Posts made by flozen

The (gay) man in the photo was the only one of 10 figures initially omitted.  Unintentional?  Christ, you must believe in unicorns and trickle-down economics, as well.  :crazy2:

@Frederick:

@smarmquetnz:

Frederick is a retard.

And you are a libtard.

If my IQ is below 80, that must put yours at about 20.  You should apply for a job as a cop.

Oh, a cop hater.  We may never know if it was losing a moonshine still, meth lab or pipe bomb assembly plant that could lead to such bitterness.  Most cops serve our country with honor, and those who demean them have likely spent a lot of time trying to evade them…

@Frederick:

@Drwas:

A federal judge in Washington has dismissed a lawsuit alleging that Hillary Clinton's lax security surrounding her emails led to the deaths of two of the Americans killed in the 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya.

In a ruling Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson tossed out the wrongful death claims as well as allegations that Clinton essentially slandered the parents of the deceased by contradicting accounts the parents gave of events related to their children's deaths.

The suit was filed last August by Patricia Smith, the mother of State Department information officer Sean Smith, and Charles Woods, the father of CIA operative Tyrone Woods.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2017/05/26/hillary-clinton-benghazi-email-suits-dismissed-238880

Why are you still talking about Hillary Clinton?  Are you obsessed with her?  She lost.. she is done.. she is a footnote in history.. let it go! 
(isn't that what you are constantly saying?)

Frederick, since you're wondering why people are "still talking about Hillary," and encouraging others to "let it go," it only serves to reason that you've adopted that belief, as well.

Let's see how long it takes for you to reference Hillary again, particularly in your usual, misplaced context of a post-election, Trump-related snafu.  Best of luck to ya!

(P.S.:  We are still enjoying your input on the "Russian banker Kushner" thread – keep up your stunning attention to detail!  P.P.S.:  Did you manage to read this far down?)

@PUTIPUELCA:

Hillary has immunity, that's why.

Everyone knows she did lie anyway.

Everyone knows that using the term "everyone knows" is the weakest, most meaningless defense in presenting an opinion.

It's amazing (or then again, is it?) that the Trump administration thinks they can erase our inclusion without the rest of the civilized world taking notice.

Not to detract from the political angle, but Gauthier Destenay is one handsome gent!

The story about Kushner is certainly worth a look.  It concerns Jared, the political neophyte, taking a meeting with a Russian banker who, coincidentally, graduated from a Russian school for spies.

But this thread has grown to be much more – essentially, a permanent tribute to the intellectual capacity of not one, but TWO, of our most prolific contributors.

Briefly, enter their world -- if you dare! -- where understanding a comment is secondary to answering a comment, and where anger reigns supreme over accuracy.  Enjoy.

I will admit to my lust for Adrian, especially in his scruffy mode.  If those GIFs are circulating, does it not suggest that somewhere, the whole session is on one complete file?

Blessings to those who may find and share such a bounty!   >:D

As a Trump family apologist, Frederick only has time to read about eight words of each post before he responds, crashing and burning, and the wreckage ending up in the next topic.  To be fair, he has a LOT of fires to put out these days, aided only by a short factual hose.

He does, sadly, make time to continue to insult people with intellectual disabilities by using the term "libtard."  It's a word that liberals, moderates and many conservatives interpret as "all I've got is a cuss, and a pathological lack of empathy."

It's also a word that hermits enjoy using in the anonymous shadows of the Internet.  But as far as Fred's overall response, he read eight words, missed the point completely, and it was funny as hell.   :cheesy2:

Found a lamp icon at the bottom of one of my posts, but had never seen one before and don't know if it's something automatic, or posted by another member?  Is it an icon I could add to someone's post if I found it illuminating?  LOL!  Thanks in advance for any wisdom.  flozen

@aadam101:

Hillary setup a private email server in her basement and later deleted the records

Kushner is being accused of setting up a secure communication method outside of US government protocol that will leave no record of the communication.

It's the same thing.

No, they are not the same.  Kushner's secure communications ideas were designed exclusively to partner with Russia, an American adversary.  From Russia's perspective, this would be a huge gift, fostering secret talks in which our dummies, no doubt, would turn over even more leads and classified information (ISIS-Israel, only the start).

Meanwhile, the Trumps, believers in personal wealth above country, would have an unfettered path to illegally gain advantages for their family's present and future business dealings in Russia.

Instead of comparing apples to oranges at this early stage, let's see where Donald, Jared and the extended Trump machine end up, once the slew of investigations and hearings weigh in.  There's so, so much more yet to come.
..

@aadam101:

Hey guys, I just thought of something! Remember when Hillary did pretty much the same thing? Anyone?

No, I don't recall, and when you have to qualify that your accusation is "pretty much" like something, it suggests you're playing a really weak hand.

As well, the topic of this thread is Jared Kushner. The discussion is centered on current news, from this Administration, that affects the immediate AND long-term protection of our democracy.  Stay on the topic at hand, and if you have any relevant information about Kushner, tell us why the charges being leveled against him are in error.

Since the Kushner revelations began in earnest a few days back, you've had time to provide contrasting views from legitimate – and I repeat, legitimate -- news sources that he is not involved in these multiple Russian entanglements.  Otherwise, you're "pretty much" saying nothing new.

Oh, one more before I turn in…

Yes, the term "libtard" is found in the Urban Dictionary, where -- not surprisingly in light of those who use it -- it's considered "vulgar".

This article is very useful:

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/12/time-to-end-highly-offensive-libtard-insult/

It would be just as easy to rally usage for a companion word, "conservatard," but that won't happen.

Broad- and fair-minded ADULTS realize that ending a word with "tard" harkens back to the days of calling people with intellectual disabilities "retards."

So if you continue to use it, that just makes you one big – what's the word I'm looking for?

Oh, yes.  "Jerk."

Per the CNN report, the alleged crimes by Kaine were from March, the proposed charges are from today.

It's late, and you're all so, so beautiful.  See Kaine's photo in the article, and perhaps some will agree, he should cut his hair and do porn.   :cheesy2:

I'm surprised the Board has yet to touch on the recent news concerning Tim Kaine's son and his buddies – LIBERALS!!! -- disrupting a Trump rally.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/26/politics/tim-kaine-son-charged/

Kaine's group, which splintered off from a larger group of protesters, tried to force their way into the Trump gathering, and as well, they had smoke bombs and resisted arrest.  Linwood Kaine, 24, faces gross misdemeanor charges as a result.

All of this is highly disturbing, and particularly shameful given his father's political career.  You don't have to be conservative or liberal to know how improper these actions are.  I'm liberal, and I see it quite well.

However, as far as your input above about the fascistic Coulter and Milo – and your proven inability to discern between violence-inciting hate speech and conservative dialogue -- you're utterly lost in the weeds.

With so much rage spewing out, and the same message dredged up ad infinitum, could you at least afford us the small mercy of paragraph breaks?

Another day, another set of detailed revelations about Jared Kushner and some of our dear Russian comrades.

First, Reuters reported that Kushner had at least three previously undisclosed contacts with the Russian ambassador to the United States during and after the 2016 presidential campaign.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/exclusive-trump-son-in-law-had-undisclosed-contacts-with-russian-envoy-sources/

Of course, this must be fake news, since only SEVEN current and former U.S. officials confirmed this to Reuters.

A separate WaPo article revealed that "During the transition, Jared Kushner proposed to the Russians that they set up a secret channel of communication using secure Russian facilities":

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/analysis-jared-kushner-trying-to-secretly-talk-to-the-russians-is-the-biggest-billow-of-smoke-yet/

Also this evening, the NY Times and other media reported that one of Paul Manafort's old Russian cronies is searching for a plea bargain deal, prior to spilling his guts before the U.S. Congress on meddling in the 2016 election:

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/russian-once-tied-to-trump-aide-seeks-immunity-to-testify-before-congress/

Those who wish to provide alternative facts for Kushner and the Russian guy are welcome to do so.  As a gentle reminder, these news stories are in no way focused on Hillary.  Ranting about her off-topic makes you look like you're out of your depth.

Still no takers?  Well, the truth hurts.

The NBC News source article on Kushner is but an hour old at this writing, but like any proper investigation, the FBI is gathering evidence while working their way to the top of the food chain:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jared-kushner-now-under-fbi-scrutiny-in-russia-probe-say-officials/ar-BBBxdCQ?li=BBnb4R7&ocid=spartanntp

Adding the Kushner report to Sessions "newest" verified Russian contact omissions, as announced by U.S. Department of Justice yesterday, it appears the dots are being connected with increasing speed:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/jeff-sessions-russia-trump-investigation-meetings-not-disclosed-security-clearance-form-a7754536.html

Now, with the Trump family circle breached, the tick-tock gets louder with each passing day.

And none of this relates to Hillary, so kindly keep any cogent, dissenting responses both current and on topic, perhaps without cursing.

As well, we are bored by people whose best fall-back in political discourse is to talk about wanting/not wanting to fellate Trump.  This only illustrates your unbalanced temperament and vulgar nature.

In a completely unexpected development, today offered even more detail on Trump, his apostles, and their long(er)-term collusion with Russia:

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/contacts-between-moscow-and-trump-campaign-began-last-summer-ex-cia-chief-says/ar-BBBsOF2?li=BBnb7Kz

Separately, as a Florida resident I'm all too familiar with Pam Blondie and her transparent pay-to-play with Trump, illuminated very well in the preceding posts, thank you gents.

After reading your post a second time, I realized what a lost effort and general waste of my keystrokes this would be.  And yet, I'll take a moment to add that I can't recall reading a more absurd remark about Trump than your point number 5, regarding his charitable endeavors.

Trump's exaggerated claims of giving, and the problems charities have experienced in collecting his pledges, are legendary and exceedingly well documented.  As one highlight, in 2007, Trump spent $20,000 that belonged to his charity — the Donald J. Trump Foundation — to buy a six-foot-tall portrait of himself during a fundraiser auction at his Mar-a-Lago Club in Florida.

A Google search of "Trump" and "charity"  brings up hundreds of relevant articles from media across the political spectrum.  How you manage to sublimate this wealth of unflattering information, is, indeed, a triumph of your single-mindedness.

There are so many reasons not to love Trump – even if we confined our discussion to LGBTQ issues, and not to the increasingly evident collusion with Russia and his ensuing efforts to suppress/cover up; his damaging ISIS-Israeli intel gaffe; etc., etc.

As one example, the U.S. Census Bureau was preparing to add LGBTQ sexual orientation and gender identity to its 2020 survey.  After a review by the Trump Administration, the questions were deleted.  We were, essentially, erased.  And yes, that kind of visibility and recognition matters.

Whether Trump directly nominates our enemies (Attorney General Jeff Sessions, anyone?), or simply allows lower-level minions to make policies that lessen us, the buck stops with Trump.  And you love him, so, good for you.