Is there a way for the tracker to better report why a torrent is dead on the torrent client side?
I've got "some" unregistered torrents. (As reported by the tracker)
That means:
Why I don't delete them? Because sometimes torrents "revive".
Could you improve that messaging system please?
@lololulu19 Camera noise.
In the past 10 years camera sensors have skyrocketed in terms of noise. I would say mainly thanks to Sony (lead technology). But because of mobile demand (lead consumer/"user").
When I mean noise I mean higher sensitivity, bla bla.
Thus, even theater movies from the late '10 look noisy compared to nowadays crisp and noise-free tv-shows recorded in the past 18-24 months.
Past production chain:
"Low quality" native resolution source sensor --> "low quality" lossy codec for production (4:2:0) --> poor reencoding low bitrate (MPEG2, QT, whatever). --> CRT displays /Early LCD (usually low res, low dpi)
Current production chain:
"High quality" high resolution source sensor --> "high quality" lossy or almost lossless codec in production (4:4:4 or 4:2:2) --> Video Downsizing (even more noise reduction) --> high quality reencoding with higher bitrate (H264, H265, VP9, AV1) --> IPS/OLED displays (higher res, higuer dpi)
So:
There you have it.
@john32123666 Thank you very much.
It was a firewall rule.
My torrents are turning red with a warning that There was an error with the torrent, my permissions don't allow to reach a certain socket. (utorrent 3).
Im not talking about 10 or 20, but hundreds.
What informatino do you need to help me debug this problem?
Yes, I would like the request section to come back as well. And maybe limit it to some users as before.
I feel there's a lot of stuff this site is missing because of the visibility of some torrents, and I doubt there is another place with such a traffic and difussion.
Why won't find a way to merge both? We're missing an opportunity here.
I understand the reasons why several versions of the same video are allowed in the tracker. Some people don't have the bandwidth to download certain versions.
But the pumping muscle versioning affair is getting to far. There are four or five sets of collections and four or five versions of the same video.
My suggestion to avoid this and refrain this collection and versioning is a modification in the rule that says that active torrents with the same content already in the tracker must be in the first line of the description.
I.e. people has to look if another "pumpingmuscle" "jacob 1" is already present and if there is cite it the description.
as:
ALTERNATIVE VERSIONS
P ump ing Mus cle Jac ob 1 2015 4GB file version:
http:/nameoftheurlofthebiggerorsmalleractivetorrent.
etc..
If not used the duplicate button should be used to alert the original publisher to add that info or the torrent will be deleted.
It actually was in http instead of https. In https it says:
Could not establish secure connection. Error -2146893048
I've tried in another client viersion with another port and i get the same 404 error. But curiously I can download several other torrents at the same time while I write this.
I'm unable to download the torrent called "JOHN B PHOTO SHOOT 2012-2"
The torrent is active and it has 8/9 seeds but I get the "HTTP Error 404" in the torrent client.
It doesn't happen with other torrents, and I've redownloaded the torrent file several times (last time today) but download never starts.
My ratio is ok, and my limits are ok.
:-[ :-[
Bring Browse Back!! :cheesy2:
btw, adding a simple "browse freelech" would also be great. And disabling that column swap would be cool as well.
The entire post was about rephrasing the rules…
Hi,
the "duplicate" torrent description and report should be change in some manners.
I've seen, specially for pumping muscle video, people who's trying to post as "new" three kinds of videos:
I understand that, a long time ago, with war formats of "DVD.iso", wmv, mov, etc. "reencoding" a video could be practical to transfer videos from one platform to another, and its acceptable, in some way even nowadays. But reencoded versions of mp4 videos should not be allowed given are "totally" cross platform.
Same happens with compilations. People is posting compilations of videos with lots of seeds of each individual video. Not adding all the information regarding the videos attached to mislead people. Those compliations should considered duplicates.
Finally cropped videos can be understood, as long as the final weight of the torrent is clearly a fraction of the original one (lets say 30%). Making a new torrent of a video because 15% of the original footage was remove should be consirederd duplicate too.
Please revise the policy about duplicated torrents.
Another example, Im seeding this torrent romeo_ib(part1) and there is only one leecher connected. Ok, I have my limit up to 50kb/s and the guy si downloading at 4.3kb/s.
Of course could be the super rare possibility that he is downloading limited to 135kb/s instead of taking full advantage of my free uploading bandwidth and raise it up to 180kb/s.
I'm facing the same issue and the facts are:
NAT works 100% because I've other ports to the same computer for another torrent client (same utorrent) and works flawless (has worked for almost 5 years).
In order to discart port forwarding I swapped the ports from the trackers (I changed to GT the one I used to use to another tracked just in case).
Client configuration is fine, because I use one similar to the other tracker in the same program.
I've got seeding more than 70 torrents and about 10-12 of them always have leechers.
Speed limit is far below the average download rate and I've got plenty of upload margin compared to the speed limit (upload).
How so I dont seed? I dont get it.
I'm seeding, I've leechers, I've bandwith but I don't upload.
:blink: :blink: :blink: :blink: :blink: :blink:
Good Teeth.
:cheesy2: :cheesy2: :cheesy2: :cheesy2:
Its always better smaller torrents, more if you take into account most countries don't have super wide broadband connections and must be more picky when it comes to download. 10GB is rather big, not to mention 40GB.
I've always wondered why, being so easy in an island, don't they rent a ship, make the porn oversees and sell them as importation porn. I presume US porn is not censored when it lands in japan.
Porn has a fantasy component (heavy IMHO) so bareback should be a must. Its their work to provide that fantasy in any kind of porn you like, so it should always had this plus, as the bodies, or faces or thematic.