@cteavin:
@Frederick:
That video has been on Youtube everytime I've ever checked. I just checked again… there are SEVERAL versions of it on Youtube. It's possible that your country is blocking it. In just seconds, I found dozens of links to several versions of it, some with still images, some with digitized images, some with links to the full original video, documentaries which include clips of the video, some in what looks to me like kanji characters. Youtube certainly has made no attempt to remove it. I found links that were 6 and 7 years old.
And then there are these 3 guys SINGING about one hammer!
Youtube Video
(ha!) ;D
Check out this video with all these kids and guns.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vj1YxTl1e2I
(One of my all-time favorite songs of all time.)
I'd just spent ten minutes looking at Three Guys One Hammer clips on YouTube. They were all videos on the documentary of what happened and reaction videos to the original snuff film which you can see here:
http://www.bestgore.com/murder/dnepropetrovsk-maniacs-murder-guy-hammer-screwdriver-real-snuff-video/
If you click, you'll need lots of eyebleach.
Youtube Video
The video of innocent children and baby-faced soldiers is the result of having terrible leaders. We had Obama for 8 years, and damn near had Hillary, so we are not immune from being one step away from chaos ourselves in the USA.
I know a bit about Bestgore.. and I don't like that site.
It was created and is run by a man named Mark Marek. It posts a load of the most horrific videos you can imagine.. mixed with sadistic BDSM.
Years ago, someone sent a video to Mark Marek. Marek edited the video, and posted it to the internet on his Bestgore site. Compared to the hundreds of other gore videos on that site, this one video would rate about a 5 out of 10 in how gorey it was. It was certainly less gorey than the "hammer" video. Anyway, the video was sent to Bestgore to frame someone. The video was highly staged. There are things in the video which make no sense unless you use computer software to analyze the video. I could write a book about that video, but let me give a very short version. What the video shows is entirely misleading. 99.9% of people think there are only 2 people in the video to this very day, even though the trial revealed that there is at least one other person. That fact was never revealed at the time of the murder, kept a secret for 2.5 years until the trial, and even then, the jury was LIED to about the 3rd person. The jury were told that the police were never able to identify the 3rd person, and could not find him in the 2.5 years since the murder. It later was revealed that they had still images of that man's face, surveillance video of him, knew exactly who he was, etc. So why wasn't his name ever revealed, and why didn't he testify in the trial? Because it would have blown the case. I guarantee you that 99.9% of the public who read about that case in newspapers, and on the radio, and on TV and on the Internet have no idea that this 3rd man is in the video. A certain internet mega genius noticed that one person in the video was not who it was supposed to be, and was someone else. That fellow was called crazy, threatened with death, and said to be the actual killer posting bullshit. However, 2.5 years later, it was revealed (in court only) that the man was 100% correct. Anyway, that video was taken DOWN by the police from Bestgore and from Youtube and just about everywhere else. (I saw it on Youtube while looking at funny Benny Hill videos). The police and other authorities were sent the video the day after the murder.. and they laughed at it as being FAKE. They were correct in a way.. because that video is fake in that it was staged and carefully edited to frame a man. For one thing, the supposed killer took the time to add a soundtrack to the video. Who has ever done that before? NEVER! Anyway.. the man was falsely convicted of murder due to the fact that he was forced to not deny committing the murder to pursue an insanity plea. The man did not want to pursue an insanity plea, however, after 20 months of being doped up on enough medications to kill 10 horses, the man agreed with his lawyer to pursue an insanity plea. In the trial, it looked as if the accused man was going to get the insanity plea since ALL 5 of the trial psychiatrists agreed that the man was insane. The prosecution said that the man was not insane, and they referenced the main psychiatrist's interview report and evaluation in which the man said "I don't remember any of this, I'm only telling you what my defense attorney TOLD me to say!" At the very last moment in the trial, the last words spoken by the defense attorney to the jury were to "IGNORE the psychiatrists!" The man had the insanity plea won - which would mean he would not go to prison, but instead spend a few years in a mental hospital. The defense attorney removed the option of insanity, so the jury had the option of either finding the man guilty of 1st degree murder, or having a mistrial.. but not so fast. The option of a mistrial was also removed, because the defense nor the prosecution asked for a mistrial.. and the judge insisted that the jury would be sequestered in a hotel until they came up with a verdict. That meant the jurors could not communicate with anybody, not even their families, until they came up with a verdict. The only verdict left was 1st degree murder. The defense attorney threw away insanity, not guilty was thrown away by not denying committing the crime (which was never proven at all), mistrial was thrown away because nobody asked for a mistrial. After 8 days, on Dec 23, the jury caved in and convicted the man. If they didn't do that on Dec 23, the court would be in recess for at least a week.. and the jury would be sitting in a hotel missing out on Christmas Eve, Christmas, New Years Eve, New Years Day.. and on and on. By the time a murder trial ends, the jury has almost always already made up their minds and the verdicts come in within a day or two. In that country, the longest deliberation in any murder trial was 4 days. This one was 8 days and forced upon the jury because of the judge and no option of mistrial. The maximum sentence for that crime was 25 years and then be eligible for parole. However, if one is designated a "dangerous offender" they are not eligible for parole and spend the rest of their life in prison. The charge that the accused man posted the video to the internet fulfilled the "dangerous offender" criteria, so at present, he will NEVER get out of prison. There is a big problem with that, because the man didn't post the video to the internet. Someone sent it to Mark Marek. Mark Marek then posted it online, and was convicted of posting that video to the internet over a year after the accused man was convicted of posting it. The defense attorney was THANKED by the father of the murder victim (which is a first!), and the defense attorney said that there would be NO appeal (which is outrageous). The convicted man ignored his defense attorney, and filed for an appeal. In a capital crime appeal, the most common premise for the appeal is that the defense attorney screwed up, was incompetent, etc. Appeals are usually done by special "appellate" attorneys who do nothing but appeals. However, that didn't happen in this case. The same defense attorney who screwed his own client was in charge of the appeal.. and on the very last possible moment before the request to appeal expired.. that defense attorney DROPPED the appeal.
Meanwhile, the main murderer whose name has never been revealed committed suicide.. and his primary accomplice attempted, but failed to commit suicide in Dec 2016. The main murderer's first name is.. Derek.
The accused (and falsely convicted) man was harassed and framed for 12 years before the murder.
