Iran hits USA base in Qatar - but no casualties. May support idea "it's theatrics, they pre-warn each other."
Argument that USA strike on Iran was legal, at least by USA law, is strained.
It relies on 2001 "Authorization for Use of Military Force" to deal with 9-11 attackers. π€¦
Logistically, Iran did help al Qaeda. But that's 24 years out of date.
I'll say this: Don't slag Trump for his illegal attack, without slagging Biden, Obama, Bush & Clinton for theirs too.
Keep it non-partisan, "ok people, let's everyone wake up from our 9-11 trance"
Few Democrats complained when President Obama broadly utilized the AUMF on numerous occasions for military operations against Libya, Syria, Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and even ISIS. His robust use of the resolution further cemented its legality. All three branches of government, including the judiciary, affirmed its legitimacy and scope.
Weirdest lib reaction:
"LA County Sheriff launches βdamage controlβ after sending Iran βcondolencesβ for bombed nuke sitesβ¦"
The official verified X account for the Los Angeles County Sheriffβs Department posted, and then quickly edited and then deleted, a truly baffling message: they actually offered condolences to Iran after President Trumpβs military strikes wiped out key parts of their nuclear program.
π€£ π€£ Libs!