if it was on camera (onlyfans etc..) would you do it?

Wondering if anyone else has thought about this? Would you have sex on camera with the high possibility it would end up on pornhub etc.. if it's the only way a hot guy would have sex with you? or would you just pass?

Comedian Bruce Vilanch was interviewed by Michael Lucas years ago. Bruce kept hitting on Michael and wanted to have sex with him.  Lucas said "sure, as long as you consent to have the cameras filming it!"  That shut Bruce up.

@flozen:

@bobcat666:

Where am I supposed to find a father figure to hold me down and tickle me?

At the risk of being repetitive, church.    :crazy2:

Yeah, but those priests can get pretty kinky.  They use the white candles used for candlelight processions to drip hot wax on chests that have been beaten with flagellation beads, fisting, and ball gags.

@flozen:

@bobcat666:

Where am I supposed to find a father figure to hold me down and tickle me?

At the risk of being repetitive, church.    :crazy2:

Yeah, those priests get pretty kinky though.  Lot's of anal beads, fisting, and ball gags.

@MrMazda:

We are still working on this. It appears to be a system wide glitch that even affects me. What I can say with certainty is that all these extra torrents do NOT get counted towards the user's download total. This is largely why a fix is taking time, because it is not as high a priority as other updates, which are directly a security issue.

I've never gotten a warning about any porn I've downloaded with torrents, but downloading mainstream movie theater movies, especially current one's, often results in a nasty warning from my ISP which is WOW!

I rarely download anything other than gay torrents.  But I know that most people who download gay torrents, also download straight torrents, as well as mainstream torrents.  I don't know why.  Any movie without some cocks in it is not worth my time watching.

@MrMazda:

The SSL tracker is a more secure option. Some VPN providers, certain torrent clients, and some proxy services don't play well with the SSL tracker. I would suggest enabling the SSL tracker option so that all new .torrent files that you download will tell your torrent client to use the SSL tracker by default.

If you want to test whether or not you will have issues with the SSL tracker option, you can try changing the tracker URL in your torrent client for an existing torrent. To do this, simply change the beginning of the URL.

Change this: http://tracker.gaytorrent.tw:2710/
To this: https://tracker.gaytorrent.ru/

If you are able to switch over to the SSL tracker without any issue, then I would recommend that you change ALL your existing torrents over to the SSL tracker, and enable that option so that all future downloads are automatically branded with the SSL tracker, instead of the regular tracker.

I'm doing some testing.  So far, I've found that in the above, it is CRITICAL that the TW version is HTTP while the RU version is HTTPS  The S is for secure.  If you put the S on the TW version, you will not get anything.  Both trackers can be used at the same time.  The TW version seems to pull a few more peers.  Once the peers are found, deleting the trackers from the client will not stop the download - but will briefly pause it for some reason.  In Utorrent, make sure you put a blank like between trackers.  I go to ADD TRACKER, CTRL+X, CTRL+V, CTRL+V (again) making sure there is a line between the two.  Edit one of the RU versions to be a TW:2710  with http instead of https

The mystery that eludes me is why bittorrent and utorrent which look exactly alike, often find different peers.  Bittorrent downloads faster, while Utorrent uploads a LOT faster.

I use the latest QTM 1.14
After uploading, the file gets stuck in the DEAD section automatically (I wish this were fixed - I wonder how many people upload stuff that never gets out of the DEAD zone)
I then download my OWN torrent, but that doesn't fix it..

The strange thing is, to fix it I have to EDIT the torrent twice by clicking on "Make Visible on Main Page" and then on Edit.  It SAYS it has been successfully edited, but the visibility is NOT saved unless I do that a second time.  It sticks on the second time.