@raphjd said in Cake gender - more liberal insanity:
And back to the topic.
How does an admittedly non-gender gender make you trans?
Ya'll fucked in the head.
You're fixated on this subject, and it just makes you look silly.
@raphjd said in Cake gender - more liberal insanity:
And back to the topic.
How does an admittedly non-gender gender make you trans?
Ya'll fucked in the head.
You're fixated on this subject, and it just makes you look silly.
You are such a juvenile! If we all admit that there is, and always has been, some amount of vote fraud, you want to explode that into the Russian KGB message of "you can't trust elections".
When we point out that the fraud found for the past 50+ years of Presidential elections (as far back as reasonable records go), that the fraud that has been detected has been statistically insignificant to the result, you scream that we don't care about fraud.
When we point out that fraud in 2020 was generally on BOTH SIDES, and generally speaking, perpetrated by individuals, not massively coordinated groups of people, you claim that's because we overlook (or refuse to look) at "all the evidence" from the 2020 election.
I have news for you... PEOPLE HAVE LOOKED! Even your own, hand-picked, "auditors" (who were wholly unqualified to act in that capacity) found NO EVIDENCE of "massive fraud" - and came back with AZ vote counts that TOOK AWAY Trump votes!
You are the same idiots who think that Drs and Scientists from around the world got together in a perverse experiment to fraudulently claim that COVID-19 was dangerous (lethal to many)... it was all a HOAX - intended to cost Trump the election (which, I might add, WAS a major contributor to his surprise loss, but certainly not the CAUSE!). "Don't trust the Dr's" --- no, instead trust that guy whose background and expertise is so amazing he warrants his own YouTube Channel! (Those are hard to come by! You gotta meet some REALLY HUGE criteria there... as I understand it tho, you do NOT actually have to have a heartbeat tho... so, there's that...)
@raphjd said in Cake gender - more liberal insanity:
As the TikTok crazy says, "cake gender" is not about gender.
It's not about gender, despite using it in the name "cake gender" and considering themselves trans.
++++
Before our resident troll arrives to spew his shit, let's not forget his extreme transphobia.
He loves to misgender me and after 15 years to the contrary, he believes that men can't have periods and get pregnant.
Thanks for the mindful seeding of my thoughts...
I just wish you spoke Spanish or French, or some other latin-based language... they apply gender to almost everything! (English is, for those unaware, germanic, not latin-based).
What's more trans-phobic? Including trans people in discussions of LGBTQ+ issues, but not force-feeding trans issues into every possible discussion? Or forcing trans-issues into every possible non-trans-related discussion?
And "gyrl" - I swap your gender pronouns from time to time the way people in gay culture have for more decades than you or I have been alive!
There's a WORLD of difference between calling your queen-bee self a "shee-devil" and forcing you to use a specific bathroom, or insisting you identify as a gender that you don't belong to.
BTW: More than trans people, I fight for the rights of the tiny-minority of intersex people!
@hottie124 said in US State Department says there are only 2 genders:
@raphjd How, specifically, would you have redone their statement?
He wouldn't - you see, there is some context here: some time ago, @raphjd said some things about trans people that some others took issue with (not really me, I just thought he showed himself to be clueless about actual trans people - but he directs ALL his ire to me, so I took up the cause! Mostly because of his childish overreaction to the whole thing - which this posting is perfectly in line with...)
What do I mean? LOL
He was called a trans-phobe, and he pulled a Donald Trump-like "I'm the least trans-phobic person in the whole world, I love trannies" kind of response out of his ass. (NOTE: You will never catch @raphjd admit to an error, or apologize... Again, like Trump, it's just not in his armory!)
So now, any statement that references people, but fails to specifically include trans-people, is a trans-phobic moment for him! He seems to think that calling everything not trans-inclusive (specifically & literally) trans-phobic, will somehow "fix" is faux pas. (Instead, it constantly brings it back up!)
My grandfather taught me young: "Son, when you make a mistake, admit it, own it, and get past it. That way it'll die and be forgotten. Otherwise, it just might stick to you and hold you back for the rest of your life!" Good advise in the 1970's, and equally good today, IMHO!
@raphjd should have just let it die... now, he can't let it go!
@Kekkaishi said in Potential problem with ssd boot drive:
@bi4smooth I understand what you're saying. But the problem I see here is that I'm not one to invest on a new computer unless I absolutely must. I have no problem buying a brand-new computer (I also have the means), but as I already mentioned, it's very difficult for me to assemble my "dream" computer right now (shortages), and as it seems for the foreseeable future as well. So unless this computer dies beyond repair, I will not buy "old-new" computer
" when "last year's tech" is a fraction of the price, and only marginally less powerful "
can you suggest me a powerful build that I can most likely buy right now? I am not that tech savvy, but I know the enough imo.
as I mentioned before, money is not an issue, and I will consider it - go wild - only if you want to of courseBut thanks for the concern. as long as my files are backed up, I really don't care (but somewhat do) what happens to the computer physically
If it were my system, I'd probably wait to see if it glitches again... depending on the UPS you have your system plugged into, it could also have been caused by power fluctuations... or a dozen other rare things... without a system log, or the ability to visually inspect the MB, it's all conjecture (this is me talking, not my tech)
Believe me, I LIVE by the mantra: if it AIN'T broke, DON'T fix it! 
@raphjd said in US State Department says there are only 2 genders:
On Armed Forces Day (21 May 2021), the US State Department tweeted this;
Today on Armed Forces Day, we celebrate the women and men who bravely serve across all branches in the United States military. We are grateful for their dedication and service to the American people.
I see - so, I can't say "Thanks to Apple Growers out there, for all the delicious food!"
Instead I have to say: "Thank you to the growers of each of the following fruits:
Gala
Red Delicious
Fuji
Granny Smith
Honeycrisp
Golden Delicious
McIntosh
Pink Lady
Braeburn
Ambrosia
Bramley
Charles Ross
Crispin
Early Victoria
Early Worcester
Ellisons Orange
Epicure
Gibsons Scarlet
Golden Spire
Greensleaves
Howgate Wonder
Ingrid Marie
James Grieve
Jonagored
Jupiter
Katy
Orleans Reinette
Peasgood Nonsuch
Red Gravenstein
Red Victoria
Rev W. Wilks
Ribston Pippin
Rosemary Russett
Spartan
Sturmer Pippin
Sunset
Superb
Tydermans Late Orange
Warners King
Winston
..."
I could go on - there are over 7,000 varieties of Apples around the world...
So, if I say "I love Apple Pie", please forgive me, growers of Granny Smith Apples, but I mean to say that I love "Braeburn Apple Pie", and the rest of you Apple Growers can go fuck yourselves...
Or, maybe, just a thought, sometimes we could have words or phrases in the English Language, that mean a WHOLE CATEGORY of things - all at once!
For example: "Men and Women" could include, cis-gender, trans-gender, and even hermaphrodite, inter-sex, and even eunichs! And even THAT is just a partial list! ... all without having to name each one, separately!
OMG - consider, just for a moment, how much easier that would make our language!
You know how when you buy a new car, all of a sudden you see that car .... EVERYWHERE!
Or, if you have a scary experience with a spider, all of a sudden, you see spiders... EVERYWHERE!
Or, if you get called out for being a transphobe, you suddenly see transphobia in EVERYTHING!
@Kekkaishi said in I don't like bubble butts, at all. Anyone else?:
@bi4smooth well I LOVE hairy butts and holes. In general I love hairy men, I guess in some way this explains my butt preferences
vive la différence!! 
@Kekkaishi said in Potential problem with ssd boot drive:
Thank you both for replying
All of my important files are backed up to the cloud. other files and folders are located at different hard drives. Basically I keep the ssd for the operating system and installed programs, so I should be find in that regard (for the most part)I will however do as @eobox91103 suggested and turn off the computer and unplug it for a few minutes.
@bi4smooth To your point about upgrading the computer, I don't do that. I actually tried to assemble a new computer a few months ago, but due to components shortages I couldn't assemble my desired pc build. (covid)
I may do a fresh install of the os, it's just a pain in the butt....
I'm sorry, but my tech is adamant that this isn't likely a software issue, but rather a hardware one - the reason is because the restart didn't fix it (which resets all of the software), but a reboot/power cycle did (which resets the hardware).
If you still suspect an OS issue, rather than do a re-install, open an elevated command prompt (CMD or PS) and run the command "sfc /scannow" - it tells MS Windows to scan all of the installed OS files for corruptions.
Oh, and we (my tech and I) were not suggesting you upgrade components - only someone reasonably experienced with computer hardware should do that. No, we were suggesting a "new" (not brand new) system entirely. Because an 8 y/o motherboard that has been powered on for most of those 8-years is VERY likely to have bulging capacitors, which affects the voltages on the MB. And if you're going to replace the MB, you should consider that 8 y/o RAM is likely DDR3 at best, so upgrading the whole package makes more sense. So long as you're not paying top-dollar for CURRENT tech, when "last year's tech" is a fraction of the price, and only marginally less powerful.
Just saying...
And I'm not saying you NEED to do this - it's just that you asked for an expert's opinion - and that's my guy's opinion, and he's making $125k/yr fixing desktops today!
@Kekkaishi said in I don't like bubble butts, at all. Anyone else?:
I sometimes hear that the "perfect" butt is a bubble butt, but I strongly disagree. For me it's just not appealing. The more bubble butt you have the more unappealing you are to me. The way I see it is too feminine - it very much depends though on how you define "bubble", but seeing all the self proclaimed bubble butt owners on the web, I don't find it attractive
Now, give me some regular butt and shove it on my face!
I am particularly fond of "skinny" butts (aka: "no butt" butts!) myself! ESPECIALLY if it is smooth (I detest HAIRY butts! ewww... I don't even like typing it out!) LOL
I am a computer professional with over 30 years experience. I owned a computing services company that included desktop support, and I asked one of my old techs about this... his comments are (summarizing):
@fromdecatur said in Short film Atraccion:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PugsnBRfQso
Short film on youtube posted by the director. I liked it a year ago but it didn't have English subtitles back then. I thought it was worth wider viewing so am suggesting it here.
What an excellent short film!
When I was younger, I fell in love with a woman (I've always been pansexual, though I haven't always self-labeled myself with that term)... when I married her and had a child with her, ALL of my gay friends dropped me like a hot potato!
I got really mad at one and called him a "hypocrite worse than Jimmy Swaggart (a televangelist who was about to be outed in 1988, but went on live TV and tearfully "confessed his sins" - albeit without details, so the nature of his "sins" remained secret for some time).
I told him something akin to "you insist that the world accept you as you are: gay, because God made you that way... yet you insist that I deny who God made ME to be so that I can fit into your closed-minded narrative! No thank you!"
We never spoke again... I had thought of him as a good, close friend... I am sorry it ended that way, but my now-ex wife and I had 12+ GOOD years together (of 15 total years of marriage).
If you care, I'm currently seeing a man - a gay man - who understands that my ATTRACTION to some women is no different than my attraction to some men. What matters is that I remain devoted to HIM, have sex with only HIM, and do not actively tempt myself to stray... those are actions, not attractions! (I can control my actions, but I cannot control my attractions!)
@kalayaan said in Star Trek Discovery TV Series:
Maybe I must be one of the very very very few who likes spoiler alert and I am not even joking
Did you mean that you like spoilers? I too like spoilers... sometimes, if I'm having a hard time staying engaged in something, I'll read the imbd entries, or other reviews - specifically to see if it's worth continuing to watch! (Sometimes, it isn't!!! That's how I dropped Discovery part-way thru Season 1!!)
@eobox91103 said in Star Trek Discovery TV Series:
@Dracula975 Thanks very much. I did some checking and it seems that I can get this material on Discovery + with an Amazon Fire Stick, which should plug into my smart-but-dumb TV.
I will be honest - I have been a live-long Trekker (re-watching TOS episodes for YEARS before TNG finally came out!).
I gave up on Discovery near the end of Season 1 (like I said, I detest these "multiverse" themes to "at a whim" just remake the environment where your story takes place). My path BACK to Discovery came through SNW (Strange New Worlds - the newest - and IMHO, best of the reboots so far, save for TNG).
I also enjoy Picard - I'm just starting Season 2...
Oh, and CBS All Access became Paramount+ (they wanted to be able to stream Paramount movies and other non-CBS TV network content too, so they re-named it and raised the rates! Boo!)
@raphjd said in Recent Shooting Being HIDDEN by the MEDIA:
I'm guessing you never watch conservative media. If you did, you would know that conservatives have been calling out white supremacists. Of course, liberal media will never tell you that.
Biden completely ignored the victims and families of the christmas parade terror attack because the terrorist was a black supremacist, who killed whites.
Indeed - let's all pity the poor white people - the REAL victims of all of the modern injustices!
Reference: https://community.gaytorrent.ru/post/294794
Another thing I REALLY liked about the writers on Discovery, was slipping in 20th Century Earth cultural references...
For example, in one of the final episodes, a Star Fleet official wryly remarks "It’s nice that they’re all so eager for a three-hour tour outside the galaxy."
No one there gets the reference, and he smooths it over by simply calling it a "figure of speech"... which actually confuses more of them...
Being raised with Gilligan's Island re-runs on our local UHF stations as I grew up, I found this hysterically funny. My 38 y/o son also laughed out loud over it... but my 21 y/o daughter (also a trekker) didn't get it! And when I explained it, she was like "so?"
There are also MULTIPLE references to Alice in Wonderland (actually, several of Lewis Carrol's works) throughout!
I would assume that, eventually, the .ru domains will die... at which time, any torrents who are using the .ru tracker will also stop functioning - well, at least stop functioning with the tracker!
Some others here have surmised correctly that I am a computer professional IRL... I have explained SO MANY TIMES how torrenting works - and how the ACTUAL xfer of data is NOT "through" the tracker, but rather from seeder's PC to leecher's PC... directly! Thus, "torrenting" is a P2P technology (peer-to-peer), and NOT a "client/server" one.
... except that the tracker here is private... so if you want to be "introduced" to the people with the porn you like, you have to be registered with the tracker... Also, so that they can "keep an eye on you" (as-in are you playing fair, not anything beyond that), they assign you a random-ish "key" value that makes all the data you send or receive. I have no idea how specific it gets, but from an outsiders view, it appears very little... best guess, they know how much data you've transferred - not to whom, and not for which torrent.
That "key" information, as well as the address of the tracker, are embedded into the .torrent files you download from the website. Files downloaded from the .ru website will use the .ru tracker, and the .rent site will use the .rent tracker. The data on both appears to be the same, so an educated guess here: they share a database and site source folder in some way.
So, since we've recently re-launched the service at a new domain name (.rent vs .ru), it is safe to assume that all of your currently seeding torrents using the .ru domain SHOULD be re-downloaded with the .rend domain to ensure their long-lasting presence here. ESPECIALLY true for your uploads!
So, I thought I'd re-start this discussion, though not so much as in how it fits into Star Trek as a whole, but instead on the LGBTQ+ themes throughout.
DO NOT READ if you haven't watched through Season 4, as I make no qualms about revealing plot lines here! SPOILER ALERT!
To start, I am a huge Star Trek fan, I have been (when much younger) to more than a few conventions (tho not in DECADES now), and find something to enjoy in all of the spin-offs. I'm REALLY enjoying the "Strange New Worlds" that has newly arrived - especially with the return of episodic television! But this is about Discovery...
That said, here are some things I hated about the first 4 seasons of Discovery:
But what I really wanted to talk about here were the efforts this version of Star Trek has taken to be "inclusive" in casting.
Honestly, though, especially when they popped Stacey Abrams on us as the President of Earth, I originally found the casting to be laughable and obvious - an about-face to standard casting! All the best, smartest (non-crazy, anyway), most important human characters were black women or gay men! (Save for 1 Admiral in the future...)
BUT - when I stepped back and considered this, I changed my opinion and NOW think "turn about is fair play" - not having white men in charge, or in any real "leadership" (or "hero") capacity is for me now (as a white male) what people of color and LGBTQ+ people (ok, like me) have been exposed to since the dawn of television!
So, please comment below - assuming you've watched the show - about the LGBTQ+ characters in Discovery - what you liked and didn't like about their storylines, or the casting, or whatever... I'm curious to hear how others feel...
@didigb said in Condom or Bareback?:
Since I've been on prep, it's bareback all the time. Sex feels so much better and I really get turned on by cumming inside some guy's ass
I agree - I prefer cumming deep inside my guy... but whether that's bareback or in a condom is not of major import... it's that feeling of thrusting and pulsing deep inside him that is so satisfying. For me.
I too am on PReP - and I'm mostly a top. I like to think of PReP as giving us control of our own level of protection vs. depending on (trusting) another. And I respect others' choices on how they protect THEMselves... so, when I encounter a partner who wants condoms, I comply.
Mind you - I am speaking for myself - I do not mean to imply others should (or must) do as I do, or feel as I feel.
If you strongly prefer bareback - and your partners agree to it - it's all good! Just so long as you aren't being deceitful (as in: telling someone who wants/demands condoms that you're using one, when you aren't (really) doing so.)
I know others have had minor issues, but no one (else) has had a complete failure..
For those torrents you already have - and WERE seeding - try re-downloading the .torrent file. Remember, the .torrent file you get from the site has the (new) tracker information embedded into it. If you changed your passkey, that will ALSO be fixed by re-downloading the .torrent file from the site.
Good luck!
@raphjd said
And she calls ME a troll!
Any more conspiracy theories you want to push out?
BTW: If every single person in a retirement home in GA were to have voted for Trump - in GA (a race that was statistically close) - Trump still loses GA by thousands of votes... not as wide a margin, but a loss (and a humiliating one, at that! GA was always predictably RED!)
The assumption that these residents all voted Democrat is laughable - it's just as likely that they were "assisted" by Trumpites as Bidenites!
And it would've been wrong - in both instances... I know you'll conflate my argument that this DOES NOT support your theory that Trump's loss was due to fraud, with the absurd notion that there was NO fraud! There was! We've found it! But, unlike your biased view, the REAL enforcement agencies have found that what fraud WAS there was pretty much evenly distributed - Republican and Democrat. In other words, statistically insignificant noise.
But statistics are a kind of science... and to Trumpites, Science is bad
Funny: you (Trumpites) will decry the vaccines, eschewing them because you "don't know what's in there" and you "don't trust the scientists"... yet, you'll force yourself to the front of the line to get monoclonal antibodies once you GET the virus! What happened to "I don't trust the doctors"?? Why not find the YouTuber who shows you how to ingest disinfectant - safely ROFL - nd take their advise on that one, too?