Topics created by blablarg18

@blablarg18

I agree with Trump, mostly.

I support "social transition", after a clear and proper diagnosis for young people.

Unlike Trump (he supports it at 18, from memory), I only support physical transitions after they turn 25, since that's when liberals tell us the brain is fully developed.

@blablarg18

This is why liberals stopped using equality and changed to equity.

They want to be virtuous bigots.

@blablarg18

The Guardian is competing with the Metro for being the UK's farthest left rag.

More hetero-child rapists who claim Trans.

It's a trend. Why?

Incentives. They can get special treatment.

That must end, so these guys can be in prison while real Trans simply live their lives.

https://reduxx.info/norway-two-trans-identified-males-convicted-for-gang-rape-of-young-girl-claim-transgender-status-and-erectile-dysfunction-in-defense/

Peterson was so weak, people ask if Jubillee selected him to ensure pro-atheist outcome. 🤡 🤣

USA CDC no longer recommends covid vaxx for kids, pregnant women.

https://www.foxnews.com/health/cdc-removes-covid-vaccine-recommendation-healthy-children-pregnant-women

Big win.

"Last year, the Biden administration urged healthy children to get yet another COVID shot, despite the lack of any clinical data to support the repeat booster strategy in children," said Kennedy in the video, in which he appears alongside FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya.

"That ends today — it's common sense and it's good science," Bhattacharya added.

It's common sense because, at population level (most kids - set aside special cases), kids have much more trouble from covid vaxx - as seen above - than from covid infection.

Or as RFKJ said: -NO DATA- exists to show that kids, at population level, benefit from jab.

Hippocratic Oath, "First do no harm" - with experimental gene therapy jabs. Especially not to kids.

Special cases can still get jab. It's not banned. Just not to be pushed.

Elias Rodriguez leaked chat: he calls for "genocide" of White people, after forced "rehabilitation".

Libs!

32897305-07bf-447f-9e21-834a0bc1274c-image.png

@blablarg18

The same thing happened in the UK. It started out fine, then expanded by the courts. The government pulled back some, which helped.

@raphjd Like that time CNN & James Okeefe both forgot to blur someone's street number, but only one got banned. (guess which)

Another HUGE liar on Biden: Gen. Mark Milley.

video - https://x.com/i/status/1927451904604315726

When does it become criminal?

& what else does Milley lie his ass off, about? (cough, J6)

a5500e70-bf26-4317-8823-f43119bd06e8-image.png

@blablarg18

Liberals are freaks.

Maybe this is "back to normal" like, would they do it for Bush or Obama? But NO WAY, for Biden or Kamabla.

Again I don't know what to make of it except, something happened. Something's up.

video - https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114527080758877004

72f04d30-a3d4-4f39-bf3d-226720c8e5a1-image.png

video - https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114527074463010521

1b1637a7-d384-4e58-9b04-bc331a7b07b4-image.png

Russia economy: At last, it struggles.

https://www.newsweek.com/russia-inflation-gdp-growth-2031744

If you just thought "Hahahaha - hurts Trump!" - You're retarded.

But if you thought "Lower oil price works. & it's interesting, how fast Trump has brought about lower oil price" - You might be smart.

Biden policies only drove Russia, China & Iran together. As Biden helped Russia & Iran, with "green" policy that raised oil price & their incomes.

When you're against oil & energy, you restrict supply & price goes up. When you relax or "drill baby drill", price goes back down.

Since Jan 20, Trump pro-energy policy has got oil from $80 down to $62.

& yes that may be read as genuine (not fake) anti-Russia policy & anti-Iran.

1f02fe71-2f7c-45b2-9277-2011a5150146-image.png

@Rapsey-0 Thank you for proving my point. MAP advocates need "safe space" because you got nothing that endures scrutiny.

Only "safe space" audience - others as insane morally, as MAP advocates are - could give you the type of discussion that you appear to want, where MAP wins.

Ancient proverb, "The wicked flee where none pursue"

@ianfontinell-0 tldr;

I did skim 2-3 paragraphs and you appeared to be constructing Air Castle that didn't reply to my position.

Which is fine, except, if you did intend to reply to me: Rethink, be shorter & more solid.

Ethically - not legally, as laws can be wrong - but ethically - crimes -by definition- are actions which have victims. Such as murder, rape, theft & child exploitation.

& actions which are victimless, like adult-consent sexuality, homo, hetero, bi group whatever - -by definition- of being victimless, ethically they cannot be crimes.

As to desire: Desire for crime is not crime - except - it is lowlife or skeezy & if indulged long enough, leads to crime ie. you do it eventually.

This new idea "Oh look how nobly MAP struggle against their impulses" - Complete bullshit.

100%, crazed, ridiculous bullshit. Absurd.

Because 1. Most don't. Most find ways to indulge their feelings, including that 2. Sooner or later, they do act - do exploit kids.

& to exploit kids, who can't meaningfully consent, is rape.

(remember lib movements for #BelieveAllWomen #MeToo - but libs won't do #BelieveAllKids ??? 👽 )

& homo/hetero makes no difference; check on post number 1, where HETERO child rape, is what I criticized. (& ruffled your feathers)

"South Africa Proposes to Amend Racial Quotas Blocking Starlink in Country"

https://www.breitbart.com/africa/2025/05/23/south-africa-proposes-to-amend-racial-quotas-to-allow-elon-musks-starlink/

The South African government published a draft regulation Friday allowing foreign companies to meet a 30% quota of black ownership through “equivalents” such as investing in projects aimed at economic equality.

The proposal is widely viewed as an attempt to remove a key hurdle that has prevented Elon Musk and his Starlink satellite Internet company from entering the South African market because of Musk’s white race.

Musk has stated on numerous occasions that he is prevented from doing business in his native South Africa because he is not black. What he means is that unless his company has 30% black ownership under South Africa’s Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) laws and regulations, it cannot operate. Musk would have to sell a 30% stake to a black investor; in South Africa, such stakes are typically given to ruling party members. [ed: classic commie-oligarchs]

Rich.

Fact is: Blacks of South Africa need Whites of South Africa, or else there's nothing there to confiscate.

Lots of stories where they confiscate farms....."wait! they seized them legally with zero compensation! you can't call that confiscation!" says USA lib media 🙄 ......... but anyway......... farm fails & produces nothing, because new South Africa Black owner had no idea what work that farm was or how to do it.

Me, I want race-blind society with race-blind property rights, Free Speech & Honest Elections to repair abuses.

@blablarg18

Libs believe whatever suits their agenda at the time.

Libs used to be against illegal immigration until Trump came down the golden escalator. Now they love illegals.