@Rotron said in Spore/Spores is now a pronoun:
Well he got banned fast at 39 posts!
Yeah, @raphjd tends to ban people when he can't defend himself against them in arguments. But such is the world when you give the wrong sorts even the littlest bit of power.
raphjd, why don't you go back to posting photoshopped pictures and then refusing to admit they're fake even when presented with the original, unedited photo.
@raphjd said in Ann Coulter Tells Trump To 'Shut The F---k Up, Forever!':
I just post what you ass clown losers say, in your own words, and you don't like it because it shows you for the kind of people you are.
The point is that you are a hypocrite because you recognize that Republicans and conservatives can have differing opinions and are not monolithic, yet you unrelentingly assume that anything any Democrat or liberal says is a shared belief of a monolithic Democrats or Liberals. In other words, you recognize distinctions on your side, but refuse to recognize them on the opposing side. That's why you're a moron.
LINK: Trump Wanted I.R.S. Investigations of Foes, Top Aide Says
The reason Trump is convinced that the multiple tax cases and DOJ investigations against him are nothing more than political hit jobs and witch hunts designed to make him look bad, is because that's what he himself did while in office.
"While in office, President Donald J. Trump repeatedly told John F. Kelly, his second White House chief of staff, that he wanted a number of his perceived political enemies to be investigated by the Internal Revenue Service...
...
Mr. Kelly said that along with Mr. Comey and Mr. McCabe, Mr. Trump discussed using the I.R.S. and the Justice Department to investigate the former C.I.A. director John O. Brennan; Hillary Clinton; Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon and the owner of The Washington Post, whose coverage often angered Mr. Trump; Peter Strzok, the lead F.B.I. agent on the Russia investigation; and Lisa Page, an F.B.I. official who exchanged text messages with Mr. Strzok that were critical of Mr. Trump."
I guess Shakespeare was right. The lady doth protest too much, indeed.
@raphjd No, she's a Republican, which means according to the moronic rules you use when you come here and post some bullshit off Twitter from some nobody who just happens to identify Democrat or Liberal....she speaks for all Republicans.
I'm sorry. Those are the rules that you have set up. Either acknowledge them now, or be an even larger hypocrite.
@raphjd said in Liberals silent on "popular vote" - I wonder why:
Your fellow liberals say we need to go by the popular vote for who runs the country. One would assume that would include Congress.
I'm confused why you think the nationwide count matters in a mid-term election with no nationwide elections. The demographic of people going out to vote in the mid-terms is related to local circumstances.
For example, there were 20 states with Republican incumbent senators running for re-election against Democratic challengers. There were only 14 Democrat states. There were also 5 states with Republican incumbents who had retired, meaning a stronger push to get Republicans in those areas to come out and hold that seat.
Also, there's no guarantee that the election jurisdictions were spread evenly into districts with equal party affiliation. In other words, if just a few of the jurisdictions were heavy Republican districts, then the massive number of Republicans coming out for that district skews the numbers. Yes, there are more registered Democrats in America than registered Republicans, but that doesn't mean that average in applicable evenly across the election jurisdictions.
All of the above was a long-winded way of saying that your argument was based on fallacious reasoning and you're an idiot.
@Drwas Herschel Walker is a lying buffoon, and this is the least of this stupidity. That Texan should never have run for Senate in Georgia.
@Drwas Clearly this is a lie because, as we know from the blowhard of this Forum, it is only crazy liberals who attack people because of partisan politics.
@raphjd If the GOP wins the House of Representatives, then do you think they should be able to demand Joe and Hunter Bidens' tax returns to investigate foreign influence?
If your answer is YES, then you should be opposed to this action by the SCOTUS now. The GOP-led House would be relying upon the same statute, 26 U.S.C. § 6103(f), to obtain the Bidens' returns. Trump used his position as head of the Executive Branch to prevent the IRS from releasing those returns. So, Biden should be able to block the IRS from releasing his and his son's returns?
Just trying to suss out how big of a hypocrite you're going to be. Maybe we should bookmark this post for future reference.
But I'm confused...the resident conservative dumbass on this Forum just spend the last several days proving that only liberals are antisemitic, so why would GOP candidate Mastriano support antisemitic memes?
@raphjd Did you forget to take your meds again today and mistook this Forum for 8Chan?
@raphjd As I recall, I posted in Gay News about a book being removed from a high school library. You interjected some nonsense unrelated to the OP about a book that was in an elementary school library, insinuating that mature material is routinely and commonly made available to children. I asked you for proof that mature books were in elementary school libraries, and all you could find was one example where the book was retained in an elementary library temporarily for 5 months, never checked out, and was removed in the proper course of librarians reviewing materials within the library.
When pressed to constrain discussion to the OP, you showed that you were incapable of doing so. As I stated there, that means you lost that argument.
Thanks for playing.
@raphjd said in Nancy Pelosi's Husband Attacked with Hammer:
Must be true since it's in quotes and unsourced.
I was quoting the Criminal Complaint and affidavit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California by FBI Special Agent Stephanie Minor.
I would surely have thought that all of the blogs and news sites that you peruse to stay so informed, as you clearly are always, would have linked to or mentioned the affidavit summarizing the FBI's investigation so far.
Or maybe you just go to websites spewing wild-eyed conspiracy theories divorced from the truth. I, unlike you, try to go read the actual source materials or investigation materials whenever that's possible.
If you'd read the affidavit, then you'd know that assailant wasn't in his underwear, as you and others keep alleging. For example: "Officers removed a cell phone, cash, clipper cards, and an unidentified card from DEPAPE’s right shorts pocket."
@raphjd Conservatives only care about fraud and tax evasion investigations when it's against Donald Trump. Thousands of people are investigated for fraud and tax evasion every year. That just shows the kind of people they are. Conservatives care more about this human circus peanut than they do about fraud and tax evasion investigations, but liberals are the evil ones.
"DEPAPE stated that he was going to hold Nancy hostage and talk to her. If Nancy were to tell DEPAPE the “truth,” he would let her go, and if she “lied,” he was going to break “her kneecaps.” DEPAPE was certain that Nancy would not have told the “truth.” In the course of the interview, DEPAPE articulated he viewed Nancy as the “leader of the pack” of lies told by the Democratic Party. DEPAPE also later explained that by breaking Nancy’s kneecaps, she would then have to be wheeled into Congress, which would show other Members of Congress there were consequences to actions. DEPAPE also explained generally that he wanted to use Nancy to lure another individual to DEPAPE."
Former GOP congressman and current Truth Social CEO Devin Nunes making jokes about the attack, referring to the original story that the assailant was arrested in only underpants. So civil!
FBI investigating a terroristic letter sent to environmental advocacy group Conservation Voters New Mexico, that was laced with toxin.
I'm sure this was the work of a liberal or Antifa, too. The other side never does stuff like this.
@raphjd "...as well as pro-Trump and anti-Democratic posts..."
There, I reposted what you seemed to miss in the above post.
