• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. alibix
    3. Posts
    A
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 9
    • Posts 98
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 1

    Posts made by alibix

    • RE: SJWS - Has anyone met one?

      @Eridanos:

      @raphjd:

      I don't think it's quite that.

      The part I was referring to is the bit of C-16 that requires you to call someone by their personally chosen pronouns.    Traditionally, personal pronouns are HE, HIM, HIS, SHE, HER, HERS, THEY, THEY'RE, THEIRS.    Now it can literally be anything a person can imagine.

      Excluding the muslim issue, Canada is only beaten for the SJW award by Sweden.

      Oh. Thanks for clearing that up. But still…dammit, human relationships are as complicated as they are without all this nonsense. And somehow they manage to tangle them up more...

      This is a textbook example of what I'm trying to talk about. Extreme exaggeration to make this huge, everpresent enemy that doesn't really exist.

      http://sds.utoronto.ca/blog/bill-c-16-no-its-not-about-criminalizing-pronoun-misuse/

      posted in Politics & Debate
      A
      alibix
    • RE: SJWS - Has anyone met one?

      @SemenDemon:

      It's hard to ignore something when it starts to impact the cultural landscape beyond the Internet (and SJW-ism has done just that, if that weren't already glaringly obvious). Sadly, enough people got fed up with the "vocal minority" of narcissistic, lying, self-righteous, hypocritical social justice fruitcakes, and now we have Donald Trump as our president (Thanks, SJW's. Really proves how effective your tactics of shutting down "the opposition" have been). Partisan politics are just political football for insular, narcissistic assholes. That is precisely why the US political pendulum keeps swinging between idiotic extremes, instead of happy mediums.

      Quite a few of my friends more or less fit into the SJW or SJW-parroting category. I just can't fucking talk to them about political shit. I just have to smile and nod and let them go on until they run out of steam.

      Vocal Minority? To be honest, the only time I EVER hear about SJWs is when other people on the internet complain about them.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      A
      alibix
    • RE: SJWS - Has anyone met one?

      @raphjd:

      You are too limiting on what an SJW is.

      SJWs include feminists, BLM, "Just Believe", the "Slut Walk", "Take Back the Night" and many, many others.

      It's Norweign male politicians who apologize to their muslim rapist.

      It's Swedish feminist Left Party politicians that claims being raped by Swedish men is worse than being raped by muslims.

      It's the people that defend muslim "refugees" who rape 10yo boys because they had a "sexual emergency".

      It's the people who demand the media de-muslim/de-refugee media articles, like the Paris McDonald's killer story.

      So anyone who disagrees with you?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      A
      alibix
    • RE: Gay Politicians

      The prime minister of luxembourg

      posted in Politics & Debate
      A
      alibix
    • SJWS - Has anyone met one?

      Has anyone met or talked to an actual SJW? One of those crazy feminist tumblr types you see on YT and reddit? I swear I hear people talking and bitching about SJWS than I ever actually meet or interact with SJWS.

      Has anyone asked you 'did you assume my gender'?
      Has anyone asked you to refer to them as 'Xe' or 'Xer'?

      I feel like a large portion of the internet are getting extremely angry at a very small minority and they keeping being angry with eachother over the same shit. A circlejerk.

      Can't we all just ignore this crap?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      A
      alibix
    • RE: RuPaul Judge Lucian Piane: Trump Is More Trustworthy than Hillary.

      @Loki100:

      @raphjd:

      :police:  You are violating our forum rules, by repeatedly calling me a troll.   :police:

      Care to show me where, considering it isn't in your posted rules? It also seems quite a little self serving, might I ask just how often you are accused of trolling?

      @raphjd:

      Those are my posts, whether you like it or not.     And like I said before, you can't debunk what I said, so you are only left with name calling.

      Okay fine. Let's play the debunk game. You said, "Feminists have taken Due Process away from men when accused of sexual assault on college campuses." Due process is fairly specific to the US, and pertains to US laws. College campuses don't pass laws, so they can't actually infringe upon due process. What college campuses do is have policies, which are enacted through various bureaucratic processes. Of course then you have to acknowledge that each college is its own unique institution with its own unique set of policies, and massive variation between them. And since you didn't actually name a college, we can't actually look up what its policies actually are. So what you actually mean is, "Some college boards/presidents/administrators have enacted policies that _feel are unfairly biased in favor of the victims of sexual assault." Which is a very, very, very long way from your initial statement.

      @raphjd:

      I responded to your comments by posting my rebuttal with facts.    If you are not willing to have a proper respectful conversation, then do not reply.

      :police:  You can disagree with me and have a civil discussion and there is no problem.  If all you have is name calling, then you are risking being muted on the forums.   :police:

      Actually you didn't. Note again that you didn't actually name a college. And if you at everything else you have posted, it is similarly long on claims, short of facts to actually examine.

      These people are professional victims. There's no use trying to reason with them. They jack themselves sore to crazy feminists on tumblr each night to confirm their worldview. There's nothing you can do to help._

      posted in Politics & Debate
      A
      alibix
    • RE: Are the majority of people voting Hillary?

      @raphjd:

      Did you just ignore the rest of the article and focused on the brief bit where they said michael brown was unarmed? How about you read it and look at all the sources and statistics they cite and get back to me instead of just rpeating what you said earlier.

      Here's some more info on the topic since you don't seem to want to hear any mentions of michael brown.
      http://www.vox.com/2016/7/12/12152772/rudy-giuliani-black-on-black-crime-police

      I'm sorry, but I discount any article that claims that Michael Brown a victim of police brutality.   That narrative has been proven a total lie. All but 2 of the black "witnesses" were proven to be liars in the case.

      OK, our black President and black Attorney General (and previous black AG) disagree with you and that biased article.  As the article mentions, they support community policing and have been pumping extra money into it.

      I love people that say that we should stop policing black communities because we know within a year you'll be screaming for blood because of massive skyrocketing of crime rates there.

      Ultra liberals hate "black on black crime" because it goes against their narrative.   They want everyone to think that everything is racist white on black crime.  Of course, from federal stats, we know that is a load of BS because the worst interracial crime rates are black on white.

      So-called "racist ticketing" is bullshit at best.  Every race gets tickets for various things.  Tickets for littering and general trash offenses tend to go to the less educated, it's not a racial thing, except to racists.  Smoking in banned places is another thing the less educated get the majority of tickets for.  Again, it only a race thing to racists.

      Loretta Lynch grew up in the racist south and managed to become Attorney General.

      It was 20 years ago that we got the first ever whites-only scholarships.  Oddly enough, it was at historically black universities in Alabama. Of course, it was after several lawsuits.  Nobody was willing to give whites their own scholarships without a fight.

      When looking at poor students (qualify for free school lunches), white boys do the worst.   This is because girls and racial minorities get subsidies (paid to the schools) to help with their education.   Boys of all races and incomes do worse than girls due to the feminizing the education system in the early 1970s.   There are no student subsidies for being white or a boy.   This issue affects ALL western countries and for the same reasons.

      In the UK, the media is required by law to have 35% representation of "visual" minorities, which is 3 times greater than their actual portion of the population.  Other European countries have similar rules.   One example of this crap is the UK's "Being Human".   They had to recast if because 1 white (Russell Tovey), 1 white girl and 1 ethnic guy wasn't diverse enough to meet the rules.  They kept the 1 white guy, but recast to 1 black girl and 1 more obviously ethnic guy.

      If you want to cry for someone, think about the reality of the situation.  White males are the most discriminated group under the law in the west.

      Holy shit. If you won't actually read the article then I can't help you. This is the quote that mentions Brown:
      "Police have shot and killed a young black man (ages 18 to 29) — such as Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo. —175 times since January 2015; 24 of them were unarmed. "
      Where are you getting all the other stuff?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      A
      alibix
    • RE: Are the majority of people voting Hillary?

      @raphjd:

      @alibix:

      @raphjd:

      @myrea:

      1. You do insist on ignoring the very real fact that whites have been targeted by BLM and pro-illegals.

      er… I recall saying that both sides where in the wrong, you obviously are only interested in venting your opinion and disregarding the whys and the causes of those events happening. Rant your hate away, be my guest... that won't help anyone however.

      YES, you said that both sides were wrong, then you went on to defend BLM and pro-illegals attacking whites.

      I know the "whys";

      BLM is completely based on lies.  BLM only cares about black criminals being killed.

      Pro-illegals feel entitled to break US laws.

      Ultra liberals pander to them and protect them.

      BLM isn't based on lies. Police disproportionately kill unarmed black people than unarmed white people.
      https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/07/11/arent-more-white-people-than-black-people-killed-by-police-yes-but-no/

      Police force and violence is also a huge and very real issue
      http://www.joincampaignzero.org/#vision

      Blacks make up 13% of the US population.

      They make up over 40% of cop killers.

      They make up over 50% of all violent crime.

      You would think that with such a high "police contact" number, they would be killed at a higher rate.    The fact is, blacks are killed at the lowest rate of "police contact" than any other racial group.   Whites are killed at the highest rate compared to their rate of police contact.

      Black cops are the most likely to shoot, while white cops are the least likely to shoot, with the other races in-between. It's only about 12% difference between the 2 ends, but it's there.   So is it really racism when white cops are the least likely to shoot?

      You would have a point, ONLY IF, the crime rates were the same among the races and their proportion of the US population.  When you multiply the black population by 5 to equalize it to the white population, your claims completely fall apart.    Now that the 2 populations are equal in size, we have to adjust the crime stats to match, so we have to multiply black crime rates by 5.   Now the robbery rate for blacks is 6 times higher than that of whites.  The same thing happens pretty much across the board.  Except for alcohol laws (DUI, open carry, etc) blacks commit every category of crime at least twice their rate of US Population.

      It needs to be noted that federal crime stats include hispanic and latino in the white category, but in the victim stats they separate them out.

      Both of your sources are biased, especially Campaign ZERO.    Campaign ZERO want's to decriminalize things that keep the peace between neighbors.  All this will do is cause more conflicts between neighbors.

      The Washington Post article talks about Michael Brown.  Umm, over 100 FBI agents investigating that case and they determined that it was justified.  They also proved that the entire "hands up, don't shoot" was a total lie by the black witnesses.   CCTV and other bits of evidence proved they lied.

      Did you just ignore the rest of the article and focused on the brief bit where they said michael brown was unarmed? How about you read it and look at all the sources and statistics they cite and get back to me instead of just rpeating what you said earlier.

      Here's some more info on the topic since you don't seem to want to hear any mentions of michael brown.
      http://www.vox.com/2016/7/12/12152772/rudy-giuliani-black-on-black-crime-police

      posted in Politics & Debate
      A
      alibix
    • RE: Are the majority of people voting Hillary?

      @raphjd:

      @myrea:

      1. You do insist on ignoring the very real fact that whites have been targeted by BLM and pro-illegals.

      er… I recall saying that both sides where in the wrong, you obviously are only interested in venting your opinion and disregarding the whys and the causes of those events happening. Rant your hate away, be my guest... that won't help anyone however.

      YES, you said that both sides were wrong, then you went on to defend BLM and pro-illegals attacking whites.

      I know the "whys";

      BLM is completely based on lies.  BLM only cares about black criminals being killed.

      Pro-illegals feel entitled to break US laws.

      Ultra liberals pander to them and protect them.

      BLM isn't based on lies. Police disproportionately kill unarmed black people than unarmed white people.
      https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/07/11/arent-more-white-people-than-black-people-killed-by-police-yes-but-no/

      Police force and violence is also a huge and very real issue
      http://www.joincampaignzero.org/#vision

      posted in Politics & Debate
      A
      alibix
    • RE: Are the majority of people voting Hillary?

      @amicusets:

      @Lagantiere:

      Hillary Clinton got 200000 votes more than Trump. This already happened in 2000, when George W Bush (Of sinister memory!) was elected with more than 500000 votes less than Al Gore.
      This is due to the voting system by states and the rule "winner takes it all".
      The supposed greatest democraty, who rules the world, allows a minority of hillbillies and degenerates to give the key of their country to unsane and dangerous blokes.

      Well, you obviously don't understand that we are a democratic republic, and how our electoral system works. Paying any attention to popular vote is ridiculous, because it isn't a true barometer. Many Trump voters in "blue states" don't bother voting just as many HRC voters in "red states" don't vote. Couple that with those voters that would vote with the majority in their state that don't vote and you have exactly no idea what an actual popular vote would be.

      The other things that never ceases to amaze me about those who lean to the left and how they preach tolerance– except apparently that tolerance is only afforded to people if they think as you do, speak as you do, and do what you tell them to do. How can you expect tolerance if you call people "hillbillies and degenerates" just because they vote differently than you. It is sickening.

      The electoral college is still flawed. Have a look at this video. It doesn't achieve it's purpose.
      Youtube Video

      posted in Politics & Debate
      A
      alibix
    • RE: NoFap community in Reddit…

      My reasons for jerking off is usually either I'm bored or I'm horny and I think that's most guys right? I do it when I feel like it. But holy crap I don't have the stamina for 4-5 times a day o_o Not judging you btw, maybe I'm not old enough.

      posted in Chit Chat
      A
      alibix
    • Really Submissive Porn

      It's really hard to find stuff like this and I feel like I'm not searching the right thing. Does anyone know other porn like Hardsneakmaster? Porn where there's a really submissive slave guy but I don't want it to be super leather shit? you know?

      posted in Porn
      A
      alibix
    • RE: Peaky Blinders. Anyone Watching?

      It's very good. Watched both seasons on Netflix recently. Watching really makes me want to find some good scally/chav top porn.  :cheesy2:
      There are a lot of hot British guys.  😊

      posted in General TV {not theme}
      A
      alibix
    • RE: The Unbreakable Kimmy Schimdt

      I felt like the first episode of S2 was weak but the rest was amazing!

      posted in Chit Chat
      A
      alibix
    • RE: What is your opinion on Hillary Clinton?

      I would vote for Bernie seeing that his campaign is funded by supporters and not huge conglomerates like Hillary is. Those companies will always have a bigger voice than the American people and she is pro-establishment. But would prefer her over any republican, even though she'd mostly be the same as Obama.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      A
      alibix
    • RE: Will the refugees crisis in europe destroy the future there?

      This is a pretty good video about the topic, it's short too.
      Youtube Video

      posted in Politics & Debate
      A
      alibix
    • RE: Does anyone else feel weird when people say 'suck my dick'?

      I don't mean it when you're having sex, thats fine, it's when like people use as an insult I mean

      posted in Sex & Relationships
      A
      alibix
    • Does anyone else feel weird when people say 'suck my dick'?

      Not so much weird but not how your supposed to be feeling. I'm in the closet and when anyone of my straight friends are like 'you can suck my dick' (not literally of course), I'm thinking 'yes please'. Or on YouTube comments when people comment 'suck my dick', I'm not angry I'm wondering (okay this is getting weirder) what they look like, thinking of sucking their dick? Anyone else feel this? No? Just me? My mum? No? Okay. I know, I'm weird.

      posted in Sex & Relationships
      A
      alibix
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 5 / 5