Posts made by blablarg18

@raphjd But I'm gonna say, systemic racism is real - just 100% opposite of what libs claim.

Black Privilege - which is real - was largely created by by Whites. (Libs)

It's gaslighting - encourages targeted group to freak out & be bad people. It's anti-Black racism, created by White libs who do 'pro-Black' as evil game for their own amusement & power, like in horror movie Get Out.

In USA, since 1960s libs targeted Black communities & families for destruction.

• Dole programs.... raised single Black moms from 25% to around 60%.... and Pres Johnson has quote, where admits he wanted to lock in Black vote & cared about nothing else.

• Abortion.... racist Margaret Sanger made Planned Parenthood to target Black communities. & super-easy abortion is literal family destruction.

• Drugs.... Libs love drugs. But it's known that USA elites in bed with drug cartels, pushed worst drugs into Black communities, horribly on purpose.

• Affirmative Action, especially as it devolved into DEI (Didn't Earn It), CRT, Woke, quotas, Defund The Police etc.... hurt Blacks with "racism of low expectations" or again, the gaslighting insane racism of Black Privilege.

Things beloved by libs, but combined, they created a subset of Blacks who are 3rd World-feral. Haiti-like.

That's systemic racism - & White libs made it.

Doctors & scienticians are baffled. Baffled!

What could possibly cause worldwide rise in cancers amongst young people?

not since 2020 mind you (covid time).........but only since 2021 (vaxx time)? WHAT??????????

OK - CA & Newsom repealed AB 2098 in Oct 2023, after legal challenges threatened to overturn it.

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2023/10/02/2753112/0/en/In-NCLA-Victory-Gov-Newsom-Repeals-California-Law-Censoring-Doctors-Covid-19-Medical-Advice.html

Back to FDA topic - well - you can't fault Dr. Pierre Kory who takes victory lap

@raphjd Looking for update on CA law - it may have been partly reversed.

I do recall, Newsom signed it with the usual empty hand-wringing, where he says "this could affect Free Speech & Medical Privacy" then goes ahead.

Under that CA law, a doctor could have his license stripped for saying things that CDC later endorses. Yup.

Example - if a doctor said "covid is just another respiratory virus, no big deal" - he would have been pilloried for "misinformation" in the four calendar years 2020-23, only to see CDC reverse & admit same in fifth year, 2024. (https://community.gaytorrent.ru/topic/64479/cdc-admits-covid-is-just-another-respiratory-virus)

This one's twisty, here is a summary.

• USA FDA, Food & Drug Administration, is supposed to test claims of safety & effectiveness, but NOT give medical orders

• 2021 FDA's famous "Stop It" propaganda tweet against ivermectin, could be reasonably taken as medical order

• FDA was brought to court about it....and, so to speak, agreed to Stop It

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24495557-fda-stipulation-of-dismissal

https://www.ntd.com/fda-settles-ivermectin-case-agrees-to-remove-controversial-stop-it-post_981178.html

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has agreed to remove social media posts and webpages that urged people to stop taking ivermectin to treat COVID-19, according to a settlement dated March 21.

The FDA has already removed a page that said: “Should I take ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19? No.”

Within 21 days, the FDA will remove another page...

FDA can continue to say:

“The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals,”

...because of course they haven't. Not FDA job. Never was.

It's up to prescribing doctors. Anyone with a serious medical condition knows, good doctors prescribe "off-label" medications ie. medications with a different or unintended use, for a specific patient - and it's nobody's business. Surely not FDA business.

Reading tea leaves.... Very SMALL signs of how people react....

but.... like Nordstream 2 attack before, things do not look great for USA-Ukraine.

First - Reported vids of killers being captured:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1771494597690069371

Russians are indeed angry. You could still say these lower-level Russians are deceived. But in any case: they take attack seriously, they believe in what they do.

Also: Note how killers tried to escape. Not suicide. They meant to live. Which probably rules out ISIS.

Next - Putin did better job of looking somber, tired & resolute after attack, than "smirky Bibi" did with Oct. 7. Putin might be better actor. OR, who knows, could his outrage be real?

Nothing proven here, but picture leans a bit toward: Hired Tajiks, non-ISIS, did 'real' attack ie. not false flag.

Next - pundits who I've found to be well-sourced in the past, say things like this:

Whoever was behind the terrorist attack in Russia yesterday, the operation was botched. They were not supposed to be captured. These Tajiks are giving up everything

We'll see.

Next, it seems that 3 weeks ago, Sneaky Toria Nuland - in charge of USA-Ukraine efforts against Russia for decades, until very recently - said this:

With this money, Ukraine will be able to accelerate the asymmetric warfare that has been most effective on the battlefield. As I said in Kiev three weeks ago, this supplemental funding will ensure Putin faces some nasty surprises on the battlefield this year...

https://twitter.com/i/status/1771506099738358012

Timeline:
Feb 25 - NYT reports on CIA-Ukraine cells
Feb 28 - Nuland promises 'nasty surprises'
Mar 5 - Nuland resigns
Mar 7 - USA embassy says, extremist attack on Moscow concert hall (yes specific) due 'in 48 hours'
it does NOT happen in 48 hours..... but then
Mar 22 - (Sh)It happens

Again - we'll see - but for now, it could smell like CIA-Ukraine hired these Tajiks, under Nuland's general guidance/wish.

@jaroonn ....said Azov Nazi Retard, in 3 empty non-responses, THREE, a new record for ANR's deflective, jealous & slow-witted pique

Death toll rises to 150, including people who died from smoke as shooters set fire to block escape.

Russia arrests 11, including 4 shooters.

In Russia's story, they appear to be Tajiks (could be Muslim) with physical support from Ukraine.

You can say Russia lies or maybe allowed attack, except then you are conspiracy theorist, literally you theorize conspiracy.

Again - "you can" - it may be fine - some conspiracy theories are truth. I only describe territory.

Video going around: https://twitter.com/i/status/1771492890230804841

Alleged shooter says, a "preacher" (Muslim? Ukie Orthodox? Some intel agency's faker?) offered him $11K on Telegram, to shoot people.

I don't vouch for anything, who knows what is real nowadays.

What Russia says:

️As a result of the actions of the special services and law enforcement agencies, 11 people have been detained, including four terrorists who took direct part in the attack at "Crocus". Further efforts are being made to identify the support network.

️After carrying out the attack, the criminals attempted to escape, moving by car towards the Russian-Ukrainian border.

️Due to the coordinated actions of law enforcement agencies, all four terrorists were detained within a few hours in the Bryansk region. They are currently being transported to Moscow.

️Efforts are ongoing to uncover all the circumstances of the attack. It has already been established that the attack was carefully planned. The weapons used by the terrorists had been prepared in advance in a cache.

️After the attack, the criminals intended to cross the Russian-Ukrainian border and had the necessary contacts on the Ukrainian side.

️The investigation into the attack continues.

So far off point.... Azov Nazi Retard, at work again.

"you suddenly admit racism exists" - Nope. Have fought racism for years.

You either know, or ought to, that my gripe with Woke DEI, CRT, Antifa (white) & BLM is their insane racism.

I'm anti-racist my whole life.

Meanwhile you fail to deal with substance - as always - after your usual pointless post #29 on verge of your ragequit #50.

"conservatives often either say it doesn't. or it only exists when Whites get the short straw" - Wrong again.

I post at length, about Blacks who get short straw. So does Charlie Kirk / TPUSA & several others.

Right here, this thread, have pointed out YOUR LIB RACISM that gives Black dude short straw.

HAHAHAHAHAhahahahhahahaha you utterly retarded clown.

Maybe, some day penny will drop for you @jaroonn , about what utter racist & retard you became.

Meanwhile: You leapt in to comment on a video that, by your own admission, you "didn't listen to" ie. knew nothing of. It said this:

Black dude: You don't think I would know what a racist is?
White lib: ..... (stunned.... then) ..... I would think you would, but you're deluded.

Indefensible.

Yet you defended racist when u asked this question as rhetoric:

Black people cannot be deluded and if they are and you are White you can't call them out on it?

RACIST. Either by Woke standards - your own standards - which would tell you Yes - OR, if u discard Woke standards as I do, then because you reinforce & approve White-lib racist's shameful conduct.

@jaroonn Apologize for your racism!

It's funny because this is BLM guy who got his start by claiming to be Black - falsely (he's White).

"Less than one day after converting, King announced a multi-city speaking tour with $1,000 VIP tickets...[but is now] disinvited from a Ramadan [CAIR] event in Minneapolis"

https://thepostmillennial.com/shaun-king-disinvited-as-cair-minnesota-keynote-speaker-after-muslim-community-slams-him-as-a-grifter-for-converting-to-islam

It's not worth it to link anybody because everyone has political color for their agenda.

CIA, Biden Regime & other anti-Russians say, Ukraine had nothing to do with it! Nothing!! Russia did it to themselves, false flag!

But they already said that with Nordstream 2 attack. (& failed; CIA/Ukraine obvs did NS2)

Some neutral-posing media say, ISIS claims responsibility - so ISIS - except Putin was so quick to console victims! Too quick!

Also, ISIS "claims responsibility" for a lot of stuff that wasn't ISIS - whether because they're egomaniacs, or because OTHERS want to deflect/project blame onto ISIS. (See: Las Vegas mass shooting)

Some point out that USA State Department had to have known about attack in advance, since it recently warned USA peeps to stay away from large events in Russia. So what did USA know?

And weeks ago, some predicted that Ukraine/CIA - being defeated - would obvs go to terror attacks on Russia soil - in someone else's name of course, always point finger elsewhere.

Long story short: take your pick. Whatever.

@raphjd Timing of this... wonder if it relates to piece that OMG (aka James OKeefe) just did, on Aidan Grey (aka Jason Beck) ?

OKeefe went on gay dates with this Pentagon middle manager... got him to blab his lib-extremist views........ plus fact that he'd had "bottom surgery....[now] the plumbing is different".

Guy was proverbial "dummy with a security clearance."

no surprise. ACLU went commie-lib a long time ago.

Still, here it is.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/22/us/politics/aclu-employee-fired-race-bias.html

• Katherine Oh is Asian woman, worked there for years
• often accused fellow ACLU-ers of sexism, misogyny, sexual abuse etc
• after some years, ACLU fired her
• parties go to administrative court (NLRB)
• ACLU admits her comments showed NO overt racism, yet says she "seriously hurt" Black colleagues
• judge-only trial in DC just ended
• judge will rule in a few months

Says, New York Times:

The [ACLU] defense - arguing for an expansive definition of what constitutes racist or racially coded speech - has struck some labor and free-speech lawyers as peculiar, since the organization has traditionally...operat[ed] on the principle that it may not like what someone says, but will fight for their right to say it...
[ACLU argued in court,] it was irrelevant [that] Ms. Oh bore no racist ill will; [only relevant] that her Black colleagues were...injured.

Fun.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1770719122617229633

"What unfair advantages do white people have in your force?"

Knox: "None"

Lee: "Then how can it be institutionally racist?"

Knox: "Um…sorry…I might need to get back to you."

Here is dialogue again. Let it sink in.

Black dude: You don't think I would know what a racist is?
White lib: ..... (stunned.... then) ..... I would think you would, but you're deluded.

@jaroonn Hey Azov Nazi Retard - you defended White lib's side of dialogue with this:

Black people cannot be deluded and if they are and you are White you can't call them out on it?

Which was retarded since your own, racist WOKE RULES do say that. Yes.

BUT - If you threw it without knowledge of the debate video - if you "didn't listen" as you NOW claim - well....... Knowledge-free leap, to comment where you had no knowledge & shouldn't comment, is just what Azov Nazi Retard, would do.

@jaroonn ...ANR said to mirror

@jaroonn Oh all of it is true.

In this thread, in front of any reader who scrolls up, you defended this video:

Black dude: You don't think I would know what a racist is?
White lib: ..... (stunned.... then) ..... I would think you would, but you're deluded.

Eat shit, Azov Nazi Retard.

@jaroonn ...said ANR to mirror

(in case you missed it in your slow-witted torpor.... ANR since you are, Azov Nazi Retard...... you defend what's reprehensible, like child-porn books in school, dictators who hug neo-Nazis then cancel elections, & here this thread, Whites who lecture Blacks on who's racist & call them 'deluded' if answer isn't what Whitie wanted to hear - which you probably do IRL)