Posts made by altoids582

Youtube Video

Turkish journalists face 45yrs in jail over claims Ankara supplied arms to jihadists

https://www.rt.com/news/325825-sarin-gas-syria-turkey/

_Islamic State terrorists in Syria received all necessary materials to produce deadly sarin gas via Turkey, Turkish MP Eren Erdem has told RT, insisting there are grounds to believe a cover up has taken place.

The main opposition Republican People's Party (CHP) member, Erdem, brought up the issue for public discussion in parliament last week, citing evidence from an abruptly-closed criminal case. He accused Ankara of failing to investigate Turkish supply routes used to provide terrorists with toxic sarin gas ingredients.

“There is data in this indictment. Chemical weapon materials are being brought to Turkey and being put together in Syria in camps of ISIS which was known as Iraqi Al Qaeda during that time," Erdem told RT._

So some people in Turkey's government are mentioning how Turkey plays a bit of a hand in allowing weapons to find their way in Syria.

It's worth remembering that there was the outed story of how the US planned to use chemical weapons in Syria and then blame Assad.

http://web.archive.org/web/20130129213824/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html

_Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.

A report released on Monday contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme 'approved by Washington' is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons._

Plus there this:
https://www.rt.com/news/325826-turkey-us-isis-oil-un/
Turkey, US failed to notify UN Security Council of ISIS oil smuggling - Russian UN envoy Churkin
_Ankara and Washington contravened the UN resolution on financing terrorism by failing to inform the Security Council about Islamic State illegally trafficking stolen oil, Russia’s UN envoy has said.

“We’ve got serious complaints about the implementation of [UN] resolution (#2199, banning financing of the terrorist organization),” Vitaly Churkin told RIA Novosti news agency.

“Under Resolution 2199, adopted on our initiative in February, countries are obliged to provide information (about financing terrorists) to the Security Council - if they have such information. That means the Americans had to provide such information, and of course Turkey, which should have reported any illegal [oil] trade going on there. They didn't do it,” Churkin said._

@antstorm:

Personally if i was a US citizen i would be far more concerned with white supremacist terrorism
of course right wing slanted media calls them ..lone wolves or deranged , why not call them what they are?   white christian terrorists anyone who has actually read the bible properly , and i mean really read the bible ,will know that it is far more violent than the Quran.
violence is violence , that i wont deny , but one is written defensively , the other offensively , and the Bible is the latter.

the facts are plain and simple ..terror on US soil by muslims from 1970 to 2012 compiled by START a global terror watch data base .2,400 terrorist attacks on U.S. soil only 60 were Islamic related. Most of the terrorist activity in the U.S. in recent years has come not from Muslims at all , but from radical Christians, white supremacists and far-right militia groups.

What "lone wolf" or white supremacist incidents? The only one I can think of off the top of my head is Dylan Roof. I've never heard of any militia group engaging in any sort of attack, or really any white supremacist group supporting anything like that even. If you mean things like school shootings, that's almost been routine for the longest time in predominately black areas, which is part of why so many started using metal detectors.

But really, the fear with ISIS is that they'd increase the number of incidents we already see. Especially when there's so many Muslims that seem to condone their actions, there recently was a survey of American Muslims that seemed to show nearly 20% being sympathetic to ISIS.

There's also this site which seems to come up with tons of these numbers:
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/opinion-polls.htm

_The Polling Company CSP Poll (2015): 19% of Muslim-Americans say that violence is justified in order to make Sharia the law in the United States (66% disagree).
http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Topline-Poll-Data.pdf

The Polling Company CSP Poll (2015): 25% of Muslim-Americans say that violence against Americans in the United States is justified as part of the "global Jihad (64% disagree).
http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Topline-Poll-Data.pdf

The Sun (2015: Following Nov. 2015 attacks in Paris, 1 in 4 young Muslims in Britain (and 1 in 5 overall) said they sympathize with those who fight for ISIS.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/6758207/1-in-5-British-Muslims-have-sympathy-for-jihadis-in-poll.html_

Also the thing about the bible versus Koran is that most Christians just interpret the bible versus taking it all literally. There's also the whole deal with the new testament for instance which is that you weren't supposed to be going off of all those old testament rules that were really harsh and genuinely tasty much of the time. That was the whole lesson of Jesus really that you basically had to chill on the bullshit. Being an atheist myself I know it's tempting to take things out of context with the bible to complain about it, especially since there's plenty of people that want to use it to legitimize their bigotries, but it is an entirely different animal from what goes on with Islam. But really it's all a bit irrelevant what the books themselves say if the people practicing the religion based around it are behaving entirely differently from the way the books suggest they should.

I saw video the other day that actually has an ex-Muslim woman breaking down some of the reasons to criticize Islam and the Koran: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKkckaZO4fw

@Hogue:

Concur.  Why are gays so hung up on the idea of doing what straight people do?  THEY get married.  It's a word.  Why can't "union" be the word gays use for theirs?  (The straight won that coin toss thousands of years ago. ) All it would really take is the amendment of a few federal laws.

Many gays were plenty happy to just have civil unions. The reason this became an issue over the past decade is many states started doing legislation to stop even allowing civil unions to be done. Made for basically two main camps arguing with each other, those wanting to allow gays to enter a legally recognized relationship with the protections they afford and those wanting to ensure their churches weren't forced to gay marry everyone in sight.

There's also just the problem that civil unions being an entirely separate legal realm just complicates everything when it comes to forming a union or dissolving one. With marriage there's already systems in place to protect either person as well as to provide opportunities for divorce. It simplifies a lot of things to just allow marriage licenses to be doled out to those wanting them.

There are murmurs that Turkey was planning on shooting down a Russian plane for weeks now. Apparently the idea being to help rouse the Turkish people into a patriotic fervor to help keeping Erdrogan's power intact.

Iraq's government has also ordered for the Turkish troops that have invaded them to leave, and has requested NATO do something about their buddy.

During this Erdrogan apparently trying to get friendlier with the de facto autonomous Kurds (a group Turks are often vehemently racist against) of Iraq to help with getting a gas pipeline from them into Turkey in anticipation of Russia turning their gas off. Turkey is also training people in an ISIS held area which is kinda odd.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-12-03/turkey-turns-to-iraq-s-kurds-for-gas-amid-pressure-from-putin

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-iraq-turkey-idUSKBN0TN2HZ20151205

https://www.rt.com/news/324787-turkish-troops-deployed-iraq/

http://pmo.iq/pme/press2015en/5-12-20151en.htm

https://twitter.com/UyusukKursun/status/673216243290218496

https://archive.is/mZTQ3#selection-367.0-385.0

_Now Erdogan is attempting to mobilise his voters by a threat of war. Turks are patriotic chaps, they were brought up on worshiping their WWI hero General Kemal Ataturk. For them (like for many nations), a threat of war is a clarion call for unity and support of government. For this reason he plans to pull Turkey to the brink of war with Russia. So claims the Turkish “Deep Throat”, an anonymous and knowledgeable insider who sends his twits under nickname fuat avni https://twitter.com/fuatavni_f  He has a strong record of disclosing noxious plans of the government. Now he claims Erdogan has given orders to shoot down Russian planes operating in Syria while claiming they have intruded into Turkish air space.

Turkish forces already shot down a drone, claiming it was a Russian one. At the same time, they carry out operations against Syrian Kurds, the preferred allies of the Americans. The Turkish opposition insists that the big terrorist attack on the Kurd peace demo in Ankara (95 dead, 215 wounded) perpetrated by ISIS had been used, or even instigated by Erdogan. Bearing in mind that Erdogan was the architect of a new peaceful policy towards the Turkish Kurds, this is a particularly unpleasant development.

Erdogan has lost his allies. The US prefers the Kurds and is annoyed that Turkey bombs them while declaring they fight against ISIS, the main enemy of the Kurds. It is not clear whether they will rush to his support in case of trouble with the Russians._

http://variety.com/2015/biz/news/donald-trump-cnn-republican-debate-1201653244/

Trump has brought up a few times about how the ratings he brings in for these debates and that the networks seem to make a fortune off of him, so he tried out asking that CNN donate a $5 million to charity. CNN's response was to say that they don't pay candidates to appear, which is sort of an interesting misrepresentation that a lot of news sites ran with as part of their headlines.

_When you’re leading in the polls, I think it’s too big of a risk to not do the debate,” Trump said in an interview with the paper.“I don’t think I have the kind of leverage I’d like to have in a deal, and I don’t want to take the chance of hurting my campaign. So, I’ll do the debate.”

Earlier this week, Trump told a rally in Macon, Ga. that he was thinking of telling CNN that he “won’t do the debate unless they pay me $5 million, all of which goes to Wounded Warriors or goes to vets. I would love to do that.”_

"On Thursday, CNN Worldwide President Jeff Zucker said that they “do not pay candidates” to appear on the network, rejecting Trump’s threat. His remarks came at a Q&A sponsored by Paley Center for Media."

So Russia came out with an explanation of how Turkey profits from the ISIS oil trade.

Youtube Video

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12-02/russia-presents-detailed-evidence-isis-turkey-oil-trade

_"

International terrorism - is the main threat of our time. This threat is not illusory but real, and many countries, primarily Russia, knows this firsthand. The notorious "Is Islamic state" - the absolute leader of the terrorist international. This is a rearing monster of international terrorism can be countered. And you can win. Over the past two months, Aerospace Russian forces is clearly demonstrated.

We are firmly convinced that victory over LIH need to deliver a powerful and devastating blow to the sources of its funding, as repeatedly mentioned by President Vladimir Putin. Terrorism has no money - is a beast without teeth. Oil revenues are a major source of terrorist activity in Syria. They earn about $ 2 billion. Dollars annually, spending this money on hiring fighters around the world, providing them with weapons, equipment and weapons. That's why so LIH protects thieves oil infrastructure in Syria and Iraq.

The main consumer of stolen from legitimate owners - Syria and Iraq - the oil is Turkey. According to the data entered in this criminal business involved the highest political leadership of the country - President Erdogan and his family.

We have repeatedly talked about the dangers of flirting with terrorists. It's like that stokes. The fire from one country can spill over to others. This situation we are seeing in the Middle East. Today, we present only part of the facts, confirming that the region has a team of bandits and Turkish elites stealing oil from the neighbors.

This oil in large numbers on an industrial scale, for the living pipelines from thousands of oil tankers entering the territory of Turkey. We are absolutely convinced today present you the hard facts about what the final destination of the stolen oil - Turkey. There is a large number of media representatives, and Our briefing will see more of your colleagues. In this regard, I would like to say the following. We know and appreciate the work of journalists. We know that in the journalistic community, many courageous, fearless people honestly do its job.Today, we have clearly shown you how the illegal trade in oil, the result of which - the financing of terrorism. Provided concrete evidence that, in our opinion, may be the subject of investigative journalism.

We are confident that the truth with your help will, will find its way. We know the price to Erdogan. He has already been caught in a lie again Turkish journalists who opened Turkey delivery of arms and ammunition to militants under the guise of humanitarian convoys. For this imprisoned journalists.

Do not resign Turkish leaders, particularly Mr. Erdogan, and did not recognize, even if their faces will be smeared by oil thieves. I might be too harsh, but at the hands of the Turkish military killed our comrades. The cynicism of the Turkish leadership is unlimited. Look what they're doing ?! Climbed to a foreign country, it shamelessly robbed. And if the owners interfere, then they have to be addressed.

I stress that Erdogan's resignation is not our goal. It is - it is the people of Turkey. Our goal and the goal to which we urge you, ladies and gentlemen, - joint action to block the sources of funding for terrorism. We will continue to provide evidence of robbery by Turkey of its neighbors. Maybe I'll be too straightforward, but the control of these thieves in business can be entrusted only to the most close people.

No one in the West, I wonder, does not cause the issue that the son of the President of Turkey is the leader of one of the largest energy companies, and son-in-appointed Minister of Energy? What a brilliant family business!

This, in general, may elsewhere? Well, once again, of course, such cases can not be charging anyone, only the closest people. Votes this fact in the Western media we do not see much, but it sure can not hide the truth. Yes, of course, dirty petrodollars will work. I am sure that there are now discussions about the fact that everything you see here, - falsification. Well. If it did not - let be allowed in those places that we showed journalists.

It is obvious that today the publicity was devoted only part of the information about the monstrous crimes of the Turkish elites who directly finance international terrorism. We believe that any sane journalist should fight this plague of the XXI century. The world experience has repeatedly argued that the objective journalism is able to be an effective and formidable tool in the fight against various financial corruption schemes. We invite colleagues to investigative journalism on the disclosure of financial schemes and supplies oil from the terrorists to the consumers. Especially since the oil produced in the controlled militants territories in transit through Turkish ports shipped to other regions. For its part, the Ministry of Defense of Russia will continue to disclose new evidence on the supply of terrorists oil to foreign countries and to talk about the conduct of aerospace forces of Russia operations in Syria.Let's unite our efforts. We will destroy the sources of financing of terrorism in Syria, as you get involved in the kind of work abroad. "_

Friend of hers ended up making some comments on Twitter suggesting that she knew the rape claim wasn't true. Seems odd to have the immediate reaction of going on Twitter to say you were raped rather than going to the police.

http://imgur.com/gallery/5qUCe

http://www.alraimedia.com/ar/article/special-reports/2015/11/30/639168/nr/syria

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.alraimedia.com%2Far%2Farticle%2Fspecial-reports%2F2015%2F11%2F30%2F639168%2Fnr%2Fsyria&edit-text=

Russia may soon get a 2nd airbase in Syria, Sha’ayrat airport southeast of Homs. The base may host up to 100 jets

https://ruposters.ru/news/01-12-2015/den-sirijskoj-operacii

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fruposters.ru%2Fnews%2F01-12-2015%2Fden-sirijskoj-operacii&edit-text=

_Additional funds not required for the Russian military operation against terrorists in Syria, said the newspaper "Izvestia", citing a senior official in the government.

"One day of the operation in Syria is much smaller than the day of the exercise of the Ministry of Defense. The military operation in Syria does not affect the increase in the budget. The exercises are often much more expensive. All costs of the military operation came in the final budget for 2016 will remain at the same level ", - said the source publication.

The Defense Ministry confirmed this information. According to the military authorities, it was decided to abandon some military exercises next year and send the funds available to the military operation in Syria.

"Military operations against the terrorist organization in Syria - it is a reality, not a doctrine. But that there was no additional cost, agreed to delete some military exercises planned in the next year ", - said the source publication. Data on how many teachings and in what regions abolished, he did not disclose.

Recall October 3, Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said that the costs of actions of the Russian armed forces in Syria are fully covered by the funds that are already laid down in their software._

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/yahoomic-accidentally-publishes-review-of-rihannas-new-album-anti-before-theyve-even-heard-it-a6753851.html

http://fortruss.blogspot.rs/2015/11/turkish-intelligence-chief-isis-is.html

_Mr. Hakan Fidan, Turkish President's staunchest ally, condemned Russian military intervention in Syria, accusing Moscow of trying to 'smother' Syria's Islamist revolution and serious breach of United Nations law.

“ISIS is a reality and we have to accept that we cannot eradicate a well-organized and popular establishment such as the Islamic State; therefore I urge my western colleagues to revise their mindset about Islamic political currents, put aside their cynical mentalité and thwart Vladimir Putin's plans to crush Syrian Islamist revolutionaries,” - Anadolu News Agency quoted Mr. Fidan as saying on Sunday.

Fidan further added that in order to deal with the vast number of foreign Jihadists craving to travel to Syria, it is imperative that ISIS must set up a consulate or at least a political office in Istanbul. He underlined that it is Turkey’s firm belief to provide medical care for all injured people fleeing Russian ruthless airstrikes regardless of their political or religious affiliation._

So Turkey's government seems to be fully in favor of ISIS due to it being an Islamic group. Seems like Turkey is really damn upset about the whole notion of Russia bombing oil trucks and oil fields since the oil was passed on to Turkey.

@durexxx:

@hellcraving:

Hello Durexx
Just read again your post. Obviously you are feeling still something… It can be love or, depending on the circumstances of the breakdown, you are still hurt. You must be sincere about your true feelings and ask yourself: is it because I am still in love with him? Or is it just the fact of me being single at the moment and I don´t want him to have a new relationship while I am on my own?
If the answer is: I am still in love with him, then: TRY TO SEDUCE HIM AGAIN AND GET HIM BACK TO YOU
If the answer is: I don´t want him to have a relationship while I am on my own, then: YOU MUST WORK ON YOUR SELF ESTEEM AND FORGET ABOUT ALL THE COMPLEXES. Say to yourself: I am hot stuff and I wish him the best... You have much to live and... you know... It´s raining men everywhere!
Hugs,
Hell 

hey hellcraving thanks a lot for replying to be honest whatever you just said its actually in my head and heart i know that im hot and i have it all in all aspects its just hard for me to open my heart to a new guy i actually believe that he is the one for me.but the problem is that when we met and started dating we were young and immature now i know what i want but he doesn't, i guess he has this fear of commitment i dunno know why would you sleep and have sex with your ex boyfriend if you dont have feelings or some lingers for right
??????!!!! i dunno but him going out with my friend and posting pictures it means something i dunno what he is trying to prove by this?!!! though couple of days ago we were together and happy and i actually slept over his house i dunno i guess he uses his brain more than his heart and i do exactly the opposite im a Pisces…...

He may just disconnect emotionally when it comes to sex and not think of it as a sign of wanting a relationship necessarily.

About the friend thing, I feel like most people that are friends have some traits in common. If your ex is dating a friend of yours, it may be that while he doesn't feel like he syncs up with you romantically, that he sees traits in your friend (that you also have) which he is attracted to. Maybe it'd work out for them, maybe it won't, but I'd assume it's just a regular relationship they're engaging in rather than something more complicated.

I pretty much got as faggy as could be for a few years. Bleached blond hair, tight cute clothes, keeping up waifish body, started acting a lot more effeminate, doing my nails, and waxing a lot of body hair.

I was afraid of doing much anything to show how I was attracted to men before I came out, and then afterward it just felt like fuck it. I got into feeling more relaxed than ever just working myself into this effeminate role, which actually made me a lot more comfortable in the bedroom. Previously I was a lot more nervous about being a bottom, I had played with toys for ages and enjoyed it immensely, but after everything I just found myself feeling as comfortable as could be drooling over a man's cock and didn't get so paranoid about making any noise during sex. Beforehand I felt like I had to hold in any sort of noise so I didn't just sound weird, and now I just feel fine squealing a bit if I feel like it as I don't feel like it makes me less of a person now.

Though I suppose I did have this short period of wondering if I was just acting like a bottom in the bedroom because I had this image of being gay as meaning you just took dicks in the ass, but that sort of concern pretty much vanished after like a week and finally feeling comfy getting laid with whoever resulting in me getting split open by a couple hot guys that took away any fantasies I had that I might ever be interested in topping.

@suitlovers:

Am I Gay?
I'm young I'm 18. I like girls, spending time with them. I would like to have a wife, kids.
But if it regard about sex I prefer men especially older 40+. Not for love, just for pure sex.

I found myself in a similar position when I was younger. Feeling like the only way to go would be to grow up, get married to a nice girl, and have some kids.

But I had no attraction to them whatsoever, which made it so I had to deal with those feelings and I pretty much gave up on the fantasy that I could force myself to be with a woman just because it fit this image of how I felt a family had to be.

If you are attracted to women, rather than just liking them for relationships (I.E. you don't want sex with them), then hey you're probably bi and can enjoy sleeping with whoever.

But if you're unable to really have sex with a woman due to a lack of attraction, then you probably are gay. In which case you may want to readjust your perceptions of how a relationship can work, as it isn't exactly impossible to have a loving relationship with a man much the same way you could with a woman. As far as kids, there's always surrogates?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/24/german-professor-nasa-fiddled-climate-data-unbelievable-scale/

Some people have been looking at the raw data NASA had collected about temperatures and found similar shenanigans to what happened in Copenhagen a few years back, where higher temperatures in the past and lower temperatures more towards the present were dumped.
From the publicly available data, Ewert made an unbelievable discovery: Between the years 2010 and 2012 the data measured since 1881 were altered so that they showed a significant warming, especially after 1950. […] A comparison of the data from 2010 with the data of 2012 shows that NASA-GISS had altered its own datasets so that especially after WWII a clear warming appears – although it never existed.

Using the NASA data from 2010 the surface temperature globally from 1940 until today has fallen by 1.110°C, and since 2000 it has fallen 0.4223°C […]. The cooling has hit every continent except for Australia, which warmed by 0.6339°C since 2000. The figures for Europe: From 1940 to 2010, using the data from 2010, there was a cooling of 0.5465°C and a cooling of 0.3739°C since 2000.

I remember back around 2003-2008 when people going on about global warming were saying the average temperature on the Earth would be going up by at least 10 degrees by now, and thinking it was more than a little odd that their projections were that wildly off. So it's interesting seeing how many places edit their data.

Like even the papers done about who believes in global warming seem to get edited. Like there's the 97% statistic trotted out by people like Obama even, of the percentage of scientists that supposedly believe in global warming.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/425232/climate-change-no-its-not-97-percent-consensus-ian-tuttle

The “97 percent” statistic first appeared prominently in a 2009 study by University of Illinois master’s student Kendall Zimmerman and her adviser, Peter Doran. Based on a two-question online survey, Zimmerman and Doran concluded that “the debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely nonexistent among those who understand the nuances and scientific bases of long-term climate processes” — even though only 5 percent of respondents, or about 160 scientists, were climate scientists. In fact, the “97 percent” statistic was drawn from an even smaller subset: the 79 respondents who were both self-reported climate scientists and had “published more than 50% of their recent peer-reviewed papers on the subject of climate change.” These 77 scientists agreed that global temperatures had generally risen since 1800, and that human activity is a “significant contributing factor.”

A major thing I've found weird is how many 'scientists' writing about global warming turn out to be things like professors of women's studies. And those folks that deal with social sciences often do not seem that concerned about using evidence to support their points (except for psychologists that at least use empirical analysis).

Slightly impossible to know how someone will be before you meet them, but as a precaution probably should always leave a not at home about where you'll be if you're going somewhere.

I've done hookups a few times, and I noticed it was usually the people that didn't do tons of typos and actually were willing to engage in conversation that were the most 'normal' people. A couple that were just seemingly illiterate gave off creep vibes as soon as I went inside their places that had me very quickly leaving (I still remember that stunned look on this one guy's face as I went "yeah I gotta go").

Over the past few days there's been some drama revolving around the release of this game, which is basically a volleyball/dating game involving scantily clad women. The developer's community manager basically came out and said straight up that they weren't dealing a regular release in the west because they didn't want to deal with the SJW types. But then out came some news from Playasia, a company that helps with importing games from Asia, came out and said the game could still be available through them which got a bunch of the SJW types all in a tizzy.

Many in the video game media got all upset at the use of the phrase SJW (social justice warrior), resulting in various game developers laughing in their face along with a variety of gamers. So a bunch of the media folks are all complaining how the volleyball game is essentially promoting sexism, rape culture, and blah blah blah.

It's weird seeing the effects of the prudishness on the part of the media affecting what games really get brought over to the US. I have to wonder how many gay dating sims would be available in the US if not for those few people in the media.

I've slept with a few that were huge, and it was something else.

First time, it took like 30 minutes of fooling around with foreplay to even get the head of his dick in me. I could barely do anything orally since it's size made it impossible to get more than inch or two in my mouth without feeling like I was choking. After that, I bent over the side of the bed with him then slowly inserting a tiny bit, and had to just ever so gently rock it in back and forth for a couple minutes so I could relax. Then he started inserting more and more, and I was pretty much feint at that point with it hurting like hell while at the same time feeling awesome. Couple minutes into it and pain entirely was done and just felt like bliss for like the half hour we went at it. After I had relaxed I was able to get on all fours on his bed and have him seriously plunge like all 10-11 inches in me. Pretty much solidified in my mind that there was no way I could top if I could feel so nice bottoming (found since that length didn't really affect how nice the sex feels).

There was one guy I slept with quite a few times that helped me realize I could really handle bigger dicks. Guy was like 45-53 while I was in my 20's, and he had this like 8-9 inch dick (about same around as well). Guy could jackhammer my ass and have me crying out for my big black daddy for ages, had been used to guys being a lot gentler when fucking so was a fantastic change of pace especially when coupled with that huge dick.

But really, the size of the dicks doesn't help with the sex that much. The appeal is mostly psychological I think.

https://variety.com/2015/film/news/tom-cruise-the-mummy-reboot-1201647889/

You may not have noticed this, but Universal studios has been working on their monster movies. No, not horror movies involving monsters, but superhero style movies involving characters from Universal's famous older monster movies. There's already been I Frankenstein and Dracula Untold.

Recently Tom Cruise has engaged in talks to be in a Mummy movie, that will likely be in this same cinematic universe. "Cinematic universe" meaning all these characters are supposed to be operating in the same world and will be interacting in an Avengers style movie down the line.

Getting talked down to by an aggressive older top.