• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. raphjd
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 1
    • Followers 37
    • Topics 2738
    • Posts 13226
    • Best 886
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 2

    Posts made by raphjd

    • RE: Another washed up actor bites the dust

      Willie Wonka was supposed to be "dark" from the beginning.  It was never supposed to be a remake of the Gene Wilder movie.    I like him as an actor.  I haven't really paid attention to him as a person.

      ANYONE who says shit like this, regardless of who the target is, should be prosecuted under incitement laws.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: US Supreme Court unanamously rules against liberals

      Those same things are illegal in Europe/Canada.  So it's not really a big deal.

      Several EU countries ban holocaust denial.

      Several EU countries and Canada ban criticism of islam.

      The UK's libel/slander laws are guilty until proven innocent.

      Causing offense is a criminal act in most of the EU, and probably Canada.

      Canada criminalizes speech that misgenders a person, even if the person doesn't present as that gender.  It also forces people to use made up words (pronouns) as chosen by the individual.

      Several EU countries and Canada ban racist speech.

      The list is seemingly never ending of banned speech.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • Feminism - part of the reason I hate it

      http://www.msn.com/en-gb/lifestyle/style/man-sent-home-from-work-for-wearing-shorts-in-30c-heat-goes-back-to-office-in-his-mums-dress/ar-BBCYPkm?ocid=spartandhp

      Feminists screech about girls having a dress code that prevents them from wearing what they want.    I have never seen this.

      In school and at work women have always been able to wear what they want, while guys have restricted dress codes.

      In school, girls could wear all manner of things.  Guys were restricted to shirts with sleeves and long pants.  So while girls could wear shoulder-less tops, guys had to wear, at minimum, short sleeve shirts.  Girls could wear short dresses (not vag showing), but guys had to wear long pants.

      Except for my job at a men's clothing store,  my work experience is exactly the same.  Women got to wear pretty much whatever they wanted, while guys had a strict dress code.

      Feminist DO NOT fight for equality where men are disadvantaged, but they say that MRAs are evil.  Men can't win for losing with these cunts and their cucks.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: US Supreme Court unanamously rules against liberals

      @strangeloop:

      You are absolutely correct, SCOTUS has always upheld freedom of speech, even when the speech is considered a threatening opinion or hate speech.  It is a ruling against liberals because it is liberals who are trying to eliminate and curtail freedom of speech - in the U.S. as well as Europe.  I can cite many examples if you are interested.

      Only the US has freedom of speech.  The rest of the west has all kinds of bans and restrictions on speech.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: UK LibDems (leftists) lead by homophobe Tim Farron

      I'm actually a classic liberal, but I refuse to call myself a liberal due to the bullshit identity politics we've seen over the last 15 or so years.

      Also, as an egalitarian, I despise feminism.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Civility Poll

      @  RoyalCrown89 - The fist picture does have a lot of baggage and that's what the reaction is based on.  It's not derailment to complain about the picture in a thread about being civil.

      @ Strangeloop - RC is probably the most centrist liberal here.  While he may be a bit SJW on some topics, he's far from a bike lock liberal.  He advocates for true free speech as defined by the USSC and condemns the violence by both sides.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: RULES for this section

      @raphjd:

      Children are allowed to be attacked, but only if they themselves have done wrong.     "Sins of the father" type stuff is banned.

      "Attack" in this case means criticize/critical of.   This is things like GWB's daughters underage drinking with secret service protection.

      You are not allowed to do baseless attacks on kids because of their parents.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: UK LibDems (leftists) lead by homophobe Tim Farron

      LibDem  are basically the SJW party and their leader is a homophobe.

      Labour has turned into a quasi communist party under it's current leader.    The top 3 people in the party support terrorism.  They refuse to condemn their praise of the IRA's terrorism and they are quick to downplay muslim terrorism.    Usually, they are like the Democrats.

      Tories are the conservative party.  It's pretty much just like the Republicans, with a lot of views on issues.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: US Supreme Court unanamously rules against liberals

      @aadam101:

      The Supreme Court doesn't vote "against" a political party.  That's not their job and not what happened here.

      It's liberals that insist that we ban speech that might offend.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: UK LibDems (leftists) lead by homophobe Tim Farron

      @abcddddd:

      @raphjd:

      @abcddddd:

      @raphjd:

      **So tell me again how it's the conservatives who are homophobes. **

      Does the existence of liberal homophobia make conservative homophobia disappear?

      Did I say that?

      Yea, I mean, when you say "tell me how conservatives are homophobes", you are absolutely implying that there is no conservative homophobia. Or that liberals deserve the brunt of the issue.

      More liberal stupidity.

      "conservatives are homophobes!!!"

      "liberals love LGBTs"

      Bullshit.

      Liberals don't like LGBTs any more than conservatives.  However, they are worse because they are liars and hypocrites.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: PSA: I was suspicious for a while, but I'm convinced

      @sutieday:

      @raphjd:

      "IT" refers to rule violations by liberals while crying about rule violations.

      Let's use your example of Fred and Sutie.

      They get into a slagging match.   Sutie and other liberals will complain in the forums, the help desk, reported topics and site email.     I'll be called "alt-right" and accused of abusing my powers and whatnot.    Fred won't complain and just get on with it.

      Why are you insistent on limiting it to "Trumptard" vs "libtard"?    Expand it out and you'll see that both sides are pretty equal in name calling.

      I was called a racist simply because I pointed out 2 proven lies told by Rep John Lewis.  I didn't mention race, just that he lied.   That was enough to make me a racist.   Why do you want to ignore things like that, if you want to talk about facts.

      How about ban all name calling and just use "liberal" and "conservative"??? But, I'm sure you get a kick out of the incivility.

      I'm sorry, but I can't take any you say seriously.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Court in Pakistan sentences man to death for ‘blasphemous’ Facebook post

      Why should I bother, you're gonna excuse it away anyway.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Liberals on their way to a peaceful protest

      I've travelled too.  So what.

      Islam loves gay people, maybe you should move to a muslim country.

      BTW, you are full of shit.  I never said ALL.

      As for not being open to new ideas, you are the last person to complain about that.  "Oh me, Oh my, I have to posts by my enemies so I can down vote them.  Who cares what they say, they must be down voted."    You're pathetic.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: A "Super Tuesday" for Trump!

      @sutieday:

      @Frederick:

      Republican Ralph Norman won a special election Tuesday to fill the South Carolina congressional seat

      Republican Karen Handel won a special election Tuesday to fill the a Georgia congressional seat.. her win was over a democrat who was using the vote as a mandate against Trump, and spent a record amount for a congressional campaign. 
      Oh.. and the polls said Jon Ossof would win.

      It would seem that the overwhelming animosity directed at Trump by the media moonbats is fizzling and backfiring.

      Can Frederick go one post without using "moonbat"? Nope.

      And with that post, are you really sure you want me to follow the rules like you demand?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • Police thwarted "peace" attack in Brussels.

      Someone who has nothing to do with islam, because muslims don't do things like that, was shot dead while attempting to do a "peace attack".

      Nazi puppets (police)  shot and killed him after he set a suit case on fire (can be seen in the photos).  When the Nazi puppets (police) inspected his body, they found that he was wearing a "love vest".

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: PSA: I was suspicious for a while, but I'm convinced

      "IT" refers to rule violations by liberals while crying about rule violations.

      Let's use your example of Fred and Sutie.

      They get into a slagging match.   Sutie and other liberals will complain in the forums, the help desk, reported topics and site email.     I'll be called "alt-right" and accused of abusing my powers and whatnot.    Fred won't complain and just get on with it.

      Why are you insistent on limiting it to "Trumptard" vs "libtard"?    Expand it out and you'll see that both sides are pretty equal in name calling.

      I was called a racist simply because I pointed out 2 proven lies told by Rep John Lewis.  I didn't mention race, just that he lied.   That was enough to make me a racist.   Why do you want to ignore things like that, if you want to talk about facts.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • US Supreme Court unanamously rules against liberals

      MATAL, INTERIM DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE v. TAM, (2017) No. 15-1293

      See more at:  http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/15-1293.html#sthash.mHieS4Eb.dpuf

      In a unanimous vote, the US Supreme Court ruled against liberals when it comes to free speech.

      "Offensive" logos (trademarks) are protected under free speech.

      While this case had nothing to do DIRECTLY with Dick Gregory's autobiography NIGGER, if the case had gone the other way, the book would either be banned or forced to recall them and change the name/cover.

      Hate speech is protected speech.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Georgia’s Special Election Couldn’t Look Much Closer

      @sutieday:

      Many are voting against the Republican woman as a vote against Trump.

      Doesn't that make them women haters?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: This douchebag is planning on being president some day…

      Here's a quick one.  It's biased in that it uses "fake news and clickbait" to justify what was done.

      https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/31/facebook-tweaks-the-feed-to-bury-fake-news-and-clickbait/

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The 4th estate very disappointed their candidate lost today

      I wonder if they did everything possible to ensure he would win like they did with Hillary.

      CNN should change it's name to DNC News.

      20 years ago CNN was one of the world's most respected news sources, now it's a fucking joke.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • 1
    • 2
    • 511
    • 512
    • 513
    • 514
    • 515
    • 661
    • 662
    • 513 / 662