Posts made by blablarg18

@frostycab bits you addressed to me -

"he has repeatedly and consistently sidestepped anything people ask" - if you say so; but in this very thread, I see @raphjd answering your question.

"refusing to engage with anyone who challenges his assertions beyond telling them they are liberal puppets" - ditto. In this very thread, he's engaging you quite a bit more than you just claimed.

"I was trying to say I'd like a direct answer" - But your original phrasing (now way above) was an attack, and indirect at that. Indirectly - and out of the blue - you called him farfetched, abusive, uncivilized.

So why should he give you a direct answer? What example of being direct and friendly and clean, did you set here?

Did you consider saying no more than "I'd like a direct answer here, please" ? and then letting him hang himself, if he's so bad?

This is an anonymous debating backwater, not a law court. Even IF your statements about him were facts (not just feelings) - even IF you could convict him - you do not need to convict him. Stop working so hard.

@frostycab I can't speak to your past interactions with @raphjd and don't claim to.

(Read the above, twice.)

That said: In this thread the "abuse" or implied personal insults..... are first from you.

But how can that be? How can a person claiming to be against insults & personal conflicts be the person, in this new thread, who starts dishing them?

Can people not be what they present themselves to be?

Is that even possible? Since when?

Also MTG ripping Yoel Roth, same topics, also his enabling child porn at Twitter: https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1623461360075145216

The look on his face: priceless.

https://twitter.com/DC_Draino/status/1623354955728912384

• Rep. Nancy Mace is R, but America First has always suspected her as too Uniparty / RINO
• yet here she is, ripping Vijaya Gadde a new one (head of censorship at Old Twitter)
• the topic: Mace's vaxx injuries
• & Twitter's evil (pre-Elon) censorship of vaxx discussion
• and PBS broadcast it

A sign of these topics getting mainstream.

We only need @hubrys to try George Santos as a diversion, and it'll be perfect.

More lying from @hubrys ! I have always said Santos is awful.

@raphjd this is the midwittery I was describing, in a comment to u above. Midwits are all about denying context & perspective. Anyone who restores them, is then lied about.

@raphjd Doublethink. Every year it gets cruder, more shameless.

@hubrys Lie alert! I routinely say Santos is awful - and you've seen it before.

So here you are obsessively tracking the obscure lies of some small politician - while yourself lying!

HAHAHAHAHahahaha!

Here's some whataboutism - What about your lies?

@nix54 I call bullshit. OMG but do you guzzle the propaganda!

I don't want to get "biographical" or pull credentialism, so let's leave it that I been following medical issues for decades....and 99.99% of people never heard the term SADS before 2022. And never saw athletes drop dead.

Because, before 2021-22 ie. before THE VAXXES, unexplained sudden heart stoppage in young adults happened, like, one-in-a-million per year.

Traffic accidents, drug overdoses, suicides, shootings (inner cities), rare cancers, even military deaths were always much more common in younger people.

Only in the last 2 years is heart death suddenly happening more to younger people. And hmm, how could that be?

What changed, not in 2020 mind you, but only starting in 2021?

Saying SADS has been "an acknowledged...syndrome for a long time"..... oh my dear what a piece of B.S that is!

BEEeeee....ESSsss!

What's really sad (no pun intended) is how "they" - media programmers & Sciency-y Establishment - are still refining & changing the definition of SADS, I'd say to maximize the smokescreen - the obstacles to Critical Thinking.

When the SADS propaganda term was released in 2022, at first it didn't mean traditional heart disease; it meant only these unexplainable heart deaths suddenly popping up in younger people. These frequent new mysteries.

But if you look up the SADS definition now in 2023, "they" have since changed it to cover traditional heart disease.

So that - like you @nix54 - they can now, suddenly pretend "Oh it was always with us, oh we always been talking about it. If it happened only after your vaxx, that's a coincidence. If impossible numbers of people are having these coincidences now, that's a coincidence."

Similar to what they did to the defiinition of "vaccine".

It used to mean, treatment with weakened organism creating immunity, in most people, to the real organism.

To make people swallow the mRNA shots, "they" altered the official CDC-FDA definition of vaccine to mean any sort of treatment stimulating any sort of immune reaction, whether or not that means immunity or any success at all.

Sickening.

@NF16 PS. Newsweek of all places, has a recent editorial for you: https://www.newsweek.com/its-time-scientific-community-admit-we-were-wrong-about-coivd-it-cost-lives-opinion-1776630

@NF16 Sorry but your comment did not come off as Critical Thinking. It did come off as what Mask Zombies say.

Just so you know: Critical Thinkers buck the trend and question why we were suddenly out to damage a generation of kids with these horrific lockdown, mask & vaxx mandates - who has made billion$$ from it - whether it all suspended the Constitution in essence - where it leads - etc.

For no reason - just fyi in general - also know that Critical Thinkers do NOT say things like "I Am The Science", "Follow The Science" when they want to stop questions, etc.

@nix54 I hope that response is some very deep reference or at least mis-typed. Because it says 1) we can't "know" things and shouldn't "worry" ie. try, and 2) being institutionalized by the State would be good. Disagree.

@MrMazda Remember SADS? Used to be plural of SAD, Seasonal Affective Disorder, a mild winter depression.

Then in 2022 as people noticed vaxx-related deaths, "they" (media programmers) had to invent SADS, Sudden Adult Death Syndrome, & claim it had somehow always been with us.

Time for a humor break.

Youtube Video

@raphjd "Whataboutism" is what midwits say when confronted with truth, perspective, context.

Example.

Midwit: "My neighbor had a wood fire on Christmas! Their carbon footprint is killing the planet!"

Truth-teller: "Even if CO2 mattered, what about your weekly private jet trips?"

Piercing questions, shutting up a midwit, often begin with "What about?" It's just grammar.

So the midwit goes "I are super smart person, I can say whataboutism as I plug my ears to you lalalalallalallalalalalalala!!!"

Unattractive people more likely to mask: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11702641/Unattractive-people-likely-continue-wearing-Covid-face-masks-study-suggests.html

Yes I laughed too.

But it's a real study from South Korea.

@NF16 The Danish researchers' study IS LITERALLY "experts chiming in".

Was your comment meant as a parody of the Mask Zombies?

I may struggle to detect parody sometimes.

@lololulu19 Indeed. All the masks ever did, was shift some of your airborne infectious exhale to the people on each side of you. So the person in front of you didn't get it all.

Oh and they do stop "large droplets" like spit or from coughing. But covid & flu are spread more by aerosols (your cloud of micro droplets, that masks ignore).

They don't do zero - the researchers did find a whopping 5% reduction in spread, from masking. Oh joy.

P.S. And for that: We damaged a generation of kids.

For language & social skillz, kids need to see faces. Also need in-person group activities, meaning lockdowns hurt them too.

We made a generation of kids more depressed & dysfunctional, compared to their pre-covid benchmarks.

@nix54 They took an experimental tech - something "used for two decades" except only on Stage 4 cancer patients - thus having ZERO long-term safety data for normies - and shoved it into the general public.

I'm sorry (if) you fell for it.

@MrMazda Correct - the push for these vaxx was weird.

They were never safe - from the beginning of 2021, they showed (un)safety signals that got a vaccine product banned immediately, in previous times.

And they were never effective for more than a few months per shot - except now they've driven covid evolultion (variants) forward to the point where these vaxx are ineffective and may perhaps even "boost" your chance of infection, something called negative protection.

I don't know if we've reached the tipping point where more people have died of vaxx heart damage, strokes, etc. than were "saved" by them, but we must be getting near.

@hubrys You've made me feel sorry for you.

Genuine pity.

YOU PERSONALLY are the victim of much, much, much, bigger liars & lies.

Like an autist watching the paint dry, unable to handle reality, you retreat to your Santos corner & write a list.

@MrMazda Like Hillary, the question is when doesn't Joe Biden lie? In the 1980s and 1990s, he was most famous for having skated through college on plagiarism. And for lifting others' speeches & zingers, repeating them straight-up like they were his own & people hadn't heard them days earlier. Comedians made fun of him nonstop. But nowadays, just put on the TV and watch him talk. "I brought gas prices down" - when they're nearly double Trump's. "If you take these vaxx you won't get infected". Biden would be Orwellian, if he weren't so crude & stupid. P.S. Many a little girl joining him for some photo op, has felt sexually abused by him ie. fondled or sniffed creepily in public.

@lololulu19 And the only one calling for a negotiated end to Ukraine war / stop WW3.

A fountain of common sense. It's weird.

The more so with today's libs LOVING the notion of German tanks in Ukraine to make World War with Russia.

Really. Think about it.

Parallel after parallel, falls into place.

With cosmetic changes only...mere changes of 1) flag, 2) which race libs hate, 3) iconography.

Japan gets it. https://twitter.com/i/status/1620850311995985922

@raphjd Government official.... saying get rid of some race or ethnic group.... as "the solution".

Hmm what does that remind me of?

What could it be?

Evidence #2,000,001493 that modern libs are re-branded fascists.

Actual Nazi fascists of past times said, oops our brand is dead now / we better re-brand as modernist libs, after all, we always were science-y progressive socialists. Only thing we gotta change is, which race we hate.

There's books on it.