Best posts made by flozen

@wrestling82:

Everyone is out of line. You're all embarrassing. I'm embarrsing. This forum is embarrassing. It's just pathetic really. The Dems and Repubs' days are numbered, they are both so ridiculous that they can't possibly exist another 50 years in this state of stupidity.

You're not embarrassing, wrestling82, you are just enjoying a bit of a rant.  And who could blame you, as this thread is well-suited.  In fact, it began with an insult headline, followed by content that completely lacked a topic for real political debate.

And somehow, this thread is allowed to remain here, rather than be locked or transferred to Rants and Raves.

Why is this so?  Could the administrator explain how a thread that was born for bragging on the "correcting of moonbats" meets the threshold for political discussion?

Truly, the standards need to be raised here, or our conversations will lose whatever integrity is left.

@john32123666 Very good research. These clips (and some of the associated websites) are really quite old. Porn from Eastern Europe and post-breakup USSR.

At that time, those governments weren't paying much attention to gay porn production, including little things like... oh, obtaining proof of age. Closer to the year 2000, I remember other video or image sites as well, where the performers' ages were at times questionable.

No doubt, some of the content is still around -- perhaps posted in private groups via the dark web.

@eobox91103 said in Pope Emeritus (aka former Pope) Benedict XVI dead @ 95:

@blablarg18 said in Pope Emeritus (aka former Pope) Benedict XVI dead @ 95:

Reality is a vast mosaic, none of us get to see it all.

True enough for many aspects of life. But in the case of Ratzinger and his pedophile chessboard actions, advanced legal systems (from which he was well protected) try to ascertain whether guilt can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. A judge or jury follows the demonstrable facts, witness testimony, etc. and arrives at a conclusion based on the preponderance of credible evidence.

I think it would help the discussion if there were some links or references,

I agree, brother eobox, so to my point above:

Pope Benedict and the pedophilia scandal: A timeline
https://theweek.com/articles/495712/pope-benedict-pedophilia-scandal-timeline
Former pope Benedict admits making false claim to child sexual abuse inquiry
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/24/former-pope-benedict-statement-child-sexual-abuse-inquiry
Pope Benedict XVI implicated in report on sexual abuse in German diocese
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/pope-benedict-xvi-implicated-in-report-on-sexual-abuse-in-german-diocese
Benedict was criticized for his handling of the church’s sex abuse scandal.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/31/world/europe/pope-emeritus-benedict-xvi-sex-abuse-scandal.html
Pope Emeritus Benedict attended meeting where pedophile priest's transfer was discussed
https://www.foxnews.com/world/pope-benedict-pedophile-priest-transfer
Pope’s child porn 'normal' claim sparks outrage among victims
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/popes-child-porn-normal-claim-sparks-outrage-among-victims-28577483.html#ixzz19fdmXHF4
Benedict's brief papacy was marred by the priest sex abuse scandal
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/pope-benedict-church-priest-sex-abuse-scandal-rcna63525 *
(*Note: some defense of Ratz in the one above!)
Victims: Pope Benedict Protects Accused Pedophile Bishops
https://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4656143
Leaked church report accuses Pope Benedict of clerical abuse cover-up
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/leaked-church-report-accuses-pope-benedict-of-clerical-abuse-cover-up-1.4769611

A list of entities and publications supporting Ratzinger can also be drawn up, from highly impartial sources such as catholic.org -- scroll past the donation plea:
Debunking the myth: Actually, Pope Benedict XVI defrocked a record number of priests
https://www.catholic.org/news/hf/faith/story.php?id=53930

As far as Ratzinger sweeping out a record # of pedos as Pope -- was that really a hard # to beat? And it doesn't excuse away his inaction -- or worse yet, action! -- during his continuity as Pope, Cardinal and Archbishop.

And one can find scads of supporting material in the links above.

If anyone wants to address Ratzinger and his unwavering opposition to gay marriage and overall equality, feel free to start a corresponding thread. Here's one to get you started:

Former Pope Benedict XVI Just Connected Gay Marriage With The Antichrist
https://www.newsweek.com/former-pope-benedict-xvi-just-connected-gay-marriage-antichrist-1501835

Have a blessed day.

Given the choice, a stranger's.      :cool2:

@F46660T said in Uploading new vs. reseeding old:

can we talk about this since nobody on this site wants to give me a reponse when i bring it up to them?????

Here is some input.

As a third-party observer, the amount of time and effort you've expended on this seems obsessive and unhealthy.

@raphjd:

Ok, raphjd, we get it.  In the Orwellian world that is gaytorrent.ru, Politics & Debate, you were forwarded some material from the HelpDesk that was unfavorable to you.  And with your cute little sunglasses emoji, you're telling us that behind those shades, you're the closest thing to the site's omniscient Oracle, and you're taking names.

Fine.  Enjoy.

Ok, I'll just let people think they can be sneaky and shop for staff to do their bidding.

And yet, we have a moderator that has allowed this original thread post – completely devoid of political content but full of taunting -- to continue, as if it merited a place here.

So yes, I can completely understand why a GT member would be looking to find another administrator for arbitration of an issue here in Politics & Debate.

This thread does not meet criteria and it needs to go.  Lock it up, I say!  Lock it up!

Going on the idea they are Ferris and Truitt, here's an article from 2014 where they seem younger, slimmer and reported to be boyfriends.

https://str8upgayporn.com/trent-ferris-sam-truitt-bareback-gay-porn/

I'm sure those porn databases could provide interested parties with their more recent work (and play). Happy hunting!

@eobox91103 I know you're not defending and sorry if my post or links made you believe otherwise. You're a constant source of reason. Thanks for sharing what must be difficult memories of friends impacted by this travesty and tragedy.

And agreed that the problem extends far beyond one individual or organized religion. I'm trying to hold to the thread, or we could go on until the Second Coming -- soon to be released on DVD with bonus features!

At least in NYC and FTL, the dating/sex apps seem to have reduced bar crowds a bit.

As for old-fashioned cruising, there's no harm walking through a park or along a waterfront, finding a friend and taking him home.  Assuming he's not dangerous!

To me, getting busy in public spaces – especially toilets -- is not a nice thing to do.  Lurking is often noticed by others who just want to have a whiz.  We have other options today.

@beachbum99 bb99, I give you a cautious welcome, because all I see on American TV as Welsh exports are these noir detective dramas like Hidden (Craith), Requiem, Hinterland, etc.

So, where do you hide the bodies of your victims? In a crevasse high in the Cambrian Mountains? In the depths of a nearby peat bog? I look forward to your clues.

Oh, and enjoy the porn.

@raphjd:

What does that have to do with you violating 2 of the rules you love to report?

If I was as bad as you claim, I'd ban you for it.

BTW, I get forwarded helpdesk things that have to do with the forums.  :cool2:

Ok, raphjd, we get it.  In the Orwellian world that is gaytorrent.ru, Politics & Debate, you were forwarded some material from the HelpDesk that was unfavorable to you.  And with your cute little sunglasses emoji, you're telling us that behind those shades, you're the closest thing to the site's omniscient Oracle, and you're taking names.

Fine.  Enjoy.

As for the initial post of this thread, it was a mini-rant which contained zero content for political debate and thus, was off-topic.  It did, however, do some empty bragging, and included a third-grade taunt in the headline and again, in the text.  For these reasons, I found no empirical evidence in the post to support that "functioning brain" claim.

While "clothes-on sex" is not really my thing, he is one handsome rascal, that's for shoe.

I recall you, yoop, from a thread on the demise of the intravenous drug-themed SlamRush website, which you were defending.

https://community.gaytorrent.ru/topic/56734/goodbye-slamrush

There are no boards here for people to discuss and advocate the taking of illegal and possibly fatal recreational drugs -- I'm not going to soften it with terms like "chems-friendly."

And, John has provided the link to content that is not allowed -- take note of the category "Intravenous Drug Use/Slamming/Shooting."

The dating sites are probably the best place to discuss your party-drug interests and meet others.

Ricky, this is great news, as I have thousands of real and imaginary site-related issues that needed a complete resolution yesterday.

Seriously, though, you have an impressive skill set and ultra-positive attitude for the job at hand. Get 'em, tiger.

While the percentages vary by study, mhorndisk is correct in noting the world's growing consumption of "food animals," and the sizable amount of methane they create, is a particularly harmful element related to climate change.  There's a lot of supportive data out there, but here's a nice article from NPR…

http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2014/04/11/301794415/gassy-cows-are-warming-the-planet-and-theyre-here-to-stay

Bearing in mind that agriculture accounted for nine percent of greenhouse gasses by sector:  "In 2011, methane from livestock accounted for 39 percent of all the greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture, according to a report that United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization released Friday. That's more than synthetic fertilizer or deforestation."

So yes, mhorn's numbers are inflated.  And yet, animals/methane remains an important part of the climate change equation.

mhorn, it's my sense that you get downvoted – even here, on a topic in which many of us agree with parts of your position -- because your forum manners are so very poor.  And yes, we know you don't care.

Why the need, on this thread, for umpteen little, enraged, complaining replies to your own message?   When you routinely type with all those screaming caps -- here, DEAD FLESH and such -- you do your case more harm than good.  It's called self-control, and until you learn some, you'll get down-votes -- even on issues where you might have unexpected allies.

From what I read long ago, Chubold was run by a single webmaster who, between growing older and the demands of upkeep, decided to sell the domain name and the existing content.

The new website is more colorful with better graphics, but interestingly, many of their "fresh" offerings have a dated look -- makes one wonder if they are recycling and renaming those older clips.

The truly oldest of their clips were generally fuzzy with poor lighting and oversaturated color -- I remember them!

With that aside, did you know that there are over 400 of the videos you seek via a simple search?

https://www.gaytor.rent/browse.php?search=chubold&incldead=0&inname=1&orderby=added&sort=desc

Happy hunting.

Sorry, it's 2022 and anyone can access the Internet -- or, in larger cities, clubs -- to hook up.

In many venues -- store bathrooms, gyms, highway rest stops, and urban parks to name a few -- public sex that subjects other people to an unexpected and unwanted experience is sexual harassment.

Welcome Noely H, always nice to see someone dive into the boards.

You can share ideas from politics to home decorating, talk about music, TV and videos, and get helpful tips from chaps like the one above.

My dad was born in the Chi suburbs -- Oak Lawn, so Go Cubs -- or White Socks?