@kco said in Reuploaded torrents appear as "downloaded" instead of "snatched". Not seeding.:

@john32123666 It seems I did not make myself clear.

One scenario:

Client --> the program in my computer: utorrent.exe or whatever.
Site --> the tracker, the server, the website showing trackers records. Not in my computer.

In my client the torrent is ok. Appears completed, can be rechecked and appears ok. I can "force start" and everything is green. The scrapper information is:
http:// tracker. gaytorrent. tw:portunumber/whatever/announce
state: working
timer: (<30min)
seeds/clients/downloaded: number/0/0

Ok, I come to the site (the tracker) in my browser, go up in my arrows, check my userdetails, click on "Show seeding torrents". I wait until the page is loaded.
I look for that torrent: The torrent is not in the list.
I search for the torrent on the tracker, instead of looking dark green (completed) appears:
case a)
light green (downloaded .torrent file but not completed)
case b)
"grey" (like I've never downloaded the .torrent file at all)

This is the case for torrents not uploaded by me but downloaded as any other torrent some time ago. I haven't touched anything (neither .torrent or the downloaded files) after downloading them.

@john32123666 by the time being your brain fills the gaps better than the reencoding: because is used to poor video content vs reality. Most old NTSC analog to digital converted video suck, but you fill the gaps among the noise and blur and chroma aberrations

You also don't mention the movement artifacts due to blocking "correction", invisible in video stills. For me its the worst part I haven't seen corrected yet.

As any other content if you don't like it don't download it, but Its true that, having the "original" video can lead to better reconstructions in the future, because most reconstruction levels can be achieved in real time (with a player) at this moment.

Current good AI reconstruction can lead to better overall experience in a lower size file, which is good.

Most of the stuff, if not all, seems to be solved.

@eddddd012779 Thats because there's only one dima
Athletic-Star, Athletic-Men, Teen-Muscle...
https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=2282e82199d3cfce4a798309d4095bee235003364026a703

@john32123666 Thank you very much.
It was a firewall rule.

@john32123666 said in send/receive PMs problem.:

A private profile and block will refuse/reject incoming PM ...
only staff/mod can modify this option ...
@ least 6 months of membership to access and allowed PM/DM to be approve ...

You mean the "Privacy Level" of the profile affects the ability to send/receive PMs?

I've got:
Normal
Low
Strong

I've tried the three of them but no "send new PM" or similar button appears in the messaging page.

I have PMs from other users (back to 2016) so I was able to send/receive PMs that for sure, also the account is older than 6 months.

@john32123666 thank you very much! Now seems to work.

Most of the stuff, if not all, seems to be solved.

@lolove said in Site messed up. Refreshing cache didnt restore web appearence. Even in private window i get errors everywhere.:

Same here. But normal on Microsoft Edge.

Never happened to me, someone messed up with css styles, cause FF didn't update (sometimes its FF fault).

I can't edit the original post, this is how torrents look like:

Some captures of how do I see the site, not only the menu is gone, but most assets are wrongly positioned. Private window (no cache). Firefox 135.0.1.

@ianfontinell-0 : Thank you! I found the answer some days ago by reverse looking the picture number to the aproximate posting date of the torrent, and afterwards looking for "cam" torrents around that date
Anyway yeah, the stuff is pretty old, who cares?
@raphjd : what I didn't find are exactly those videos in the shower

I'm talking about this guy:

I've seen this guy before, here but I don't know where these videos are from (torrent) or any ID if this guy.

Any info would be appreciated!

These are images 15721322 and 15721330 from GT btw.

@wewe1221 can't visit the site I'm not member of that tracker.

@john32123666 by the time being your brain fills the gaps better than the reencoding: because is used to poor video content vs reality. Most old NTSC analog to digital converted video suck, but you fill the gaps among the noise and blur and chroma aberrations

You also don't mention the movement artifacts due to blocking "correction", invisible in video stills. For me its the worst part I haven't seen corrected yet.

As any other content if you don't like it don't download it, but Its true that, having the "original" video can lead to better reconstructions in the future, because most reconstruction levels can be achieved in real time (with a player) at this moment.

Current good AI reconstruction can lead to better overall experience in a lower size file, which is good.

I know the techniques, whats underneath and their requirements. Thats why I doubt any porn site can afford such features.

Nevertheless, no one mentioned a single a site with such feature. After so many replies no one has.

Part of my point is:
If you had a site with such feature wouldn't you let your customers know? "don't try it, we can track you down"
Keep it secret it only increase the costs, because DCMA lets you take down distribution easily (and its cheap) without such techniques. If you do it its because you want to go up to courts in most cases, which are expensive (if you can reach the user) legal costs are bigger than the benefits in mosts sites.

In the technical point of view my concerns are:

• per user video reencoding requires a very expensive and complex infrastructure (economy of scale): you need to either: A) have a pool of encoded videos and associated with an user ID or B) real-time (or faster) reencode video for each user. Video is SOFTWARE ENCODED so its cpu bound.
  If a user can download a video, be sure that the video was previously encoded unless the download speed its at the encoding phase. Do you understand the storage implications and costs?
  If a user can't download a video (drm), speed is limited to real time, well maybe they have enough cpu power to encode all their userbase on real time, try to encode a 1440p video at 30fps with good old x264. But then videos come from "video capture" (software or hdmi) source, is that the case for justforfans?
  AFAIK neither AMD or NVIDIA (I don't know about quicksync) hardware encoding apis allow such interference (addition in the workflow) for the protections mentioned (and others). Maybe in their "uber" expensive hardware encoders, I don't know.
  It that case we have to evaluate the benefits/costs per "second" encoded/dowloaded/userpayment. It may be profitable, I can't tell.

• since the possibility of AI in the reencoding* process, most of those techniques vanish on the video "reconstruction".
  (thats where the battle is right now).

I don't want to go any further, still looking for some sites.