"Pelosi’s wealth grew by at least 2,292%, largely through stock trading, during her 37 years in Congress"

https://dailycaller.com/2025/11/07/nancy-pelosi-got-filthy-rich-in-congress/

$2,675,036 minimum net worth in the year she began serving and a $63,996,050 minimum net worth in 2024, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation analysis of assets and liabilities listed in her congressional financial disclosures. An analysis by Quiver Quantitative estimates her current net worth more precisely at $278,760,000 million.

Pelosi’s maximum net worth in 2024 was an estimated $311,443,000, her filings show.

The 85-year-old congresswoman’s portfolio nearly doubled the S&P 500’s growth in 2024...Her office [said] she does not personally own stocks or have prior knowledge or subsequent involvement in transactions. Her husband, Paul, manages her trades.

Got that? Her excuse is: -My husband trades....I, Nancy, only talk to him-. 🙄

USA proposes law, "Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments (PELOSI) Act"

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/11/06/lawmakers-call-to-pass-pelosi-act-banning-congressional-stock-trading-in-honor-of-nancy-pelosis-retirement/

🤣

Report about Lance & Tyler was posted thru "anonbirdd aka Turkey Tom" - but source is different person, closer to Lance & Tyler, not named.

New photo corroboration is going around:

https://x.com/_midGRAY/status/1987418679785468115

Video where Charlie kids sing in their dad's absence.

https://x.com/i/status/1986978730552504533

Heartbreaking - but some of you twisted/sick libs will get pleasure. Whatevs..... .....on u.

DOJ to investigate Charlie murder as "hate crime".

https://x.com/i/status/1986898738879537315

I don't agree. It's more like terrorism - u try to change politics thru terror & killing.

But hey................... ................. If libs decreed "hate crime" is thing, is USA standard, go for it.

"One tier justice".........1 standard applied to all.

@billd28971 Thank you so much. Been searching all over for him 🙂

@OKCancel-0 said in Is it possible to undergo a sex-change surgery in a single month??:

Sorry to digress but it made me wonder why @lololulu19 didn't share his two bits on one of the topics close to his hearts.

He disappeared earlier this year.

they are Jess & Ryan from Sean Cody, Jess is the top.

https://www.needgayporn.com/videos/5351/jess-ryan-bareback/

I don't know why some actors and videos have disappeared from the Seancody website.

@deckbox2

Hi deckbox2,
Maximus only shot two videos,
both for TimeTales.

Tim Kruger fucks Maximus Esteban fucks Maximus

However, there are a few private videos of and with him. I'll see if I can edit a few private sessions so that they can be used.

If you have a few private pictures or videos of him, let's swap them 😉

It was just a great time and it's been far too long.

q2.jpg

@ianfontinell-0 Thx so much!!!

@raphjd With name "Gay News" being a bit old-timey perhaps

@ianfontinell-0 No 😁 . It's a shame the other guy decided to transition. He was a good fuck

@blablarg18

Other studies have shown that lesbian couples have the highest rate of Domestic Violence. Gay couples have the lowest rate, with hetero couples being in the middle.

Elon says he & AI could block sun.

https://www.unilad.com/technology/news/scientists-warning-elon-musk-block-sun-global-warming-198154-20251104

It remains, worst idea ever.

But Elon only said how they could. He didn't endorse it.

I guarantee u, he is against it & wanted to troll libs to be against it. With good effect.

Lili Fuhr, director of the fossil economy program at the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), said it could ‘destabilize’ our climate.

She told the Daily Mail: “Solar geoengineering is inherently unpredictable and could further destabilize our already fragile climate system.

“Any future geoengineering deployment would threaten the lives and rights of billions of people, including in the UK,” she added, explaining: “If it were ever deployed, it would not be possible to pause or halt it without risking rapid temperature spikes and an acceleration of global heating.”

“These highly speculative technologies are a dangerous distraction from solving the climate crisis and should be taken off the table for good,” Fuhr noted.

Meanwhile, glaciologist and climate scientist at Northumbria University, Professor Sammie Buzzard, said Musk’s vision could have ‘unintended consequences', telling the outlet: “It shouldn't be up to one individual or one country to decide the climate for another, especially with the risk of unintended consequences from untested methods.”

“Some examples of things that would need to be investigated further for this method would be the carbon costs (launching satellites and AI both involve a lot of carbon) and governance,” she shared, adding that it could have ‘global consequences that would not be equal everywhere there would need to be global agreement for it to go ahead’.

Remember where this began. UK libs, Starmer government, are doing it. Stop them.

& if Elon were serious, stop him too.