@raphjd said in YouTube is at it AGAIN:

@bi4smooth

As always, you only care about the fake "human rights" of businesses but don't give a fuck about actual people unless they are "non-conforming, gender fluid" penis possessing skirt wearers.

Here you go again, Comrade - YouTube doesn't have the RIGHT to take down videos - they have the FREEDOM to do so! It's their platform - they could change the terms and make it "All Barney - All Day" (Barney being the annoying, ear-worm spewing purple dinosaur on childrens TV)... It's not their RIGHT to do so, its their FREEDOM to do so!

You still slurp Fauci's back vag, claiming he's a saint.

Let's clear something up here: Fauci is a scientist. A former medical researcher who rose through the ranks to become a leading voice & administrator in medical research in immunology and disease mitigation.

He made a significant mistake in 2019 and 2020 - he ALLOWED Donald Trump to politicize his role in the NIH and allowed himself to be duped into becoming the "faceman" for the Trump Administration's originally well-intentioned, but eventually woefully inadequate response to COVID-19.

But: He's a man... he's just a man. (Thanks Yvonne Elliman!)

You and he share some of your experiences, however. You are also being duped into being an unwitting tool of the Russian KGB - who are feeding lies and twisted news stories into our Western Culture in an attempt to defeat us from within. So far, you and your ilk are winning - just as Germany & Japan initially made great strides in WW-II. But you WILL fail. Real FREEDOM is a bell that cannot be un-rung! You will be defeated!

Sadly, you are completely oblivious to the role you're playing because you allow yourself to be spoon-fed lies that feed into your basic cultural fear: that your "supremacy" as a white male is being challenged and will soon be replaced. You don't think you'll be as successful without the "white privilege" you've been raised with, and you're MORTALLY TERRIFIED that others will treat you - as a white male - as poorly as you have treated them!

Whether you are capable of independent thought, critical thinking, or basic problem solving is immaterial: you refuse to apply them to the drivel you spread, and you become infuriated with people who point out the OBVIOUS flaws in your "stories" (that's all most of them are: made up stories based on tiny fragments of truth - an entire garden of lies around a single chicken-nugget that you call a "chicken salad").

@raphjd said in Arizona Audit report presentation, Cyber Ninjas share their results of election audit:

@bi4smooth

You refused to watch the Steven Crowder video that proved fraud, with official Wayne County documentation, while you claimed that voter fraud doesn't happen.

You REALLY need to refresh your English reading comprehension, Comrade... I have repeatedly pointed out that the presence of SOME fraud is common. It's not that there IS fraud, it's about HOW MUCH fraud is present.

Talk to me when you can read English on a 5th Grade level...

Now, once again, you refuse to watch another video, by the party, you claim to be a part of because it doesn't show what you want it to show.

This is not a Republican video - this is a Trumpist video. My party - the Party of Lincoln (who JOINED this country into a single, non-Slave-owning, FREE country), and Reagan (who also JOINED the parties of this country into ONE - he received almost as many Democrat vote for President as the Democrat nominee!)...

Trump is a DIVIDER. He plays on race, ethnicity, and religion to sow FEAR into people... fear of anyone not like "you"... I, and most "traditional" Republicans reject that.

So once again, you LOVE voter fraud, when it goes in favor of your beloved Dear Father, aka Bejing Biden to us normal people.

Comrade, you might want to check your translator... you're repeating yourself. I think maybe your cut/paste buffer didn't refresh right...

@raphjd said in Louden County VA high school tried to hide sex assault in bathroom:

@bi4smooth

Stop being a total twat, if you can help it.

Ouch - be careful, Comrade - you're hurting my feelings!

LOL - NOT! Drawing your ire here is a BADGE of HONOR!

What does "investigating" a criminal matter have to do with a dirty ass pig grabbing someone for something that is not a crime?! Clearly, our previous discussion about the current state of policing was nothing but you being a liar.

Here you are again, Comrade, mixing up how things work in Mother Russia and over here in the Western Democracies.

I know, back in Russia, they would just send all the bad policemen to prisons in Siberia and forget about them! But here in the West, we try to FIX broken things - without throwing them away completely.

Back in Russia, you would just "eliminate" the bad police force and replace them with the Army while you found new lackys who would tow the Government line more appropriately. But, here in the West, it's illegal to use the Army that way (Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 - yeah, just 100 years after our founding!)...

So... we rally don't have much choice, but to let the police do the policing, while we try to fix things about their departments. Besides, not ALL police are bad guys!

However, in this case, the DAD in question had said his piece, over-extended his allotted time to speak, and had been asked to move so that the next citizen could speak.

I know - in Russia, this wouldn't have been a problem - he'd have been BEATEN by the political police before he even GOT there! But this isn't like Mother Russia! He had a right to say what he wanted to say, but then he had to move aside and let the NEXT person speak... and when he wouldn't move, the POLICE grabbed his arm to move him out of the way.

I know - again, In Russia, they would have knocked is skull in, but I keep telling you: THIS ISN'T LIKE RUSSIA! The policeman grabbed his arm to move him aside, and he... well, he reacted badly and the policeman arrested him.

I haven't said that there isn't a possibility that the girls have lied. You made that shit up because you are a limp wristed liberal.

What? You and your news source made it CLEAR! The PERPETRATOR here was the Trans girl, and the message was equally clear: if s/he hadn't been allowed to use the GIRL'S restroom, this would never have happened!

Get your messaging straight Comrade! Putin is watching!
Trans people are ALWAYS the aggressors! They are ALWAYS the bad people! Come on, they're TRANS! Shit, man it's so simple! Even Igor remembers that, and he was the DUMBEST one in your KGB classes! Are you dumber than Igor?

Pull your head out of your twat. I never said that the police should not investigate, you fucking liar.

OK, YOU didn't say that, specifically - but you DID fault the school and the school board for not taking action (just a guess here - against the trans girl!) and for not sharing all the details (in spite of their being an open police investigation)...

Forgive me Comrade - I took the presence of lemons, sugar, and water to mean you were making lemonade! I did not stop to consider that you were perhaps going to make lemon wedges covered in sugar and then would drink the water separately. My apologies! Please don't shoot me in the head, this isn't Russia!

If you got your head out of your ass, you would know that I balked at the dirty ass pigs GRABBING the dad, when they had no legal right to other than under the bullshit Qualified Immunity that protects dirty ass fucking pigs.

Yes, Comrade! There you go! Back on message: American Police are BAD... ALWAYS BAD! Worse than KGB!

Oh wait - he was just being pulled away from the podium where his time was up... OOPS! Sorry! But, COPS ARE STILL BAD, RIGHT?? ALWAYS BAD!

Yeah! That's the ticket!

Your bias was clearly spelled out when you said you had 2, maybe 3 foster kids that were trans/gender fluid.

No - I said they were QUEER. I'm QUEER. At least here in the US, that's a synonym for ALL of the LGBTQ+ community!

I will cut you some slack there tho - they do use the term "Gender Queer" to describe gender-fluid people... but Queer (without the word Gender in front) is anywhere in the LGBTQ+ spectrum.

• My 30 y/o daughter is a married & divorced lesbian
• My 22 y/o daughter is a self-avowed asexual/pansexual
• My 15 y/o son is a self-avowed queer (gay male)
• I am a 57 (almost 58) y/o self-avowed hyper-pan-sexual

So, not trans - tho not for lack of trying! As a foster parent, we took in the "hard cases"...

UMM, you are the fuck headed leftist, so "Just Believe" and "Me Too" is your religious dogma. I was just asking why you are suddenly, in a case against a "non-conforming, gender fluid" person with a penis is accused of rape and sexual assault. By your own religion, this proves you hate "females" whether they have a penis or cervix. You are a rape apologist and probably a rapist in your own right. I mean, that is your religious dogma, or have you conveniently changed religions just for this single case?

Um... we've never EVER discussed my religion in this forum. I have a term for my sexuality - not one for my "religion" per se - because I don't follow any "organized" religion - I don't go to any "church" regularly.

As for RAPE - how that has a religious component in your Russian head is beyond my ability to comprehend. I admit I don't know a LOT about your Mother Russia, but I had no idea rape and religion were intertwined. I'm feel sorry for you, you sick fucker!

With 5 daughters, 2 grand-daughters (and an ex-wife), I can assure you that I am not a rape apologist. Making valid rape claims can be terrifying - albeit eventually empowering - for the abused MEN AND WOMEN who are victims of rape and other sexual assault.

However, there have been many instances where false rape accusations have been made to attack or rebuke an otherwise innocent person. Care has to be taken in rape accusations that you get it right - because a LOT of damage can be done to the ACTUAL victim - whether that's the accuser or accused!

Clearly, you people hate when your own religious dogma is used against you.

If you know my religious dogma, I'd like to know it too - please share! As far as I know, I don't have one... (woof!)

Maybe your actual issue is that you are getting drunk off Pelosi's gin-soaked pussy farts and you can't keep track of what is going on. Maybe you should consider not being her panty shield and you'd sober up.

Funny thing about my sexuality - I LOVE to rim a smooth ass on a hot guy... I don't eat pussy... DISGUSTING! Intellectually, a vagina is WAY CLEANER than an asshole - even IMMEDIATELY AFTER CLEANING!... but tell that to my dick!

Seriously - they only support I'd give Nancy Pelosi is a hand to hold onto while she gets into the car taking her away from Washington - forever! I respect here for her ability to herd cats (democrats), but politically we agree on almost nothing... ALMOST nothing - we did both agree that Trump was a danger to our Democracy.... but I didn't agree with impeaching him - EITHER time... You gotta be sure the cure isn't worse than the disease!

@lololulu19 said in AG Garland and conflict of interest:

@raphjd Garland is self destructing, losing whatever credibility he had. He certainly is far more interested in protecting himself than doing his job.

I think they should hang Garland on the White House Christmas Tree!

Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!

Trumpites don't like the Attorney General!

News at 11! Dog chases cat!

The Trumpites didn't like THEIR OWN Attorneys General, WTF makes you think they'll like a DEMOCRAT one?

Well GOOOOLLLLLYYYY! Gee Sergeant! I never thought of it THAT way! Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!

@raphjd said in Where are the Biden supporters?!:

@bi4smooth

OK, liar.

You do not call out the shit the DNC does.

Um... I lied by NOT saying something?
Comrade, you're having trouble with your English translator again! To lie, you have to actually SAY something!

For example... quietly accepting that Trump lost another election (by popular vote) in 2020, but believing that he should have won in the Electoral College again isn't lying...
it's WRONG - factually - but it's not lying.

Saying out loud (or writing) that Trump won the 2020 Election by a landslide... that's a lie! It's factually untrue!

We can start on some more English lessons another time - I'm running short on time today.

Oh no, instead you do nothing but downplay things I post about your "Dear Father" and Co doing.

Comrade, we in the Western Democracies don't "revere" our leaders like you do in Mother Russia... we don't consider them "Father" or "Mother" figures - they're just politicians - all of whom can only serve for limited terms.

Trump's followers, who actually do revere him, are an abomination of Western Culture.... he's an outlier.

Be patient, Comrade - It'll take time - I know that while Trump was in office it was hard to distinguish between a Trump Administration and a Putin Administration from back home, but we Western Democracies don't like dictators - eventually Trump's supporters will turn on him... you'll see!

You have absolutely no issue with the shitting all over the human rights of actual humans, but you get butt hurt when they tickle a business' non-existent "human rights".

There you go again, Comrade... mixing up the ideals of "human rights" with the ideals of "freedom". Here in our Western Democracies, businesses don't have "rights", only "freedoms". People have rights... and people IN business have rights, but only those rights given to people to begin with.

But unlike Mother Russia, Comrade, businesses don't get SPECIAL rights - because they're NOT part of the Government here! Still, we believe in FREEDOM - and that includes allowing businesses the FREEDOM to sell both Coke AND Pepsi - in the same store!

In time, you'll get used to it! Still - practice your English, and work on your vocabulary words!!

@raphjd said in (CA) Gov Newsome vetoed Cal Grant expansion bill:

@bi4smooth

LIAR.

YES, you do have extreme TDS, thanks to your drug laces chop suey.

You don't start threads because you don't have a problem with what your "Dear Father" and the rest of the liberals do, except when they violate a business' "human rights".

If your delusions were true, then simply applying a little Critical Thinking and/or Problem Solving (2 skills you are WOEFULLY inadequate in), you would have thought that during the Trump Administration, I'd have been creating thread after thread railing against him!

Nope... even then, I mostly posted my "true conservative" alternatives to your bloviated and hyperbolic Trumpist version of conservatism.

Tell Vladimir I said "Hi and F*CK YOU!", will you? Please?

@raphjd said in California decides to MANDATE gender-free toy aisles:

@bi4smooth

You may not have been here then, but it does sound exactly like the crap you say.

Guilt by association - how very FASCIST of you! Thanks! Putin must be SO PROUD of you!

OK, since you are soooo incredibly slow; I can agree with something someone says/does but be against everything else they do/say. DUH!!!!!!

Really? That's not what happened in the OTHER GOV of CAL thread here - the one YOU started: where he VETOed a piece-of-shit legislation and you railed against him anyway!

Tell me ONE thing you disagreed with Trump about - better yet, tell us one thing CURRENT that you disagree with Trump about!

You are a liberal DNC whore because you defend everything they do or say, except on a minute few occassion, like violating a business' "human rights" but you have no issue when they violate an actual person's human rights.

You continually conflate business with Government. THIS is how we KNOW you're a RUSSIAN AGENT! In the west, we have laws that say that the GOVERNMENT is restricted in ways that businesses and people are not!

Most people raised here (in the Western Democracies) understand that easily. People raised in environments where the Government runs EVERYTHING (like Mother Russia) have a hard time coming to terms with that! Freedom can be SO CONFUSING to people like you!

Speaking of Sen Sinema, you were, as always, totally silent when your fellow lunatic liberals (both persons with penises and cervixes) followed her into the bathroom to harass her and your beloved self-proclaimed dictator downplayed.

I hadn't heard any story of Sen Sinema being accosted in the bathroom. People have the right to protest their Government - and its officials, but they (individually) ALSO have rights! Sadly, however, we don't have a RIGHT TO PRIVACY in this country... something I have rallied for on many occasions.

IT IS NOT OK to follow someone into the bathroom to protest against them - not even a public official!

Again, sadly, many in my own party REFUSE to support a right to privacy - mostly because they fear it could be used to support abortion rights. But I'm sorry, 2 wrongs do NOT make a right, and we - ESPECIALLY in the INTERNET AGE - NEED A RIGHT TO PRIVACY!

@raphjd said in FUCK SCIENCE says Instagram:

@bi4smooth

We have had censorship discussions before and you always sided with whichever business or industry is involved.

And you have always had difficuly understanding the difference between a BUSINESS censoring its own content on its own platform vs the GOVERNMENT telling a business what can and cannot appear on its platform!

An illustrative point: recall the "de-platforming" of Parler (the Trumpite alternative to Twitter):

• Amazon (owner of AWS) told them they were in violation of their terms of service, which Parler ignored
• Amazon warned them they were in danger of being turned off (de-platformed), which Parler ignored
• Amazon turned off Parler - and they screamed like a poked pig! Then again, in about a month (delayed only because of their own focus on portraying themselves as victims) they were back up on another platform.

Those are the facts. YOU thought the Government should intervene and FORCE AWS to keep Parler.

I said AWS was within their rights to "cancel" the Parler account. It was a business decision - and one that angered many AWS "tenants" (and endeared others).

UMM, are you forgetting that the person you voted for has been open that he is working directly with big tech on who and what topics to ban? Both Biden and Jen Psaki has gleefully admitted to it.

I don't mind the President saying he'd like certain things taken down: Trump certainly did it! Facebook, Twitter, etc. can take advise from anyone they want - even YOUR Boss, Comrade Putin! I don't object to their "accepting" advise from any source!

I would object to the Government FORCING them to do the President's bidding! They are private businesses! Their "job" is to grow the business and make money for their investors.

Businesses are FREE to be as political or apolitical as they want (under most circumstances - Government Contractors cannot be overtly political). Being a Conservative, I'm generally used to being in the "good graces" of big business. Trump has arguably changed (or at least STARTED to change) that equation. Time will tell - but business will (and should) continue to do what's best for their shareholders and stakeholders - not any political party! (Not even MY political party!)

We shouldn't be surprised that you liberals are never, ever consistent in your dogma.

You, Comrade, are the one with dogma whiplash! Let there be NO Government interference when things are going your way, but when they DON'T, why THEN, the Government needs to intervene!

Instagram is NOT THE GOVERNMENT. Not Federal, not State, not local, not even Global or InterGalactic! Thus, you have no 1st Amendment rights there... the 1st Amendment protects you from GOVERNMENT infringement of free speech! Individuals (and businesses) are NOT also "controlled" by the 1st Amendment.

READ IT: "Congress shall make no law...*" It doesn't say "People shall not...." or "Businesses shall not..." - it only applies to the Government - even more specifically, the FEDERAL Government - it can apply to State & Local Governments only in so far as they also include free speech protections - but those are not the same as 1st Amendment protections, tho they are often conflated).

"BURN THE WITCH" for not following the science that you like and "BURN THE WITCH" for following the science you hate.

I mean, we aren't talking the bullshit non-science crap the homophobic NARTH put out in the 1980s - 2000s. NARTH's state goal was to uphold the ultra far-right's agenda on all topics and they would use science to do it. From memory, in 35ish years, they only had 1 successful peer-reviewed study and that said that kids of gay parents suffered because other people treated them like shit. They used that to prove why LGBs (especially gay men) should be banned from having kids.

SOCIAL SCIENCE is soft, pseudo-science (shit, NAMBLA had studies that showed the pedophilia was psychologically GOOD for the young boys who were abused! SICK!)

MEDICAL SCIENCE is not a LOT BETTER, but it's making headway. Some of Medical Science is "hard evidence" (like when you can measure levels of antibodies), but some of Medical Science is "soft" - like when they tell you what the "good" levels of cholesterol are - because they're purely "observational".

MATH (including STATISTICS) is mostly HARD SCIENCE - like the ability to count 81-million votes AGAINST Trump, and just 74-million FOR Trump in 2020! LOL (I couldn't resist!)

CHEMISTRY is mostly HARD SCIENCE (mix Chlorine and Ammonia and you get a DEADLY gas - every time, not just some of the time!)

POLITICAL SCIENCE is an oxymoron

@raphjd said in YouTube is at it AGAIN:

@bi4smooth

I have no problem with YouTube making a profit, but they are doing it off of my work.

I used to be monetized and got maybe $200 a year.

YouTube, changed its rules and I no longer qualify to monetize. It's not because they targeted me specifically, but they targeted smaller video makers.

YouTube runs ads on my videos and keeps all the money.

Easy solution: post your videos somewhere else.

Problem solved

As for censoring stuff, they censor stuff to control the narrative so it suits their political and social agenda. All of "big tech" does this, as Tim Pool pointed out to Jack Dorsey and Twitter's top lawyer (Indian woman, can't remember her name) on the Joe Rogan podcast. Their rules directly discriminate against conservative voices. "But men aren't women though" and the like will get you a ban on all of the big tech platforms.

Easy solution: point your web browser somewhere else. Alternatively, download different apps to your "devices"

Problem solved

Posting about a peer-reviewed scientific study ordered by the IOC will get you banned because "big tech" doesn't like the results of the study despite if being validated by the peer-review.

"Follow the science" is only true when the science suits the liberal agenda.

Easy solution: point your web browser somewhere else. Better yet, stop trying to use SOCIAL MEDIA as a NEWS SOURCE!

Problem solved

"Follow the science" isn't what Fauci did during the AZT scandal where he killed a lot of people because he lied about AZT. Despite the"science" declaring AZT as a drug of last resort, St Fauci of Can Do No Wrong pushed it as a drug of first choice.

Fauci caused a lot of gay/bi men to die, but liberals (including you) demand we ignore that and worship him because, as you people claim, all he does is follow the science.

Your demons run deep, Comrade... Your fixation on Fauci and his AZT past get dragged into more posts than Trump!

Tell your Russian Handlers you need therapy! This is likely some kind of PTSD...

@raphjd said in Arizona Audit report presentation, Cyber Ninjas share their results of election audit:

@bi4smooth

BULLSHGIT, YOU LIAR!!!!

You constantly defend fraud.

Comrade, you need to fix (or update the software in) your English to Russian translator! I've never defended fraud - especially the BIGGEST fraud: the attempt to STEAL the election by making hundreds of BOGUS claims of fraud - claims that the Trump Attorneys couldn't defend in court because they were worried about losing their law licenses for bringing such bullshit into court!

Going back to an earlier analogy - when we count your $100 in change and find a slug-nickel, I don't claim your entire bankroll is fraudulent! Just that one nickel... and if what you wanted only cost $75, you're still good to go!

So, in the election of 2020, when Trump lost by over 7-million votes - and you can find fraud covering (being VERY generous here) 100,000 votes - you can't claim the whole election is a fraud!

There were over 160-million votes cast, about 155-million in the Presidential race (yes, some people "sat out" the Presidential contest - in disgust!).

Biden won with 51+% of the vote (a Damn-SITE better than Trump won with in 2016 - 46% of the vote!)... Start finding evidence of fraud getting close to 1% of the vote (that would be 1.6 million votes - put away the calculator!) and we've got something to look into!

But when ALL of the fraud Trumpites CLAIM to have uncovered don't even rise - even when all combined - to 1% of 1% (.01%), how can you expect to be taken seriously?

But let's also distinguish between FRAUD (intentional swaying of the vote by illegal means) and ERROR. When the 250 or so people in Florida were told they were eligible to vote because their Civil Rights had been restored after their felony conviction's complete sentences were completed - per the new Florida constitution - they did so "in good faith".... that it was LATER determined that they shouldn't have been allowed to vote meant they voted in ERROR, not FRAUDULENTLY.

When the workers in the GA precinct first counted the TEST BALLOTS in with the REAL BALLOTS and came up with vote totals HIGHER than the total number of voters in the district, it was an ERROR (one that was corrected before official results were posted), not FRAUD!

Every time I posted about another proven case of voter fraud, you get butt hurt and screechy demanding it is ignored because it helped Creepy Uncle Joe win.

No voter fraud should be ignored - but you're conflating "not enough to overturn or invalidate the election results" with "who cares" - and that's YOUR problem, not mine!

The only one who gets butt-hurt here is you, Comrade!

DUMB ASS, I never implied or stated a fucking thing, other than what I said here and in previous discussions on this topic.

The issue was over 1 part of NJ, no fucking duh. BUT, it involved EVERY election on the fucking ballot for that area. Of course, the presidential election was perfect in every way despite every other part of that ballot was so rampant with fraud that it had to be done again.

So it's clear - the process in NJ worked - they DISCOVERED the attempted fraud.

But let's be clear here, Comrade Nut-Job: the tainted election was held in May - and it was a City Council race. They actually did not re-run the Presidential results - but because they didn't exist, not because they were OK with the results! Trump wasn't on the ballot (which is a better explanation for his getting 0 votes in that election than fraud!)

Put away your almanac, Comrade - the US holds Presidential elections in NOVEMBER, not May!

AND AGAIN, you are doing the "voter fraud should be ignored if I like the way voter fraud went".

The next time you go to the bank to deposit coins, let's keep your mentality (or lack thereof) in mind... you dump $100 in change into the counter - it says you have $99.95, not $100 - so it confiscates your entire deposit - you'll have to re-do it later.

As always, you have your face buried so deep in the collective unwashed vags of the DNC. Me being against voter fraud for as long as I can remember has nothing to do with Trump because I doubt I even knew his name when I first became aware of voter fraud.

Your concepts of higher math (percentages), much less higher math (like statistics) is amazing! (for a 3rd Grader, anyway!)

I'll re-wind, Comrade: EVERY election has some level of fraud - perfect elections don't even happen in High School Prom elections!

That's why they REALLY CLOSELY scrutinize elections where the results get closer than about 1%... but fraud and errors SELDOM reach the level of even 0.01%, so in most cases, these really close elections are actually VALIDATED.

The 2020 Presidential election wasn't THAT close... only in the minds of Trumpites who cannot BELIEVE that their candidate LOST does a handful of irregularities, a few minor cases of fraud (all detected and prosecuted), and rise to the level of INVALIDATING an entire election!

BTW: In case you missed it back when you were DREAMING that the AZ audit would discover the MASSIVE FRAUD that would have changed the outcome of the AZ results... the FEDERAL election system has NO MECHANISM for re-running an election. EVEN IF it is later determined that fraud happened, once the Electoral College vote is certified by Congress, it's done. Signed, sealed, and delivered. See you again in 4-years. Until then, enjoy the 25th Amendment to figure shit out.

NJ can re-run their elections all they want... in the Presidential election, they submit their approved electors to the Electoral College, or they don't vote at all. There are no provisions for delays, re-dos, recounts, or audits... up to 538 votes can be cast (and it's an important election, so exactly 538 are normally cast)... and once they are, it's a done deal. If someone wins, they win. If there is NO winner, the new House and Senate decide (with constitutionally defined rules!)... and once they decide, THAT's a done-deal... no re-do, recount, audit, or reversal... again: see you in 4-years, please see the 25th Amendment for further directions.

I remember way back during Carter, dirty ass politics in Chicago, where you could go to each fire station and look at their memorial wall and be sure that each one would vote Dem in the next election. Same with the police. Likewise in Detroit and every other DNC run area.

ROFL - yes, there were areas of the country where fraud was rampant... but the Dems weren't the only ones "fixing" elections... We Republicans did our fair share of "vote rigging" ourselves (the prisons bear this out!). No one is claiming we've got this permanently "fixed" or "foolproof' - but the fact is, we have professionals who run these things - professionals from both parties... and while it still isn't perfect (because these are PEOPLE we're talking about here!) we DO get better at it year over year!

AND, I still know you refuse to watch the video because it goes against your Biden worshipping claims.

I'll watch that video if you watch "Roger and Me" with your eyes open! LOL

The 'audit' was performed by partisan amateurs - amateurs so DUMB they couldn't even get the REVISED counts right! SHIT, GUYS! Your guys were hired with ONE JOB: Show the fraud! Even if they had to make it up - everyone - even the Dems - expected them to SHOW FRAUD! SHOW A HUGE TRUMP WIN! Even if it's totally (even LAUGHABLY) bogus... YOU HAD ONE JOB GUYS! And you came up with MORE votes for BIDEN and fewer for TRUMP! I mean, come one, guys - ONE F^CK^NG JOB!!!

FAIL

@raphjd said in California decides to MANDATE gender-free toy aisles:

@bi4smooth

BItch, puhlease.

I make a thread specifically about some stupid shit you BFF, Honest Joe did and the first thing you do is defend him to the hilt and drag Trump into it.

I haven't looked but I bet you were one of the liberal ass clowns that demanded that no one mention Obama while Trump was in office because they didn't want whataboutism.

I suggest you DO LOOK! It'll be hard to find, because i wasn't a user on this Forum until after Trump was in office... but YOU GO BOY! LOOK! FIND IT! IT'S THERE!

And your spin is off there Comrade: The OTHER recent thread about CAL is illustrative:

• You post that the Dem Gov of CAL actually VETOES a piece-of-shit bill that you didn't support - but you pepper the post with lies and rantings that don't even support your own story.
• I point out where your Comrades got things wrong - and point out that the Dem Gov did exactly what you would have WANTED him to do (save for the part about having the CAL legislature shot in the head and replaced - but honestly, Comrade that's not how we do it in the US... that might work in Mother Russia, but we don't DO that here!)
• You claim I'm a liberal because I think the DEM GOV did the right thing - even if it was a VETO of an ultra-liberal, left-wing-nutjob of a law! Why? Because I said something nice about a Dem! Oh my! What you must think of me when I support the Dem Senators who are holding up the Biden Agenda because it's "too expensive" and at the same time support the ULTRA-LEFT Dems in the House who are holding up the pared-down Biden Agenda because it doesn't "Spend Enough!"

Well, you ignore-a-moose, by those 2 sets of Dems "sticking to their principals" they're getting NOTHING done!

I know this is a shocker - but as a Conservative, the LESS the Liberal Administration can get done in these next 2-years before the mid-terms, the BETTER!

So: Yay Manchin and Sinema in the Senate! and Yay KFC (or whatever her initials are) in the House! You STAND for those principles! (In the meantime, ain't SHIT of the Biden Agenda goin' anywhere! LOL! WINNING!

@raphjd said in (CA) Gov Newsome vetoed Cal Grant expansion bill:

@bi4smooth

Of course, you are not "my straw man", you are a Biden loving liberal.,

We have seen your posts, we know what you believe.

You claim I'm a Russian and Chinese troll, but you are the one that believes the government can trample our rights at any turn, as they please.

AGAIN, since you are an idiot.

You have never, ever made a thread calling out your lord and savior, but you have made them about Trump.

True, i don't start that many NEW threads here - I'm too busy trying to defend actual conservative principles against your bastardization (Trumpization) of them...

Your Russian influences have become clear, Comrade... your confusion about how Western Civilization works is in-line with the lack-luster, mediocre educational system in Mother Russia, not the exacting precision of the Chinese! There is no more confusion! Your handlers are Russians to be sure! If only because of the ERRORS they make!

Show me a Biden proposal I've supported!

Your 2-dimensional Trumpian mind equates anything NOT aligned with your false, Russian-aligned Propaganda in support of Trump as being FOR Biden.... NEWS FLASH COMRADE! There are other points of view than Biden or Trump!

@raphjd said in Where are the Biden supporters?!:

@bi4smooth

LIAR!!!

You voted for Biden/Harris.

You refuse to call out Biden's and Harris' wrongdoing because they are doing the agenda you support.

Thanks for the personal inventory, Comrade! Your understanding of my thought processes about my first vote for a Democrat for President in 40 years is SPOT ON! You're a fuckin MIND READER! AMAZING!

Can you tell me what your Russian Handlers will accuse me of next?

I call out the Biden Admin's bullshit all the time... but, you moron, unless you've been hiding in the Siberian Snow Banks for the past year, you'd have noticed the Biden Agenda is going NOWHERE! Even shaving it down to less than HALF of what they wanted, it's TOO HOT for some in his party, and TOO COLD for others... and being Dems, they can't agree to a WIN unless it's a TOTAL WIN!

They'll have control of Congress until Jan, 2023 - at which point Biden and his Dems become as USELESS as Trump was in 2019 & 2020! Except they WON'T have the Senate on their side...

Why is that important you ask Comrade?

Well, in OUR form of Government, the Senate has to approve of Supreme Court nominees... and once the Dems lose the Senate, any liberal justice the Dem President might want to appoint will be voted down! They'll just wait for 2024 and a new President (assuming it's NOT TRUMP! Outside the still-shrinking Republican Party, he's downright TOXIC as a candidate!).

Anyway - that's one of the many ways the Republican Leadership ALWAYS out-maneuvers the Dems - we think about the FUTURE, and leverage our CURRENT powers to their FULLEST extent FOR THE FUTURE!

Those silly Dems just look to the future... they can't pass PART of Biden's plans because... because... well, it's not EVERYTHING they were PROMISED if they won! (simulate crying temper-tantrum here) If they can't have their "dessert" they're just not going to "eat" at all! WAH!

Meanwhile, the clock is ticking! Their window of opportunity is rapidly closing! Then the Biden Presidency will be one of the MOST IMPOTENT in HISTORY!

Oh wait! I'm supposed to be FOR the liberal! Sorry to disappoint you Comrade... I just can't seem to overcome my 40-year history of enjoying Dem infighting stopping them from getting anything actually done (Obamacare being an exception) in the short historical periods when they actually get power!

@raphjd said in AG Garland and conflict of interest:

@bi4smooth

Now it's clear why you voted for Hunter's daddy.

AGAIN since you are an idiot.

Garland's official stance as the head of the DOJ is; If you disagree with the anti-white racist shit my son-in-law is selling to public schools, I will treat you like a domestic terrorist.

I would have thought that even you would have been able to understand that.

You're such a tool... If Merrick Garland said he prefers Post Toasties in ads for breakfast cereals - even though his son-in-law works for Kellogg's - it's a breach of "family ethics", but it's not a "conflict of interest".

The fact that Garland's DOJ and his son-in-law's opinions about CRT are both leftist is NOT a conflict of interest! And if Garland "goes too far" in his defense of CRT, that's professional misconduct - but it's not a "conflict of interest" just because his son-in-law supports the same viewpoint - in his job.

What would become a conflict of interest would be if the DOJ started to investigate the company his son-on-law worked for... or even a "direct competitor" of theirs... something that would be directly beneficial (or detrimental) to his son-in-law (or his employer) in his official capacity... and that conflict would be easily solved by his recusal from all decisions regarding those cases.

Look, Comrade - word choices matter.

I'm not defending Garland's position on CRT - but it's not a conflict of interest. Its also not embezzlement, rape, treason, assault and battery, or jaywalking!

@raphjd said in Louden County VA high school tried to hide sex assault in bathroom:

@bi4smooth

You always come back with "to be clear, a leftwing outlet said" and then you downplay what happened.

You're just a clueless ass...

My post lauded RWM for all-but-forcing this to light, and literally ended with a comment that it was a tragedy for one or the other... downnplay my ass.

Your Russian Handlers need to brush up on their reading skills!

Why did the dirty-ass pigs grab him? Police do not have, as matter of course, the right to grab people. BUT, pigs being pigs, police love to overstep their rights and do what they love to do as they feel like it to the public because they are shielded by Qualified Immunity.

Mr. "I'm a conservative" is now a 60's era LIBERAL protester against the police?

I'm sorry - but WHO THE FUCK does your pitiful ass think should investigate this? Or should we just take the word of all teenage girls?

This is not Trumpian of you at all! Where's that "Thin blue Line" you're supposed to be a supporter of?

BTW: Can I have a flower, child?

The policy being discussed and the incident involving his daughter are directly related; ie more special rights for the rapist at school.

Indeed... Louden county has ONLY ONE Trans student, and your OMNIPOTENT SELF is so certain that these girls are telling the truth, you're ready to EXECUTE the trans student!

You're awfully quick to condemn the Trans Girl... a little trans-phobic yourself, bitch?

Let the police do their job... SOMEONE is the victim of some awful shit here - but it's FAR FROM CLEAR who is the victim yet! If this was clearcut and easy, I have a feeling there would have been arrests by now!

Oh wait! I forgot about those CENTURIES OLD police policies to PROTECT Trans People you're always ranting about! I'm sure it's a conspiracy to protect the trans student that's stopping the truth from coming out!

Yeah, that's the ticket!

Well, we already know you are biased, by your own admission in other discussions.

Yeah - I admit a bias here... a bias to get to the TRUTH and NOT have a knee-jerk reaction to ACCUSATIONS!

Once again, your Russian background is showing: here in the West, we don't shoot first and ask questions later! That's a KGB tactic we DERIDE here... we take our time, investigate fully, and charge people AFTER the FACTS are discovered (and confirmed)... not based on a teen-aged girl's accusations!

Mind you, her accusations MAY BE TRUTHFUL! I'm not calling her a liar... but I AM saying that if this was as cut/dried as you and your Russian Handlers want to make it out to be, the police would have filed charges by now.

We will know WHO should be executed AFTER the investigation, Comrade! Until then, chill the fuck out!

What happened to "just believe" and "me too" or do you hate women? Are you a rapist or rape supporter? "Women never lie about that kind of thing, they only ever lie about what they had for lunch".

Which side are you on?

I think there must have been a shift change in the KGB while you were writing this!

First, you're totally in the "believe the girls, shoot the Trannie in the head and be done with it!" - and now you're in the "Wait, those girls shouldn't be believed" camp? All in the same post?

Holy shit, Batman! I'm gonna need a chiropractor! WHIPLASH!

NURSE!! NURSE!! Over here! This one needs his meds!

One last comment: Gentle reader (that is, everyone else BUT @raphjd) - please note the LACK OF CRITICAL THINKING here by our Russian Comrade... His news media made this out to be a liberal coverup to protect the trannie... and he's incapable of interpreting it any other way! (Did I get your pronoun right, dear?)

ANYTHING that gets in the way of that narrative being 100% accurate is false, liberal, evil, conspiratorial, downright ANTI-DEMOCRATIC! Why actually THINK about what's being accused here? The reporter already DID all the thinking! Just read, believe, distribute, and defend! That's the KGB way!

@raphjd said in Louden County VA high school tried to hide sex assault in bathroom:

The Louden County VA school board tried to hide that a girl was sexually assaulted in a high school bathroom, but a "non-conforming, gender fluid" person with a penis.

This became viral because the girl's father was arrested at the school board meeting for bringing up the topic.

"The Daily Wire that a boy was charged with two counts of forcible sodomy, one count of anal sodomy, and one count of forcible fellatio, related to an incident that day at that school." as quoted The Burning Platform.com.

All the reports I've read say that it was wearing a skirt, but only some have said it was wearing no panties and that its dick was just hanging loose.

As it is a hate crime to mis-gender a trans-person in Scotland, I will just say IT, in reference to the scumbag.

Not surprisingly, it's not a hate crime to mis-gender a non-transperson, cuz reasons.

BTW, Happy Hate Crimes Awareness Week.

This is a case where Conservative Media was on this and essentially forced the hand of MSM to pick it up.

To be clear tho, things aren't as bad as the right-wing media makes it out to be. From Newsweek's article:

• The kid (remember, s/he's a kid) who is accused is "gender fluid" - and yes, that apparently gives them access to use the girl's restroom... but sexual assault can happen virtually anywhere. Let's not forget that MANY cultures DO NOT separate bathrooms based on gender at all!
• The dad who was arrested was NOT arrested at the SB meeting for what he said, he was arrested because when he was approached and grabbed by a police officer, he reacted violently. I can't say as I blame him - but the policy being debated by the SB that night had nothing to do with bathrooms - it was a policy requiring school personnel to use the pronouns that the students request to be used for them.
• The school reported the incident to law enforcement, who asked them NOT to interfere with the investigation. It wasn't a "cover up", it was the school doing what they were asked to do by law enforcement - including NOT releasing information about an ongoing investigation.

NONE of that lessens the fact that TWO separate girls have reported assaults by this same individual.

BUT neither has there been any arrest or charges filed - it's not inconceivable that these stories are made up BECAUSE they're (the accusers are) transphobic!

THAT'S why we have police - to investigate and figure out what's fact and what's not.

It's a bad situation - a real shit-show - there right now... and there are either 2 cis-female victims of a very disturbed trans student, or there is a trans-female student being horribly victimized by these 2 girls.

Honestly, the best we can do right now is WAIT for the police to investigate....

@raphjd said in FUCK SCIENCE says Instagram:

Instagram bans scientist for posting peer-reviewed study on the "born with a penis" advantage in sports because it proved people with penises have an advantage over people with cervixes.

Instagram labeled it transphobia.

Keep in mind, our resident fake Repub will spew "don't violate Instagram's human rights to be bigoted against people who believe in science" while spewing "but St Fauci of GOFR just followed the science and if you disagree with St Fauci of AZT, you hate science and St Fauci of Wuhan".

Remember, people do not have human rights, businesses do and it's only "follow the science" as long as the science suits your liberal agenda.

PS: Happy Hate Crimes Awareness Week from Scotland, where only mean tweets are actual crimes and ambulances are being taken out of service, and people are dying, so they can be converted to Gaelic, from English, because it's the only health emergency in the lowlands of Scotland.

NOTE: The highlands ambulance service and virtually all government signage in the highlands have been in Gaelic for ages.

Wow... who pee'd in your cereal this morning? That's quite the rant!

Your supposition that I would take Instagram's side is (typical for you) completely off-base. I don't believe in censorship.

That said, I don't think it's up to the GOVERNMENT to force Instagram to take down or NOT take down posts they don't like! That's an Instagram decision, and if they want to limit all posts to trans-positive posts with exactly 19 vowels in the captions... well, that's their choice!

This isn't all that different from the California "gender neutral toy aisle" debate... it doesn't matter to me if the toy aisles are gender-based or gender-neutral! What matters to me is that the Government has no place in telling private businesses how to run their businesses! If they make bad choices, people will stop using their store/service!

Remember MySpace? AuctionQuest? Netscape? Blockbuster? Compaq?

Yeah - things NEVER change in the modern times! Facebook is here to STAY! Forever!

Instagram shouldn't have taken down the post(s)...
the Government should stay out of it!

@raphjd said in YouTube is at it AGAIN:

YouTube has banned the video of UK MP David Davis speaking against Vaccine Passports, as a civil rights concern.

YouTube has also banned a video by Steven Crowder about the high school girl who was sexually assaulted in the school's bathroom by a "non-conforming, gender fluid" fellow student with a penis. Apparently, reporting on this incident is deemed by YouTube as "transphobic". Crowder also has a 1-week ban and YouTube is once again deciding if they want to block him from monetizing his videos, AGAIN.

There were a bunch of other topics and specific videos that YouTube has banned, but I got sidetracked and my browser crashed so I no longer have the links.

I don't like censorship in any form. I don't know the content you describe, but unless it's DANGEROUS (as-in trying to promote an insurrection or organize a riotous attack on Government buildings) it shouldn't be touched.

I do NOT object to one of the social media outlet's who mark those things as "false" or "unsubstantiated" or "misleading" or whatever it was.... you have a right to say your piece.... that doesn't mean you have the right to say you piece "uninterrupted"

@lololulu19 said in YouTube is at it AGAIN:

It addition to Youtube's attempts to control people's thinking, they have also increased their forced advertising. For many years, Youtube did not require people to watch and commercials. Then, they started forcing us to watch 1 commercial per video. They recently increased that to TWO.

FUCK them for wanting to make a profit! The Internet should be FREE! I mean, I pay my ISP, right? Isn't that enough?

@raphjd said in Arizona Audit report presentation, Cyber Ninjas share their results of election audit:

@bi4smooth

Oh puhlease, Mary.

You have desperately tried to find any and every excuse to justify voter fraud, then pretend that it had no bearing on the elections.

I do not defend fraud - and I've admitted that there was fraud in the 2020 election. As there was in the 2016 election... and the 2012... and the 2008 and the 2004 and the 2000, 1996, 1992, 1988, 1984, & 1980 elections. (That's as far back as my voting experience goes)...

ONLY the Trumpites seem to be STUCK on the idea that ANY error means the ENTIRE thing was a fraud. You sure as hell didn't think so in 2016 when all the polls said Hillary would win!

Say you owe the bank $25,000 and the balance seems off by about $0.50 ... does that mean the entire loan is shit? Head down to the bank and try to pull that shit!

Let's go back to that NJ election where the judge declared EVERY election on the ballot was corrupted by fraud and had to be redone, EXCEPT the Presidential election.

That's bullshit. You imply that the entire State of NJ had to re-do their election. One City had issues (Patterson). Had EVERY registered voter in Patterson, NJ voted for Trump, it wouldn't have been enough votes for him to have won that heavily Democratic state.

AGAIN (you're a fucking idiot that you can't "get this") - there are ALWAYS some irregularities when you try to get 160-million to do anything... including voting. It's IMPOSSIBLE to think you could get a "PERFECT" election! But you get the errors down more and more every year, and you learn from mistakes made every year!

I have no issues with the new voter ID laws - I think voters SHOULD have to prove their identity. I only object when those IDs are limited to specific kinds of IDs that cost $100+ to obtain! That makes those ID cards a poll-tax, and that is unconstitutional. If you want Voter ID, then poor people have to ALSO have the ability to get a FREE ID (no cost, but you certainly still have to prove your identity to get one!)

What bullshit is your excuse to call the judge a fucking liar? Remember, he said that all but 1 of the elections on the ballots was corrupted. That's something you have constantly denied is possible.

You STUPID TWIT! I've said all along that there ARE errors... EVERY YEAR, there are errors... what there are NOT are SUFFICIENT errors to CHANGE the outcome!

If you have $100 in change, but it turns out one of your nickels is a fake, that doesn't mean you're broke!

Now, if we are to believe that the judge is correct about the other elections on the ballot, why would the presidential election not also be corrupted? How is that 1 election on the ballot be the only honest one?!

I don't know the details about why they said there was something fishy about that election - and it doesn't matter! Not because fraud doesn't matter, but because - as I said above - IF EVERY SINGLE VOTER - 100% - voted for Trump, it wouldn't be enough votes to change the outcome in the NJ Presidential race....
Maybe that's why they didn't include that one? I don't know... but you're the one in the other threads insisting that MATH IS MATH... well, DO THE FUCKIN MATH!

I know you haven't watched the video because you haven't touched on any specific points, just spewing your normal "fuck Trump, he's literally worse than Hitler" crap to justify your BFF Honest Joe winniing.

Sigh -- those straws you're grasping for are awfully thin... but i get it.... your Russian handlers won't let you concede ANY points... so I feel for you, man... you're stuck!