I had a very similar situation occur with an upload that named an actor as primary, but whose clip constituted only about 3 percent of the content, with the remainder being an unrelated clip that was mentioned in very brief fashion.
It was meant to be deceptive and to gain many times the seedpoints compared to the tiny clip on its own. Several other members expressed dissatisfaction in the comments section.
When I reported the upload, I received the following reply:
"While this is not in the written rules, we do highly frown upon users who over inflate their torrents with content other than what is advertised. Not only is this considered inflating the torrent size, but it also a violation of rule #11
Quote:
Any information, e.g. the title, categories, pictures and description must correctly represent the content of the files shared with the torrent and avoid misleading members about the content. This applies as well to additions, votes or comments made by other members than the original uploader. In doubt, rather than providing wrong information, omit it.
* At least one good quality picture is mandatory for the torrent presentation.
* Torrents in the Themed Movie and TV / Episodes categories need to indicate the audio language(s) and, if present, the subtitle language(s), including if optional, forced or hardcoded in the video.
* Descriptions in the title such as "Hot!", "Must See!", "Best Ever!", "New" or "Latest" are unacceptable. The comment area is the only appropriate place to give your personal opinion of the content or otherwise make personal requests. Include the release date, rather than "New", "Latest", etc. …
* Do not plead for bonus seed points in the description area."
So yes, it is regarded as a violation, and you're well within your rights to report it and help in keeping things "honest." I hope you do just that.