I know why no one replies, my questioning it is rhetorical.
I was mostly commenting on the liberals who love to hide in the shadows down voting those they don't have they courage to debate. They even down vote their own for wrong think by condemning the violence by both sides.
It's rooted in inter-sectionality and virtue signaling, along with a lot of anti white hatred.
If you don't hate white people and are POC, then you are a race traitor.
If you don't hate whites and you are white, then you are the most evil piece of shit to ever exist.
I guess you are blinded by your liberalism.
Wipe the liberalism from your eyes and see that you guys do exactly what you accuse me of. On top of that, I do not hunt for the "enemy" to down vote all of their posts.
Female circumcision is pretty common outside the west.
How "common" something is, shouldn't be a factor in whether it should be allowed to be done.
Males deserve the same right to bodily integrity that women in the west enjoy.
Wait, are liberals petty little bitches or do they not believe that males should have the right to bodily integrity like females have?
Grow some balls and defend your down votes.
Come on crybabies, get some balls and discuss this.
And as always, the liberal whiners down vote, but don't have the balls to discuss the topic.
Typical leftist crybabies, down voting but not having the courage to discuss the topic.
Liberals are willing to down vote those who expose liberals, but they won't condemn lunatic crap from their fellow liberals.
It just more proof that, except for a tiny portion, liberals are fucking lunatics en masse.
We already saw how butt hurt they got when 6 of their own condemned the violence on both sides. Hell, they even down voted the conservatives who condemned the violence on both sides. Clearly, liberals (extreme vast majority) support violence to achieve their goals.
Bette Milder has stabbed her gay fans in the back on a few occasions, like when she said we're such sluts that we don't deserve marriage equality.
Of course liberals are going to ignore this. If they ignore it, then they can claim it never happened.
It kills their narrative that everything in the US is pro white. Clearly the university, town gov and police sided with the blacks, against the whites.
Female circumcision is pretty common outside the west.
How "common" something is, shouldn't be a factor in whether it should be allowed to be done.
Males deserve the same right to bodily integrity that women in the west enjoy.
There's a huge difference, though.
Liberals are lunatics en masse.
Don't like Hillary, you're a sexist.
Don't like BLM, you're a racist.
Disagree with the liberal mindset, they search you out to down vote all your posts, regardless of topics and what is actually said.
Liberals think that wearing eye shadow makes you trans.
Only 6 liberals have condemned the violence on both sides. Other liberals down voted them for this.
Down votes but not discussion, typical liberal cowardice.
It's specifically a female only showing.
Alamo Drafthouse, a small movie theater chain known for its anti-texting stance and general coolness, scheduled a special women-only showing of the summer superhero film Wonder Woman. This seemed like a fun one-off idea, but the idea has met some resistance, particularly online. Now a law professor who specializes in employment discrimination and sexual orientation law is filing a complaint with the city, claiming that the showing may be violating the city’s own laws.
Notice that feminists aren't fighting against this?
You know they'd be butt hurt if it was a male only screening though.
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/329767/call-to-shift-burden-of-proof-to-rape-accused
Labour's sexual violence spokesperson, Mrs Williams has called for radical reform of the sexual justice system which would see rape accusers believed by police as a starting point.
This would place the burden of proof on the accused - directly contradicting the philosophy of "innocent until proven guilty".
I said this, in general, in a previous thread but I was called a liar.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-39976018?SThisFB#
A doctor accused of circumcising a boy without his mother's consent should be prosecuted, a leading human rights lawyer has said.
The three-month-old boy was circumcised for religious reasons while staying with his paternal grandparents in 2013.
A police investigation was dropped but Saimo Chahal QC wants Nottinghamshire Police to take action against Dr Balvinder Mehat.
…......................
If this exact case had happened to a girl, it would be a crime.
Can the feminist cucks explain why feminists aren't screeching for equality on this?
Nope.
I mean like: ban the gays & lesbians from a peaceful and normal life, deny them the right of having families & jobs as others do, outlaw them, instill the venom of shame and self-hatred in their mind, call them sick and perverts, etc.
How is that not islam?
American actress and songwriter Bette Midler tweeted Saturday evening in response to reports of incidents leading to multiple casualties in London, calling religion and men "worthless."
"More sorrow and grief at the hands of madmen in London. Men and religion are worthless," the actress wrote.
….........................