• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. bi4smooth
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 3
    • Topics 53
    • Posts 2104
    • Best 326
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by bi4smooth

    • RE: Arizona Audit report presentation, Cyber Ninjas share their results of election audit

      @raphjd said in Arizona Audit report presentation, Cyber Ninjas share their results of election audit:

      @bi4smooth

      BULLSHGIT, YOU LIAR!!!!

      You constantly defend fraud.

      Comrade, you need to fix (or update the software in) your English to Russian translator! I've never defended fraud - especially the BIGGEST fraud: the attempt to STEAL the election by making hundreds of BOGUS claims of fraud - claims that the Trump Attorneys couldn't defend in court because they were worried about losing their law licenses for bringing such bullshit into court!

      Going back to an earlier analogy - when we count your $100 in change and find a slug-nickel, I don't claim your entire bankroll is fraudulent! Just that one nickel... and if what you wanted only cost $75, you're still good to go!

      So, in the election of 2020, when Trump lost by over 7-million votes - and you can find fraud covering (being VERY generous here) 100,000 votes - you can't claim the whole election is a fraud!

      There were over 160-million votes cast, about 155-million in the Presidential race (yes, some people "sat out" the Presidential contest - in disgust!).

      Biden won with 51+% of the vote (a Damn-SITE better than Trump won with in 2016 - 46% of the vote!)... Start finding evidence of fraud getting close to 1% of the vote (that would be 1.6 million votes - put away the calculator!) and we've got something to look into!

      But when ALL of the fraud Trumpites CLAIM to have uncovered don't even rise - even when all combined - to 1% of 1% (.01%), how can you expect to be taken seriously?

      But let's also distinguish between FRAUD (intentional swaying of the vote by illegal means) and ERROR. When the 250 or so people in Florida were told they were eligible to vote because their Civil Rights had been restored after their felony conviction's complete sentences were completed - per the new Florida constitution - they did so "in good faith".... that it was LATER determined that they shouldn't have been allowed to vote meant they voted in ERROR, not FRAUDULENTLY.

      When the workers in the GA precinct first counted the TEST BALLOTS in with the REAL BALLOTS and came up with vote totals HIGHER than the total number of voters in the district, it was an ERROR (one that was corrected before official results were posted), not FRAUD!

      Every time I posted about another proven case of voter fraud, you get butt hurt and screechy demanding it is ignored because it helped Creepy Uncle Joe win.

      No voter fraud should be ignored - but you're conflating "not enough to overturn or invalidate the election results" with "who cares" - and that's YOUR problem, not mine!

      The only one who gets butt-hurt here is you, Comrade!

      DUMB ASS, I never implied or stated a fucking thing, other than what I said here and in previous discussions on this topic.

      The issue was over 1 part of NJ, no fucking duh. BUT, it involved EVERY election on the fucking ballot for that area. Of course, the presidential election was perfect in every way despite every other part of that ballot was so rampant with fraud that it had to be done again.

      So it's clear - the process in NJ worked - they DISCOVERED the attempted fraud.

      But let's be clear here, Comrade Nut-Job: the tainted election was held in May - and it was a City Council race. They actually did not re-run the Presidential results - but because they didn't exist, not because they were OK with the results! Trump wasn't on the ballot (which is a better explanation for his getting 0 votes in that election than fraud!)

      Put away your almanac, Comrade - the US holds Presidential elections in NOVEMBER, not May!

      AND AGAIN, you are doing the "voter fraud should be ignored if I like the way voter fraud went".

      The next time you go to the bank to deposit coins, let's keep your mentality (or lack thereof) in mind... you dump $100 in change into the counter - it says you have $99.95, not $100 - so it confiscates your entire deposit - you'll have to re-do it later.

      As always, you have your face buried so deep in the collective unwashed vags of the DNC. Me being against voter fraud for as long as I can remember has nothing to do with Trump because I doubt I even knew his name when I first became aware of voter fraud.

      Your concepts of higher math (percentages), much less higher math (like statistics) is amazing! (for a 3rd Grader, anyway!)

      I'll re-wind, Comrade: EVERY election has some level of fraud - perfect elections don't even happen in High School Prom elections!

      That's why they REALLY CLOSELY scrutinize elections where the results get closer than about 1%... but fraud and errors SELDOM reach the level of even 0.01%, so in most cases, these really close elections are actually VALIDATED.

      The 2020 Presidential election wasn't THAT close... only in the minds of Trumpites who cannot BELIEVE that their candidate LOST does a handful of irregularities, a few minor cases of fraud (all detected and prosecuted), and rise to the level of INVALIDATING an entire election!

      BTW: In case you missed it back when you were DREAMING that the AZ audit would discover the MASSIVE FRAUD that would have changed the outcome of the AZ results... the FEDERAL election system has NO MECHANISM for re-running an election. EVEN IF it is later determined that fraud happened, once the Electoral College vote is certified by Congress, it's done. Signed, sealed, and delivered. See you again in 4-years. Until then, enjoy the 25th Amendment to figure shit out.

      NJ can re-run their elections all they want... in the Presidential election, they submit their approved electors to the Electoral College, or they don't vote at all. There are no provisions for delays, re-dos, recounts, or audits... up to 538 votes can be cast (and it's an important election, so exactly 538 are normally cast)... and once they are, it's a done deal. If someone wins, they win. If there is NO winner, the new House and Senate decide (with constitutionally defined rules!)... and once they decide, THAT's a done-deal... no re-do, recount, audit, or reversal... again: see you in 4-years, please see the 25th Amendment for further directions.

      I remember way back during Carter, dirty ass politics in Chicago, where you could go to each fire station and look at their memorial wall and be sure that each one would vote Dem in the next election. Same with the police. Likewise in Detroit and every other DNC run area.

      ROFL - yes, there were areas of the country where fraud was rampant... but the Dems weren't the only ones "fixing" elections... We Republicans did our fair share of "vote rigging" ourselves (the prisons bear this out!). No one is claiming we've got this permanently "fixed" or "foolproof' - but the fact is, we have professionals who run these things - professionals from both parties... and while it still isn't perfect (because these are PEOPLE we're talking about here!) we DO get better at it year over year!

      AND, I still know you refuse to watch the video because it goes against your Biden worshipping claims.

      I'll watch that video if you watch "Roger and Me" with your eyes open! LOL

      The 'audit' was performed by partisan amateurs - amateurs so DUMB they couldn't even get the REVISED counts right! SHIT, GUYS! Your guys were hired with ONE JOB: Show the fraud! Even if they had to make it up - everyone - even the Dems - expected them to SHOW FRAUD! SHOW A HUGE TRUMP WIN! Even if it's totally (even LAUGHABLY) bogus... YOU HAD ONE JOB GUYS! And you came up with MORE votes for BIDEN and fewer for TRUMP! I mean, come one, guys - ONE F^CK^NG JOB!!!

      FAIL

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: California decides to MANDATE gender-free toy aisles

      @raphjd said in California decides to MANDATE gender-free toy aisles:

      @bi4smooth

      BItch, puhlease.

      I make a thread specifically about some stupid shit you BFF, Honest Joe did and the first thing you do is defend him to the hilt and drag Trump into it.

      I haven't looked but I bet you were one of the liberal ass clowns that demanded that no one mention Obama while Trump was in office because they didn't want whataboutism.

      I suggest you DO LOOK! It'll be hard to find, because i wasn't a user on this Forum until after Trump was in office... but YOU GO BOY! LOOK! FIND IT! IT'S THERE!

      And your spin is off there Comrade: The OTHER recent thread about CAL is illustrative:

      • You post that the Dem Gov of CAL actually VETOES a piece-of-shit bill that you didn't support - but you pepper the post with lies and rantings that don't even support your own story.
      • I point out where your Comrades got things wrong - and point out that the Dem Gov did exactly what you would have WANTED him to do (save for the part about having the CAL legislature shot in the head and replaced - but honestly, Comrade that's not how we do it in the US... that might work in Mother Russia, but we don't DO that here!)
      • You claim I'm a liberal because I think the DEM GOV did the right thing - even if it was a VETO of an ultra-liberal, left-wing-nutjob of a law! Why? Because I said something nice about a Dem! Oh my! What you must think of me when I support the Dem Senators who are holding up the Biden Agenda because it's "too expensive" and at the same time support the ULTRA-LEFT Dems in the House who are holding up the pared-down Biden Agenda because it doesn't "Spend Enough!"

      Well, you ignore-a-moose, by those 2 sets of Dems "sticking to their principals" they're getting NOTHING done!

      I know this is a shocker - but as a Conservative, the LESS the Liberal Administration can get done in these next 2-years before the mid-terms, the BETTER!

      So: Yay Manchin and Sinema in the Senate! and Yay KFC (or whatever her initials are) in the House! You STAND for those principles! (In the meantime, ain't SHIT of the Biden Agenda goin' anywhere! LOL! WINNING!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: (CA) Gov Newsome vetoed Cal Grant expansion bill

      @raphjd said in (CA) Gov Newsome vetoed Cal Grant expansion bill:

      @bi4smooth

      Of course, you are not "my straw man", you are a Biden loving liberal.,

      We have seen your posts, we know what you believe.

      You claim I'm a Russian and Chinese troll, but you are the one that believes the government can trample our rights at any turn, as they please.

      AGAIN, since you are an idiot.

      You have never, ever made a thread calling out your lord and savior, but you have made them about Trump.

      True, i don't start that many NEW threads here - I'm too busy trying to defend actual conservative principles against your bastardization (Trumpization) of them...

      Your Russian influences have become clear, Comrade... your confusion about how Western Civilization works is in-line with the lack-luster, mediocre educational system in Mother Russia, not the exacting precision of the Chinese! There is no more confusion! Your handlers are Russians to be sure! If only because of the ERRORS they make!

      Show me a Biden proposal I've supported!

      Your 2-dimensional Trumpian mind equates anything NOT aligned with your false, Russian-aligned Propaganda in support of Trump as being FOR Biden.... NEWS FLASH COMRADE! There are other points of view than Biden or Trump!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Where are the Biden supporters?!

      @raphjd said in Where are the Biden supporters?!:

      @bi4smooth

      LIAR!!!

      You voted for Biden/Harris.

      You refuse to call out Biden's and Harris' wrongdoing because they are doing the agenda you support.

      Thanks for the personal inventory, Comrade! Your understanding of my thought processes about my first vote for a Democrat for President in 40 years is SPOT ON! You're a fuckin MIND READER! AMAZING!

      Can you tell me what your Russian Handlers will accuse me of next?

      I call out the Biden Admin's bullshit all the time... but, you moron, unless you've been hiding in the Siberian Snow Banks for the past year, you'd have noticed the Biden Agenda is going NOWHERE! Even shaving it down to less than HALF of what they wanted, it's TOO HOT for some in his party, and TOO COLD for others... and being Dems, they can't agree to a WIN unless it's a TOTAL WIN!

      They'll have control of Congress until Jan, 2023 - at which point Biden and his Dems become as USELESS as Trump was in 2019 & 2020! Except they WON'T have the Senate on their side...

      Why is that important you ask Comrade?

      Well, in OUR form of Government, the Senate has to approve of Supreme Court nominees... and once the Dems lose the Senate, any liberal justice the Dem President might want to appoint will be voted down! They'll just wait for 2024 and a new President (assuming it's NOT TRUMP! Outside the still-shrinking Republican Party, he's downright TOXIC as a candidate!).

      Anyway - that's one of the many ways the Republican Leadership ALWAYS out-maneuvers the Dems - we think about the FUTURE, and leverage our CURRENT powers to their FULLEST extent FOR THE FUTURE!

      Those silly Dems just look to the future... they can't pass PART of Biden's plans because... because... well, it's not EVERYTHING they were PROMISED if they won! (simulate crying temper-tantrum here) If they can't have their "dessert" they're just not going to "eat" at all! WAH!

      Meanwhile, the clock is ticking! Their window of opportunity is rapidly closing! Then the Biden Presidency will be one of the MOST IMPOTENT in HISTORY!

      Oh wait! I'm supposed to be FOR the liberal! Sorry to disappoint you Comrade... I just can't seem to overcome my 40-year history of enjoying Dem infighting stopping them from getting anything actually done (Obamacare being an exception) in the short historical periods when they actually get power!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: AG Garland and conflict of interest

      @raphjd said in AG Garland and conflict of interest:

      @bi4smooth

      Now it's clear why you voted for Hunter's daddy.

      AGAIN since you are an idiot.

      Garland's official stance as the head of the DOJ is; If you disagree with the anti-white racist shit my son-in-law is selling to public schools, I will treat you like a domestic terrorist.

      I would have thought that even you would have been able to understand that.

      You're such a tool... If Merrick Garland said he prefers Post Toasties in ads for breakfast cereals - even though his son-in-law works for Kellogg's - it's a breach of "family ethics", but it's not a "conflict of interest".

      The fact that Garland's DOJ and his son-in-law's opinions about CRT are both leftist is NOT a conflict of interest! And if Garland "goes too far" in his defense of CRT, that's professional misconduct - but it's not a "conflict of interest" just because his son-in-law supports the same viewpoint - in his job.

      What would become a conflict of interest would be if the DOJ started to investigate the company his son-on-law worked for... or even a "direct competitor" of theirs... something that would be directly beneficial (or detrimental) to his son-in-law (or his employer) in his official capacity... and that conflict would be easily solved by his recusal from all decisions regarding those cases.

      Look, Comrade - word choices matter.

      I'm not defending Garland's position on CRT - but it's not a conflict of interest. Its also not embezzlement, rape, treason, assault and battery, or jaywalking!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Louden County VA high school tried to hide sex assault in bathroom

      @raphjd said in Louden County VA high school tried to hide sex assault in bathroom:

      @bi4smooth

      You always come back with "to be clear, a leftwing outlet said" and then you downplay what happened.

      You're just a clueless ass...

      My post lauded RWM for all-but-forcing this to light, and literally ended with a comment that it was a tragedy for one or the other... downnplay my ass.

      Your Russian Handlers need to brush up on their reading skills!

      Why did the dirty-ass pigs grab him? Police do not have, as matter of course, the right to grab people. BUT, pigs being pigs, police love to overstep their rights and do what they love to do as they feel like it to the public because they are shielded by Qualified Immunity.

      Mr. "I'm a conservative" is now a 60's era LIBERAL protester against the police?

      I'm sorry - but WHO THE FUCK does your pitiful ass think should investigate this? Or should we just take the word of all teenage girls?

      This is not Trumpian of you at all! Where's that "Thin blue Line" you're supposed to be a supporter of?

      BTW: Can I have a flower, child?

      The policy being discussed and the incident involving his daughter are directly related; ie more special rights for the rapist at school.

      Indeed... Louden county has ONLY ONE Trans student, and your OMNIPOTENT SELF is so certain that these girls are telling the truth, you're ready to EXECUTE the trans student!

      You're awfully quick to condemn the Trans Girl... a little trans-phobic yourself, bitch?

      Let the police do their job... SOMEONE is the victim of some awful shit here - but it's FAR FROM CLEAR who is the victim yet! If this was clearcut and easy, I have a feeling there would have been arrests by now!

      Oh wait! I forgot about those CENTURIES OLD police policies to PROTECT Trans People you're always ranting about! I'm sure it's a conspiracy to protect the trans student that's stopping the truth from coming out!

      Yeah, that's the ticket!

      Well, we already know you are biased, by your own admission in other discussions.

      Yeah - I admit a bias here... a bias to get to the TRUTH and NOT have a knee-jerk reaction to ACCUSATIONS!

      Once again, your Russian background is showing: here in the West, we don't shoot first and ask questions later! That's a KGB tactic we DERIDE here... we take our time, investigate fully, and charge people AFTER the FACTS are discovered (and confirmed)... not based on a teen-aged girl's accusations!

      Mind you, her accusations MAY BE TRUTHFUL! I'm not calling her a liar... but I AM saying that if this was as cut/dried as you and your Russian Handlers want to make it out to be, the police would have filed charges by now.

      We will know WHO should be executed AFTER the investigation, Comrade! Until then, chill the fuck out!

      What happened to "just believe" and "me too" or do you hate women? Are you a rapist or rape supporter? "Women never lie about that kind of thing, they only ever lie about what they had for lunch".

      Which side are you on?

      I think there must have been a shift change in the KGB while you were writing this!

      First, you're totally in the "believe the girls, shoot the Trannie in the head and be done with it!" - and now you're in the "Wait, those girls shouldn't be believed" camp? All in the same post?

      Holy shit, Batman! I'm gonna need a chiropractor! WHIPLASH!

      NURSE!! NURSE!! Over here! This one needs his meds!

      One last comment: Gentle reader (that is, everyone else BUT @raphjd) - please note the LACK OF CRITICAL THINKING here by our Russian Comrade... His news media made this out to be a liberal coverup to protect the trannie... and he's incapable of interpreting it any other way! (Did I get your pronoun right, dear?)

      ANYTHING that gets in the way of that narrative being 100% accurate is false, liberal, evil, conspiratorial, downright ANTI-DEMOCRATIC! Why actually THINK about what's being accused here? The reporter already DID all the thinking! Just read, believe, distribute, and defend! That's the KGB way!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Louden County VA high school tried to hide sex assault in bathroom

      @raphjd said in Louden County VA high school tried to hide sex assault in bathroom:

      The Louden County VA school board tried to hide that a girl was sexually assaulted in a high school bathroom, but a "non-conforming, gender fluid" person with a penis.

      This became viral because the girl's father was arrested at the school board meeting for bringing up the topic.

      "The Daily Wire that a boy was charged with two counts of forcible sodomy, one count of anal sodomy, and one count of forcible fellatio, related to an incident that day at that school." as quoted The Burning Platform.com.

      All the reports I've read say that it was wearing a skirt, but only some have said it was wearing no panties and that its dick was just hanging loose.

      As it is a hate crime to mis-gender a trans-person in Scotland, I will just say IT, in reference to the scumbag.

      Not surprisingly, it's not a hate crime to mis-gender a non-transperson, cuz reasons.

      BTW, Happy Hate Crimes Awareness Week.

      This is a case where Conservative Media was on this and essentially forced the hand of MSM to pick it up.

      To be clear tho, things aren't as bad as the right-wing media makes it out to be. From Newsweek's article:

      • The kid (remember, s/he's a kid) who is accused is "gender fluid" - and yes, that apparently gives them access to use the girl's restroom... but sexual assault can happen virtually anywhere. Let's not forget that MANY cultures DO NOT separate bathrooms based on gender at all!
      • The dad who was arrested was NOT arrested at the SB meeting for what he said, he was arrested because when he was approached and grabbed by a police officer, he reacted violently. I can't say as I blame him - but the policy being debated by the SB that night had nothing to do with bathrooms - it was a policy requiring school personnel to use the pronouns that the students request to be used for them.
      • The school reported the incident to law enforcement, who asked them NOT to interfere with the investigation. It wasn't a "cover up", it was the school doing what they were asked to do by law enforcement - including NOT releasing information about an ongoing investigation.

      NONE of that lessens the fact that TWO separate girls have reported assaults by this same individual.

      BUT neither has there been any arrest or charges filed - it's not inconceivable that these stories are made up BECAUSE they're (the accusers are) transphobic!

      THAT'S why we have police - to investigate and figure out what's fact and what's not.

      It's a bad situation - a real shit-show - there right now... and there are either 2 cis-female victims of a very disturbed trans student, or there is a trans-female student being horribly victimized by these 2 girls.

      Honestly, the best we can do right now is WAIT for the police to investigate....

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: FUCK SCIENCE says Instagram

      @raphjd said in FUCK SCIENCE says Instagram:

      Instagram bans scientist for posting peer-reviewed study on the "born with a penis" advantage in sports because it proved people with penises have an advantage over people with cervixes.

      Instagram labeled it transphobia.

      Keep in mind, our resident fake Repub will spew "don't violate Instagram's human rights to be bigoted against people who believe in science" while spewing "but St Fauci of GOFR just followed the science and if you disagree with St Fauci of AZT, you hate science and St Fauci of Wuhan".

      Remember, people do not have human rights, businesses do and it's only "follow the science" as long as the science suits your liberal agenda.

      PS: Happy Hate Crimes Awareness Week from Scotland, where only mean tweets are actual crimes and ambulances are being taken out of service, and people are dying, so they can be converted to Gaelic, from English, because it's the only health emergency in the lowlands of Scotland.

      NOTE: The highlands ambulance service and virtually all government signage in the highlands have been in Gaelic for ages.

      Wow... who pee'd in your cereal this morning? That's quite the rant!

      Your supposition that I would take Instagram's side is (typical for you) completely off-base. I don't believe in censorship.

      That said, I don't think it's up to the GOVERNMENT to force Instagram to take down or NOT take down posts they don't like! That's an Instagram decision, and if they want to limit all posts to trans-positive posts with exactly 19 vowels in the captions... well, that's their choice!

      This isn't all that different from the California "gender neutral toy aisle" debate... it doesn't matter to me if the toy aisles are gender-based or gender-neutral! What matters to me is that the Government has no place in telling private businesses how to run their businesses! If they make bad choices, people will stop using their store/service!

      Remember MySpace? AuctionQuest? Netscape? Blockbuster? Compaq?

      Yeah - things NEVER change in the modern times! Facebook is here to STAY! Forever!

      Instagram shouldn't have taken down the post(s)...
      the Government should stay out of it!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: YouTube is at it AGAIN

      @raphjd said in YouTube is at it AGAIN:

      YouTube has banned the video of UK MP David Davis speaking against Vaccine Passports, as a civil rights concern.

      YouTube has also banned a video by Steven Crowder about the high school girl who was sexually assaulted in the school's bathroom by a "non-conforming, gender fluid" fellow student with a penis. Apparently, reporting on this incident is deemed by YouTube as "transphobic". Crowder also has a 1-week ban and YouTube is once again deciding if they want to block him from monetizing his videos, AGAIN.

      There were a bunch of other topics and specific videos that YouTube has banned, but I got sidetracked and my browser crashed so I no longer have the links.

      I don't like censorship in any form. I don't know the content you describe, but unless it's DANGEROUS (as-in trying to promote an insurrection or organize a riotous attack on Government buildings) it shouldn't be touched.

      I do NOT object to one of the social media outlet's who mark those things as "false" or "unsubstantiated" or "misleading" or whatever it was.... you have a right to say your piece.... that doesn't mean you have the right to say you piece "uninterrupted"

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: YouTube is at it AGAIN

      @lololulu19 said in YouTube is at it AGAIN:

      It addition to Youtube's attempts to control people's thinking, they have also increased their forced advertising. For many years, Youtube did not require people to watch and commercials. Then, they started forcing us to watch 1 commercial per video. They recently increased that to TWO.

      FUCK them for wanting to make a profit! The Internet should be FREE! I mean, I pay my ISP, right? Isn't that enough?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Arizona Audit report presentation, Cyber Ninjas share their results of election audit

      @raphjd said in Arizona Audit report presentation, Cyber Ninjas share their results of election audit:

      @bi4smooth

      Oh puhlease, Mary.

      You have desperately tried to find any and every excuse to justify voter fraud, then pretend that it had no bearing on the elections.

      I do not defend fraud - and I've admitted that there was fraud in the 2020 election. As there was in the 2016 election... and the 2012... and the 2008 and the 2004 and the 2000, 1996, 1992, 1988, 1984, & 1980 elections. (That's as far back as my voting experience goes)...

      ONLY the Trumpites seem to be STUCK on the idea that ANY error means the ENTIRE thing was a fraud. You sure as hell didn't think so in 2016 when all the polls said Hillary would win!

      Say you owe the bank $25,000 and the balance seems off by about $0.50 ... does that mean the entire loan is shit? Head down to the bank and try to pull that shit!

      Let's go back to that NJ election where the judge declared EVERY election on the ballot was corrupted by fraud and had to be redone, EXCEPT the Presidential election.

      That's bullshit. You imply that the entire State of NJ had to re-do their election. One City had issues (Patterson). Had EVERY registered voter in Patterson, NJ voted for Trump, it wouldn't have been enough votes for him to have won that heavily Democratic state.

      AGAIN (you're a fucking idiot that you can't "get this") - there are ALWAYS some irregularities when you try to get 160-million to do anything... including voting. It's IMPOSSIBLE to think you could get a "PERFECT" election! But you get the errors down more and more every year, and you learn from mistakes made every year!

      I have no issues with the new voter ID laws - I think voters SHOULD have to prove their identity. I only object when those IDs are limited to specific kinds of IDs that cost $100+ to obtain! That makes those ID cards a poll-tax, and that is unconstitutional. If you want Voter ID, then poor people have to ALSO have the ability to get a FREE ID (no cost, but you certainly still have to prove your identity to get one!)

      What bullshit is your excuse to call the judge a fucking liar? Remember, he said that all but 1 of the elections on the ballots was corrupted. That's something you have constantly denied is possible.

      You STUPID TWIT! I've said all along that there ARE errors... EVERY YEAR, there are errors... what there are NOT are SUFFICIENT errors to CHANGE the outcome!

      If you have $100 in change, but it turns out one of your nickels is a fake, that doesn't mean you're broke!

      Now, if we are to believe that the judge is correct about the other elections on the ballot, why would the presidential election not also be corrupted? How is that 1 election on the ballot be the only honest one?!

      I don't know the details about why they said there was something fishy about that election - and it doesn't matter! Not because fraud doesn't matter, but because - as I said above - IF EVERY SINGLE VOTER - 100% - voted for Trump, it wouldn't be enough votes to change the outcome in the NJ Presidential race....
      Maybe that's why they didn't include that one? I don't know... but you're the one in the other threads insisting that MATH IS MATH... well, DO THE FUCKIN MATH!

      I know you haven't watched the video because you haven't touched on any specific points, just spewing your normal "fuck Trump, he's literally worse than Hitler" crap to justify your BFF Honest Joe winniing.

      Sigh -- those straws you're grasping for are awfully thin... but i get it.... your Russian handlers won't let you concede ANY points... so I feel for you, man... you're stuck!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: California decides to MANDATE gender-free toy aisles

      @raphjd said in California decides to MANDATE gender-free toy aisles:

      @bi4smooth

      OK, so all of your "whataboutisms" concerning Trump prove you're my bitch, but you don't want your fellow leftists to know.

      I don't need any "what-aboutisms" for Trump - YOU are the one who constantly changes the subject when FACTS do not support the Trumpian line...

      But I understand... you're bound by your Russian Handlers to support all things Trump... you don't have any leeway in that...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: (CA) Gov Newsome vetoed Cal Grant expansion bill

      @raphjd said in (CA) Gov Newsome vetoed Cal Grant expansion bill:

      @bi4smooth

      The law Newsome vetoed is shit, but a lot of your party supported it. So he did something right, on this single occasion. That doesn't mean he didn't do the right thing on any other law.

      I don't read OAN, except on rare occasions when something pops up in one of my feeds.

      Since I don't know the article you are talking about, I'll have to assume you got your cliff notes from Joy "I was hacked" Reid.

      Let's not forget, it's your people that love 2+2= whatever the fuck you want it to be, or you are a racist.

      I am not the "straw man" you are looking for...

      My people are what used to be called Reagan Republicans.
      My people believe in smaller Government
      My people believe in DEMOCRACY - you know, the one where the person with the most VOTES wins?

      However, I'm not SO PARTISAN that I'll fault a CA Governor who vetoes a bad (liberal) bill! I applaud him for vetoing that shit legislation! The fact that he's a Democrat doesn't mean he can't make a RIGHT decision every once in a while!

      You, on the other hand, aren't allowed by your Russian handlers to say anything nice about anyone BUT TRUMP... so I understand how you could be caught between a rock and a hard-place.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Where are the Biden supporters?!

      @raphjd said in Where are the Biden supporters?!:

      @bi4smooth

      Ah, so when you agree with me, you remain silent, but act like a drama queen when you disagree with me.

      Clearly, you being a liberal Biden jockstrap, you can't be seen agreeing with me.

      Didn't your party tell others to join the RNC to fuck up one of the primaries? AND, can you say "I voted for Biden/Harris" or have you forgotten who you voted for.

      As a Democrat, it would be best to speak to your party's intentions. I do find it ironic though, that you clowns repeatedly vote for people that constantly do things you claim to be against, expecting them to change this time.

      Let's not forget that it was the DNC that gave us the 3 most homophobic laws the US ever had, as well as Biden's racist 1994 crime bill. You, stupid clowns, support BLM, anti-racism, CRT, and all the other bullshit, and you vote for Biden.

      Likewise, all the anti-black shit Kamala pulled as California AG and San Francisco DA, and you losers voted for her.

      The solution is to shut your pie holes until you are willing to speak out against the shit the government, et al, is doing to actual people, with actual human rights.

      You are wrong, and I've made it clear before... I know it ties your panties into a knot, but I did not vote FOR Biden, I voted AGAINST Trump!

      That you cannot tell the difference is clearly a reflection of your Russian influences... ๐Ÿ™‚

      I've been a registered Republican for 40 years... I am one DEEP ASSED mole! ๐Ÿ™‚

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: AG Garland and conflict of interest

      @raphjd said in AG Garland and conflict of interest:

      @bi4smooth

      Yet another topic that you side with libersals.

      I know you are an idiotic liberal, but the conflict of interest is a no brainer.

      Garland's official stance, as the head of the DOJ, that being opposed to CRT being taught in public schools is "domestic terrorism" while his son-in-law is actively selling CRT shit to public schools.

      So simple, liberals are too stupid to get it.

      well, I guess we've found yet another topic on which you are clueless as to how "the real world" works...

      I'm not surprised, the US and the west have very different rules than Mother Russia...

      You'll catch on eventually... keep trying!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Why is everything new being deleted from the "Fan Sites" category?

      @krad3434 said in Why is everything new being deleted from the "Fan Sites" category?:

      @2econdspark Thanks I've noticed the deletions too. It really sucks that there is such an aggressive takedown of these here. Studio uploads even stay up for longer.

      I hope if one account is issuing this many dmcas they get banned. I've even seen some torrents get 1 star ratings pretty much as they have been uploaded.

      Off topic, I know - but I've wondered at that too... some torrents virtually NEVER get a "star" rating, and others seem to have them even before they've been leeched!

      Duplicate accounts are banned - but someone gaming the system? I don't know! A curiosity to be sure!

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: AG Garland and conflict of interest

      @raphjd said in AG Garland and conflict of interest:

      https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/10/05/ag-merrick-garlands-daughter-married-to-co-founder-of-company-selling-critical-race-theory-resource-material-to-school-districts/?fbclid=IwAR38FePD0unTpqB1OrRwGfds-J6Xw2BYIP3AGnnl_Vc7U9Poy-cl49nb-9Q

      AG Merrick Garlandโ€™s Daughter Married to Co-Founder of Education Company Selling Critical Race Theory Resource Material to School Districts

      No conflict of interest there, if you're a liberal.

      Imagine the shit storm liberals would have had if that was someone from the Trump admin.

      If Merrick Garland's daughter's husband shouldn't be selling Critical Race Theory bullshit (and let's forget the topic - shouldn't be selling to local school boards), then Trump's daughter - who was actually on the Government Payroll - shouldn't have been hawking clothes & shoes at the same time either.

      Be careful: people in glass houses!

      Merrick Garland's daughter's husband shouldn't be selling anything to the Justice Department... or to the Federal Government, for that matter... but to local Governments? I would say he's OK there...

      Ethics 101 - clearly a topic you've never taken ๐Ÿ™‚

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Where are the Biden supporters?!

      @raphjd said in Where are the Biden supporters?!:

      @bi4smooth

      No straw man here. You are a pos liberal.

      And you are a communist puppet (whether of the Russian or Chinese model, I am unsure! I am equally unsure if you are even aware of the strings!

      It's not "new math" but "de-colonialized math" or "anti-racist math". Have you forgotten so soon?

      LOL - "Jane, you ignorant slut"

      "New math" wasn't describing the new math where they tried to teach new ways of doing long division - it was a generalization of all the anti-math bullshit that's come out - from multiple sides.

      Math is math. Numbers don't lie (hence: Trump lost by BIG numbers!). Numbers aren't political. Algebra isn't racist. Calculus isn't Communist. Statistics aren't anti-Democratic. They're all just numbers... the least-political field of knowledge we have today.

      And when you were ranting about this months and months ago, I didn't argue with you... why should I? We agreed.

      But since I'm your "straw man" for all things more liberal than you, you assumed I thought otherwise.

      Typical for you: you got your facts wrong. LOL

      You want me to ignore all these kinds of things, but get butt hurt over some stupid law about toy aisles.

      Actually, I think MOST people who read my posts would agree that they are TOO LONG already... so, sticking to one topic at a time is likely a GOOD strategy for me... I'll stick to it, thanks.

      You give no fucks about educating young people, but you screech like a crack whore in church when a business' "human rights" are tickled, by your own fucking party.

      I care a LOT about how my children are educated - which is why I support teaching children about problem solving and critical thinking, and not just about "what viewpoints-as-facts are in-vogue today" or "what answer are they looking for"...

      Unlike folks like you, I support the idea of things like High School classes in "comparative world religions" - being taught by believers of ANY one of those religions (so long as NONE - not even paganism or Scientology - are ridiculed. The teacher MAY declare his/her own beliefs, but NOT that those are superior to the beliefs of others - that's the whole point of such a class!)

      Indeed, my daughter in college got a nice compliment from her Ethics professor the other day. He wrote a test question that was worded as a "what's YOUR opinion" when it meant to be "what is the school's stance" about an Ethics situation. She knew that the question, having been worded that way, would have been quite unusual - but also that this class had been quite unusual - so she wrote a prelude: explaining that the question was vague and she could immediately see 2 approaches to answering the question... then she wrote 2 quick (short) replies - 1 for each possible interpretation of the question's real meaning, and added a suffix that said she didn't have time for more detail because she essentially had to answer the question twice!

      You have never posted about the shit your party is doing, but you will jump in to slag me off for posting about it, as well as telling me to ignore it, so I can focus on some business's non-existent "human rights".

      You silly *twit - is my party the Republican one (the one I've belonged to - as a voter - for 40 years), or the Democrat one you keep trying to align me with since I'm not a Trumpite...

      As I said, the law you are crying about is idiotic, but that is what you people (liberals) demanded. Maybe not you specifically, but you liberals overall.

      I don't think MOST Democrats are in favor of this kind of Government Overreach... I think it will get overturned in courts, or by a later Legislature... I hope, anyway.

      No, the REASON I brought up this idiotic law was to eventually point to its ROOT CAUSE: California is an echo-chamber of liberal, leftist, social crusaders. This is the kind of law that is created in an echo-chamber environment. It's wrong for leftists, and it's wrong for Conservatives too!

      We get things RIGHT when we take the best intentions of the far left and the far right and find common ground.

      This ain't that!

      I have a solution for you, just call it "anti-sexist/racist/trans toy aisles" and be happy with your win.

      Sorry: the solution is to keep Government out of the aisles entirely! See, here we are at a fundamental difference:

      • I actually believe that less Government in ALL AREAS is better
      • You think Government support of your ideas and ideals is GREAT - even NECESSARY to support and maintain them! But Government interference when it goes AGAINST your beliefs is egregious.

      My way is short, simple, and easy to explain.
      Your way is unique to every individual who tries to implement it, and impossible to justify...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: (CA) Gov Newsome vetoed Cal Grant expansion bill

      @raphjd said in (CA) Gov Newsome vetoed Cal Grant expansion bill:

      Something happened to the previous post that is preventing me from adding more to it.

      ANyway, you dumb ass, I am an American (and UK national) so what happens in the US is my business.

      It's, even more, my business since I still pay US taxes.

      So fuck off and go back to snortching Pelosi's crusty old vag.

      Actually, you have your own post wrong... THIS thread stared out with you confusedly DECRYING the fact that Cal Gov Newsome actually VETOED a bill you didn't support. And this somehow made him even WORSE!

      The NY "thread" was a rabbit-hole of your own making, and it didn't take long to find the OAN story that was your source - and to see the flaws in it.... the same flaws I pointed out....

      Your excuse here (that a NY politician said something stupid - like THAT'S rare!) is like the 1st grader who complains that when he added 2 + 2 and got 5 - his "5" was printed PERFECTLY, so he should get some credit for that!

      Pathetic...

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: California decides to MANDATE gender-free toy aisles

      @raphjd said in California decides to MANDATE gender-free toy aisles:

      @bi4smooth

      While this is completely idiotic (typical DNC), why do you care about this but not the other shit Newsome is doing in California?

      I know you believe that businesses have human rights, but people don't unless the DNC says they do.

      It's funny how you worship Fauci, Biden, Pelosi, etc, etc, etc, etc and their nanny state demands on us mere humans, but you are against it when it violates a business' "human rights".

      It's people like you that will cause the dystopian future to come true.

      ROFL - I take it from your "100% what-aboutism" response that you generally agree with me here... but, you just can't bring yourself to say so...

      You are so predictable.... Tell Comrade Putin he should keep you! You're totally transparent and we love to watch you as his puppet!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • 1
    • 2
    • 49
    • 50
    • 51
    • 52
    • 53
    • 105
    • 106
    • 51 / 106