Posts made by eobox91103

@lololulu19 said in Site duplicate rules as applied to AI enhancement:

I have mentioned dozens of times..

Yes, you certainly have. I'm curious why. Nothing's going to change.

It seems that the OP is advertising a commercial porn site. That's probably not kosher/halal/permitted in the forum.

On the torrent search page, you'll see your username at the upper left. Click on that to get a drop-down menu. From that menu, click on "Details & Stats." On that page, towards the bottom, you'll see "Torrent comments" with a number to the right. Click on that number and it will bring you to a page with all your comments, 25 per page, overflowing onto additional pages.

I think this will only show comments on torrents that are still active (posted) in the system, even if it's dead with no seeders. If you commented on a torrent that was taken down for one reason or another, I don't think that will show up. (I'm not absolutely sure about this, but I did a small random sample of my older comments, and every torrent showed up.)

Happy hunting!

@kingjamking I'd also suggest that you download the torrent and start it in your client even though there are no active seeders. If I get a reseed request and I see that there's someone trying to leech the stuff, I'm more inclined to jump in...assuming of, course, that I still have the content.

@lololulu19 I took it from one of the preview pictures at https://www.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=0d48b5058b3ae6573f627acd8bc2072f7e65d4d57e9e146e . There's probably a way to make an animated .gif from bits of the video, although I don't know how that's done.

Maybe this is an excessive load?

As for the website issue, reloading the page usually fixes it.

@blablarg18 said in Pope Emeritus (aka former Pope) Benedict XVI dead @ 95:

I also can't think of any unique or exceptional way that the Church damages gay people.

Really? REALLY? REALLY?

Perhaps you need to think harder. If you want to continue this topic, move it to the Religion forum group...but I won't take part in that.

@flozen said in Pope Emeritus (aka former Pope) Benedict XVI dead @ 95:

I know you're not defending and sorry if my post or links made you believe otherwise.

No worries--I probably shouldn't have clicked the "reply to you" option on that message. I appreciate your steady hand in these discussions and the quality of your posts. I don't think you could ever offend me, but please don't take that as a challenge.

@blaberg said in Pope Emeritus (aka former Pope) Benedict XVI dead @ 95

you're saying he did some sort of special damage as Pope. I can't account for that, except as "Oh there goes the typical incomplete, parochial, gay-lib-tribal viewpoint again, example 1 million.

Oh dear. This sounds like the kind of excrement that one finds in the "Politics and Debate" section. I said above that have respect for the RC church, probably more than most LGBT people. But the fact remains that the church continues to do great damage to LGBT people, and Bennie15 did nothing to stop that.

@flozen I'm not at all defending Ratzinger as Benedict XVI. While he might have been a "theoretical theology liberal" in the 1960's, when he put on a white dress in 2005 he permitted and/or caused a great deal of damage. He certainly had lots of help within the hierarchy in doing this, but as with any bureaucracy, the buck stops at the top.

The whole pedophilia mess is scandalously bungled at every level. (Side note: I have friends who were molested by clerics, and a high school classmate of mine became a priest-pedophile and is now living in Costa Rica or some some place outside of extradition.) One aspect of the social tragedy is that the RC church had/has no monopoly on child molestation--it might be the most public face of it, but some studies (and I don't have a handy reference) say that the most prevalent situations of molestation are schools and families.

In a more perfect world, the RC church could have tried to come clean and say, essentially, "yes, we fucked up, and we're going to clean house. We also want to help the other institutions in society clean their houses." That's obviously not what happened, and the disaster continues. I don't know how it will get fixed. I will say that if I had a child who was being molested by a priest/teacher/scout-leader, etc., I would probably take some rather direct action.

@blablarg18 said in Pope Emeritus (aka former Pope) Benedict XVI dead @ 95:

https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/ratzinger-vatican-ii
I don't know about this magazine, merely that the link turned up quickly in a search for "ratzinger theologian vatican 2".

Thanks for the link. Commonweal is a reliable source; I remember reading/citing it several times as an undergrad.

The article shows that Ratzinger was what would be considered "liberal" in the 1960's, but definitely changed his views. Those who do forensic psychology could have a field day in examining his motivation.

He will probably be remembered in LGBT circles for his 1986 letter On the Pastoral Care of Homosexual Persons (https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19861001_homosexual-persons_en.html ). On a first read of that document, people saw hope when he said that homosexual orientation might not be a choice "in certain cases," and thus the person would not be culpable for engaging in homosexual activity. Unfortunately, he went on to insist that all such activity was "objectively disordered." It's a bit like saying "you were born a bird, and thus the desire to fly is not wrong, but if you do fly, it's a sin." (This bird metaphor is admittedly an oversimplification of the interplay between the very complex topics of free will and sin.)

While I am not a member of the Catholic church, I probably have more respect for it than most LGBT people. I also respect LGBT people who have a long family and cultural rooting in Catholicism, and thus live a difficult life with one foot in each community. My first partner was among that group, and life was a challenge for him.

@blablarg18 said in Pope Emeritus (aka former Pope) Benedict XVI dead @ 95:

Reality is a vast mosaic, none of us get to see it all.

Very true! I sometimes use the metaphor of people standing in a circle around an elephant--no one person gets the full concept.

I think it would help the discussion if there were some links or references, especially when an assertion like, "As a young theologian he [Ratzinger] was the key liberal voice at the Vatican." This is not the presumed narrative, so a link to something he wrote/published in that time frame would be very useful.

@blablarg18 said in Pope Emeritus (aka former Pope) Benedict XVI dead @ 95:

I don't ... claim to know everything.

Your post suggests otherwise.

There have been many very lengthy discussion threads on this topic, and I don't want to start another one...but the most likely reason is that the copyright owner asked the site to remove the torrent, and site management complied with the request. Some studios are very thorough about finding their material and asking for it to be removed. That's their right if they are the copyright owner. This site's management is very thorough about complying with those legal requests.

It's staged. See https://pbc.xxx/wiki/Category:Czech_Gay_Fantasy_models for a listing of some of the models that worked it.

Too bad it's not real; it would be fun to visit.

@FDS2000 That's a good approach. It's a gold mine if there's a brand new freeleech torrent and you download just a few of the files, and keep the thing running. You won't be "charged" for the download, but you should get lot of upload credit. You want to keep that torrent active, which I think is what you mean when you say "keep it in my download area."

This also works for non-freeleech torrents, but you will be "charged" with the amount that you download. Whether freeleech or not, check to be sure that there are other people who are leeching the torrent. For example, I just did a search on freeleech torrents, and here's a snip of the results:

The second one could work out well for you: Notice that there are many leechers compared to seeders, and also nine files, all about 1 GB each. I'd select one, or two of those and let the system work. It doesn't matter whether you like the content or not; you're acting as a "distribution hub" for other hungry users.

I hope this works for you.

What an amusing domain name! When I first saw it, my mind went to "Lad Suck," but now I see it means "Lads UK." I wonder what that says about me...

@kalayaan The "pause" symbol in the first image over the guy's asshole is amusing. Does it mean, "stop fucking me?"

@ianfontinell said in DMCA takedowns ( Access denied!):

Likely a duplicate. If you check the full URL when you're on the torrent page you'll see that theres an identifier that saying it's a duplicate file and therefore neither you nor other members can see the torrent anymore. If it was a DMCA you would have been informed in your inbox.

This sounds right. I think the way the system works is that if a torrent is removed for being a duplicate, it isn't really taken out of the system; it just becomes invisible so that people who are leeching it can finish the file(s). It's a nice feature, because that way leechers don't get stuck with just a partial download.

The models are Ian Ivanovic (who gets fucked) and Rosta Benecky (the "hunter").

At the risk of repeating myself, I really think that we've beaten this topic to death. Before posting another item here, may I suggest that the Gentle Member re-read the preceding 200 posts, and then consider two things:

• Was my question already answered?
• Will my new post add anything to the discussion?

I think the bottom (!) line is that people upload torrents, and moderators are sometimes forced to remove some of those torrents. It has always been that way, and always will be. It's inherent in peer-to-peer file sharing.

I am thankful for members who upload things, and I am thankful for moderators who keep the site safe and available for all of us.

In the mean time,