@djhf2021-0 I'm afraid not. Already, majority of Americans think Bragg indicting Trump would be an "outrageous abuse of power".
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/poll-trump-indictment-da/2023/03/27/id/1114003/
Also, I daresay you're missing the narrative logic - where public opinion would kinda-hafta go AFTER indictment.
For starters, an indicted Trump wins the GOP nomination almost automatically.
Any trial (the consequence of indicting) would bring out the full evidence in a 2-sided format.
Many normies (people who believe the ultra-one-sided media) would then grapple with the proverbial "other side of the story", for the first time, moving a good chunk of them toward Trump.
We've seen it before. Every time Trump gets into a legit 2-sided format, he can finally expose normies to his side & he comes out better for it. EVERY time. He thrives on it.
Which is why Dems prefer stacked committees a.k.a. kangaroo courts, de-platforming, cancel culture, censorship etc. Trump's key move is always to escape them, get his story to people direct.
But anyway, next Trump would sell himself to Independents as a persecuted underdog.
If that works.... GOP + Independents = a majority, ie., if (or when) Trump gets both of those on his side, Dem opinions cease to matter.
And that's with 46% of Dems(!) already agreeing, along with clear majorities of Independents & GOP making up a majority overall, that Bragg indicting Trump would be an "outrageous abuse of power".