• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. bi4smooth
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 3
    • Topics 53
    • Posts 2140
    • Best 333
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by bi4smooth

    • RE: AG Garland and conflict of interest

      @raphjd said in AG Garland and conflict of interest:

      @bi4smooth

      Now it's clear why you voted for Hunter's daddy.

      AGAIN since you are an idiot.

      Garland's official stance as the head of the DOJ is; If you disagree with the anti-white racist shit my son-in-law is selling to public schools, I will treat you like a domestic terrorist.

      I would have thought that even you would have been able to understand that.

      You're such a tool... If Merrick Garland said he prefers Post Toasties in ads for breakfast cereals - even though his son-in-law works for Kellogg's - it's a breach of "family ethics", but it's not a "conflict of interest".

      The fact that Garland's DOJ and his son-in-law's opinions about CRT are both leftist is NOT a conflict of interest! And if Garland "goes too far" in his defense of CRT, that's professional misconduct - but it's not a "conflict of interest" just because his son-in-law supports the same viewpoint - in his job.

      What would become a conflict of interest would be if the DOJ started to investigate the company his son-on-law worked for... or even a "direct competitor" of theirs... something that would be directly beneficial (or detrimental) to his son-in-law (or his employer) in his official capacity... and that conflict would be easily solved by his recusal from all decisions regarding those cases.

      Look, Comrade - word choices matter.

      I'm not defending Garland's position on CRT - but it's not a conflict of interest. Its also not embezzlement, rape, treason, assault and battery, or jaywalking!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Louden County VA high school tried to hide sex assault in bathroom

      @raphjd said in Louden County VA high school tried to hide sex assault in bathroom:

      @bi4smooth

      You always come back with "to be clear, a leftwing outlet said" and then you downplay what happened.

      You're just a clueless ass...

      My post lauded RWM for all-but-forcing this to light, and literally ended with a comment that it was a tragedy for one or the other... downnplay my ass.

      Your Russian Handlers need to brush up on their reading skills!

      Why did the dirty-ass pigs grab him? Police do not have, as matter of course, the right to grab people. BUT, pigs being pigs, police love to overstep their rights and do what they love to do as they feel like it to the public because they are shielded by Qualified Immunity.

      Mr. "I'm a conservative" is now a 60's era LIBERAL protester against the police?

      I'm sorry - but WHO THE FUCK does your pitiful ass think should investigate this? Or should we just take the word of all teenage girls?

      This is not Trumpian of you at all! Where's that "Thin blue Line" you're supposed to be a supporter of?

      BTW: Can I have a flower, child?

      The policy being discussed and the incident involving his daughter are directly related; ie more special rights for the rapist at school.

      Indeed... Louden county has ONLY ONE Trans student, and your OMNIPOTENT SELF is so certain that these girls are telling the truth, you're ready to EXECUTE the trans student!

      You're awfully quick to condemn the Trans Girl... a little trans-phobic yourself, bitch?

      Let the police do their job... SOMEONE is the victim of some awful shit here - but it's FAR FROM CLEAR who is the victim yet! If this was clearcut and easy, I have a feeling there would have been arrests by now!

      Oh wait! I forgot about those CENTURIES OLD police policies to PROTECT Trans People you're always ranting about! I'm sure it's a conspiracy to protect the trans student that's stopping the truth from coming out!

      Yeah, that's the ticket!

      Well, we already know you are biased, by your own admission in other discussions.

      Yeah - I admit a bias here... a bias to get to the TRUTH and NOT have a knee-jerk reaction to ACCUSATIONS!

      Once again, your Russian background is showing: here in the West, we don't shoot first and ask questions later! That's a KGB tactic we DERIDE here... we take our time, investigate fully, and charge people AFTER the FACTS are discovered (and confirmed)... not based on a teen-aged girl's accusations!

      Mind you, her accusations MAY BE TRUTHFUL! I'm not calling her a liar... but I AM saying that if this was as cut/dried as you and your Russian Handlers want to make it out to be, the police would have filed charges by now.

      We will know WHO should be executed AFTER the investigation, Comrade! Until then, chill the fuck out!

      What happened to "just believe" and "me too" or do you hate women? Are you a rapist or rape supporter? "Women never lie about that kind of thing, they only ever lie about what they had for lunch".

      Which side are you on?

      I think there must have been a shift change in the KGB while you were writing this!

      First, you're totally in the "believe the girls, shoot the Trannie in the head and be done with it!" - and now you're in the "Wait, those girls shouldn't be believed" camp? All in the same post?

      Holy shit, Batman! I'm gonna need a chiropractor! WHIPLASH!

      NURSE!! NURSE!! Over here! This one needs his meds!

      One last comment: Gentle reader (that is, everyone else BUT @raphjd) - please note the LACK OF CRITICAL THINKING here by our Russian Comrade... His news media made this out to be a liberal coverup to protect the trannie... and he's incapable of interpreting it any other way! (Did I get your pronoun right, dear?)

      ANYTHING that gets in the way of that narrative being 100% accurate is false, liberal, evil, conspiratorial, downright ANTI-DEMOCRATIC! Why actually THINK about what's being accused here? The reporter already DID all the thinking! Just read, believe, distribute, and defend! That's the KGB way!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Louden County VA high school tried to hide sex assault in bathroom

      @raphjd said in Louden County VA high school tried to hide sex assault in bathroom:

      The Louden County VA school board tried to hide that a girl was sexually assaulted in a high school bathroom, but a "non-conforming, gender fluid" person with a penis.

      This became viral because the girl's father was arrested at the school board meeting for bringing up the topic.

      "The Daily Wire that a boy was charged with two counts of forcible sodomy, one count of anal sodomy, and one count of forcible fellatio, related to an incident that day at that school." as quoted The Burning Platform.com.

      All the reports I've read say that it was wearing a skirt, but only some have said it was wearing no panties and that its dick was just hanging loose.

      As it is a hate crime to mis-gender a trans-person in Scotland, I will just say IT, in reference to the scumbag.

      Not surprisingly, it's not a hate crime to mis-gender a non-transperson, cuz reasons.

      BTW, Happy Hate Crimes Awareness Week.

      This is a case where Conservative Media was on this and essentially forced the hand of MSM to pick it up.

      To be clear tho, things aren't as bad as the right-wing media makes it out to be. From Newsweek's article:

      • The kid (remember, s/he's a kid) who is accused is "gender fluid" - and yes, that apparently gives them access to use the girl's restroom... but sexual assault can happen virtually anywhere. Let's not forget that MANY cultures DO NOT separate bathrooms based on gender at all!
      • The dad who was arrested was NOT arrested at the SB meeting for what he said, he was arrested because when he was approached and grabbed by a police officer, he reacted violently. I can't say as I blame him - but the policy being debated by the SB that night had nothing to do with bathrooms - it was a policy requiring school personnel to use the pronouns that the students request to be used for them.
      • The school reported the incident to law enforcement, who asked them NOT to interfere with the investigation. It wasn't a "cover up", it was the school doing what they were asked to do by law enforcement - including NOT releasing information about an ongoing investigation.

      NONE of that lessens the fact that TWO separate girls have reported assaults by this same individual.

      BUT neither has there been any arrest or charges filed - it's not inconceivable that these stories are made up BECAUSE they're (the accusers are) transphobic!

      THAT'S why we have police - to investigate and figure out what's fact and what's not.

      It's a bad situation - a real shit-show - there right now... and there are either 2 cis-female victims of a very disturbed trans student, or there is a trans-female student being horribly victimized by these 2 girls.

      Honestly, the best we can do right now is WAIT for the police to investigate....

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: FUCK SCIENCE says Instagram

      @raphjd said in FUCK SCIENCE says Instagram:

      Instagram bans scientist for posting peer-reviewed study on the "born with a penis" advantage in sports because it proved people with penises have an advantage over people with cervixes.

      Instagram labeled it transphobia.

      Keep in mind, our resident fake Repub will spew "don't violate Instagram's human rights to be bigoted against people who believe in science" while spewing "but St Fauci of GOFR just followed the science and if you disagree with St Fauci of AZT, you hate science and St Fauci of Wuhan".

      Remember, people do not have human rights, businesses do and it's only "follow the science" as long as the science suits your liberal agenda.

      PS: Happy Hate Crimes Awareness Week from Scotland, where only mean tweets are actual crimes and ambulances are being taken out of service, and people are dying, so they can be converted to Gaelic, from English, because it's the only health emergency in the lowlands of Scotland.

      NOTE: The highlands ambulance service and virtually all government signage in the highlands have been in Gaelic for ages.

      Wow... who pee'd in your cereal this morning? That's quite the rant!

      Your supposition that I would take Instagram's side is (typical for you) completely off-base. I don't believe in censorship.

      That said, I don't think it's up to the GOVERNMENT to force Instagram to take down or NOT take down posts they don't like! That's an Instagram decision, and if they want to limit all posts to trans-positive posts with exactly 19 vowels in the captions... well, that's their choice!

      This isn't all that different from the California "gender neutral toy aisle" debate... it doesn't matter to me if the toy aisles are gender-based or gender-neutral! What matters to me is that the Government has no place in telling private businesses how to run their businesses! If they make bad choices, people will stop using their store/service!

      Remember MySpace? AuctionQuest? Netscape? Blockbuster? Compaq?

      Yeah - things NEVER change in the modern times! Facebook is here to STAY! Forever!

      Instagram shouldn't have taken down the post(s)...
      the Government should stay out of it!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: YouTube is at it AGAIN

      @raphjd said in YouTube is at it AGAIN:

      YouTube has banned the video of UK MP David Davis speaking against Vaccine Passports, as a civil rights concern.

      YouTube has also banned a video by Steven Crowder about the high school girl who was sexually assaulted in the school's bathroom by a "non-conforming, gender fluid" fellow student with a penis. Apparently, reporting on this incident is deemed by YouTube as "transphobic". Crowder also has a 1-week ban and YouTube is once again deciding if they want to block him from monetizing his videos, AGAIN.

      There were a bunch of other topics and specific videos that YouTube has banned, but I got sidetracked and my browser crashed so I no longer have the links.

      I don't like censorship in any form. I don't know the content you describe, but unless it's DANGEROUS (as-in trying to promote an insurrection or organize a riotous attack on Government buildings) it shouldn't be touched.

      I do NOT object to one of the social media outlet's who mark those things as "false" or "unsubstantiated" or "misleading" or whatever it was.... you have a right to say your piece.... that doesn't mean you have the right to say you piece "uninterrupted"

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: YouTube is at it AGAIN

      @lololulu19 said in YouTube is at it AGAIN:

      It addition to Youtube's attempts to control people's thinking, they have also increased their forced advertising. For many years, Youtube did not require people to watch and commercials. Then, they started forcing us to watch 1 commercial per video. They recently increased that to TWO.

      FUCK them for wanting to make a profit! The Internet should be FREE! I mean, I pay my ISP, right? Isn't that enough?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Arizona Audit report presentation, Cyber Ninjas share their results of election audit

      @raphjd said in Arizona Audit report presentation, Cyber Ninjas share their results of election audit:

      @bi4smooth

      Oh puhlease, Mary.

      You have desperately tried to find any and every excuse to justify voter fraud, then pretend that it had no bearing on the elections.

      I do not defend fraud - and I've admitted that there was fraud in the 2020 election. As there was in the 2016 election... and the 2012... and the 2008 and the 2004 and the 2000, 1996, 1992, 1988, 1984, & 1980 elections. (That's as far back as my voting experience goes)...

      ONLY the Trumpites seem to be STUCK on the idea that ANY error means the ENTIRE thing was a fraud. You sure as hell didn't think so in 2016 when all the polls said Hillary would win!

      Say you owe the bank $25,000 and the balance seems off by about $0.50 ... does that mean the entire loan is shit? Head down to the bank and try to pull that shit!

      Let's go back to that NJ election where the judge declared EVERY election on the ballot was corrupted by fraud and had to be redone, EXCEPT the Presidential election.

      That's bullshit. You imply that the entire State of NJ had to re-do their election. One City had issues (Patterson). Had EVERY registered voter in Patterson, NJ voted for Trump, it wouldn't have been enough votes for him to have won that heavily Democratic state.

      AGAIN (you're a fucking idiot that you can't "get this") - there are ALWAYS some irregularities when you try to get 160-million to do anything... including voting. It's IMPOSSIBLE to think you could get a "PERFECT" election! But you get the errors down more and more every year, and you learn from mistakes made every year!

      I have no issues with the new voter ID laws - I think voters SHOULD have to prove their identity. I only object when those IDs are limited to specific kinds of IDs that cost $100+ to obtain! That makes those ID cards a poll-tax, and that is unconstitutional. If you want Voter ID, then poor people have to ALSO have the ability to get a FREE ID (no cost, but you certainly still have to prove your identity to get one!)

      What bullshit is your excuse to call the judge a fucking liar? Remember, he said that all but 1 of the elections on the ballots was corrupted. That's something you have constantly denied is possible.

      You STUPID TWIT! I've said all along that there ARE errors... EVERY YEAR, there are errors... what there are NOT are SUFFICIENT errors to CHANGE the outcome!

      If you have $100 in change, but it turns out one of your nickels is a fake, that doesn't mean you're broke!

      Now, if we are to believe that the judge is correct about the other elections on the ballot, why would the presidential election not also be corrupted? How is that 1 election on the ballot be the only honest one?!

      I don't know the details about why they said there was something fishy about that election - and it doesn't matter! Not because fraud doesn't matter, but because - as I said above - IF EVERY SINGLE VOTER - 100% - voted for Trump, it wouldn't be enough votes to change the outcome in the NJ Presidential race....
      Maybe that's why they didn't include that one? I don't know... but you're the one in the other threads insisting that MATH IS MATH... well, DO THE FUCKIN MATH!

      I know you haven't watched the video because you haven't touched on any specific points, just spewing your normal "fuck Trump, he's literally worse than Hitler" crap to justify your BFF Honest Joe winniing.

      Sigh -- those straws you're grasping for are awfully thin... but i get it.... your Russian handlers won't let you concede ANY points... so I feel for you, man... you're stuck!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: California decides to MANDATE gender-free toy aisles

      @raphjd said in California decides to MANDATE gender-free toy aisles:

      @bi4smooth

      OK, so all of your "whataboutisms" concerning Trump prove you're my bitch, but you don't want your fellow leftists to know.

      I don't need any "what-aboutisms" for Trump - YOU are the one who constantly changes the subject when FACTS do not support the Trumpian line...

      But I understand... you're bound by your Russian Handlers to support all things Trump... you don't have any leeway in that...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: (CA) Gov Newsome vetoed Cal Grant expansion bill

      @raphjd said in (CA) Gov Newsome vetoed Cal Grant expansion bill:

      @bi4smooth

      The law Newsome vetoed is shit, but a lot of your party supported it. So he did something right, on this single occasion. That doesn't mean he didn't do the right thing on any other law.

      I don't read OAN, except on rare occasions when something pops up in one of my feeds.

      Since I don't know the article you are talking about, I'll have to assume you got your cliff notes from Joy "I was hacked" Reid.

      Let's not forget, it's your people that love 2+2= whatever the fuck you want it to be, or you are a racist.

      I am not the "straw man" you are looking for...

      My people are what used to be called Reagan Republicans.
      My people believe in smaller Government
      My people believe in DEMOCRACY - you know, the one where the person with the most VOTES wins?

      However, I'm not SO PARTISAN that I'll fault a CA Governor who vetoes a bad (liberal) bill! I applaud him for vetoing that shit legislation! The fact that he's a Democrat doesn't mean he can't make a RIGHT decision every once in a while!

      You, on the other hand, aren't allowed by your Russian handlers to say anything nice about anyone BUT TRUMP... so I understand how you could be caught between a rock and a hard-place.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Where are the Biden supporters?!

      @raphjd said in Where are the Biden supporters?!:

      @bi4smooth

      Ah, so when you agree with me, you remain silent, but act like a drama queen when you disagree with me.

      Clearly, you being a liberal Biden jockstrap, you can't be seen agreeing with me.

      Didn't your party tell others to join the RNC to fuck up one of the primaries? AND, can you say "I voted for Biden/Harris" or have you forgotten who you voted for.

      As a Democrat, it would be best to speak to your party's intentions. I do find it ironic though, that you clowns repeatedly vote for people that constantly do things you claim to be against, expecting them to change this time.

      Let's not forget that it was the DNC that gave us the 3 most homophobic laws the US ever had, as well as Biden's racist 1994 crime bill. You, stupid clowns, support BLM, anti-racism, CRT, and all the other bullshit, and you vote for Biden.

      Likewise, all the anti-black shit Kamala pulled as California AG and San Francisco DA, and you losers voted for her.

      The solution is to shut your pie holes until you are willing to speak out against the shit the government, et al, is doing to actual people, with actual human rights.

      You are wrong, and I've made it clear before... I know it ties your panties into a knot, but I did not vote FOR Biden, I voted AGAINST Trump!

      That you cannot tell the difference is clearly a reflection of your Russian influences... ๐Ÿ™‚

      I've been a registered Republican for 40 years... I am one DEEP ASSED mole! ๐Ÿ™‚

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: AG Garland and conflict of interest

      @raphjd said in AG Garland and conflict of interest:

      @bi4smooth

      Yet another topic that you side with libersals.

      I know you are an idiotic liberal, but the conflict of interest is a no brainer.

      Garland's official stance, as the head of the DOJ, that being opposed to CRT being taught in public schools is "domestic terrorism" while his son-in-law is actively selling CRT shit to public schools.

      So simple, liberals are too stupid to get it.

      well, I guess we've found yet another topic on which you are clueless as to how "the real world" works...

      I'm not surprised, the US and the west have very different rules than Mother Russia...

      You'll catch on eventually... keep trying!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Why is everything new being deleted from the "Fan Sites" category?

      @krad3434 said in Why is everything new being deleted from the "Fan Sites" category?:

      @2econdspark Thanks I've noticed the deletions too. It really sucks that there is such an aggressive takedown of these here. Studio uploads even stay up for longer.

      I hope if one account is issuing this many dmcas they get banned. I've even seen some torrents get 1 star ratings pretty much as they have been uploaded.

      Off topic, I know - but I've wondered at that too... some torrents virtually NEVER get a "star" rating, and others seem to have them even before they've been leeched!

      Duplicate accounts are banned - but someone gaming the system? I don't know! A curiosity to be sure!

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: AG Garland and conflict of interest

      @raphjd said in AG Garland and conflict of interest:

      https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/10/05/ag-merrick-garlands-daughter-married-to-co-founder-of-company-selling-critical-race-theory-resource-material-to-school-districts/?fbclid=IwAR38FePD0unTpqB1OrRwGfds-J6Xw2BYIP3AGnnl_Vc7U9Poy-cl49nb-9Q

      AG Merrick Garlandโ€™s Daughter Married to Co-Founder of Education Company Selling Critical Race Theory Resource Material to School Districts

      No conflict of interest there, if you're a liberal.

      Imagine the shit storm liberals would have had if that was someone from the Trump admin.

      If Merrick Garland's daughter's husband shouldn't be selling Critical Race Theory bullshit (and let's forget the topic - shouldn't be selling to local school boards), then Trump's daughter - who was actually on the Government Payroll - shouldn't have been hawking clothes & shoes at the same time either.

      Be careful: people in glass houses!

      Merrick Garland's daughter's husband shouldn't be selling anything to the Justice Department... or to the Federal Government, for that matter... but to local Governments? I would say he's OK there...

      Ethics 101 - clearly a topic you've never taken ๐Ÿ™‚

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Where are the Biden supporters?!

      @raphjd said in Where are the Biden supporters?!:

      @bi4smooth

      No straw man here. You are a pos liberal.

      And you are a communist puppet (whether of the Russian or Chinese model, I am unsure! I am equally unsure if you are even aware of the strings!

      It's not "new math" but "de-colonialized math" or "anti-racist math". Have you forgotten so soon?

      LOL - "Jane, you ignorant slut"

      "New math" wasn't describing the new math where they tried to teach new ways of doing long division - it was a generalization of all the anti-math bullshit that's come out - from multiple sides.

      Math is math. Numbers don't lie (hence: Trump lost by BIG numbers!). Numbers aren't political. Algebra isn't racist. Calculus isn't Communist. Statistics aren't anti-Democratic. They're all just numbers... the least-political field of knowledge we have today.

      And when you were ranting about this months and months ago, I didn't argue with you... why should I? We agreed.

      But since I'm your "straw man" for all things more liberal than you, you assumed I thought otherwise.

      Typical for you: you got your facts wrong. LOL

      You want me to ignore all these kinds of things, but get butt hurt over some stupid law about toy aisles.

      Actually, I think MOST people who read my posts would agree that they are TOO LONG already... so, sticking to one topic at a time is likely a GOOD strategy for me... I'll stick to it, thanks.

      You give no fucks about educating young people, but you screech like a crack whore in church when a business' "human rights" are tickled, by your own fucking party.

      I care a LOT about how my children are educated - which is why I support teaching children about problem solving and critical thinking, and not just about "what viewpoints-as-facts are in-vogue today" or "what answer are they looking for"...

      Unlike folks like you, I support the idea of things like High School classes in "comparative world religions" - being taught by believers of ANY one of those religions (so long as NONE - not even paganism or Scientology - are ridiculed. The teacher MAY declare his/her own beliefs, but NOT that those are superior to the beliefs of others - that's the whole point of such a class!)

      Indeed, my daughter in college got a nice compliment from her Ethics professor the other day. He wrote a test question that was worded as a "what's YOUR opinion" when it meant to be "what is the school's stance" about an Ethics situation. She knew that the question, having been worded that way, would have been quite unusual - but also that this class had been quite unusual - so she wrote a prelude: explaining that the question was vague and she could immediately see 2 approaches to answering the question... then she wrote 2 quick (short) replies - 1 for each possible interpretation of the question's real meaning, and added a suffix that said she didn't have time for more detail because she essentially had to answer the question twice!

      You have never posted about the shit your party is doing, but you will jump in to slag me off for posting about it, as well as telling me to ignore it, so I can focus on some business's non-existent "human rights".

      You silly *twit - is my party the Republican one (the one I've belonged to - as a voter - for 40 years), or the Democrat one you keep trying to align me with since I'm not a Trumpite...

      As I said, the law you are crying about is idiotic, but that is what you people (liberals) demanded. Maybe not you specifically, but you liberals overall.

      I don't think MOST Democrats are in favor of this kind of Government Overreach... I think it will get overturned in courts, or by a later Legislature... I hope, anyway.

      No, the REASON I brought up this idiotic law was to eventually point to its ROOT CAUSE: California is an echo-chamber of liberal, leftist, social crusaders. This is the kind of law that is created in an echo-chamber environment. It's wrong for leftists, and it's wrong for Conservatives too!

      We get things RIGHT when we take the best intentions of the far left and the far right and find common ground.

      This ain't that!

      I have a solution for you, just call it "anti-sexist/racist/trans toy aisles" and be happy with your win.

      Sorry: the solution is to keep Government out of the aisles entirely! See, here we are at a fundamental difference:

      • I actually believe that less Government in ALL AREAS is better
      • You think Government support of your ideas and ideals is GREAT - even NECESSARY to support and maintain them! But Government interference when it goes AGAINST your beliefs is egregious.

      My way is short, simple, and easy to explain.
      Your way is unique to every individual who tries to implement it, and impossible to justify...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: (CA) Gov Newsome vetoed Cal Grant expansion bill

      @raphjd said in (CA) Gov Newsome vetoed Cal Grant expansion bill:

      Something happened to the previous post that is preventing me from adding more to it.

      ANyway, you dumb ass, I am an American (and UK national) so what happens in the US is my business.

      It's, even more, my business since I still pay US taxes.

      So fuck off and go back to snortching Pelosi's crusty old vag.

      Actually, you have your own post wrong... THIS thread stared out with you confusedly DECRYING the fact that Cal Gov Newsome actually VETOED a bill you didn't support. And this somehow made him even WORSE!

      The NY "thread" was a rabbit-hole of your own making, and it didn't take long to find the OAN story that was your source - and to see the flaws in it.... the same flaws I pointed out....

      Your excuse here (that a NY politician said something stupid - like THAT'S rare!) is like the 1st grader who complains that when he added 2 + 2 and got 5 - his "5" was printed PERFECTLY, so he should get some credit for that!

      Pathetic...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: California decides to MANDATE gender-free toy aisles

      @raphjd said in California decides to MANDATE gender-free toy aisles:

      @bi4smooth

      While this is completely idiotic (typical DNC), why do you care about this but not the other shit Newsome is doing in California?

      I know you believe that businesses have human rights, but people don't unless the DNC says they do.

      It's funny how you worship Fauci, Biden, Pelosi, etc, etc, etc, etc and their nanny state demands on us mere humans, but you are against it when it violates a business' "human rights".

      It's people like you that will cause the dystopian future to come true.

      ROFL - I take it from your "100% what-aboutism" response that you generally agree with me here... but, you just can't bring yourself to say so...

      You are so predictable.... Tell Comrade Putin he should keep you! You're totally transparent and we love to watch you as his puppet!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Arizona Audit report presentation, Cyber Ninjas share their results of election audit

      @raphjd said in Arizona Audit report presentation, Cyber Ninjas share their results of election audit:

      @bi4smooth

      I guess you didn't watch the video.

      It's ironic that your beloved DNC hated Maricopa County until this shit, and now they love them.

      We already know you love voter fraud that works in favor of the DNC, as it almost always does. I mean, you keep telling us how wonderful it is and that we should ignore it.

      Hell, even you claim to be a Repub and we see your stance on issues.

      You just love to make me your Straw Man for all of liberaldom... whatever gets you off...

      Sorry, but just because I call out the LIES about election fraud doesn't mean that I claim there was NO FRAUD AT ALL... there are always a few bad actors who, at least temporarily, get away with something...

      But that's a FAR CRY from the kinds of MASSIVE fraud that would have been necessary to overcome Trump's humiliating loss - in both the overall numbers AND the Electoral College.

      Nor does your attempted SPIN of the partisan AZ audit - that found totals completely in opposition to your early claims of "complete and massive fraud" = change anyone's mind about the 2020 results.

      Your Trumpite side came out of that with egg on your face, and your attempts to make an omelette out of it are hilarious, if not also completely sad. The complete new definition of a sore loser!

      When the grocery store finds a bad apple, they throw out the bad apple, and maybe a few more that were contaminated by it... they don't empty out the whole store and start over!

      What's more - and I know this totally confuses you: I trust the professionals. Especially the ones who were members of the LOSING party, but were in a position to FALSIFY records, but did not - whether because there were sufficient checks in place to make doing so overly risky (which is true), or because they were (and remain) loyal Americans - dedicated to true Democratic ideals: that whoever gets the most votes, wins!

      I don't give a rat's ass what the Dem (or Republican) parties think of the elections supervisors in AZ or GA or MI - I think they should keep their partisan hands OFF of running the elections! When you inject partisan "support" on one side or the other, you HAVE to remember that partisan things CHANGE SIDES regularly! So the partisan Republican you put in place this year becomes a partisan Democrat 5 years from now! Then you're REALLY in a pickle, because not only do they have the "extra powers" you gave to the position, but they also have "an axe to grind" for all the underhanded, partisan shit you pulled earlier. And it only continues to get worse, as each side keeps tying to "out do" the other when "they" get the power.

      No thank you - I don't want my Doctor telling me to drink Clorox to cure COVID "because the President said so", and I don't want partisans counting ballots in an election!

      My Dr can be a Trumpite in his personal life - none of my damned business... but he better bring his DOCTOR hat (and not his MAGA hat) to work every day!

      Elections officials can belong to one party or another, but they are expected to leave that "at the door" when they come to work. Like Doctors, they are expected to be professionals... and most, like Doctors, are!

      In both cases, not everyone is perfect... that's why each State has Medical Boards to review complaints about bad Doctors, and each State has layers of double-checking to ensure that bad actors in running elections get weeded out and discovered - usually very quickly!

      That happened in 2020. It was arguably the CLEANEST election ever run in the US (we keep getting better at it!)... but that doesn't mean it was PERFECT or PURE....

      Still, it was DECISIVE... and Trump lost the popular vote (again) as well as the Electoral College vote - by wide margins. Margins way too large to explain away with what irregularities were really there!

      Trump suffered a humiliating loss - a solid rebuke by the voting public - similar to the one suffered by the first Bush (in losing to Clinton in 1992).

      And Trump is lining himself up to do it again! His unfavorable rankings are so high: they're even worse than when he ran against Hillary! But since he ONLY surrounds himself with "yes men", he can't see it (none of them have the BALLS to tell him he's wrong!)

      The NEW record for worst candidates for President will be: 1 - Trump (2024); 2 - Hillary (2020); 3 - Trump (2020); 4 - McGovern (1972)

      A sad time for American politics...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Where are the Biden supporters?!

      @raphjd said in Where are the Biden supporters?!:

      @bi4smooth

      You are a dumb-ass DNC worshipper, that is why you get upset with me.

      Stop being a liberal twat and respond to what I actually said. I posted about things that are actually happening in the US.

      Why is California's new law on toys and different than Oregon telling teachers that correct answers are racist?! Hell, letting our kids grow up stupid is far worse, but you have your face buried so far into Pelosi's dried-up old vag that you can't see that.

      Pull your head out of your ass and look at what is going on in the country and the world.

      Stop fucking downplaying everything your beloved DNC does.

      You sound like Jan Brady; Russia, Russia, Russia.

      I am not the STRAW MAN you're looking for

      I've never supported "new math" in schools, nor have I supported all this mass "standardized testing" - which essentially has our teachers "teaching the answers" vs. teaching problem solving or critical thinking.... Gee, I wish I'd said that earlier! Wait! I DID! Oh, I forgot - you can't comprehend compound SENTENCES, much less complex thoughts!

      I am not the liberal you love to hate on... and my position about companies having the rights to display their toys any damned way they want to is based on my belief in "corporate rights" - rights you often want to trample when they go against your own views.

      You see, that's a difference between us: its not that I think there should be a law AGAINST gender neutral toy aisles... and I'm not in favor of this law mandating them!

      This is my libertarian and conservative sides converging on the same conclusion: There should be no law about this at all!

      Companies (CORPORATIONS) should be allowed to display toys however they choose - It's supposed to be a FREE COUNTRY!

      If Toys-R-Us wants to make gender-neutral aisles, I'm OK with that - even though I think its ridiculous! And if KayBee Toys wants to put "girl toys" on the other side of the store so as not to potentially attract any "iffy boys", then I'm OK with that too, even though I think that's wrong!

      The Government has about as much "right" to say how toys are displayed as they do about whether public restrooms should be in the front or back of the store, and whether they should be for "paying customers only"! Namely: none.

      What's next? Prohibiting women-owned companies from printing their employees paychecks on pink paper stock? LOL

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: (CA) Gov Newsome vetoed Cal Grant expansion bill

      @raphjd said in (CA) Gov Newsome vetoed Cal Grant expansion bill:

      @bi4smooth

      And there you are, always defending the DNC and liberal causes, while claiming to be a conservative.

      The US and UK have the problem if it's better to be from somewhere else than your own country when it comes to getting welfare.

      Scotland couldn't find enough homes for the homeless that they already has but found 2,000 homes for the Syrians they imported. Now we are seeing the same thing with the Afghanis.

      It's like how New York spends just over 1% of what they spend on illegals, on 1st Responders and military and their families.

      It's how you most revered Fauci, makes rules for us, but not for illegals.

      You claim these are LIBERAL caused problems (inequities in spending on illegals vs locals) - yet most of those spending ratios were put in place when Conservatives were in power - and that's true in the UK as well as the US!

      Your NY numbers are bogus by the way: they count ALL public health & public assistance money as money "spent on illegals", even though only a fraction of that money is spent on healthcare for illegals. The REAL shame is that some of these first responders - esp teaches - fit into BOTH categories: first responders who ALSO qualify for public assistance, like Food Stamps... that is SHAMEFUL! And BOTH parties are to BLAME for it, because it didn't START with one - both parties have been in power long enough to fix it at some point in the past 40 years!

      NOTE: Healthcare is an issue where I am personally, admittedly, liberal: I believe that BASIC healthcare (wellness visits, recovery from serious illness/injury, vaccinations, etc) is a basic human right and not a privilege of and for the wealthy.

      Back to our topic here though: Here in the US, the Biden Admin has been UNSUCCESSFUL at passing any MAJOR legislation, save for extra COVID relief! Zip! NADA! NIL! Thankfully, it has turned out SOME of their "moderate" members aren't willing to just throw almost $6T of federal money (debt) out the window and believe it'll solve everything! And their margins are so slim, without those 2 Senators, their massive spending bills are DEAD ON ARRIVAL!

      Minority? maybe so, but their majorities are so slim, they have to appease their "moderates" and most left-wing "radicals" at the same time... good luck with that! Herding cats comes to mind! LOL Mind you, NO Republican will vote for ANY of these things - because in today's political climate, you can't vote for something - whether actually good or not - if it might make the other party "look good"... FUCK making the Country look or actually get better... if the "other guys" will get credit (not blame), then you cannot vote for it! Witness this debt ceiling bullshit!

      As for your favorite Boogey-Man Fauci, what policy has he ever made that was for Americans but not Illegals?

      • He doesn't actually MAKE policy, he recommends policy
      • He makes recommendations to our politicians about public health policy - not immigration policy
      • Politicians get/have to MAKE the policy... as we've seen from the Trump years, they don't always take the recommendations of the experts!
      • Public Health policy (at least in the US) gets applied to everyone. There are no separate rules for vaccinating illegals or legals. There are no separate rules for wearing masks if you're illegal or legal. There are no public health policies about treating illegals, but not legals, when they get COVID.

      Finally, you are in Scotland... unless your Parliament has done something REALLY strange, and somehow both seceded from the UK (something many ARE LITERALLY trying to do), and joined the US (not possible without approval from the US Congress - i honestly don't think we'd "take you"... no offense...), then Fauci hasn't made a SINGLE RULE for you, and NOTHING the DNC (much less the RNC) has done in the past 40 years has affected YOU , NOW (currently)!

      On behalf of the ENTIRE US Population: thank you for your concern: but butt-out... we've got it managed, thanks! Focus on your own piles of shit over there, thank you very much! Your "us" and the "Royal we" are clearly misplaced! We don't even HAVE Royals (no, not even Trump! We voted that "would-be-King" out, remember?)
      [Sarcasm: off] LOL

      Again, though: I'm not FOR any Democrat being in power - but I'm not going to blame them for my dog dying and the lunar eclipse just because my political opponents are currently in-power, albeit by the slimmest of margins!

      I am actually ENJOYING the Dem's vapid attempts to "fix everything once they get into power"... it's all well and good to claim your policies are better, and deride the policies of "the idiots in power" when you are the truly powerless "minority opposition"... it's another thing entirely when you have to ACTUALLY GOVERN yourself! Your wacko pie-in-the-sky policies DO NOT actually turn smog into cotton candy when ACTUALLY put into place! And those "deplorable" immigration policies aren't so awful when you're the one having to deal with the massive inflow of immigrants at the borders!

      Be that as it may, I also recognize that the worse they do, the worse things will be for us when we regain power (in 2022 in Congress? Let's PRAY Trump doesn't ruin that!)... and the harder that will make it for US to "fix everything that's wrong once we're back in power"...

      My point is, though: If you claimed Hitler and Musselini were pedophiles who ate their prey: Jewish children, for dessert every night... I would say "NO, you 're making that up" - not because I support fascism (I do not - witness my opposition to Trump), but because I value TRUTH above making up ridiculous lies about my opponents! I want to win political arguments based on the MERITS of my positions, not based on lies made up about the opposition!

      Funny thing: sometimes I learn that way - and sometimes I'm convinced that the other guy has a better plan or idea than me! I'm not above being wrong... you should ty it sometime... learning new things (instead of defending old things) is sometimes good!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: How old were you

      Hmmm... Coming Out... This gets complicated for me:

      My first male/female sexual encounter happened in the 3rd Grade (yup, just 9 years old) when I was on my way home from school, walking through the woods that I did every day, and happened onto 2 5th-Grade girls comparing tits and pubic-hair. I got to see theirs, so they got to see mine... We kept our encounters very VERY SECRET. (NOTE: I DID have a "real" dick at that age - it was NEW to me - that's precisely when my own public hair started to come in! Awesome timing, eh?) My first male/male sexual encounter came shortly after I started the 6th Grade (11 y/o), and it was with my 15 y/o neighbor. Again, we kept the whole thing a COMPLETE SECRET! There were others throughout middle & early high school: both boys AND girls... and it always a HUGE SECRET!

      While I liked playing "sex games" with guys, I also REALLY liked fucking girls & playing with their tits! (The guys I was fooling around with then didn't do anal sex (we were dumb kids!) - so the only FUCKING at the time was with girls!).

      But it's important - in terms of coming out - that I didn't know you were "allowed" to do both boys and girls! And NO ONE I was having sex with was telling me about anyone else they were having sex with - so I thought I was TRULY breaking ALL the rules! I was a FREAK! I had no label for myself - I had learned about heterosexual and homosexual, but knew no other labels. I lied to the boys I was playing with (saying I was homosexual, like them), and I equally lied to the girls I was playing with (saying I was heterosexual, like them). I knew of NO ONE who was LIKE ME in that they liked boys and girls...

      However, late in the 8th Grade, my SECRET was revealed: it turned out that one of the boys and one of the girls I was playing around with were brother & sister (I swear I didn't know!)... and they talked! I was TOTALLY OUTED to them. I was hugely embarrassed... and they were FURIOUS with me! But they came from a VERY unusual (nudist) family, and eventually they thought it was cool, so long as there was no deception - though they were ADAMANT that they would NOT play together! I vowed to NOT be in that position ever again! Truly from that day onward, no sexual partner of mine has NOT been aware that I've had sex with both men and women in my past!

      But still, other than those 2, and relatively quickly thereafter, all of the others I was having sex with, I was a completely closeted - and unique person. Not one of them admitted to me that they were attracted to both boys and girls. I dared not tell anyone else about this - especially my parents. What kind of freak did they raise?

      Let me reiterate here: I (like many teens) had LOTS of sex in high school - some with boys, some with girls - and all knew that I had-had sex with both boys and girls... and no one - not one other person - ever told me they were bisexual too!

      Then I went to college...I didn't expect it to be the SAME as it was in High School, but I went to school in "a big city" - Atlanta, GA - and while it was the "Queer Capital of the South" in those days, that WAS NOT TRUE on our campus! I got "outed" my freshman year by a roommate who found my porn stash... and I was nearly thrown-out of my Fraternity as a result. They LITERALLY had a VOTE on whether to keep me in, or expel me - for the "offense" of being bi-sexual! Mind you: I never disclaimed being bi - I just asked them why they cared so much if they didn't want (themselves) to have sex with me? I "won" by just 2 votes! Funny tho: in my Jr year, I was elected VP of that frat!

      That happened in the Spring, so I was freshly 18 - and out, although not of my own volition. Not only as I "out" to my frat, but I was basically "out" to everyone - my fraternity brothers couldn't keep a secret to save their ass!

      It wouldn't be until my Sr year in college that I ever met someone ELSE who got off just as well with girls as boys (and wasn't looking for it as a way to cheat of their bf/gf)... He was in a different frat - and was totally out to them, and totally accepted by them. That was an awakening to me! He was "allowed" to be himself - he could bring girls OR guys to his room and no one batted an eye over it! (I had been asked to "be discrete" and never bring a "gay guy" to the frat - where I lived.) So, any way you look at it, I was OUT virtually all through college.

      But here's where it gets weird: In my first job after graduation, I needed a military security clearance - and being gay (or bi) was considered, at the time, to be a legitimate cause for losing said clearance (and with it, my job and my career!)... so for that time of my life, while I was still "out" to the people I had sex with (or wanted to have sex with), I was TOTALLY closeted in the rest of my life! It is the ONLY time in my life I have ever LIED (publicly) about my sexuality: I declared myself "straight" on multiple occasions - including on my clearance applications.

      That didn't stop me from having boyfriends and girlfriends... but it DID mean I never went to gay bars or gay pride events (though I DID attend the first ever Gay Days at Disney - and I wore the requisite RED! ... I truly considered even that small act to be a risky one, and feared for weeks afterward that I would lose my job over it!). I didn't.

      I didn't get married until I was 35 - to a woman, and she knew my sexual past. I told her I would never cheat on her, and I never did - except for porn... which she would later claim ACTUALLY WAS cheating on her... but that's another story. While we were married we had, and adopted, a total of 9 children - and during this time the world's appreciation for LGBTQ+ changed immensely! I even helped write the new laws in my state that legalized gays & lesbians becoming foster parents, and later adoptive parents!

      While my sexuality never changed, my sexual ACTIVITY while I was married remained STRICTLY monogamous and heterosexual. (Though my now-ex-wife claims vociferously otherwise... but, remember: she considered watching porn "cheating" - and I DID watch porn!) Anyway, as my children got older, and I taught each of them about the "birds and the bees", I came out to each of them (as pansexual) as well. That wasn't risky: they got their morals from me and their mother, so I knew it was SAFE to do so.

      Still, especially after 15 years in a straight marriage, I was never "public" about my LGBTQ+ "alignment"... I never hid it, but I certainly never advertised it either.... at least not until I met the love-of-my-life: David. Once we became a couple, it became VERY CLEAR to EVERYONE that I was queer. And to this day (even though David passed 4 years ago), I wear a rainbow mask, gay pride t-shirts, and so forth. Today, I'm 57, out and proud, and some of my children attend gay pride events with me!

      So, as you can see: mine has been a long, strange journey - probably VERY different from yours. But I do have suggestions:

      • Come out for you, not them (whoever they may be).
      • Come out when it is SAFE for you do so, and have a plan in place in case it doesn't go well - a place to stay the night, a way to separate from whoever in case it becomes a dangerous situation - JUST IN CASE!
      • TRUST your family: assuming you were raised by them, you share (largely, at least) a common moral code. Clearly there are exceptions to this - some families ARE NOT SAFE for LGBTQ+ people... of any age! But trust yourself too - to make the right call!

      It hasn't always been easy: I've missed out on some hot, sexy, men and women who were NOT OK with my pansexual nature and history, and flat-out rejected me because of it... c'est la vie! But, I've also had a LOT of incredible and interesting sex with men and women who were far more willing to be EXPERIMENTAL with me because they knew of my full sexuality!

      posted in Coming Out
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • 1
    • 2
    • 51
    • 52
    • 53
    • 54
    • 55
    • 106
    • 107
    • 53 / 107