Posts made by alibix

That's not really a productive debate. But I guess you can post your multitude of 'feminist rekt' videos from YouTube or something.

@jbo1:

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/3/8/14848636/hillary-clinton-tv-ads

Hopefully the lefties will learn that it's strong policy and not identity politics that really matter.

::)

policy doesn't matter.

mostly.

Trump's healthcare plan is horrible and most of his supporters rely on obamacare, the wall will be paid by Americans and the usefulness of it isn't really certain, Trump is cutting public spending etc. identity politics matter. A lot.

http://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/1/26/14340542/white-fear-trump-psychology-minority-majority

@raphjd:

@alibix:

@raphjd:

LOL, you don't like me not obeying your demands to only Trump hate, so I'm irrational.  Gotta love it.  :cheers:

If those that voted for Trump are X, Y and Z because they voted for Trump, then the same for those that voted for Hillary.

Just because Hillary didn't win, means nothing.  You and anyone who supported her hate gays and women, because Saudi Arabia supported her.

Saudi Arabia donated to the Clinton Foundation charity. So did many other countries. Norway gave more money than Saudi Arabia too.

The Clinton Foundation which used that money to help disenfranchised individuals all around the world get access to medication for HIV/AIDs and malaria and also set up networks that provide accessible and equitable healthcare.

Trump on the other hand registered eight companies in Saudi Arabia during his campaign while at the same time saying that he would never take Saudi money. He is also in talks with Mr. Son, who runs a front for Saudi money to the tune of $100 billion dollars, 45 billion of which is Saudi. This will allow Saudi money to take over many companies in Sillicon Valley.

Is doing business directly with the royal family, or letting Saudi investors take control of American companies the same fucking thing as using Saudi money to fund solutions for healthcare?

AND?   Trump is a douche bag, so what?!

RC doesn't care about any of that, he just wants to scream "racism" at white people.

Saudi is still killing gays and women, regardless if they give money to the Clinton charity.   So Hillary isn't as innocent as you want us to think.

I think you missed the point… You need to calm down a bit.

@raphjd:

LOL, you don't like me not obeying your demands to only Trump hate, so I'm irrational.  Gotta love it.  :cheers:

If those that voted for Trump are X, Y and Z because they voted for Trump, then the same for those that voted for Hillary.

Just because Hillary didn't win, means nothing.  You and anyone who supported her hate gays and women, because Saudi Arabia supported her.

Saudi Arabia donated to the Clinton Foundation charity. So did many other countries. Norway gave more money than Saudi Arabia too.

The Clinton Foundation which used that money to help disenfranchised individuals all around the world get access to medication for HIV/AIDs and malaria and also set up networks that provide accessible and equitable healthcare.

Trump on the other hand registered eight companies in Saudi Arabia during his campaign while at the same time saying that he would never take Saudi money. He is also in talks with Mr. Son, who runs a front for Saudi money to the tune of $100 billion dollars, 45 billion of which is Saudi. This will allow Saudi money to take over many companies in Sillicon Valley.

Is doing business directly with the royal family, or letting Saudi investors take control of American companies the same fucking thing as using Saudi money to fund solutions for healthcare?

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/09/epa-chief-scott-pruitt.html

Jesus… I don't even know anymore...

@rawr:

@nydude25:

Trump was a huge hit at CPAC, and the straw poll showed that he's got huge support on the right.

The poll found that 86 percent of those polled approve of the job Trump is doing as president.

And to the question of "President Trump is realigning the Conservative Movement," 80 percent agreed, while only 15 percent disagreed.

So "conservatives" aren't nearly as divided as you may think.

If there's one thing that this previous election definitely proved, is that polls are bullshit.

Something curious happens though if you do this: Trump got 45.9 of the popular vote, 86 percent of the Republicans polled at CPAC approve of the job he is doing, (.459 * .86) * 100 = 39.474% Net approval rating, which is right about where he sits in the Gallup polls (actually those polls have him higher.) Look, I just manipulated numbers to make him look less popular then he's polling. I wouldn't recommend playing the numbers game if you desire intelligent discussion. The big take away here is that: the majority of Americans disapprove. That's still 7 out of 50 Republicans who don't approve. Generally speaking, a newly elected president has the approval from the majority. You're trying to marginalize his lack of popularity because he still has strong support with his base. I'm not surprised at this point. I'm sure Nazi's still support Hitler, so this isn't the best point to argue.

Polls aren't bullshit most of the time. They get it wrong on occasion and also hte media exaggerates things.

@raphjd:

Umm,  that doesn't affect what I said.

You were kinda of implying that hate crimes are faked.

@raphjd:

Ok, so we have 1 fake crime assumed to be by right wingers vs about a dozen from the left.

DO NOT assume that hunters are right wingers.  My stepdad hunts and is a lifelong Democrat.

In the UK at least, the data says otherwise!

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/hate-crime-england-and-wales-2015-to-2016

Overall, 2.8 per cent of hate crimes originally recorded in 2015/16 were subsequently transferred or cancelled. Most of these (2.2%) were cancelled and 0.7 per cent of crimes were transferred to another police force (compared with 3.0% and 0.5% for non-hate crime offences respectively; Appendix table 2.06).

Only 2.2% of hate crimes are deemed to be false reports, compared to 3.0% for similar crime.

@raphjd:

Edit: I can't wait for the responses to this, I'm just trying to figure out ahead of time, how this is Obama's fault.

See, I knew you weren't honest when you claimed to be a conservative in the other thread.

I haven't heard anyone, even the most conspiracy theory minded, blame Obama for this.  Sounds like liberal paranoia.

Western morals aren't the morals of the world.   Not everywhere has the same high age of consent.  Usually though, girls tend to have the lowest age of consent compared to boys.

US soldiers got in trouble, under Obama, for complaining about the boy fucking pedo situation in Afghanistan.  Boys are for pleasure and women are for babies.

I wonder if you would say the same about Mohammed.

The protest started peaceful until anarchists dressed in black started attacking people and being violent. These guys have done so before at UC Berkeley. They don't represent everyone on the left. They spray painted things bad about  liberals there too. I dn't even know where anarchism falls on the political spectrum.

@raphjd:

@aadam101:

I don't think he got them all but he likely got most of the fraudulent votes.  He did win after all and he did tell us it was rigged.

I think you mean; rigged like the DNC primary so Hillary would win.

I think you mean; rigged like in the mass media ignoring stories that made Hillary and liberals look bad.

Look, I wanted Bernie to win but the DNC didn't 'rig' the votes. Bernie lost by 3 million voters. Sure the DNC preferred hillary, but the RNC hated Trump and tried everything they could to stop him. This shouldn't be happening but it is.

@raphjd:

@alibix:

Very glad that the justice system in America worked this time. Despicable people. This is a hate crime done and dusted, everyone said it would be and it was. The criminals have been prosecuted.

As a black person, it's hard not to notice the general difference when stories like this:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/20/idaho-football-coat-hanger-rape-teammate-john-rk-howard
Aren't covered at nearly the same amount - and the criminals here weren't charged of a hate crime and haven't been giving any jail time yet to my knowledge. Maybe this situation will allow more light to be shed on this recent issue too.

Well, the head of Chicago PD was desperate not to class the latest attack as a hate crime.    Don Lemon and Symone Sanders have been adamant that it wasn't a hate crime since they are black.  You know, blacks can't commit hate crimes.

The football player case is tough because we don't know if it was a hate crime or not.   It's definiately a sex crime, but I'm unsure of the motive.   Maybe it was revenge for the victim snitching that the criminal was smoking behind the equalipment locker.   No hate crime there.

"The victim was called racial epithets such as “watermelon”, “chicken-eater”, and “nigger”, and Howard taunted the victim with a “Ku Klux Klan” song, the lawsuit alleged."

Yep. No Hate crime. Sure.

I want a link to where Don Lemon says its not a hate crime and Symone Sanders saying it's not a hate crime.

You can interpret press briefings however way you want. I want a quote.

@raphjd:

@alibix:

Very glad that the justice system in America worked this time. Despicable people. This is a hate crime done and dusted, everyone said it would be and it was. The criminals have been prosecuted.

As a black person, it's hard not to notice the general difference when stories like this:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/20/idaho-football-coat-hanger-rape-teammate-john-rk-howard
Aren't covered at nearly the same amount - and the criminals here weren't charged of a hate crime and haven't been giving any jail time yet to my knowledge. Maybe this situation will allow more light to be shed on this recent issue too.

Well, the head of Chicago PD was desperate not to class the latest attack as a hate crime.    Don Lemon and Symone Sanders have been adamant that it wasn't a hate crime since they are black.  You know, blacks can't commit hate crimes.

The football player case is tough because we don't know if it was a hate crime or not.   It's definiately a sex crime, but I'm unsure of the motive.   Maybe it was revenge for the victim snitching that the criminal was smoking behind the equalipment locker.   No hate crime there.

Citation needed.
Also didn't know Don Lemoon and Symone Sanders are the voice of the media and black people everywhere.

The Chicago PD was 'desperate' to class it has a hate crime? Where did he say that?
I think you're desperate to be the victim here.

Very glad that the justice system in America worked this time. Despicable people. This is a hate crime done and dusted, everyone said it would be and it was. The criminals have been prosecuted.

As a black person, it's hard not to notice the general difference when stories like this:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/20/idaho-football-coat-hanger-rape-teammate-john-rk-howard
Aren't covered at nearly the same amount - and the criminals here weren't charged of a hate crime and haven't been giving any jail time yet to my knowledge. Maybe this situation will allow more light to be shed on this recent issue too.

@raphjd:

As I said, feminists always get what they want, including senior politicos to lie by spewing feminists "facts" that run completely opposite of official government stats.

So, if these mythical unnamed feminist women's groups actually wanted true gender equality, then it would happen.

Let's requote the only women's group the article mentions;

**A group called the Crimson Women’s Coalition has demonstrated against the policy several times, claiming that women’s-only groups are “safe spaces” for female students, and that welcoming men opens those organizations to the possibility of sexual assault.” **

In other words, if they let men into women's groups, all the women will get raped.

Now let's look at if from the otherside.  If they let women into men's groups, won't all the women get raped there too?

Yeah, I know, logic is too complicated for SJWs.

BTW, "fucking hell" doesn't refute anything I said.

It doesn't. I know that. I give up in trying to debate you.

If 2017 is full of more people like you then I've lost all faith in humanity. You won't change your mind on any of this so I'd rather spend my time talking to people who can change their mind.

You are obsessed and there's nothing I can do to help that. I hope you have fun jerking yourself red over crazy SJWs and Feminists for the rest of your life.

@raphjd:

@alibix:

@raphjd:

So, where are all the so-called "good feminists" to fight against this man-hating gender inequality?    Yeah, that's what I thought.

"The Harvard Crimson reports:

This fall, the all-female Seneca organization will formally adopt a gender neutral policy in response to administrative sanctions against single-gender social groups—but future memberships could remain all-women in practice without running afoul of the College’s penalties.

According to an email from the Seneca’s undergraduate officers to Seneca members obtained by The Crimson, Associate Dean of Student Life David R. Friedrich assured the Seneca at a May meeting that if the group removed gender requirements from its charter and bylaws, the club “could continue to operate as it always has.”

According to the Harvard’s administration, they are able to avoid the new policy because Seneca is a non-profit and serves more than being a social group.

Heat Street reports that it’s not just men’s groups, like the Fox club, who have spoken out against the new policy, but women’s groups as well. They “want the gender-inclusive policy enforced, just not against them. A group called the Crimson Women’s Coalition has demonstrated against the policy several times, claiming that women’s-only groups are “safe spaces” for female students, and that welcoming men opens those organizations to the possibility of sexual assault.”
"

http://hypeline.org/does-harvards-gender-neutral-policy-only-affect-male-clubs/

There you go.

If feminists want something, they always get it.

A group called the Crimson Women’s Coalition has demonstrated against the policy several times, claiming that women’s-only groups are “safe spaces” for female students, and that welcoming men opens those organizations to the possibility of sexual assault.”

Let's look at that again.     It says that if there is gender equality in women's groups, then men will rape women.

Fucking hell.

@raphjd:

@alibix:

@raphjd:

@alibix:

@raphjd:

LOL, you just don't get it do you?!

Blacks have the privilege to tell Bernie Sanders to "shut the fuck up" and demand that he pander to their whims, without fear of reprisal because if they got into trouble, it would be a racist issue.   Bernie is a jew, look it up.

Blacks have the privilege of doing many things that would get whites arrested if the races where reversed, like forcing white students to walk through a creek to go to class.

The rest of your post is a bunch of racial studies apologetics bullshit.

You are not interested in any discussion, you are only interested in forcing your racist SJW version of reality on everyone.

You are comparing a protest to Sanders and a one off student protest in a University (which white people participated in) to fucking Jim Crow and Black supremacy?

What the fuck man?

They aren't one-offs and if you paid attention you would know that.  Blacks have been hijacking everything in sight and demanding that everyone pander to them.    They know they can get away with it because no one wants to punish them because it would then become an anti-black racist thing.

You are blind.  It's black people who are now demanding we bring back Jim Crow.

Black Supremacy has always been around and it's ok for people to be black supremacists.

Jesus.

Student protest = Jim Crow

I'm sorry man. Clearly nothing is going to change you and you are going to see the world in the only way you want to see it.

Clearly dishonesty is a personality trait for you.

Black students demanding racial segregation = Jim Crow.

Black AND white students protesting for safe spaces in college =/= Jim Crow
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/24/berkeley-protesters-form-human-chain-stop-white-st/

I can't believe you're comparing decades of racial discrimination, persecution to this. A student protest (made of BLACK and WHITE) students.

And you make it seem as if these people represent all black people in America.

I don't know what to say anymore.

@dozerbear1:

what country are you from in Europe? Why can't it be English pride, Italian pride, Greek pride etc etc. Why white pride?

Why NOT white pride? I have ancestors from England, Ireland, Germany, and some that I can't trace. So if I say English pride, that's a microaggression and a trigger for the Irish part, and it's on like Belfast back in the 70s. Then when Oktoberfest comes around and I say German pride, the English part feels discriminated against and needs to find a safe space. On top of that I'm not being inclusive to the part I don't know about, and since I don't want it to feel marginalized I got all of them together and decided on white pride.

Nobody's saying that but you bud. You can be proud of all those countries…
They're culture is very different though, which makes 'white pride' kind of weird.

Plus the people who use 'white pride' are usually racist cunts because there is a stigma to white pride (coming from history obviously).

@raphjd:

So, where are all the so-called "good feminists" to fight against this man-hating gender inequality?    Yeah, that's what I thought.

"The Harvard Crimson reports:

This fall, the all-female Seneca organization will formally adopt a gender neutral policy in response to administrative sanctions against single-gender social groups—but future memberships could remain all-women in practice without running afoul of the College’s penalties.

According to an email from the Seneca’s undergraduate officers to Seneca members obtained by The Crimson, Associate Dean of Student Life David R. Friedrich assured the Seneca at a May meeting that if the group removed gender requirements from its charter and bylaws, the club “could continue to operate as it always has.”

According to the Harvard’s administration, they are able to avoid the new policy because Seneca is a non-profit and serves more than being a social group.

Heat Street reports that it’s not just men’s groups, like the Fox club, who have spoken out against the new policy, but women’s groups as well. They “want the gender-inclusive policy enforced, just not against them. A group called the Crimson Women’s Coalition has demonstrated against the policy several times, claiming that women’s-only groups are “safe spaces” for female students, and that welcoming men opens those organizations to the possibility of sexual assault.”
"

http://hypeline.org/does-harvards-gender-neutral-policy-only-affect-male-clubs/

There you go.

@raphjd:

@alibix:

@raphjd:

LOL, you just don't get it do you?!

Blacks have the privilege to tell Bernie Sanders to "shut the fuck up" and demand that he pander to their whims, without fear of reprisal because if they got into trouble, it would be a racist issue.   Bernie is a jew, look it up.

Blacks have the privilege of doing many things that would get whites arrested if the races where reversed, like forcing white students to walk through a creek to go to class.

The rest of your post is a bunch of racial studies apologetics bullshit.

You are not interested in any discussion, you are only interested in forcing your racist SJW version of reality on everyone.

You are comparing a protest to Sanders and a one off student protest in a University (which white people participated in) to fucking Jim Crow and Black supremacy?

What the fuck man?

They aren't one-offs and if you paid attention you would know that.  Blacks have been hijacking everything in sight and demanding that everyone pander to them.    They know they can get away with it because no one wants to punish them because it would then become an anti-black racist thing.

You are blind.  It's black people who are now demanding we bring back Jim Crow.

Black Supremacy has always been around and it's ok for people to be black supremacists.

Jesus.

Student protest = Jim Crow

I'm sorry man. Clearly nothing is going to change you and you are going to see the world in the only way you want to see it.